AI4Science 论文速递

Low-resource named entity recognition is still an open problem in NLP. Most state-of-the-art systems require tens of thousands of annotated sentences in order to obtain high performance. However, for most of the world's languages, it is unfeasible to obtain such annotation. In this paper, we present a transfer learning scheme, whereby we train character-level neural CRFs to predict named entities for both high-resource languages and low resource languages jointly. Learning character representations for multiple related languages allows transfer among the languages, improving F1 by up to 9.8 points over a loglinear CRF baseline.

Low-resource named entity recognition is still an open problem in NLP.

Even for common NLP tasks, sufficient supervision is not available in many languages -- morphological tagging is no exception. In the work presented here, we explore a transfer learning scheme, whereby we train character-level recurrent neural taggers to predict morphological taggings for high-resource languages and low-resource languages together. Learning joint character representations among multiple related languages successfully enables knowledge transfer from the high-resource languages to the low-resource ones, improving accuracy by up to 30% over a monolingual model.

Even for common NLP tasks, sufficient supervision is not available in many languages -- morphological tagging is no exception.

Large language models (LLMs) are predominantly trained on English-centric data, resulting in uneven performance for smaller languages. We study whether continued pretraining (CPT) can improve Estonian capabilities in multilingual LLMs while preserving English and general reasoning performance. Using Llama 3.1 8B and Apertus 8B as base models, we apply CPT with Estonian-enriched multilingual replay, followed by mostly English supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and chat vector merging. Evaluation on Estonian benchmarks, targeted pairwise human evaluation, and an Estonian Chatbot Arena-style setup shows consistent improvements in Estonian language competence, reasoning, translation, and instruction-following. Although Apertus exhibits stronger Estonian capabilities before adaptation, the more English-centric Llama model achieves substantially larger gains after adaptation. While some English capabilities regress relative to the original instruction-tuned models, chat vector merging substantially restores English instruction-following and reasoning performance. These findings suggest that CPT with balanced multilingual replay and lightweight post-training alignment can substantially improve single-language capabilities in multilingual LLMs.

Large language models (LLMs) are predominantly trained on English-centric data, resulting in uneven performance for smaller languages.

Meta-learning enables models to rapidly adapt to new tasks by leveraging prior experience, but its adaptation mechanisms remain opaque, especially regarding how past training tasks influence future predictions. We introduce TLXML (Task-Level eXplanation of Meta-Learning), a novel framework that extends influence functions to meta-learning settings and provides task-level explanations of adaptation and inference. By reformulating influence functions for the bi-level structure of meta-learning, we quantify the contribution of each meta-training task to the adapted model's behaviour. To ensure scalability, we propose a Gauss-Newton-based approximation that significantly reduces computational complexity from $O(pq^2)$ to $O(pq)$, where $p$ and $q$ denote the numbers of model and meta parameters, respectively. Moreover, we propose generalized influence functions defined using pseudo-inverse Hessian, which are applicable even when the loss landscape has flat directions. Results demonstrate that TLXML effectively ranks training tasks by their influence on downstream performance, offering concise, intuitive explanations aligned with user-level abstraction. This work provides a critical step toward interpretable and trustworthy meta-learning systems.

Meta-learning enables models to rapidly adapt to new tasks by leveraging prior experience, but its adaptation mechanisms remain opaque, especially regarding how past training tasks influence future predictions.

Although scaling up the number of trainable parameters can effectively improve the training performance of large language models, it also leads to increased computational overhead. When delving into the parameter difference, we find that a subset of parameters, termed advantageous parameters, plays a crucial role in determining model performance. Further analysis reveals that stronger models tend to possess more such parameters. In this paper, we propose Advantageous Parameter EXpansion Training (APEX), a method that progressively expands advantageous parameters into the space of disadvantageous ones, thereby increasing their proportion and enhancing training effectiveness, while keeping the total parameter count unchanged. Extensive experiments on both instruction tuning and continued pre-training across five base models demonstrate that, in instruction tuning, APEX outperforms full-parameter tuning while using only 52% of the trainable parameters. In continued pre-training, APEX achieves the same perplexity level as conventional training with only approximately 30% of the training data, and yields significant improvements on downstream tasks.

Although scaling up the number of trainable parameters can effectively improve the training performance of large language models, it also leads to increased computational overhead.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in mainstream visual understanding tasks, but their ability to process action scenes that contradict everyday common sense remains undertested. To address this gap, we introduce CAIT, a benchmark comprising 400 high-fidelity synthetic scenes focused on counter-intuitive visual actions, such as ``a rabbit is chasing a tiger'', where visual evidence explicitly contradicts common-sense expectations. We evaluate human, leading proprietary models (e.g., Claude and Gemini), and 14 representative open-source MLLMs. Humans achieve near-perfect performance (around 0.95 accuracy) and proprietary models demonstrate robust understanding (achieving up to 0.88 accuracy), standard open-source instruction-tuned models perform at the chance level. Further analysis demonstrates that this failure is driven by a strong language prior: rather than trusting the visual input, they automatically override the anomalous visual signals with statistically common text descriptions. Although introducing Chain-of-Thought reasoning mechanisms can improve accuracy, it significantly slows down the response and generates a new failure mode: models overthink the scenario and refuse to accept the actual visual content simply because it violates real-world physical laws. Finally, we demonstrate that targeted fine-tuning and structured prompting can effectively mitigate this reliance on language priors, enabling open-source models to accurately ground their reasoning in actual visual evidence.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in mainstream visual understanding tasks, but their ability to process action scenes that contradict everyday common sense remains undertested.

