AI4Science 论文速递

Causal discovery from nonlinear multivariate time series is challenging in high-dimensional systems, where the number of candidate directed relations grows quadratically with the number of variables. Existing methods are often limited by target-wise model fitting, repeated conditional testing, or expensive graph-search procedures. We propose SCDM, a shared-parameter meta-learning framework for scalable temporal causal discovery. SCDM treats each target variable as a task while learning a shared temporal predictor and a shared causal-strength matrix across tasks. Each meta-episode updates only a subset of target-variable tasks, allowing the model to accumulate structural evidence across the full system without exhaustive target-wise optimization. After training, a post-training graph readout converts the learned predictor into continuous directed causal scores for threshold-independent evaluation. We also provide a finite-error recovery principle showing that, under fully observed delayed-system assumptions and a positive risk-gap condition, thresholding SCDM scores recovers the graph when statistical, meta-optimization, and readout errors are below the population margin. Experiments on controlled synthetic, neuroimaging-inspired, high-dimensional, and real-world temporal benchmarks demonstrate competitive causal recovery and improved scalability in large temporal systems.

Causal discovery from nonlinear multivariate time series is challenging in high-dimensional systems, where the number of candidate directed relations grows quadratically with the number of variables.

This paper describes our submission to the WMT 2026 Multilingual Instruction Shared Task. We adapt Qwen3-8B with LoRA using organiser-provided data, EuroAlpaca, a multilingual instruction dataset created through task-preserving localisation, and CrossEuroAlpaca, a cross-lingual augmentation that assigns different source and target languages to instructions, contexts and responses. Our system targets open-ended question answering (QA-OEG) in ten shared-task languages represented in the auxiliary data. Under matched decoding, adaptation improves the mean Gemma-4 judge score on target-language QA-OEG by 7.8% relative to the base model. On an additional evaluation using the Aya Evaluation Suite across all shared-task languages, it yields relative gains of 41.5% in macro-averaged ROUGE-L and 2.9% in BERTScore-F1, with larger improvements in target languages. However, these gains are task- and language-specific. Gemma-4 scores improve for QA-OEG and summarisation in the target languages but decline for context-grounded QA there and across all three tasks in the non-target languages.

This paper describes our submission to the WMT 2026 Multilingual Instruction Shared Task.

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in value-sensitive contexts, aligning them with human values has emerged as a post-training objective in NLP, aimed at instilling additional values and guiding model behaviour. However, current evaluations remain narrow. Because values are interconnected, it is unclear how fine-tuning for specific values alters unrelated capabilities and behaviours. In this work, we adapt four instruction-tuned LLMs across individual Hofstede's value dimensions and evaluate them on both cross-value transfer and broader behaviours. We find that value-specific training produces unintended side effects on untrained values, risk preferences, social cognition, and safety traits. Consequently, we suggest that value alignment after post-training should incorporate broader behavioral evaluations, and we highlight the need to investigate where additional value training might best fit into the pipeline.

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in value-sensitive contexts, aligning them with human values has emerged as a post-training objective in NLP, aimed at instilling additional values and guiding model behaviour.

This position paper argues that many behaviours framed as either "stochastic parroting" or "advanced reasoning" are better explained as context-directed extrapolation from training-data priors, and that ML and NLP research communities would benefit from evaluations that distinguish remembering and basic extrapolation from genuine application-level generalisation. Our central contribution is an actionable evaluation checklist and design patterns that make these distinctions testable in practice. Our framework posits that LLMs extrapolate from training data priors while using context to guide the model to the appropriate priors; we call this "context-directed extrapolation." Specifically, this context direction is achieved through examples in base models, leading to in-context learning, while instruction tuning allows analogous task specification via prompts rather than explicit examples. We argue that adopting this more realistic framework and controls for improving evaluation would better calibrate claims about LLM "reasoning," refocus research on how LLM performance interacts with training data and generalisability to out-of-domain tasks, and reduce miscalibration in deployment and policy decisions.

This position paper argues that many behaviours framed as either "stochastic parroting" or "advanced reasoning" are better explained as context-directed extrapolation from training-data priors, and that ML and NLP research communities would benefit from evaluations that distinguish remembering and basic extrapolation from genuine application-level generalisation.

