AI4Science 论文速递

Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safe deployment of large language models (LLMs) in scientific question answering, where long-form outputs exceed practical human verification at scale. We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for UQ calibration in long-form, reasoning-demanding scientific QA, evaluating four UQ methods on 685,000 responses across up to 20 LLMs and seven datasets, supported by an extensible open-source framework whose shared-generation design enables reproducible cross-method comparisons. Instruction tuning is shown to associate with systematic token probability polarization, collapsing confidence distributions and undermining the reliability of token-level uncertainty signals. Reasoning model families diverge: some reproduce this polarization while others actively mitigate it, a pattern that clusters by provider and suggests training pipeline design as a key differentiating factor. Verbalized and token-aggregation sequence-level methods fail systematically. Only semantic consistency, as measured by consistency of the final answer, yields well-calibrated outputs, providing the first large-scale evidence that semantic calibration persists in multi-step, dependency-rich reasoning settings.

Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safe deployment of large language models (LLMs) in scientific question answering, where long-form outputs exceed practical human verification at scale.

On the named Prisoner's Dilemma under direct prompting, three larger instruction-tuned models, Llama-3-70B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Qwen2.5-72B, lock at full cooperation, the metric's maximum distance from Nash with zero variance across replicates, while Llama-3-8B plays near-Nash. Opening the models, a logit-lens analysis finds a distributed cooperative override. Intermediate readouts lean toward the Nash action through roughly three quarters of network depth before a late surge toward cooperation, and the final layer settles the contest. The size of that final correction, not the surge, rank-matches chain-of-thought behavior across scale and two architectures. In the 8B the override is a single causally controllable direction in the residual stream; steering it dials the decision, and clamping its component at one position of one layer moves the choice strictly monotonically, Spearman rho = 1.000, with generation fluent. The circuit is lexical. It survives name removal and payoff rescaling but disengages when Cooperate and Defect are replaced with neutral labels, and on 48 payoff-random games with neutral surfaces no model locks cooperative on any dilemma or shows general equilibrium competence. In mixed-model populations a single Nash-playing agent collapses cooperation contagiously. What suppresses Nash play in large language models is a word-triggered circuit rather than missing competence, and it can be measured, bounded, and controlled.

On the named Prisoner's Dilemma under direct prompting, three larger instruction-tuned models, Llama-3-70B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Qwen2.5-72B, lock at full cooperation, the metric's maximum distance from Nash with zero variance across replicates, while Llama-3-8B plays near-Nash.

Modern deep learning models achieve impressive generalization through over-parameterization, but this paradigm often struggles with overfitting and memorization in few-shot regimes. Neural Cellular Automata (NCAs) offer a highly parameter-efficient alternative, yet research has focused primarily on their output, leaving the role of their internal hidden channels largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate the internal dynamics of NCA hidden channels and introduce a novel transfer-learning mechanism that injects a pretrained teacher's hidden states into a student model to guide early optimization. Evaluated on few-shot and scale-variant MNIST benchmarks, NCAs outperform comparable recurrent and feed-forward architectures, demonstrating superior generalization with a minimal parameter budget (~9,800 parameters). Mechanistic analysis reveals that the hidden channels decouple feature extraction from uniform classification consensus by absorbing morphological complexity and converging to mutually orthogonal states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these hidden channels capture general, scale-invariant topological primitives rather than class-specific templates. This allows a student model to achieve strong few-shot performance on unseen classes using features transferred from a teacher trained only on a subset of digits (0-5). Our results highlight the potential of utilizing hidden-state dynamics as a robust, decentralized computational substrate for parameter-efficient transfer learning

Modern deep learning models achieve impressive generalization through over-parameterization, but this paradigm often struggles with overfitting and memorization in few-shot regimes.

Emergency department (ED) decision-making relies on heterogeneous clinical information, including patient history, vital signs, laboratory results, and electrocardiograms (ECGs). Vision--language models (VLMs) can jointly process these modalities, but strong predictive performance does not necessarily imply meaningful use of the correct patient's ECG. We term this failure mode ECG Mirage: apparent multimodal capability without useful dependence on patient-specific ECG information. We distinguish two forms: ECG neglect, where ECGs provide little predictive benefit, and ECG confusion, where matched ECGs outperform no-image inputs but not mismatched ECGs. To evaluate these behaviours, we compare predictions obtained with matched ECGs, outcome-discordant mismatched ECGs, and no-image inputs while holding the clinical text and prediction targets fixed. Across four VLMs on MDS-ED, matched ECGs provide no consistent advantage for either ICU admission or clinical deterioration prediction. We then train four restricted visual prompts using supervised learning followed by conditional direct preference optimisation, while keeping the VLM backbone frozen. The resulting models achieve balanced accuracies of 70.6% for ICU admission and 67.5% for deterioration and increase the matched-versus-mismatched performance gap to approximately 16.5 and 5.5 percentage points, respectively. Overall, our study identifies ECG Mirage in multimodal clinical prediction and introduces visual prompt tuning as an efficient mitigation strategy.