Construction accident narratives contain rich causal information, but the evidence is often implicit, long-span, and distributed. We introduce ConstructCIE, a manually annotated dataset for Causal Information Extraction from OSHA construction accident reports. The dataset uses a hierarchical schema for accident types, causal factors, sub-causal factors, and supporting evidence spans. We evaluate supervised sequence taggers and instruction-tuned LLMs in an end-to-end hierarchical extraction setting. Results show that most evaluated models achieve strong accident-type prediction and recover broad causal meaning but remain limited in precise span-level extraction. Joint Hierarchical Extraction generally achieves stronger exact and soft matching, while Individual Hierarchical Extraction sometimes achieves higher keyword F1. Error distributions vary by extraction strategy, but evidence-selection and span-boundary errors remain common. These findings show that reliable Causal Information Extraction for construction accidents requires stronger domain grounding and more accurate evidence extraction. The code and data can be found at https://github.com/lab-flair/ConstructCIE .

Construction accident narratives contain rich causal information, but the evidence is often implicit, long-span, and distributed.

Ensuring robust safety alignment while preserving utility is critical for the reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, current techniques fundamentally suffer from intertwined deficiencies: insufficient robustness against malicious attacks, frequent refusal of benign queries, degradation in generated text quality and general task performance, the former two reflecting tensions in robust safety and the latter constituting utility impairment. We attribute these limitations to the coarse-grained layer-wise interventions in existing methods. To resolve this, we propose NeuronTune, a fine-grained framework that pinpoints and modulates sparse neurons to achieve simultaneous safety-utility optimization. Our approach first pinpoints safety-critical and utility-preserving neurons across all layers via attack-aware attribution, then adapts meta-learning to adaptively modulate their activations. Crucially, the intervention scope of NeuronTune is dynamically controlled via neuron inclusion thresholds, providing a flexible mechanism to prioritize either security-critical or utility-priority requirements. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art technologies, achieving superior model safety while maintaining excellent utility.

Ensuring robust safety alignment while preserving utility is critical for the reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs).

The Gemma 4 instruction-tuned models share a reproducible failure: on long factual enumeration prompts, such as TV episodes, the 88 IAU constellations, or the 151 original Pokemon, they collapse into repetition, either a tight verbatim loop or a list whose entries decay onto one answer. These loops reach 87.5% (7/8 generations) and survive prompt rewording and most sampling adjustments. In this paper, we explore whether edits to a few internal model components can directly reduce this failure, without relying on repetition penalties, which can distort valid repetition and degrade task performance. To locate such targets, we combine per-layer ablation with per-neuron or routed-expert attribution, then evaluate weight edits over complete generations. We find that these edits substantially reduce detected loops on the prompts and seeds used to select them; in Gemma 4 E2B, for example, one sign-inverted neuron suffices. Across all four Gemma models, detected loops fall from 46/384 to 12/384 on frozen held-out prompts and seeds, driven mainly by E4B and 31B, while general-purpose benchmarks show no statistically detectable regressions. Our attribution methodology identifies useful candidates, but rankings vary across examples. At longer generation budgets, edits remain effective for E2B and E4B, whereas remaining failures in 26B and 31B shift toward doom looping: non-convergent self-correction over facts the model cannot recall. In exploratory experiments on Qwen3.5 and LFM2.5, sparse edits also reduce repetition, providing preliminary cross-family evidence, although effect strength and selectivity vary. Overall, our results show the promise and limits of targeted, small-scale weight editing: it can suppress specific repetition failures and provide a training-free causal intervention, but does not reveal a universal loop circuit, guarantee clean termination, or supply missing knowledge.

The Gemma 4 instruction-tuned models share a reproducible failure: on long factual enumeration prompts, such as TV episodes, the 88 IAU constellations, or the 151 original Pokemon, they collapse into repetition, either a tight verbatim loop or a list whose entries decay onto one answer.