Asked what to study, which career to pursue, or what product to build, large language models (LLMs) often recommend AI-related options. We ask where this tendency comes from by comparing models before and after fine-tuning and by varying how questions are asked. First, pretrained models already include explicit AI/ML terms in the recommendations of 27% of their responses, and their released instruction-tuned versions do so in 59%. Second, fine-tuning models ourselves shows that this rise is not inevitable: general instruction tuning leaves the rate unchanged, but removing the 7% of instruction examples that concern AI cuts it by 14 percentage points, below the level of the pretrained models it starts from. Data rewarding helpfulness raise it by 9 points, while data ranked by the preferences of diverse simulated users lower it by 9. Finally, with models held fixed, asking for the "best" option or for what to do "right now" raises the rate by 8 and 18 points, whereas telling the model it is an AI advisor adds 4. Overall, the tendency starts in pretraining, and what models learn afterward, together with how a question is phrased, decides how strongly it appears.

Asked what to study, which career to pursue, or what product to build, large language models (LLMs) often recommend AI-related options.

Recent work uses entropy-based signals at multiple representation levels to study reasoning in large language models, but the field remains largely empirical. From a theoretical perspective, reductions in model uncertainty do not necessarily reflect progress toward correctness. In this work, we characterize when such alignment can be expected through the Stepwise Informativeness Assumption (SIA), which requires entropy-reducing reasoning-prefix extensions increase the probability assigned to valid answers in expectation. We show that next-token prediction can transfer answer-relevant information from training data to the model, but does not, by itself, guarantee alignment with correctness. Instead, we propose that this alignment depends on how the training regime couples reasoning traces to correct answers. Furthermore, we hypothesize observable signatures of this phenomenon and characterize its expected failure regimes. We empirically investigate how entropy dynamics relate to correctness across four reasoning benchmarks (GSM8K, ARC, SVAMP, MATH) and diverse open-weight language models spanning base, instruction-tuned, and RL-trained regimes. Our results show that entropy-correctness alignment strengthens with post-training but can weaken when task difficulty exceeds model capabilities.

Recent work uses entropy-based signals at multiple representation levels to study reasoning in large language models, but the field remains largely empirical.

Indoor localization systems are critical for Industry-4.0 applications. Visible Light Communication (VLC)-based systems offer advantages such as immunity to electromagnetic interference, high accuracy, and energy efficiency, but their performance is hindered by environmental variability across deployment areas. This paper presents a transfer learning (TL) framework for VLC-based indoor localization that enhances cross-area robustness while reducing data requirements. Using real-world measurements from four distinct areas of a Bosch manufacturing facility, we show that fine-tuning a deep neural network (DNN) pre-trained on source area data with only 40% of target-area measurements recovers 97% of full-data performance, thereby reducing the amount of target data needed. We further introduce the Transfer Efficiency Score (TES), a composite metric that identifies the most effective source models for transfer without exhaustive evaluation. Guided by TES, the framework selects the best source model, yielding localization errors as low as 40.9 cm with success rates above 86%. Validation on an unseen area confirms its generalization capability, with a 3.28 cm mean error achieved using the TES-selected source model. Overall, the proposed framework provides a scalable and data-efficient pathway for industrial VLC localization, substantially reducing deployment costs and computational burden while maintaining high accuracy in diverse and dynamic environments.

Indoor localization systems are critical for Industry-4.0 applications.

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things enables seamless collaboration among connected devices, making indoor localization a critical component of industrial automation. However, conventional localization techniques struggle in dynamic environments. These methods depend on extensive, frequent data collection and environment-specific calibration, limiting scalability, interoperability, and effective use of prior research while imposing significant energy penalties that hinder practical deployment. To address these challenges, we propose an energy-efficient transfer learning (TL) based approach for visible light communication based indoor localization. Our method leverages TL to tackle environmental variability, including lighting fluctuations and physical obstacles that typically degrade localization performance, while simultaneously reducing computational overhead and energy consumption compared to conventional approaches. We also introduce a novel model efficiency (ME) metric, designed to integrate localization accuracy, energy efficiency, data efficiency, and transfer gain into a single evaluative measure for comprehensive optimization. Evaluations on a real-world dataset collected from a BOSCH factory demonstrate that our model achieves a 47% improvement in localization accuracy compared to a conventional model that does not utilize TL, and achieves up to 67.5% ME with TL models, compared to only 10.4% in conventional models under high-noise conditions. These results underscore the potential of our approach to deliver a highly efficient and scalable indoor localization system suitable for energy-constrained industrial applications.