Emergency department (ED) decision-making relies on heterogeneous clinical information, including patient history, vital signs, laboratory results, and electrocardiograms (ECGs).

Instance discrimination learns visual representations by treating different augmented views of the same image as positive pairs. While this encourages invariance to handcrafted transformations, same-image positives can preserve nuisance correlations such as background, texture, illumination, and object-specific details. Semantic positive pairs, i.e., different same-class instances, may reduce these correlations by presenting objects across diverse contexts. However, previous studies often combine semantic pairs with augmented positives or false neighbors (i.e., incorrectly mapped semantic pairs), making it difficult to isolate the effect of semantic pairing. We present a controlled empirical study of semantic positive pairs for self-supervised representation learning. From ImageNet-1K, we construct two matched subsets: an augmented-pair baseline and a manually curated semantic-pair dataset with the same class composition and training-pair count. We use these datasets to compare representative contrastive and non-contrastive SSL methods under matched training conditions. Across transfer learning and object detection evaluations, semantic-pair pretraining consistently improves generalisation over augmented-pair pretraining. Additional ablations show that semantic pairs induce invariances beyond the standard transformation pipeline. Among the evaluated methods, contrastive learning benefits most strongly from semantic pairs, with SimCLR showing the largest relative improvement. These results clarify the role of semantic positive pairs in SSL and provide guidance for selecting and designing frameworks that can exploit semantic pair information effectively.

Instance discrimination learns visual representations by treating different augmented views of the same image as positive pairs.

Large Language Model (LLM) alignment is commonly achieved through supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, both of which require labeled or preference data and update model weights. Without targeted cultural adaptation, however, deployed LLMs often exhibit culturally homogeneous behavior that fails to reflect diverse local values. Aligning models to cultural value frameworks such as Hofstede's Value Survey Module (VSM13) presents a distinct challenge: alignment signals are available only as aggregated survey-level scores computed after generating responses to an entire survey, providing no per-token gradient and requiring no preference data by construction. This makes standard gradient-based alignment methods ill-suited to the task. We propose a deployment-friendly approach that encodes cultural behavior in short, tunable soft prompts optimized with Differential Evolution (DE), while keeping model weights frozen and requiring no preference data. At inference, the system inserts the appropriate cultural-specific prompt to adapt model responses for different cultures. Experiments across four countries and four instruction-tuned models show that DE-optimized prompts generally reduce discrepancy with VSM13 reference profiles, improve rank agreement with the World Values Survey (WVS), an independent framework not seen during optimization, and are preferred in blinded pairwise evaluations using majority voting across three LLM judges.

Large Language Model (LLM) alignment is commonly achieved through supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, both of which require labeled or preference data and update model weights.

Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks but have recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence, which may manifest in less diverse supporting rationales for incorrect answers. However, whether such overconfidence is associated with rationale consistency remains an open question. In this paper, we study whether changes in the lexical diversity of generated answer rationales accompany changes in model confidence induced by instruction tuning. We evaluate three matched base and instruction-tuned models across question-answering benchmarks and find that instruction tuning consistently increases answer confidence, despite limited changes in predictive accuracy, while degrading likelihood-based calibration. Secondly, we observe a non-uniform effect of instruction tuning on rationale diversity: cross-rationale diversity consistently decreases, whereas surface-level lexical diversity varies in both direction and magnitude across models and benchmarks. Finally, we find that these differences persist after controlling for answer selection and rationale length, confirming that confidence and rationale diversity capture distinct effects of instruction tuning.

Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks but have recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence, which may manifest in less diverse supporting rationales for incorrect answers.

