AI4Science 论文速递

Domain models are central to software engineering, as they enable a shared understanding, guide implementation, and support automated analyses and model-driven development. Yet, despite these benefits, practitioners often skip modeling because it is time-consuming and demands scarce expertise. We address this barrier by investigating whether open-weight large language models, adapted via instruction tuning, can generate high-quality BPMN process models directly from natural language descriptions in a cost-effective and privacy-preserving way. We introduce InstruBPM, a reproducible approach that prepares paired text-diagram data and instruction tunes an open source large language model with parameter-efficient fine-tuning and quantization for on-prem deployment. We evaluate the tuned model through complementary perspectives: (i) text/code similarity using BLEU, ROUGE-L, and METEOR, (ii) structural fidelity using Relative Graph Edit Distance, (iii) guidelines conformance using external tool checks, and (iv) a small expert review. Using a curated subset of a multi-domain BPMN dataset, we compare the tuned model with untuned open-weight baselines and strong proprietary models under consistent prompting regimes. Our compact tuned model outperforms all baselines across sequence and structural metrics while requiring substantially fewer resources; guideline analysis and expert feedback further indicate that the generated diagrams largely follow BPMN best practices and are useful starting points that reduce modeling effort. Overall, instruction tuning improves structural accuracy and robustness compared to untuned baselines and reduces reliance on heavy prompt scaffolding. We publicly share the trained models and scripts to support reproducibility and further research.

Domain models are central to software engineering, as they enable a shared understanding, guide implementation, and support automated analyses and model-driven development.

Transfer learning is a highly successful learning paradigm in deep learning which leverages knowledge from one task and applies it to another. Despite its success, the necessary conditions for knowledge transfer are unclear and require further research. In this dissertation, our aim is to understand transferability a little better by answering the following question: Does good generalization on a source task necessarily imply transferability to a related target task? We hypothesize the answer is negative, and attempt to find counterexamples via adversarial attacks on the transfer learning procedure. Over three types of adversarial attacks, our empirical results show a strong relationship between generalization on the source task and transferability. These results do not rule out generalization on the source task as a sufficient condition for successful transfer.

Transfer learning is a highly successful learning paradigm in deep learning which leverages knowledge from one task and applies it to another.

Sparse tuning is widely used to adapt large language models due to its parameter efficiency. However, its effectiveness depends not only on the number of trainable parameters, but also on the feature-interaction topology of the sparse update's structural support. Limited or uneven connectivity in this support may isolate subsets of feature dimensions, forming information islands that restrict direct task-specific interactions through the trainable update. To address this issue, we propose Small-World Induced Fine-Tuning (SWIFT), a sparse tuning framework inspired by small-world connectivity. SWIFT combines block-diagonal sparse updates for local feature mixing with a fixed deterministic scattering permutation that routes the mixed outputs across feature groups without additional trainable parameters. We further show theoretically that certain random sparse-update models and block-diagonal updates can exhibit information islands, whereas a sufficiently scattering permutation guarantees positive block-level expansion when the trainable block-diagonal factor consists of equal-sized, structurally dense square blocks. Extensive experiments on commonsense reasoning, natural language generation, and image classification demonstrate that SWIFT outperforms the evaluated parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) baselines on average and can match or surpass full fine-tuning. Implementation is available at https://github.com/xianchaoguan/SWIFT

Sparse tuning is widely used to adapt large language models due to its parameter efficiency.

Small-scale sentiment classification often suffers from data scarcity, which limits the generalization ability of the models. This study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of three data augmentation strategies: Easy Data Augmentation (EDA), back-translation, and contextual token substitution (nlpaug-style), with both traditional machine learning classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest) and transformer-based models (BERT). We perform a comprehensive empirical comparison with low-resource sentiment datasets by summarizing the results of recent studies and performing targeted head-to-head experiments. Our findings indicate that all augmentation methods improve performance. Contextual augmentation yields the most consistent gains for BERT models, while EDA and back-translation provide greater benefits for traditional classifiers. These insights help guide the selection of data augmentation techniques tailored to model type and dataset size, filling a critical gap in research on data augmentation for sentiment classification on small datasets.