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things enables seamless collaboration among connected devices, making indoor localization a critical component of industrial automation.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS). Despite the practical success, we empirically found that the MAxS behind SAM's generalization enhancements face the "Flatness Indicator Problem" (FIP), where SAM only considers the flatness in the direction of gradient ascent, resulting in a next minimization region that is not sufficiently flat. A better Flatness Indicator (FI) would bring a better generalization of neural networks. Because SAM is a greedy search method in nature. In this paper, we propose to utilize the difference between the training loss and the minimum loss over the neighborhood surrounding the current weight, which we denote as Min-Sharpness (MinS). By merging MaxS and MinS, we created a better FI that indicates a flatter direction during the optimization. Specially, we combine this FI with SAM into the proposed Bilateral SAM (BSAM) which finds a more flatter minimum than that of SAM. The theoretical analysis proves that BSAM converges to local minima. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BSAM offers superior generalization performance and robustness compared to vanilla SAM across various tasks, i.e., classification, transfer learning, human pose estimation, and network quantization.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS).

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins. We propose the Capability-Driven Multimodal Scaling Law, the first cross-family framework that predicts VLM benchmark accuracy from directly observable textual capability. Given a low-dimensional capability score $S$ extracted from LLM textual benchmarks via PCA, we model VLM performance as a function of $S$, with a per-backbone transfer rate and an absorption rate that quantifies data-scaling efficiency. To fit and validate the framework, we train over 150 VLMs on 34 LLMs spanning 7 model families under a strictly controlled recipe. Evaluations on more than 200 textual and 50 multimodal benchmarks show that the law accurately extrapolates transfer rate from models up to 8B parameters to 72B-scale backbones, predicts full VLM training trajectories with high fidelity, and generalizes to entirely held-out model families. Beyond the scaling law, our analysis surfaces actionable insights: certain textual benchmarks negatively correlate with multimodal performance, exposing latent benchmark-gaming behavior; base LLMs outperform instruction-tuned counterparts as VLM backbones due to higher absorption rates and lower data-scaling decay; and different model families occupy distinct positions in the transfer--absorption space. The framework turns backbone selection from costly empirical sweeps into a principled, quantitative decision. Code and data are available at https://github.com/wangq-dev/CDMScaling.

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins.

Why large language models trained via log-loss minimization over massive and diverse datasets exhibit broad capabilities and generalizable skills is not yet fully understood. Grau-Moya et al. (ICML 2024) offer a conceptual explanation through the lens of meta-learning: if sequence-generating environments $ν$ are drawn from a prior $w_ν$, minimizing population log-loss recovers the corresponding Bayesian mixture predictor $ξ=\sum_νw_νν$. In the idealized limit in which $w$ is a universal prior, the optimal predictor corresponds to Solomonoff universal induction. Practical machine learning algorithms, however, generally produce only \emph{approximately} optimal predictors. This raises a natural question: \emph{Does the prediction performance remain robust under approximation}? In this paper, we first provide a tight bound on the worst-case effect of approximation on prediction error. We show any predictor $ρ$ satisfying $D_{KL}(ξ\|ρ)\leq η$ retains bounded cumulative-expected-squared prediction error. However, while the Bayesian mixture predictor $ξ$ has error $O(\log(1/w_μ))$ in an environment $μ$, we establish a tight $Θ(η/w_μ)$ bound on the excess error of $ρ$ relative to $ξ$. Thus, approximation can substantially degrade performance in environments assigned small prior probability. In sharp contrast, when environments are averaged according to prior $w$, we prove that the excess prediction error is only $O(η)$. Furthermore, we establish a distribution-shift theorem for dominated shifts from a training prior $w$ to a test prior $w'$, interpolating our average-case and worst-case guarantees. Finally, we extend our robustness analysis to a finite-sampling setting relevant to learning universal predictors with neural networks and Transformers, where $D_{KL}(ξ\|ρ)$ could be unbounded. [For the full abstract, see the paper.]

Why large language models trained via log-loss minimization over massive and diverse datasets exhibit broad capabilities and generalizable skills is not yet fully understood.