Multi-label few-shot learning (MLFSL) remains a significant challenge in medical image analysis (MIA). Current metric-based meta-learning methods face two critical limitations in MIA. First, conventional prototype generation often entangles irrelevant disease information, leading to contaminated prototypes and degraded performance. Second, prior studies typically enforce inter-class separability in embedding space, largely neglecting the inherent correlations among diseases. To overcome these challenges, we propose Prototype Purification and Regulation (PPR), a novel MLFSL framework for MIA. PPR first performs prototype purification by leveraging sample-level comorbidity scores to emphasize disease-specific features, producing purified prototypes that better characterize each disease. Building upon these purified prototypes, PPR further addresses the underexplored problem of inter-class prototype distance in MIA by incorporating disease-level comorbidity statistics to adaptively regulate inter-class similarity, forming a comorbidity-aware embedding space. Overall, PPR sequentially enables the model to capture pure disease features and inter-class relationships for reliable MLFSL in MIA. Extensive experiments across four chest X-ray benchmark datasets, including cross-domain evaluation, show that PPR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, significantly improving disease detection while demonstrating robust generalization and clinical applicability.

Multi-label few-shot learning (MLFSL) remains a significant challenge in medical image analysis (MIA).

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly trained to abstain from answering questions they are unsure about. However, this ability is often misused: in real-world applications, user prompts sometimes contain uncertainty elements, and driven by this, LLMs are inclined to abstain even on problems they are capable of solving. We argue that LLM abstention is not only an expression of genuine uncertainty; it is also an artifact that can be largely influenced by prompts. We name this phenomenon *Abstention Inflation*. We add "Unknown" as an extra option for LLMs to choose from; experiments show serious accuracy drops on True/False Questions (TFQs). Replacing "Unknown" with an unrelated random word produces an identical effect. We argue that LLMs are trained to imitate the surface pattern of *abstention*, rather than to express genuine uncertainty. Based on eleven experimental settings, we support four claims that form a progressive argument: **(C1)** *Abstention Inflation* can be triggered by the presence of an extra option, not by genuine uncertainty; **(C2)** further, it makes the model deny it can answer even when it can; **(C3)** at the representation level, this manifests as a later-layer output override; **(C4)** finally, this bias is stable across repeated sampling and option positions, emerges through instruction tuning, and is mitigated at larger model sizes.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly trained to abstain from answering questions they are unsure about.

Prior work has shown that internal harmfulness representations in large language models vary across risk categories, while sharing a common general harm representation component. This raises a question about the role of the category-specific component beyond general harm representation in LLM safety. To answer this question, we isolate the category-specific component by removing shared general harmfulness representation from each categorical harmfulness representation, yielding a category residual that is orthogonal to general harmfulness at every layer. Using activation steering with category residuals across 11 risk categories in 3 instruction-tuned LLMs, we find that whether category residuals encode harmfulness varies across categories, and that this category-wise pattern is similar across models. Whether category residuals induce refusal also varies across categories, but this category-wise pattern is more model-dependent. We also find that category residuals increase LLMs' downstream internal alignment with shared general harmfulness representation. Together, these findings demonstrate that more fine-grained category residuals should also be considered beyond shared general harmfulness representation to fully understand LLM safety. More broadly, our findings show that even a direction orthogonal to a concept at one layer can contribute to the concept's downstream amplification.

Prior work has shown that internal harmfulness representations in large language models vary across risk categories, while sharing a common general harm representation component.

To perform few-shot learning, language models extract signals from a few input-label pairs, aggregate them into a learned prediction rule, and apply this rule to new inputs. How is this implemented in the forward pass of modern transformer models? To explore this question, we study a structured family of few-shot learning tasks for which the true prediction rule is to add an integer $k$ to the input. We introduce a novel method that localizes the model's few-shot learning ability to only a few attention heads. This method and the findings generalize to four additional task families spanning arithmetic and semantic tasks. We then perform an in-depth analysis of individual heads via dimensionality reduction and decomposition of the heads' output spaces. For example, in Llama-3-8B-Instruct, we reduce the mechanism underlying these tasks to just three attention heads with six-dimensional subspaces, in which four dimensions track the units digit using trigonometric functions with periods $2$, $5$, and $10$, while two dimensions track magnitude using low-frequency components. To deepen our understanding of this mechanism, we also derive a mathematical identity relating the ''aggregator'' and ''extractor'' subspaces of attention heads, allowing us to track the flow of information from individual examples to a final aggregated concept. Our results demonstrate how tracking low-dimensional subspaces of localized heads throughout a forward pass can provide insight into fine-grained computational structures in language models. Our code is available at https://github.com/xyVickyHu/addition-subspaces.

To perform few-shot learning, language models extract signals from a few input-label pairs, aggregate them into a learned prediction rule, and apply this rule to new inputs.