Small-scale sentiment classification often suffers from data scarcity, which limits the generalization ability of the models.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sequential decision-making tool widely used for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable adaptability in low-data regimes, making them promising tools for black-box optimization by leveraging contextual knowledge to propose high-quality query points. However, LLMs lack explicit surrogate modeling and calibrated uncertainty, and their internal mechanisms remain opaque. This structural opacity can result in unnecessary experiments, which are costly in BO and may prevent the search from approaching the optimum. To address this, we propose LLINBO: LLM-in-the-Loop BO, a general framework that wraps existing LLM-based BO approaches, deciding when and how to act on their suggestions and when to revert to classical BO. We introduce three mechanisms for this interaction, each accompanied by a no-harm theoretical guarantee that ensures sublinear cumulative regret for common kernels while requiring no performance assumptions on the LLM. Beyond these theoretical guarantees, we show through simulation studies that LLINBO makes existing LLM-based BO more reliable while still exploiting the LLM's few-shot learning ability to outperform classical BO. We further demonstrate its practical use on a real-world, expensive 3D printing experiment. Code is available at https://github.com/UMDataScienceLab/LLM-in-the-Loop-BO.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sequential decision-making tool widely used for optimizing expensive black-box functions.

We study how text serialization affects table lookup in instruction-tuned language models. Our diagnostic asks the model to find the row containing a specified value under one named column, then return the value under another named column in that same row. We render the same synthetic 256-cell tables in row-major form and in column-major form with each header placed beside its values, while varying the table aspect ratio across five shapes. Across three models, the better format changes with table shape: row-major performs better on tall tables, whereas column-major performs better on wide tables. At 64 x 4, row-major leads by 42.3-54.0 percentage points; at 4 x 64, column-major leads by 35.0-59.0 points. Mapping wrong answers back to their source cells reveals a complementary error pattern: row-major tends to preserve the correct row but lose the target column, while column-major tends to preserve the correct column but lose the row. We use the term relational locality to describe this pattern: serialization keeps one relation locally available while making the other depend on positional alignment. A separate non-tabular ordering experiment supports this interpretation. Thus, apparent width-related failures in text-serialized tables depend on linearization, not table shape alone.

We study how text serialization affects table lookup in instruction-tuned language models.

Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks using First-Order (FO) optimizers presents significant computational challenges. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods address these by freezing most model parameters and training only a small subset. However, PEFT often underperforms compared to full fine-tuning when high task-specific accuracy is required. Zeroth-Order (ZO) methods fine-tune the entire pre-trained model without back-propagation, estimating gradients through forward passes only. While memory-efficient, ZO methods suffer from slow convergence and high sensitivity to prompt selection. We bridge these two worlds with Bilevel-ZOFO, a bilevel optimization method that couples fast, local FO-PEFT adaptation at the inner level with stable, memory-efficient ZO updates of the full backbone at the outer level. The FO-PEFT inner loop performs fast, low-memory local adaptation that reduces the variance of ZO estimates and stabilizes the search, guiding the outer ZO updates of the full backbone and reducing prompt sensitivity. In the mean time, the outer ZO provides better generalization ability for PEFT. We provide theoretical convergence guarantees and empirically demonstrate that Bilevel-ZOFO significantly outperforms existing ZO and FO-PEFT methods, achieving 2-4 times faster training while maintaining similar memory efficiency. Additionally, we show by updating the backbone with ZO and adapting only a tiny FO-PEFT block per task, Bilevel-ZOFO combines full-model capacity with few-shot efficiency, making it a very efficient meta-learning algorithm that quickly adapts to new tasks.

Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks using First-Order (FO) optimizers presents significant computational challenges.

Humans and animals have a unique capacity to generalize and learn in novel circumstances, including "0-shot" inference (ZI) and continual learning (CL) -- two powerful cognitive abilities. Despite this importance, efforts to model ZI and CL are seriously limited in several ways. First, existing models typically lack components critical to ZI and CL in the brain, namely, strong inductive biases (for ZI) and autonomous control of learning (for CL). Second, models can be less tractable to analysis if model components are overly complex (lacking simplicity), or too task-restricted if model components are overly bespoke (lacking expressivity). Here we introduce autonomous Hebbian networks ("AutoHebb"), a class of online learning feedforward neural networks that realize strong inductive biases and autonomously controlled learning, and are both simple and expressive. Unlike standard models that learn via externally controlled optimization (e.g. gradient descent), AutoHebb networks combine external feedback with internally generated activity to produce a global learning signal ('neuromodulator') fed back to the network. The neuromodulator in turn gates a biologically grounded local learning rule (3-factor Hebbian rule) that updates networks' plastic weights. Using meta-learning to search for fixed (non-plastic) weights, we find that AutoHebb networks (1) succeed on ZI tasks, (2) show emergent (untrained) ZI/CL abilities, (3) admit reverse-engineering into explicit algorithms, and (4) outperform modern learning models on ZI/CL tasks. Lastly, performance comparisons to related models implied an essential role for three model components: meta-learning, Hebbian plasticity, and autonomous control of learning. These findings indicate that AutoHebb may be useful in hypothesis generation, analysis, and discovery of biologically grounded forms of learning and generalization.