Inferring network-wide traffic states from sparse observations with high accuracy and trustworthy uncertainty quantification is essential for intelligent transportation systems, yet it remains challenging due to the underdetermined nature of the problem, multifaceted disturbances in sensing networks, and the inherent conflicts among multiple inference subtasks when modeled jointly. We propose the Task-Aware Attentive Neural Process (TA-ANP), a unified probabilistic framework for resilient and trustworthy global traffic state inference (GTSI) by fusing floating car data (FCD) with sparse fixed-detector measurements. By casting GTSI as a stochastic process, TA-ANP leverages the meta-learning properties of neural processes to adapt rapidly to changes in sensing configurations without retraining. A task-aware multi-query attention module with distinct spatiotemporal inductive biases is introduced to handle three GTSI subtasks jointly ---real-time estimation at unobserved locations, forecasting at both observed and unobserved locations---while mitigating cross-task interference. For uncertainty quantification, we combine neural processes with Monte Carlo Dropout to capture both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. To support metropolis-scale evaluation, we construct the Metropolitan Multi-Source Traffic Dataset (MMTD), integrating fixed-loop sensor measurements, FCD statistics, and OpenStreetMap road-network data over an urban network of 26,166 road segments, including 2,371 fixed-sensor-equipped segments used for quantitative evaluation. Experiments across multiple independently generated sensor configurations show that TA-ANP achieves best performance across all subtasks under deterministic and probabilistic metrics. The resulting well-calibrated uncertainties enable more efficient fixed-sensor placement with fewer sensor deployments.

Inferring network-wide traffic states from sparse observations with high accuracy and trustworthy uncertainty quantification is essential for intelligent transportation systems, yet it remains challenging due to the underdetermined nature of the problem, multifaceted disturbances in sensing networks, and the inherent conflicts among multiple inference subtasks when modeled jointly.

Personalized shopping benchmarks ask which item fits the user; we ask how far an agent may commit on that item, and pose learning the individual's auto-purchase line as a task. The boundary is evidence-conditioned and three-valued: whether committing is appropriate depends on the sufficiency of product information (warrant), reversibility, price against the user's norm, and urgency, not only on fit; and the natural output is don't buy, confirm first, or buy automatically. Across sixteen instruction-tuned models, autonomous commitment is misaligned with a human authorization reference in which fifteen annotators, role-playing the delegating principal from a given profile, choose the furthest action they would allow without confirmation: models commit even when fit is low and when their own evidence flag reports the warrant missing. This is overreach. The line is individual: these raters disagree, yet the disagreement is structured and partly predictable from a person's own other labels. A shallow learner on a few dozen of a person's own labels predicts their held-out auto-purchase line at a median of 0.79 by 30-40 labels, outperforming every evaluated prompt$\times$model configuration, including a per-annotator oracle over 80 configurations; the learned boundary does not transfer across domains. We release the counterfactual benchmark, human authorization reference, and annotation protocol after acceptance.

Personalized shopping benchmarks ask which item fits the user; we ask how far an agent may commit on that item, and pose learning the individual's auto-purchase line as a task.

Full fine-tuning has achieved remarkable success on reasoning-intensive tasks, but it often requires substantial GPU resource consumption. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) provides a promising alternative for reducing this cost, yet we observe a substantial performance gap on reasoning-intensive tasks. In this paper, we present three key observations showing that this gap is closely associated with norm-related under-adaptation, where PEFT produces markedly smaller weight-update norms than full fine-tuning. Based on these observations, we propose Norm-Guided Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (NormTune), a simple yet effective strategy that adaptively strengthens insufficiently updated layers according to their weight-update norms. Extensive experiments show that NormTune consistently enhances multiple PEFT methods across challenging reasoning benchmarks. Specifically, when trained on S1K-1.1, integrating NormTune into rank-8 LoRA, Bone, and MoRA yields substantial average accuracy improvements of 24.24\%, 11.33\%, and 16.21\% , respectively, across AIME 2024, MATH 500, GPQA, and AIME 2025. Moreover, NormTune-enhanced rank-256 LoRA, Bone, and MoRA achieve performance comparable to S1 full fine-tuning, with respective average gains of 2.17\%, 0.93\%, and 3.00\% over this baseline.

Full fine-tuning has achieved remarkable success on reasoning-intensive tasks, but it often requires substantial GPU resource consumption.

Merging different models into a single model is highly desirable for multi-task deployment, particularly in regulated domains like healthcare. In such settings, models are often locally fine-tuned due to strict data privacy policies, necessitating that aggregation operates exclusively on the fine-tuned weights. Existing methods apply a uniform merge across all tasks, ignoring the geometric relationships among their learned subspaces. When task updates occupy misaligned subspaces, projecting them onto a shared low-rank basis discards task-relevant directions, a failure mode named \emph{subspace interference}. Through this study, we show that the per-task projection error of a merged model is governed by the principal-angle alignment between each task and the shared subspace, so that grouping geometrically compatible tasks provably reduces this error within each group. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{Group-wise Rank-Aware Model Merging (GRAM)}, which uses the principal-angle geometry of task vectors to decide which tasks should be merged together and then performs a standard SVD-based merge within each coalition; the pipeline requires only the fine-tuned weights at merge time. With only one additional model ($\nK{=}2$), GRAM significantly mitigates subspace interference and consistently outperforms prior merging methods across language understanding (GLUE with Flan-T5), 8-task CLIP vision, and medical instruction tuning (Qwen2-7B-Instruct with four English/Chinese medical LoRAs).