We introduce Exemplar Partitioning (EP), an unsupervised method for building interpretable feature dictionaries from large language model activations. An EP dictionary is a Voronoi partition of activation space, built by leader-clustering streamed activations within a distance threshold. Each region is defined by an observed exemplar and an average of its member activations, which define region membership and provide directions for intervention. Dictionary size is determined by the activation stream at the chosen threshold rather than pre-selected. Exemplars link regions to observed inputs, allowing dictionaries built from the same input stream to be compared across layers, training checkpoints, and architectures. We demonstrate how EP can be used to interpret and intervene on model behaviour, track changes in activation space through training, and detect hidden concepts. Comparing EP dictionaries on base and instruction-tuned Gemma-2-2B and Llama-3.1-8B reveals that instruction tuning reorganises harmful prompt activations similarly across the two models, but at different granularities. Interventions on these regions make both models answer harmful requests they previously refused. In 19 of 21 Taboo models trained to hide a secret word, EP finds new regions that do not exist in the base model, whose decoded tokens relate to the known secret on inspection. Although EP assigns each token to a single region, linear probes built from EP regions achieve up to $90.5\%$ of full-activation probe accuracy. On AxBench concept detection at Gemma-2-2B-it layer 20, EP achieves the highest mean AUROC of all unsupervised methods ($0.937$), outperforming SAE-A ($0.911$) and approaching supervised probes ($0.946$). Building EP dictionaries is fast and cheap: EP uses $\sim 10^3$ times fewer construction tokens than comparable SAEs.

We introduce Exemplar Partitioning (EP), an unsupervised method for building interpretable feature dictionaries from large language model activations.

Large language models (LLMs) often generate plausible yet incorrect answers, posing risks in safety-critical settings such as medicine. Human evaluation is expensive, and LLM-as-judge approaches risk introducing hidden errors. Recent single-pass white-box methods detect contextual hallucinations using linear probes over model internals, but their generalization to out-of-domain, out-of-task, and training-free settings remains poorly understood. We introduce HeadEntropy, a method that predicts answer correctness by measuring how susceptible each attention head's pattern is to modification under further gradient updates. The key insight is that the trace of the softmax Jacobian is a monotonic function of 2-Renyi entropy, linking attention spread to gradient stability during training, even without the reference annotation. With no training, HeadEntropy reaches 0.736 AUROC, outperforms every training-free baseline in paired comparison and matches a hidden-state probe out-of-domain, at under 1% of inference cost. We evaluate broadly across 5 instruction-tuned LLMs and 5 datasets spanning general knowledge, multi-hop reasoning, mathematical reasoning, claim verification, and medicine. The code is available at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/HeadEntropy.

Large language models (LLMs) often generate plausible yet incorrect answers, posing risks in safety-critical settings such as medicine.

Data assimilation (DA) for compressible flows with shocks is challenging because many classical DA methods generate spurious oscillations and nonphysical features near uncertain shocks. We focus here on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). We show that the poor performance of the EnKF may be attributed to the bimodal forecast distribution that can arise in the vicinity of an uncertain shock location; this violates the assumptions underpinning the EnKF, which assume a forecast which is close to Gaussian. To address this issue we introduce the new neural EnKF. The basic idea is to systematically embed neural function approximations within ensemble DA by mapping the forecast ensemble of shocked flows to the parameter space (weights and biases) of a deep neural network (NN) and to subsequently perform DA in that space. The nonlinear mapping encodes sharp and smooth flow features in an ensemble of NN parameters. Neural EnKF updates are therefore well-behaved only if the NN parameters vary smoothly within the neural representation of the forecast ensemble. We show that such a smooth variation of network parameters can be enforced via physics-informed transfer learning, and demonstrate that in so-doing the neural EnKF avoids the spurious oscillations and nonphysical features that plague the EnKF. The applicability of the neural EnKF is demonstrated through a series of systematic numerical experiments with the inviscid Burgers' equation, the Sod shock tube, and a two-dimensional blast wave.

Data assimilation (DA) for compressible flows with shocks is challenging because many classical DA methods generate spurious oscillations and nonphysical features near uncertain shocks.

Businesses increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to automate simple repetitive tasks instead of developing custom machine learning models. LLMs require few, if any, training examples and can be utilized by users without expertise in model development. However, this comes at the cost of substantially higher resource and energy consumption compared to smaller models, which often achieve similar predictive performance for simple tasks. In this paper, we present our vision for just-in-time model replacement (JITR), where, upon identifying a recurring task in calls to an LLM, the model is replaced transparently with a cheaper alternative that performs well for this specific task. JITR retains the ease of use and low development effort of LLMs, while saving significant cost and energy. We discuss the main challenges in realizing our vision regarding the identification of recurring tasks and the creation of a custom model. Specifically, we argue that model search and transfer learning will play a crucial role in JITR to efficiently identify and fine-tune models for a recurring task. Using our JITR prototype Poodle, we reduce inference time by up to 7.5x compared to a self- hosted LLM and save more than $2,200 per 1M requests compared to a flagship hosted LLM, while achieving accuracy competitive with the LLM baseline.