Humans and animals have a unique capacity to generalize and learn in novel circumstances, including "0-shot" inference (ZI) and continual learning (CL) -- two powerful cognitive abilities.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable, yet they produce wrong answers indistinguishable from correct ones. In question answering (QA), such an error propagates unnoticed into downstream tasks. Perturbation-based uncertainty quantification (UQ) addresses this by probing a model over a set of input rewrites and reading uncertainty from how much its predictions vary. Yet this set is usually built generically, by free paraphrasing, token-level perturbation, or adversarial search. Such rewrites leave two things uncontrolled that matter in QA: what kind of change is made to the context, and how explicitly the context supports the answer. When neither is controlled, the composition of the set is determined by the generator rather than by design, and the estimate inherits whatever that generator happens to produce. Quality-diversity (QD) search is built to cover a predefined exploration space, so we recast input perturbation as a QD problem and propose \emph{neighborhood elites (NE)}, a neighborhood constructor that spreads answer-preserving rewrites across two axes, the kind of edit and the explicitness of support. We compare NE against three other neighborhood constructors, holding the editor, QA model, uncertainty measure and search objective fixed, and against three scores read from the original context. Across five extractive-QA datasets and five instruction-tuned LLMs, NE improves failure detection against every other constructor in at least 24 of the 25 dataset-model pairs, reaching 0.726 AUROC and 0.211 AUPRC lift over the base rate. Additionally, NE detects failure better than semantic entropy computed over decoder samples, by 0.074 AUROC and 0.062 AUPRC lift, and this advantage widens as the neighborhood grows.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable, yet they produce wrong answers indistinguishable from correct ones.

Self-supervised contrastive learning (SSCL) learns representations by contrasting augmented views of the same sample, but it can exhibit feature suppression, where dominant or easy-to-learn factors suppress other class-relevant signals, degrading the performance of representations, particularly in high-dimensional data with heterogeneous features. We introduce Fisher Contrastive Learning (FCL), which uses a regularized Fisher trace criterion to address feature suppression. FCL learns embeddings by maximizing the discriminative strength of Fisher discriminant functions, producing representations that preserve class-relevant information implied by the augmentation process. We prove that the representations learned by FCL could alleviate the feature suppression effects. We demonstrate FCL on simulated benchmarks designed to induce feature suppression and on a real-world biomedical application, pretraining on large white blood cell microscopy image dataset and transfer learning for diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia in an external cohort. In all experiments, FCL outperforms the self-supervised baselines and yields more robust and discriminative representations.

Self-supervised contrastive learning (SSCL) learns representations by contrasting augmented views of the same sample, but it can exhibit feature suppression, where dominant or easy-to-learn factors suppress other class-relevant signals, degrading the performance of representations, particularly in high-dimensional data with heterogeneous features.

Personalized text generation requires models to capture user-specific writing styles from historical data. Existing approaches based on retrieval, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, or activation steering either introduce inference and storage overhead or struggle to separate stylistic signals from semantic content. We propose GLASS, a training-free framework for personalized generation via Global-Local Activation Steering with Sparse priors. GLASS uses sparse autoencoders to extract a global user-style prior from historical responses and constructs local contrastive style vectors over clustered interaction scenarios. During inference, it jointly injects global and local vectors into different model layers, enabling context-aware personalization without retrieval or parameter updates. Experiments on LaMP and LongLaMP show that GLASS outperforms retrieval-, fine-tuning-, and steering-based baselines across ROUGE metrics and LLM-as-judge evaluations. Further analyses show that SAE-based representations are more robust to topic and length shifts, suggesting better disentanglement of stylistic information from semantic residue.

Personalized text generation requires models to capture user-specific writing styles from historical data.

Deep neural networks achieve strong performance across many tasks but remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Adversarial training (AT) is one of the most effective defenses, yet it suffers from high memory cost on large models and the persistent clean-robust accuracy trade-off. Recent work introduces parameter-efficient fine-tuning, such as LoRA, into AT, but this constraint induces a notable robustness gap relative to full-parameter AT. In this work, we revisit parameter-efficient adversarial fine-tuning from a parameter space perspective. Through gradient analysis, we find that adversarial optimization is highly concentrated on a small subset of parameters, which we call Robustness-Critical Parameters (RCPs), suggesting that robustness is encoded in a sparse subspace. Building on this observation, we propose Sparse Adversarial Fine-Tuning (SAFT), which identifies RCPs via adversarial gradient saliency and performs AT by updating only these parameters while freezing the rest. Across architectures and datasets, SAFT outperforms LoRA-based methods in both clean and robust accuracy with fewer trainable parameters, and approaches or surpasses full parameter AT in robustness while updating only about 5\% of parameters.