Merging different models into a single model is highly desirable for multi-task deployment, particularly in regulated domains like healthcare.

Reinforcement learning remains sample inefficient, particularly when agents must adapt over time to related but distinct tasks, as in continual learning settings. Efficiency can be improved by transferring knowledge from a pretrained teacher policy to guide exploration in new but related tasks. However, if the new task sufficiently differs from the teacher's training task, the transferred guidance may be sub-optimal and bias exploration toward low-reward behaviors. We propose an energy-based transfer learning method that uses out-of-distribution detection to selectively issue guidance, enabling the teacher to intervene only in states within its training distribution. We theoretically link energy scores to state-visitation patterns under on-policy reinforcement learning. Empirically, our method improves sample efficiency and performance across both single-task and multi-task settings.

Reinforcement learning remains sample inefficient, particularly when agents must adapt over time to related but distinct tasks, as in continual learning settings.

Cross-tokenizer logits distillation enables knowledge transfer across model families, allowing students to learn from stronger or more specialized teachers. However, differences in vocabulary and segmentation make teacher and student next-token distributions difficult to align. Existing logits-based methods are easy to integrate into standard distillation pipelines, but often rely on restrictive heuristics or tokenizer-pair-specific choices. They may restrict supervision to shared vocabulary subsets, require manually selecting different objectives for different tokenizer pairs, or match only the observed chunk and its complement rather than individual alternative continuations. We introduce Common-Support Distillation (CSD), a unified logits-based framework that constructs a shared support between the teacher and student at each aligned input chunk and matches the induced distributions with a single objective. For one-to-one alignments, CSD uses explicit common-token pairs as the shared support. For other alignments, it constructs a virtual support whose probabilities are computed using the autoregressive chain rule. A residual event captures probability mass outside the explicit support, ensuring that both induced distributions remain normalized. Across four teacher-student settings comprising Llama-3.2-1B and Gemma3-1B-PT students with Qwen and Phi teachers, CSD consistently achieves the highest average performance among the evaluated cross-tokenizer methods, outperforming the strongest alternative by up to 1.8 points and surpassing both continued pretraining and same-tokenizer distillation. For Llama-3.1-8B, CSD improves average accuracy over the strongest evaluated baseline by up to 4.2 points for the base student and 1.6 points for the instruction-tuned student.

Cross-tokenizer logits distillation enables knowledge transfer across model families, allowing students to learn from stronger or more specialized teachers.

Adapting language models to new domains during post-training risks degrading previously acquired capabilities, a phenomenon commonly known as catastrophic forgetting. Existing mitigation methods largely treat forgetting as a consequence of excessive model drift. They therefore constrain updates by preserving old outputs, replaying old data, or regularizing changes to parameters and representations so that the updated model remains close to its previous state. We take a different view: Rather than pulling the updated model back toward its old state, we translate the new domain into the model's pre-existing knowledge space, making unfamiliar knowledge learnable through familiar procedures. Therefore, we propose Skill Schema Transport (SST), a post-training framework that transports new knowledge into the model's existing skill space. SST abstracts each example type into a skill schema, preserving its essential operations, dependencies, and verification steps while removing domain-specific surface forms. By recasting new examples as instances of reusable procedures, SST turns knowledge update from trajectory memorization into procedural reuse. In continual domain adaptation settings, SST consistently reduces forgetting while improving generalization to related tasks. Across two 3B instruction-tuned backbones, SST improves average final performance on streamed domains by 2.53 to 5.75 points over sequential post-training. It also lowers max-drop forgetting in all evaluated settings, with the largest reduction from 42.41 to 7.10 points on the Qwen-3B MATH stream, while substantially recovering the OOD degradation induced by sequential updates.

Adapting language models to new domains during post-training risks degrading previously acquired capabilities, a phenomenon commonly known as catastrophic forgetting.

Long-horizon robotic operation requires memory that scales with essential information rather than execution time. We present a parameter-space memory framework where each episode is stored as a separable object. A neural implicit representation is fitted to episode video from a shared, meta-learned initialization; the resulting weight delta constitutes the memory. Crucially, this delta remains a fixed size regardless of whether the episode spans a hundred or a hundred thousand frames. A learned projector maps the weight delta into token embeddings, conditioning a language model for question answering and a decoder for joint command regression, without frame retrieval at query time. On RoboMME, the language model exceeds chance across all question types, and the decoder achieves a mean $R^2$ of 0.51. Replacing the delta with matched noise drops performance by 11.4 points, while random-origin weights are non-decodable, proving the meta-learned initialization is essential for embedding episode content. By representing individual experiences as fixed-size weight deltas in a common parameter space, this approach decouples memory cost from time horizon and provides a basis for scalable streaming memory.