Businesses increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to automate simple repetitive tasks instead of developing custom machine learning models.

Fine-tuning foundation models on new tasks inevitably suffer from catastrophic forgetting. While existing works attempt to mitigate this on the basis of parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, they adopted an overly restrictive Subspace Orthogonality condition. In this paper, we introduce a purely post-hoc and tuning-agnostic weight rectification framework that achieves Parameter Space Orthogonality, which is the necessary and sufficient condition for preserving historical performance to the first order. By projecting parameter updates into the JAcobian NUll Space (JANUS), our method significantly recovers compromised historical knowledge without interfering with the underlying fine-tuning process. To overcome the local validity of the Jacobian approximation, we further propose a Multi-step Adaptive Rectification mechanism that utilizes the JANUS shift to dynamically verify the valid trust region and adjust step sizes. Coupled with our proposed ghost projection, ghost orientation comparison, and sequence-level singular value decomposition compression techniques, JANUS also achieves great temporal and spatial efficiency. Experiments demonstrate that JANUS seamlessly integrates with various fine-tuning methods, significantly mitigating the stability-plasticity dilemma by recovering historical knowledge while preserving downstream task adaptation.

Fine-tuning foundation models on new tasks inevitably suffer from catastrophic forgetting.

Data attribution methods using gradient similarity are widely used to analyze and select training data for large language models, but what gradient similarity actually measures is debated. Some interpret it as identifying task-relevant skills, while other work reports that surface form is the main factor. We resolve this debate for supervised fine-tuning examples by varying task and answer format independently. Specifically, we render benchmarks in different answer formats, such that datasets can share a task without a format or a format without a task. We find that gradient alignment follows the answer format, as benchmark pairs sharing an answer format align strongly (disattenuated cosine near 0.4), while same benchmarks rendered with different answer format classes show no alignment (near 0.0). We demonstrate that this ordering holds from the earliest pretraining checkpoints through post-training, and across model scales and families. We then analyze the released selections of LESS, a gradient-based data selection method for instruction tuning, and find that each target's selections over-represent the target's own answer format. Hence, we demonstrate that gradient-based attribution methods track format similarity more than task semantics, meaning that such methods, as well as the semantic interpretation of the gradient, should be tested on data where answer format and task vary independently for greater robustness and reliability.

Data attribution methods using gradient similarity are widely used to analyze and select training data for large language models, but what gradient similarity actually measures is debated.

In mental health care, reasoning over patient journeys is a key task for clinicians. Yet these journeys, encompassing a longitudinal progression of biological, psychological, and social events, are often spread across disparate unstructured text narratives, making temporal recovery challenging. We present CliniCIRCA, a multi-stage LLM framework for Calendar-anchored, Imprecision-aware Reconstruction of Clinical Annals. To our knowledge, CliniCIRCA is the first to temporally classify clinical events across unstructured discharge summaries without event-level timestamps. From 14,882 MIMIC-III mental health admissions, we first construct a benchmark of 52 discharge summaries on which CliniCIRCA produces 15,891 temporally tagged events. After correcting 629 errors based on a clinician-in-the-loop evaluation, we produce verified gold-standard labels. Finally, the corrected timelines drive a temporally grounded summarization stage that compresses each source 1.52 times into a date-grouped chronological record. We then scale the framework to generate 1,000 silver-standard timelines and evaluate them as training data. Compared with zero- and few-shot prompting, instruction tuning generally improves five open-weight models on event extraction, temporal tagging, and summarization across silver and clinician-verified evaluations.

In mental health care, reasoning over patient journeys is a key task for clinicians.

We propose Ambient Dataloops, an iterative framework for refining datasets that makes it easier for diffusion models to learn the underlying data distribution. Modern datasets contain samples of highly varying quality, and training directly on such heterogeneous data often yields suboptimal models. We propose a dataset-model co-evolution process; at each iteration of our method, the dataset becomes progressively higher quality, and the model improves accordingly. To avoid destructive self-consuming loops, at each generation, we treat the synthetically improved samples as noisy, but at a slightly lower noisy level than the previous iteration, and we use Ambient Diffusion techniques for learning under corruption. Empirically, Ambient Dataloops achieve state-of-the-art performance in unconditional and text-conditional image generation and de novo protein design. We further provide a theoretical justification for the proposed framework that captures the benefits of the data looping procedure.