Deep neural networks achieve strong performance across many tasks but remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations.

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks threaten the availability of Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures, particularly under resource-constrained deployment conditions. Although transfer learning models have shown promising detection accuracy, their reliability, computational feasibility, and interpretability in operational environments remain insufficiently explored. This study presents an explainability aware empirical evaluation of seven pre-trained convolutional neural network architectures for multi-class IoT DDoS detection using the CICDDoS2019 dataset and an image-based traffic representation. The analysis integrates performance metrics, reliability-oriented statistics (MCC, Youden Index, confidence intervals), latency and training cost assessment, and interpretability evaluation using Grad-CAM and SHAP. Results indicate that DenseNet and MobileNet based architectures achieve strong detection performance while demonstrating superior reliability and compact, class-consistent attribution patterns. DenseNet169 offers the strongest reliability and interpretability alignment, whereas MobileNetV3 provides an effective latency-accuracy trade-off for fog-level deployment. The findings emphasize the importance of combining performance, reliability, and explainability criteria when selecting deep learning models for IoT DDoS detection.

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks threaten the availability of Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures, particularly under resource-constrained deployment conditions.

Survival analysis provides statistical methods to model the time until an event occurs. Reporting delays arise when event times are not observed at their occurrence but are only revealed upon reporting. This issue is particularly critical for timely risk evaluation when the observation window is short due to administrative censoring. In this study, we incorporate right-censored reporting delays by jointly modeling parametric hazards for the event and reporting processes. We then construct a consistent estimator for the model parameters and develop a Monte Carlo expectation-maximization algorithm to compute it. To address the challenges posed by administrative censoring, we leverage these findings and propose a transfer-learning procedure. Experimental results demonstrate that our method improves the accuracy of timely risk evaluation under administrative censoring.

Survival analysis provides statistical methods to model the time until an event occurs.

Data mixing decides how to combine different sources or types of data and is a consequential problem throughout language model training. In pretraining, data composition is a key determinant of model quality; in continual learning and adaptation, it governs what is retained and acquired. Yet existing data mixing methods address only one phase of this lifecycle at a time: some require smaller proxy models tied to a single training phase, others assume a fixed domain set, and continual learning lacks principled guidance altogether. We argue that data mixing is fundamentally an online decision making problem---one that recurs throughout training and demands a single, unified solution. We introduce OP-Mix (On-Policy Mix), a data mixing algorithm that operates across pretraining, midtraining, and instruction tuning. Our main insight is that candidate data mixtures can be cheaply simulated by interpolating between low-rank adapters trained directly on the current model, eliminating separate proxy models and ensuring the search is always grounded in the model's actual learning dynamics. Across the language model training lifecycle, OP-Mix consistently finds near-optimal mixtures while using a fraction of the compute of the baselines. In pretraining, OP-Mix improves upon training without mixing by 6.3% in average perplexity. For continual learning, OP-Mix matches the performance of both retraining and on-policy distillation while using 66% and 95% less overall compute, respectively. OP-Mix suggests a different view of language model training: not a sequence of distinct phases, but a single continuous process of learning from data.

Data mixing decides how to combine different sources or types of data and is a consequential problem throughout language model training.

Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based coding agents are now used to generate code from natural-language specifications, yet ensuring such code is both functionally correct and secure remains a challenge. We present DualGauge, the first fully automated framework for jointly evaluating correctness and security of specification-only code generation, supported by DualGauge-Bench, a language-agnostic benchmark of 307 coding tasks each paired with functional and security tests derived from the same specification. Evaluating 10 representative LLMs across Python, C++, and JavaScript, we find that functional correctness substantially overestimates reliable code generation: even the strongest model remains below 15% joint security-functionality success in every language. Common model-side factors--scale, extended thinking, quantization, instruction tuning, and code specialization--do not reliably improve joint performance, suggesting secure-and-correct code generation does not simply emerge from stronger coding capability. Evaluation of 3 leading coding agents (Codex, OpenHands, and Claude Code) shows that iterative scaffolding is not a reliable remedy on specification-only tasks: results are strongly scaffold-dependent, with two of the three agents failing to outperform a comparable direct model. A qualitative audit reveals that these failures concentrate at the output contract boundary and in guards that exist but are insufficient--patterns that only joint benchmarking reliably exposes.

Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based coding agents are now used to generate code from natural-language specifications, yet ensuring such code is both functionally correct and secure remains a challenge.

Ranking aggregation from multiple retrievers is a powerful yet under-explored technique in modern retrieval and RAG systems. We introduce LLM-IRA, the first extension of the quantum-inspired interactive ranking aggregation framework to document reranking. By leveraging large language models (LLMs) solely for pairwise judgments on high-disagreement document pairs, our method learns fusion weights in a principled, interactive way. The final ranking is a simple, ultra-fast pointwise linear fusion of scores, no full pairwise matrix or expensive listwise prompting is required. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark and TREC Deep Learning tracks with an open-weight instruction-tuned judge (Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct) show that LLM-IRA matches or numerically exceeds strong static fusion baselines on 5 of 6 evaluated benchmarks. We report two weight-update variants: momentum blending and a full accumulated-history refit, which together reach statistical significance (Wilcoxon signed-rank, p<0.05) over the best unsupervised aggregator on 4 of 6 benchmarks (DL19 under momentum; DL20, DBpedia, and NFCorpus under accumulated refit, which is the stronger of the two configurations overall). On the benchmarks we profiled (DL19, DL20), it already clears the best unsupervised baseline within as few as 5 LLM calls per query, well before exhausting its typical ~25--30 call budget. LLM-IRA also achieves cost-effectiveness comparable to state-of-the-art zero-shot LLM rerankers at an order of magnitude fewer LLM calls, and requires no training data or model fine-tuning.

Ranking aggregation from multiple retrievers is a powerful yet under-explored technique in modern retrieval and RAG systems.

Human social behaviour is not a collection of independent motions, but a jointly organised process in which group dynamics and individual variation continuously shape one another. Yet existing social motion models often prioritise plausible trajectories while leaving interaction state implicit, limiting their ability to transfer across groups, tasks, and partial-observation regimes. To address this gap, we introduce Bilevel Representations for Agent Interaction Dynamics (BRAID), a hierarchical sequential latent-variable model for generative multi-person interaction. BRAID explicitly formulates social motion generation as a meta-transfer learning problem: shared interaction priors are learned across datasets and adapted through arbitrary context sets of observed people and joints. The model represents each scene through a group-level latent state that captures shared interaction dynamics and person-level latent states that capture individual behaviour conditioned on the evolving group context. This modelling choice enables coherent generation under full, sparse, or partial observations while exposing compact social-state vectors that can serve as an interface for downstream embodied-agent systems. We evaluate BRAID under a unified SMPL-based representation on social forecasting, tracking and in-filling, and response generation, using metrics that assess not only reconstruction accuracy but also realism, diversity, temporal alignment, and interpersonal coordination. We further analyse the hierarchical latent space, showing that it captures separable group- and individual-level structure.

Human social behaviour is not a collection of independent motions, but a jointly organised process in which group dynamics and individual variation continuously shape one another.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporally grounded reasoning because their static parametric memory is misaligned with the dynamic evolution of real-world knowledge. Although RAG and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) provide practical ways to enhance LLMs, they remain insufficient for temporal reasoning. Existing retrieval methods typically prioritize semantic relevance while overlooking temporal validity, event order, and evolutionary dependencies, resulting in evidence that is relevant in isolation but temporally fragmented. Meanwhile, conventional PEFT methods usually employ fixed and input-agnostic low-rank updates, making it difficult to capture time-dependent entity semantics and relation drift. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Evidence-Parameter Co-Alignment (TEPCA), a framework for LLM reasoning over TKGs. TEPCA aligns LLM reasoning with temporal knowledge at both the evidence and parameter levels. At the evidence level, it introduces time-constrained Dynamic Relevance-Guided Path (DRGP) pruning to preserve globally coherent temporal paths, together with Mutual-Information (MI)-based pruning to retain query-informative local facts under temporal constraints. At the parameter level, it integrates Dynamic-Gated LoRA (DG-LoRA), a timestamp-conditioned low-rank adaptation mechanism that dynamically modulates the effective adaptation subspace according to temporal context. This design enables LLMs to better capture fine-grained entity evolution and time-dependent relation semantics while preserving parameter efficiency. Experimental results on two TKG benchmarks demonstrate that TEPCA achieves state-of-the-art performance. Additional evaluations of DG-LoRA on eight commonsense QA datasets further verify its general input-adaptive capacity, scalability across LLM backbones, and interpretability.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporally grounded reasoning because their static parametric memory is misaligned with the dynamic evolution of real-world knowledge.