Long-horizon robotic operation requires memory that scales with essential information rather than execution time.

We consider federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning of foundation models, e.g., LLMs and LVMs, using low-rank adaptation (LoRA; ~Hu et al.\ 2022). Combining LoRA with federated learning introduces challenges absent from either setting alone: clients may use different LoRA ranks, making their factor matrices dimension-incompatible, and factor-wise averaging suffers from a bilinear mismatch. We propose SeFoRA, a sketch-aggregated federated LoRA algorithm in which each client transmits a linear sketch of its local $Δ\mathbf{W}$ updates, enabling direct aggregation at the federator. As a result, SeFoRA overcomes the rank heterogeneity challenge and alleviates the bilinear mismatch. We establish convergence to a neighborhood of a first-order stationary point at rate $\\mathcal{O}(T^{-1/2})$. Extensive numerical experiments on language and vision models showcase the performance of our algorithm compared to existing methods.

We consider federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning of foundation models, e.g., LLMs and LVMs, using low-rank adaptation (LoRA; ~Hu et al.\ 2022).

Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score. This approach is overly coarse and ignores the diverse scope of skills covered by benchmark datasets. To address this limitation and better exploit benchmark data, we propose SkillEval, a new evaluation framework that performs cross-model, skill-level analysis. The framework integrates advances from two areas: (1) it leverages the meta-cognitive capabilities of LLMs to automatically discover interpretable skills from questions, and (2) it applies cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) from psychometrics to estimate per-skill abilities of LLMs. We conduct experiments on 3,811 LLMs evaluated on 9,523 items across five benchmarks spanning diverse domains (MATH, BBH, GPQA, MuSR, IFEval). Compared to the traditional average-based evaluation paradigm, SkillEval produces reliable, more calibrated and informative yet concise model profiles that more accurately predict model behavior on unseen items. We also demonstrate the utility of SkillEval in two downstream tasks: (1) LLM routing, which dynamically assigns each query to a capable but efficient model, reducing inference cost by over 60% while achieving improved performance, and (2) Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT), where an unseen model can be efficiently evaluated using a trained CDM. Furthermore, we show that these skill profiles provide useful insights, for example, how benchmarks share skills and how instruction-tuned models differ from their base models.

Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score.

Do visual tasks have a relationship, or are they unrelated? For instance, could having surface normals simplify estimating the depth of an image? Intuition answers these questions positively, implying existence of a structure among visual tasks. Knowing this structure has notable values; it is the concept underlying transfer learning and provides a principled way for identifying redundancies across tasks, e.g., to seamlessly reuse supervision among related tasks or solve many tasks in one system without piling up the complexity. We proposes a fully computational approach for modeling the structure of space of visual tasks. This is done via finding (first and higher-order) transfer learning dependencies across a dictionary of twenty six 2D, 2.5D, 3D, and semantic tasks in a latent space. The product is a computational taxonomic map for task transfer learning. We study the consequences of this structure, e.g. nontrivial emerged relationships, and exploit them to reduce the demand for labeled data. For example, we show that the total number of labeled datapoints needed for solving a set of 10 tasks can be reduced by roughly 2/3 (compared to training independently) while keeping the performance nearly the same. We provide a set of tools for computing and probing this taxonomical structure including a solver that users can employ to devise efficient supervision policies for their use cases.

Do visual tasks have a relationship, or are they unrelated?

Safety alignment in instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) depends on a model's ability to reliably refuse harmful or disallowed requests. Recent work has shown that a steering vector can be applied to a dense LLM during inference to suppress refusal behavior and induce responses to harmful requests. We extend this refusal steering method to three open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLMs to decompose and better understand how refusal mechanisms operate across MoE components. We find that steering performance is uninhibited by the complex routing patterns inherent to the MoE architecture, and that a single expert recovers 78% of the full steering effect on average when free to select its own location. However, expert-level steering only recovers 54% on average when constrained to the location used by full-layer steering, a gap that widens further under safety-related system prompts. Our results also show that refusal signals captured by these steering methods differ from those captured by expert routing behavior. Together, these results suggest that refusal behavior is distributed unevenly across the MoE LLM architecture rather than governed by a single unified mechanism.