We propose Ambient Dataloops, an iterative framework for refining datasets that makes it easier for diffusion models to learn the underlying data distribution.

Activation steering promises modular control of language model behavior: a behavior such as politeness corresponds to a direction in a model's activations, and adding that direction while it generates should switch the behavior on and leave everything else alone. It does not. We ask what decides which other behaviors move, and by how much, and find that it is the model rather than the behavior being steered. A steer relaxes the model toward a small set of behaviors it already favors, chiefly refusal, sycophancy, and poeticism, and that set is much the same whatever is steered. Three results across 24 behaviors and ten instruction-tuned models support this, every effect read off the generated text by a language-model judge rather than off a probe. That readout matters: all 24 behaviors are linearly decodable, but only 20 change what the model writes. First, a direction carrying no behavioral content, matched to a real steer only in the size of the vector it adds, moves the same behaviors in the same order as real steers do, while producing none of the behaviors that need a specific direction. Second, most interference runs one way, so it cannot be an overlap between two directions: steering profanity makes the model toxic, while steering toxicity leaves profanity untouched. Third, with a behavior held out entirely, geometry measured on the others explains almost none of the interference it takes part in. The account holds on all ten models, the pull toward defaults strongest below 10B parameters and weakening in each family's largest. Reading a steer as a perturbation whose endpoint the model fixes implies that disentangling behavior directions cannot by itself make steering modular.

Activation steering promises modular control of language model behavior: a behavior such as politeness corresponds to a direction in a model's activations, and adding that direction while it generates should switch the behavior on and leave everything else alone.

Owing to the unprecedented capability in semantic understanding and logical reasoning, large language models (LLMs) have shown fantastic potential in developing next-generation sequential recommender systems (RSs). However, existing LLM-based sequential RSs mostly separate index generation from sequential recommendation, leading to insufficient integration between semantic information and collaborative information. On the other hand, the neglect of user-related information hinders LLM-based sequential RSs from exploiting high-order user-item interaction patterns. In this paper, we propose the End-to-End Dual Dynamic (ED$^2$) recommender, the first LLM-based sequential RS which adopts dual dynamic index mechanism, targeting resolving the above limitations simultaneously. The dual dynamic index mechanism can not only assembly index generation and sequential recommendation into a unified LLM-backbone pipeline, but also make it practical for LLM-based sequential recommender to take advantage of user-related information. Specifically, to facilitate the LLM comprehension ability to dual dynamic index, we propose a multigrained token regulator which constructs alignment supervision based on LLMs semantic knowledge across multiple representation granularities. Moreover, the associated user collection data and a series of novel instruction tuning tasks are specially customized to capture the high-order user-item interaction patterns. Extensive experiments on three public datasets demonstrate the superiority of ED$^2$, achieving an average improvement of 19.62% in Hit-Rate and 21.11% in NDCG.

Owing to the unprecedented capability in semantic understanding and logical reasoning, large language models (LLMs) have shown fantastic potential in developing next-generation sequential recommender systems (RSs).

Reconstructing who infected whom often relies on case timing and published transmission links. However, two important questions remain: can a temporal pattern learned from other diseases transfer to a new outbreak, and how reliable are the transmission links used as ground truth? We learned a temporal prior from eleven disease groups using logistic regression. The model was locked before any target-outbreak data were accessed and was then tested without refitting on 29 Andes virus (ANDV) parent-ranking tasks. The locked prior achieved a mean reciprocal rank (MRR) of 0.571, compared with 0.274 for the strongest fair source-trained temporal baseline (permutation p<0.001). Its Top-1 accuracy was 37.9%, compared with 13.8%. The MRR advantage remained significant unless 7-8 favorable task outcomes were reversed. We separately examined the reliability of published transmission links. Among 75 epidemiologically linked inter-host pairs from the 2022 New York City mpox outbreak, 54.67% were genomically unresolved or unsupported as direct transmission links (exact 95% CI: 42.75-66.21%). We also tested whether retaining uncertain transmission edges changed source prioritization. In ANDV and Guangdong Delta outbreak graphs, the top-5 priority sets changed, with Jaccard similarity ranging from 0.429 to 0.667. These results show that temporal information learned across diseases can provide a useful ranking signal without target-specific refitting. They also show that uncertainty in published transmission links can affect which source cases are prioritized for investigation.