Large language models (LLMs) routinely face requests that should be refused, creating a trade-off between helpfulness and harm prevention. However, refusals themselves can be helpful. In high-risk interactions involving crisis, coercion, or escalating intent, blunt non-compliance may prevent direct harm while still failing to support the needs of the person behind the request. We present PsychoSafe, a psychologically-informed refusal framework that reframes refusal as structured supportive communication grounded in evidence-based intervention strategies. To develop PsychoSafe, we construct a corpus of 8,019 prompt-response pairs spanning five psychologically salient risk domains and apply prompting and parameter-efficient fine-tuning to Qwen 3.5 27B. On a balanced validation set of 500 prompts, evaluated with an LLM judge and validated through human ratings, PsychoSafe prompting improves overall refusal quality by 28.1% over a generic baseline, with particularly strong gains in external resource referral (+46.8%) and psychological grounding (+34.8%), while preserving downstream performance on non-refusal tasks. Fine-tuning achieves near-perfect refusal and resource-referral rates but reduces response relevance. Additional evaluations on SORRY-Bench and XSTest show strong in-domain robustness but limited out-of-domain generalization, suggesting that future work should diversify fine-tuning data to help models apply interventions selectively rather than schematically.

Large language models (LLMs) routinely face requests that should be refused, creating a trade-off between helpfulness and harm prevention.

Fine-tuning foundation models on new tasks inevitably suffer from catastrophic forgetting. While existing works attempt to mitigate this on the basis of parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, they adopted an overly restrictive Subspace Orthogonality condition. In this paper, we introduce a purely post-hoc and tuning-agnostic weight rectification framework that achieves Parameter Space Orthogonality, which is the necessary and sufficient condition for preserving historical performance to the first order. By projecting parameter updates into the JAcobian NUll Space (JANUS), our method significantly recovers compromised historical knowledge without interfering with the underlying fine-tuning process. To overcome the local validity of the Jacobian approximation, we further propose a Multi-step Adaptive Rectification mechanism that utilizes the JANUS shift to dynamically verify the valid trust region and adjust step sizes. Coupled with our proposed ghost projection, ghost orientation comparison, and sequence-level singular value decomposition compression techniques, JANUS also achieves great temporal and spatial efficiency. Experiments demonstrate that JANUS seamlessly integrates with various fine-tuning methods, significantly mitigating the stability-plasticity dilemma by recovering historical knowledge while preserving downstream task adaptation.

Fine-tuning foundation models on new tasks inevitably suffer from catastrophic forgetting.

Hallucination detection is critical for deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. Due to strong empirical performance, internal representation-based methods have emerged as the prevailing direction for detecting hallucinations, yet they remain largely model-specific and often fail to generalize to unseen LLMs. In this paper, we study an important yet underexplored problem, termed cross-model hallucination detection (CMHD), which aims to train hallucination detectors on source LLMs while ensuring performance on unseen target LLMs. The core challenge of CMHD lies in cross-model representation heterogeneity: hidden states from different LLMs exhibit severe semantic inconsistency, which limits the transferability of classical representation-based detectors. Through analysis and empirical validation, we show that relational structures over layers, tokens, and features capture transferable detection signals despite semantic inconsistency. Based on this observation, we propose cross-model hallucination detection via heterogeneity-oriented relational discrimination (CHORD), a relational graph discrimination framework that represents hidden states as joint relational graphs over layers, tokens, and features. It feeds these graphs into relation-aware attention to obtain structure-aware features, and uses meta-learning to shape these features toward transferable detection signals. Extensive experiments show that CHORD outperforms representative detection methods in cross-model generalization. Code is available at https://github.com/MiracleworkerD/CHORD.

Hallucination detection is critical for deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications.

Skills, as reusable external knowledge, have demonstrated substantial potential to enhance the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks. However, existing skill-augmented generation methods typically rely on separate models for skill retrieval and skill utilization, resulting in disconnected optimization of these two processes. To address this gap, we propose Skill-Uni, a unified reinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes skill retrieval and utilization. Specifically, we adopt a generative skill retrieval paradigm that enables a single model to both learn how to retrieve relevant skills and leverage them for task solving. To effectively train this unified framework, we introduce a two-stage training strategy consisting of warm-up instruction tuning and GRPO, allowing the model to progressively improve its skill retrieval and utilization capabilities. Extensive experiments on five skill-related benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of Skill-Uni, yielding average performance gains of 66.59% and 34.82% over the base Qwen3-4B and LLaMA3.1-8B models, respectively. Besides, Skill-Uni is compatible with various skill retrieval engines, demonstrating its flexibility and generalizability. Additional in-depth analyses also provide insights into the effectiveness of Skill-Uni.