Safety alignment in instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) depends on a model's ability to reliably refuse harmful or disallowed requests.

Generalizing manipulation policies across robot embodiments remains difficult because standard policies tie the interactions needed for a task to the actions of a particular robot. We study zero-shot cross-embodiment manipulation, where a policy trained on source embodiments must be deployed on a structurally different target embodiment without additional task demonstrations. We introduce Kinematic Interaction Transfer across Embodiments (KITE), which decouples manipulation into embodiment-agnostic interaction prediction and embodiment-specific kinematic decoding, connected through a learned representation of interaction intent based on contact patterns. An interaction policy is trained to predict the intent using demonstration data only collected on a source robot, and shared across morphologically different target robots. A kinematic decoder realizes these intents by learning from synthetic data generated from each embodiment's kinematic model. Through such decoupling, KITE can robustly transfer learned skills to a new embodiment given only its kinematic model, without recollecting any task-specific demonstration data. We evaluate KITE on four manipulation tasks in simulation and the real world spanning transfer between parallel grippers, dexterous hands, and composite embodiments. KITE successfully achieves zero-shot transfer to structurally different target embodiments, and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Project website: https://kite-manip.github.io/.

Generalizing manipulation policies across robot embodiments remains difficult because standard policies tie the interactions needed for a task to the actions of a particular robot.

Large retail chains must tailor assortment and pricing decisions to local customer preferences, yet even retailers with extensive sales records often have limited data for estimating demand at the store or local market level, particularly in product categories with short selling windows. Local estimation (fitting a demand model for each store on its own) can therefore be unreliable, while pooling data across stores improves estimation precision at the cost of ignoring local demand heterogeneity. We study how retailers can balance these competing effects through transfer learning under a multinomial logit (MNL) demand model. We propose a shrinkage estimator that combines store-specific demand estimates with information pooled from other stores. Unlike the linear or quadratic settings underlying much of the existing theoretical literature on information transfer in operations, the nonlinear MNL likelihood does not admit a straightforward bias-variance decomposition. By exploiting its self-concordant-like properties, we establish finite-sample performance guarantees that characterize when information transfer improves demand estimation and how the appropriate degree of shrinkage depends on local sample size, feature dimensionality, and cross-store heterogeneity. We further derive regret bounds for downstream assortment and pricing decisions. Numerical experiments demonstrate the operational benefits of shrinkage across different data environments. An empirical study using data from several hundred stores of a European apparel retailer shows that shrinkage improves out-of-sample product prioritization and revenue capture relative to both local estimation and full pooling. Our findings demonstrate how retailers can leverage information across their store networks to improve revenue management decisions while preserving local demand differences.

Large retail chains must tailor assortment and pricing decisions to local customer preferences, yet even retailers with extensive sales records often have limited data for estimating demand at the store or local market level, particularly in product categories with short selling windows.

We present our solution to the AKBC LM-KBC 2026 Shared Task, where we achieved a score of 0.6836 on the official leaderboard, more than double the baseline of 0.2964. This task requires generating all possible objects for subject-relation pairs using a language model with up to 32 billion parameters, with no retrieval or fine-tuning involved. We show that the prompting methodology is as important as the model architecture: while the instruction-tuned model version achieves 0.5681 with its chat interface, the base model achieves 0.6836 when prompted using text completion. Thus, instruction tuning decreases factual recall; we refer to this effect as the instruction tax, which is caused by the model's weights rather than the prompting method. Our final solution is fairly straightforward: we prompt the base model with some examples from the training data, generate 64--256 outputs, and retain only the repeated ones. Two specialized methods are then applied for each relation: one improves the recall of large answer sets, and the other verifies a person's vitality before predicting their place of death.

We present our solution to the AKBC LM-KBC 2026 Shared Task, where we achieved a score of 0.6836 on the official leaderboard, more than double the baseline of 0.2964.

In reinforcement learning, one presumes the action set to be known ahead of time, and, thus, one must know if any state-action pairs are not permissible ahead of computations. In some applications, determining this action mask is the main computational bottleneck. Isolating this problem to highlight its core properties, we study how to combine the search for an optimal policy with the learning of the mask itself, under a linear MDP model in which each attempted action reveals the exact value of a linear score determining its validity. In this framework, we first construct an algorithm based on deterministic optimistic optimization and show that it is minimax optimal, which we show is also computationally efficient. However, it is sub-optimal on non-degenerate instances, as we show. We propose an alternative, which is also computationally efficient, which plans its exploration strategy. This algorithm admits a formal interpretation as an analogue of information-directed-sampling for deterministic feedback, which may be of independent interest. Finally, we study an application of this framework to transfer learning, where the invalid action set changes over time.