Reconstructing who infected whom often relies on case timing and published transmission links.

Large language models act as strategic agents and models of human choice, yet choosing like a strategic agent does not mean computing like one. We recorded activations from four open-weight models --- dense and mixture-of-experts, including a matched base--instruct pair --- in one-shot play of 144 strict ordinal $2\times2$ games. We followed a prespecified incentive from prompt, through activations, to choice. Dense models mirrored the unadjusted human decline with game complexity. Incentive and choice were detectable in every model, but models differed in whether incentive reached the choice, aligned with it and, where tested, whether strengthening it shifted preference. The base and instruction-tuned Qwen2.5 models chose almost identically at baseline yet differed in whether incentive reached choice. Fixed decision cues were distinguishable internally but changed choices selectively. Similar behaviour can rest on different computation; post-training can reshape the path from represented incentive to decision while leaving behaviour and decodable information largely intact.

Large language models act as strategic agents and models of human choice, yet choosing like a strategic agent does not mean computing like one.

Transfer learning involves taking information and insight from one problem domain and applying it to a new problem domain. Although widely used in practice, theory for transfer learning remains less well-developed. To address this, we prove several novel results related to transfer learning, showing the need to carefully select which sets of information to transfer and the need for dependence between transferred information and target problems. Furthermore, we prove how the degree of probabilistic change in an algorithm using transfer learning places an upper bound on the amount of improvement possible. These results build on the algorithmic search framework for machine learning, allowing the results to apply to a wide range of learning problems using transfer.

Transfer learning involves taking information and insight from one problem domain and applying it to a new problem domain.

Wildfire spread is traditionally predicted using physics-based simulators, which are physically interpretable but whose cost increases with each additional ensemble member. We ask how well deep learning surrogates can reproduce these simulations at a fraction of this cost, training them on 10,584 fire spread simulations at 2m resolution for the Rectoret region in Catalonia, Spain. Four architectures are compared: a patch-based U-Net, a transfer-learned ResNet-50, a physics-informed network constrained by the wind-driven advection equation and a Swin-Unet transformer. Among the terrain and vegetation variables, only surface fuel load predicts burn probability with any strength (r = 0.27) and including it lowers prediction error by 21%. The remaining variables correlate weakly and are highly duplicative. Next, an experiment with saliency, occlusion and rotation demonstrates the models' learning. Convolutional models rely primarily on distance from the current fire front, while Swin-Unet assigns more weight to fuel and terrain, a finding also noted in an unrelated wildfire dataset. When applied without retraining to the second region, Pedriza, all three convolutional models still predict fire spread, losing accuracy by a small but systematic margin.

Wildfire spread is traditionally predicted using physics-based simulators, which are physically interpretable but whose cost increases with each additional ensemble member.

Large Language Models have achieved remarkable performance across a large number of tasks, but face critical deployment and usage barriers due to substantial computational requirements. Model compression methods, which aim to reduce model size while preserving its capacity, are an important means to mitigate these issues. Promising approaches along these lines, such as structured pruning, typically require costly manual hyperparameter exploration or rely on local heuristics that may run the risk of ignoring better solutions. In this work we introduce GeLaCo, an evolutionary approach to LLM compression via layer collapse. Our approach supports an efficient exploration of the compression solution space via population-based search and a novel layer collapse formulation based on parametrized weight merging, with a fitness function based on similarity over residual updates and language modeling KL divergence. GeLaCo also supports both single and multi-objective evolutionary compression search, establishing the first Pareto front estimation along compression and quality axes. We evaluate GeLaCo solutions via both perplexity-based and generative evaluations over foundational and instruction-tuned models, outperforming state-of-the-art alternatives.

Large Language Models have achieved remarkable performance across a large number of tasks, but face critical deployment and usage barriers due to substantial computational requirements.

Online task-free continual learning (TFCL) requires intelligent agents to sequentially accumulate knowledge from an unbounded, non-stationary data stream under strict single-pass constraints and without any explicit task identifiers. Existing online TFCL paradigms primarily rely on parameter-efficient prompt tuning or dynamic structure expansion driven by training-coupled optimization dynamics, such as empirical loss fluctuations or evolving latent distances. As a result, these training-coupled solvers remain agnostic to the structural origins of distribution drift, mechanically enforcing a fixed strategy across fundamentally distinct streaming variations. To address this gap, we propose LargeMonitor, a framework that leverages large pretrained foundation models to autonomously orchestrate task-free continuous adaptation. Specifically, LargeMonitor introduces a decoupled detection module utilizing the frozen, stable representation space of large vision models (LVMs) to achieve robust, zero-shot drift detection without training-dependent interference or brittle threshold tuning. Upon a confirmed drift, the framework activates a context-aware diagnostic module driven by large multimodal models (LMMs) to interpret the precise semantic etiologies of the stream variation (e.g., novel class emergence vs. environmental domain shift). This dual-stage capability empowers the continuous learner to dynamically deploy adaptive and shift-specific optimization strategies. Extensive experiments across multiple TFCL settings and benchmarks demonstrate that LargeMonitor achieves precise, robust detection and diagnosis of complex data streams while consistently improving the performance of existing online TFCL algorithms.