Skills, as reusable external knowledge, have demonstrated substantial potential to enhance the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks.

Adversarial attacks on graph neural networks (GNNs) have been studied as a model-centric optimization problem driven by gradients, learned policies, or meta-learning, with the graph treated as a passive substrate. This view overlooks a defining feature of GNNs: their predictions are produced by structured message passing along the graph, so their adversarial vulnerabilities are encoded as much in the geometry of the graph as in the learned weights. We develop a structure-driven framework for feature attacks in which the attack is derived from the spectral properties of the normalized adjacency operator. Its central result is a separation principle: under a natural relaxation of the attack objective, the optimal feature perturbation is rank one and factorizes into a graph-dependent component (degree-proportional spatial allocation, depending only on the graph) and a weight-dependent component (top singular vector of the composed weights, depending only on the weights). Node degree thus emerges as the fundamental graph quantity governing adversarial vulnerability to feature perturbations. The resulting attack, which we call SepAttack, requires no gradient computation, carries analytical guarantees, achieves competitive or superior performance against established baselines such as Nettack and IG-Attack with up to ${\sim}70\times$ speedup in the targeted setting, and transfers near-perfectly across architectures on continuous-feature graphs because its graph-dependent component is architecture-invariant by construction. We further derive a separation-principle adversarial training procedure (SepAT) directly from the closed-form worst-case attack and report robustness gains on binary-feature benchmarks.

Adversarial attacks on graph neural networks (GNNs) have been studied as a model-centric optimization problem driven by gradients, learned policies, or meta-learning, with the graph treated as a passive substrate.

Medical chart abstraction transforms unstructured clinical narratives into structured variables for research and quality monitoring. We evaluated a prompting-based large language model (LLM) framework for extracting eight clinical variables from 2,416 neurointerventional acute stroke intervention reports across three hospitals. Twenty-two instruction-tuned open-source LLMs were evaluated across architectures, model sizes, and biomedical adaptations using Quick Response and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Non-expert staff annotations served as the cross-model reference standard. Evaluation was restricted to report-variable pairs with a valid LLaMA3.3-70B CoT prediction and a corresponding reference label. Performance measures included extraction accuracy, inference latency, and agreement with expert adjudication. Twenty discordant cases per variable underwent review by two senior physicians and four medical students. LLaMA3.3-70B achieved the highest overall accuracy (94.8%). CoT improved performance on inference-dependent variables such as site of occlusion, while Quick Response was optimal for directly stated procedural fields. Expert adjudication showed that AI predictions were more closely aligned with expert interpretations than non-expert annotations for most variables, with intracranial angioplasty remaining a challenge. Locally deployed LLMs can support scalable clinical information extraction and retrospective stroke registry curation, with expert oversight for ambiguous cases.

Medical chart abstraction transforms unstructured clinical narratives into structured variables for research and quality monitoring.

Semi-supervised learning in automatic speech recognition (ASR) typically relies on pseudo-labeling, which often suffers from confirmation bias and error accumulation due to noisy supervision. To address this limitation, we propose ReHear, a framework for iterative pseudo-label refinement that integrates an instruction-tuned, audio-aware large language model (LLM) into the self-training loop. Unlike conventional text-based correctors, our approach conditions the LLM on both the ASR hypothesis and the source audio, allowing it to recover phonetically accurate transcripts even from severe recognition errors. These refined pseudo-labels serve as high-fidelity targets for fine-tuning the ASR model in an iterative cycle. Experimental results across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that ReHear effectively mitigates error propagation and improves over both supervised and pseudo-labeling baselines.

Semi-supervised learning in automatic speech recognition (ASR) typically relies on pseudo-labeling, which often suffers from confirmation bias and error accumulation due to noisy supervision.

Code language models need repository-level context to resolve imports, APIs, and project conventions. Existing methods inject this knowledge as long inputs (retrieved through RAG or dependency analysis) or through per-repository fine-tuning and LoRA---costly at repository scale and brittle to evolving codebases. We introduce Code2LoRA, a hypernetwork framework that generates repository-specific LoRA adapters, effectively injecting repository knowledge with zero inference-time token overhead. Code2LoRA supports two usage scenarios: Code2LoRA-Static converts a single repository snapshot into an adapter, suitable for comprehension of stable codebases; while Code2LoRA-Evo maintains an adapter backed by a GRU hidden state updated per code diff, suitable for active development of evolving codebases. To evaluate Code2LoRA against parameter-efficient fine-tuning baselines, we build RepoPeftBench, a benchmark of 604 Python repositories with two tracks: a static track with 40K training and 12K test assertion-completion tasks, and an evolution track with 215K commit-derived training and 87K commit-derived test tasks. On the static track, Code2LoRA-Static achieves 63.8% cross-repo and 66.2% in-repo exact match, matching the per-repository LoRA upper bound; on the evolution track, Code2LoRA-Evo achieves 60.3% cross-repo exact match (+5.2 pp over a single shared LoRA). Code2LoRA's code can be found at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/code2lora-6857; the model checkpoints and RepoPeftBench datasets can be found at https://huggingface.co/code2lora.