In reinforcement learning, one presumes the action set to be known ahead of time, and, thus, one must know if any state-action pairs are not permissible ahead of computations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporally grounded reasoning because their static parametric memory is misaligned with the dynamic evolution of real-world knowledge. Although RAG and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) provide practical ways to enhance LLMs, they remain insufficient for temporal reasoning. Existing retrieval methods typically prioritize semantic relevance while overlooking temporal validity, event order, and evolutionary dependencies, resulting in evidence that is relevant in isolation but temporally fragmented. Meanwhile, conventional PEFT methods usually employ fixed and input-agnostic low-rank updates, making it difficult to capture time-dependent entity semantics and relation drift. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Evidence-Parameter Co-Alignment (TEPCA), a framework for LLM reasoning over TKGs. TEPCA aligns LLM reasoning with temporal knowledge at both the evidence and parameter levels. At the evidence level, it introduces time-constrained Dynamic Relevance-Guided Path (DRGP) pruning to preserve globally coherent temporal paths, together with Mutual-Information (MI)-based pruning to retain query-informative local facts under temporal constraints. At the parameter level, it integrates Dynamic-Gated LoRA (DG-LoRA), a timestamp-conditioned low-rank adaptation mechanism that dynamically modulates the effective adaptation subspace according to temporal context. This design enables LLMs to better capture fine-grained entity evolution and time-dependent relation semantics while preserving parameter efficiency. Experimental results on two TKG benchmarks demonstrate that TEPCA achieves state-of-the-art performance. Additional evaluations of DG-LoRA on eight commonsense QA datasets further verify its general input-adaptive capacity, scalability across LLM backbones, and interpretability.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporally grounded reasoning because their static parametric memory is misaligned with the dynamic evolution of real-world knowledge.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance through instruction tuning, yet real-world deployment often requires continual capability expansion across sequential tasks. In such scenarios, Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) aims to acquire new capabilities while limiting catastrophic forgetting. Existing methods mainly follow a module-composition paradigm: they maintain task-level prompts or LoRA experts and dynamically route or aggregate a subset of them at inference. However, samples within the same task can still differ substantially in visual scenes, question intents, and reasoning demands. This motivates instance-level adaptation to individual query-image pairs rather than only selecting or combining task-level modules. To this end, we propose DRAPE (Dynamic Cross-Modal Prompt Generation), a prompt-learning framework that synthesizes continuous instance-specific soft prompts for MCIT. Instead of selecting prompts from a fixed pool, DRAPE derives prompt queries from the textual instruction and cross-attends to visual patch features, producing prompts conditioned on query-image pairs that are prepended to the frozen LLM. To mitigate forgetting during sequential updates, DRAPE applies null-space gradient projection to the shared projector and uses CLIP-based prototype routing for task-label-free generator selection at inference. Extensive experiments on MCIT benchmarks show that DRAPE achieves state-of-the-art performance among representative prompt-based and LoRA-based continual-learning baselines. Code is available at: https://github.com/LAMDA-CL/NeurIPS2026-Drape.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance through instruction tuning, yet real-world deployment often requires continual capability expansion across sequential tasks.

Learning rate schedules are typically fixed before training begins, yet when fine-tuning large language models with low-rank adapters (LoRA), the appropriate scale varies substantially with the model, task, and adapter configuration. Practitioners re-tune a schedule for every new problem, yet a tuned schedule still cannot react to the training dynamics it encounters. We instead amortize learning rate selection across LoRA fine-tuning problems. We leave the base optimizer, Muon, untouched, so that its normalized update fixes the direction, and meta-learn only the global step size. Our method MuPACE is a small recurrent policy, meta-trained across a distribution of fine-tuning runs, that conditions on the observed trajectory and emits bounded adjustments to an interpretable analytic schedule. On 64 fine-tuning problems, MuPACE outperforms standard fixed schedules at a strong shared default on 64-78% of problems and is on par with the same schedules with per-task tuned peaks. Meta-trained only on models with up to 16 layers, MuPACE transfers one-shot to unseen tasks on models as deep as 64 layers, such as Qwen3-32B and Qwen3.8-27B, where a single run remains competitive with swept schedules.

Learning rate schedules are typically fixed before training begins, yet when fine-tuning large language models with low-rank adapters (LoRA), the appropriate scale varies substantially with the model, task, and adapter configuration.