Online task-free continual learning (TFCL) requires intelligent agents to sequentially accumulate knowledge from an unbounded, non-stationary data stream under strict single-pass constraints and without any explicit task identifiers.

Large language models are commonly adapted to downstream tasks through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), but substantial distribution mismatch between downstream supervision and a model's generation distribution can intensify catastrophic forgetting. Data rewriting offers a data-centric way to narrow this mismatch before SFT. Existing methods, however, typically sample rewrites from a prompt-induced conditional distribution, which need not align with the backbone's natural question-answering generation distribution, and fixed templates can reduce output diversity. We formulate data rewriting as a policy-learning problem and train a lightweight LoRA rewriting policy with reinforcement learning. The policy optimizes question-answering-style distributional alignment and semantic diversity under a hard task-consistency gate, producing verified supervision for downstream SFT. Across three instruction-tuned backbones, the resulting models attain downstream gains broadly comparable to standard SFT while reducing degradation on non-downstream benchmarks in every evaluated setting. Additional experiments on logical reasoning and medical question answering provide preliminary evidence that a rewriting policy can be reused across domains for the same backbone.

Large language models are commonly adapted to downstream tasks through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), but substantial distribution mismatch between downstream supervision and a model's generation distribution can intensify catastrophic forgetting.

We present a real-world case study of multi-task learning (MTL) for temporal process modeling from limited data with temporally sparse labels. Specifically, we investigate multi-task learning for the important agricultural problem of predicting grape cold hardiness, which is the temperature at which lethal freezing occurs. Cold hardiness changes in response to weather and is difficult to measure directly in the field. Thus, growers rely on predictions to decide when to apply costly frost mitigation measures. We apply recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for daily cold-hardiness prediction from time series weather data. A major challenge is that the cold hardiness response varies across plant cultivars and ground-truth data for each cultivar is temporally sparse and limited. To address this challenge, we investigate multi-task learning (MTL) approaches for combining data, where different tasks correspond to different cultivars. We develop a variety of MTL architectures and evaluate them in both MTL and transfer learning settings. Our results show significant differences between architectures and that certain architectures are able to consistently outperform single-task learning and state-of-the-art scientific models. Additionally, we show similar results for the qualitatively different, but related, task of budbreak prediction. Further, improved accuracy for budbreak and cold hardiness is achieved by a single MTL model that simultaneously learns both tasks.

We present a real-world case study of multi-task learning (MTL) for temporal process modeling from limited data with temporally sparse labels.

As unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) become increasingly prevalent in consumer and defense settings, classifying them reliably from limited, modality-specific data is an urgent challenge. The dominant approach, large pretrained networks fully fine-tuned on task data, carries a substantial computational and memory weight that is hard to bear in resource-constrained UAV deployments, where edge inference and rapid retraining for emerging platforms are both required. This paper systematically scales across both model architectures and fine-tuning methods for UAV audio classification, asking when that weight is justified and when lighter alternatives prevail. Using a custom dataset of 3,100 audio clips spanning 31 drone classes, we evaluate transformer (ViT, AST) and convolutional (custom CNN, ResNet-18/152, MobileNet-V3-S/L, EfficientNet-B0/B7) backbones under full fine-tuning, classifier-only fine-tuning, and four parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods: SSF, IA3, OFT, and selective batch-norm tuning. All configurations are evaluated with 5-fold cross-validation across accuracy, training time, trainable-parameter share, and inference-time memory footprint. Selective batch-norm fine-tuning of EfficientNet-B7 with three-fold augmentations achieves the highest validation accuracy (97.65% +- 0.30) while updating under 0.5% of model parameters. Across the sweep, lightweight CNNs consistently outperform transformers on both accuracy and efficiency. For UAV audio classification under data scarcity, scaling the method outperforms scaling the model.

As unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) become increasingly prevalent in consumer and defense settings, classifying them reliably from limited, modality-specific data is an urgent challenge.