Code language models need repository-level context to resolve imports, APIs, and project conventions.

Human exploration of the moon is expected to resume in the next decade, following the last such activities in the Apollo programme time. One of the major objectives of returning to the Moon is to continue retrieving geological samples, with a focus on collecting high-quality specimens to maximize scientific return. Tools that assist astronauts in making informed decisions about sample collection activities can maximize the scientific value of future lunar missions. A lunar rock classifier is a tool that can potentially provide the necessary information for astronauts to analyze lunar rock samples, allowing them to augment in-situ value identification of samples. Towards demonstrating the value of such a tool, in this paper, we introduce a framework for classifying rock types in thin sections of lunar rocks. We leverage the vast collection of petrographic thin-section images from the Apollo missions, captured under plane-polarized light (PPL), cross-polarised light (XPL), and reflected light at varying magnifications. Advanced machine learning methods, including contrastive learning, are applied to analyze these images and extract meaningful features. The contrastive learning approach fine-tunes a pre-trained Inception-Resnet-v2 network with the SimCLR loss function. The fine-tuned Inception-Resnet-v2 network can then extract essential features effectively from the thin-section images of Apollo rocks. A simple binary classifier is trained using transfer learning from the fine-tuned Inception-ResNet-v2 to 98.44\% ($\pm$1.47) accuracy in separating breccias from basalts.

Human exploration of the moon is expected to resume in the next decade, following the last such activities in the Apollo programme time.

Recent research demonstrates that pretrained large language models (LLMs) require minimal but carefully curated data for instruction-tuning. Building on LLMs, multi-modal models further contend with far larger data volumes, heterogeneous sources, and cross-modal alignment, amplifying both the necessity and the complexity of data selection. However, existing methods rely on deeply extracted embeddings, gradients or narrow quality scores that are time-consuming to compute and limited in expressiveness, frequently failing to surpass a simple random-sampling baseline. To overcome these limitations, we step back from complex embedding spaces and target the fundamental objective of instruction tuning: how and what knowledge should be elicited from the pretrained model and exposed to users. We leverage interaction \underline{S}tyles as a proxy for structural diversity, and decompose data quality into capability-specific \underline{S}cores, yielding an explicit yet \underline{R}ich (SSR) profile for each sample. We further cast the selection as submodular coverage maximization over the capability--style grid, providing an approximation guarantee. SSR consistently delivers superior performance across two distinct architecture stacks, LLaVA-1.5 (Vicuna + CLIP) and LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2 + SigLIP), two large-scale data pools, six data budget settings, and 14 multi-modal benchmarks. To our knowledge, SSR is the first data selection method validated at million-scale, achieving 99.1% of full-data performance using only 30% of a 2.6M pool. Furthermore, the SSR profile models and selected subsets transfer training-free across data pools and model architectures with capability extensibility.

Recent research demonstrates that pretrained large language models (LLMs) require minimal but carefully curated data for instruction-tuning.

The success of large language models in real-world applications relies on parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which inserts compact, trainable adapters into selected layers. In this paper, we propose SimplexLoRA, a LoRA variant that adaptively adjusts adapter ranks during fine-tuning based on their learned importance. Unlike standard LoRA, which employs a fixed rank across all layers, SimplexLoRA optimizes per-adapter importance weights on the $n$-scaled simplex during a short warm-up and then freezes them, dynamically allocating capacity where it is most beneficial without increasing the overall parameter budget or inference cost. We evaluate SimplexLoRA across 12 language understanding, summarization, and reasoning tasks using DeBERTaV3, BART-large, Llama 3.1 8B, and Qwen3-8B. Our results show that SimplexLoRA consistently matches or outperforms standard LoRA and recent adaptive baselines, with the largest gains at low ranks. Our code is available at https://github.com/brain-lab-research/SimplexLoRA.

The success of large language models in real-world applications relies on parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which inserts compact, trainable adapters into selected layers.