When a code generating language model fabricates a Python package name, an adversary who has pre-registered that name on PyPI can convert that hallucination into a supply chain compromise. This event has been termed as 'slopsquatting'. We propose a two layer detector to counter this issue. The first layer performs a deterministic PyPI existence check. The second is a Random Forest classifier trained on ten features derived from the package name and its PyPI metadata. An import name reconciler bridges the two, resolving cases such as 'import cv2' versus 'pip install opencv-python' without a security bypass. The detector is embedded in a LangGraph state machine that retries at escalating temperatures and, on repeated failure, routes to a stronger fallback model. Across 300 curated prompts, the pipeline produces hallucination free code on 76% of runs. The primary exhausts its retry budget on 28.7%; intra model retries recover roughly a quarter of those, and cross model fallback recovers a further 16.5% of the remainder. Four findings have been observed. First, half of the flagged hallucinations are packages already registered on PyPI, as low quality lookalikes of well known projects, caught by the classifier rather than the deterministic layer (e.g., pil, faiss, tabula, haystack). Second, hallucination rate scales almost linearly with prompt adversariality, from 0 to 10% on routine coding to 40 to 73% on slopsquat baits. Third, the weaker primary refused 6 of 10 direct baits unaided, suggesting recent instruction tuning provides a baseline defense. Fourth, when primary and fallback share a model family, approximately 84% of primary failures recur on the fallback, motivating cross family pairing. A user study (n = 24) reports mean satisfaction 4.4 out of 5 and 21 of 24 stated adoption intent.

When a code generating language model fabricates a Python package name, an adversary who has pre-registered that name on PyPI can convert that hallucination into a supply chain compromise.

Designing effective reward signals for open-domain question answering is challenging because high-quality responses must simultaneously satisfy multiple aspects of answer quality that are difficult to capture with a holistic scalar objective. We introduce a rubric-based reward framework that generates query-specific rubrics grounded in retrieved evidence and decomposed into multiple quality dimensions, providing fine-grained supervision during post-training. Averaged across three evaluation axes (composition, grounding, and instruction-following), our approach improves over the instruction-tuned baseline by 6.5% and over flat rubric variants by 4%, with consistent gains across all evaluation datasets. Conditioning rubrics on retrieved evidence improves factual support, while decomposing rubrics into quality-specific dimensions further improves coherence, organization, and adherence to query requirements. Our results show that grounded, multi-dimensional rubrics provide more effective reward supervision for complex open-domain question answering.

Designing effective reward signals for open-domain question answering is challenging because high-quality responses must simultaneously satisfy multiple aspects of answer quality that are difficult to capture with a holistic scalar objective.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales language models by routing each input through a small set of independently parameterized experts. We show that copying this design into convolutional networks fails for a structural reason: parallel convolutional experts that read the same input channels learn nearly identical filters. We therefore move the expert axis from operator duplication to channel selection. We introduce Mixture of Channel Experts (MoCE), a structured sparse channel-mixing layer, inspired by MoE, that replaces pointwise (1x1) channel-reduction projections. In MoCE, an expert is a single output channel with a learned sparse support of k << C input channels. The selected channels are combined by a softmax whose temperature is predicted per input, so each expert can move between mean-like and max-like aggregation. A residual expert summarizes the unselected channels, and a load-balancing loss keeps channel coverage complete. MoCE replaces a dense projection whose cost is quadratic in C with a mechanism whose relative cost scales as k/C, and the predicted savings hold in measured wall-clock time. Across ResNet backbones on ImageNet-1K and CIFAR-100, transfer learning, EfficientViT, and a strong modern training recipe, MoCE matches or exceeds dense baselines and prior channel-selection methods while reducing MACs by 16.7% and end-to-end latency.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales language models by routing each input through a small set of independently parameterized experts.

Time series forecasting (TSF) is evolving toward multimodal and agentic settings, yet using foundation models remains uneconomical in resource-constrained scenarios, where compact, specialized forecasters are more desirable. However, lightweight forecasters typically require substantial training data, limiting their use in domains with scarce, slowly accumulated, or privacy-sensitive time series. To address this dilemma, we investigate the challenging problem of few-shot learning for lightweight forecasters. We propose MetaCaster, a meta-harness-optimized multi-agent framework that uses agentic data generation to automatically train specialized lightweight forecasters from only a few examples and textual contexts. Our work highlights a new TSF paradigm in which agents act not as forecasters but as intermediary engineers that prepare efficient, task-specific forecasters for deployment. Experiments on 18 datasets, 23 state-of-the-art lightweight forecasters, and 14 baselines demonstrate that MetaCaster achieves both data efficiency and computational efficiency while maintaining high-quality TSF performance.

Time series forecasting (TSF) is evolving toward multimodal and agentic settings, yet using foundation models remains uneconomical in resource-constrained scenarios, where compact, specialized forecasters are more desirable.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide prior causal knowledge for structural causal discovery, yet whether their direct-edge judgments and confidence can be trusted remains unclear. We systematically evaluate 12 instruction-tuned open-weight models across six benchmark causal graphs, five prompting strategies, and four confidence sources: verbalized, logit-based, cross-prompt agreement, and cross-model agreement. Under our language-only pairwise protocol, our evaluation yields three key findings. (i) LLM-based causal judgments are strongly recall-dominant: models predict overly dense graphs with many false-positive edges, while prompting mainly shifts the precision-recall trade-off rather than resolving overprediction. Gains from model scale diminish on the largest graphs and do not eliminate miscalibration. (ii) LLMs often capture causal relatedness without reliably identifying directness or orientation. Relative to published reference graphs, models misclassify 40.0% of indirect and 36.0% of reversed non-edges as direct edges, versus 28.2% of other non-edges. Moreover, 80.8% and 84.6% of these false positives receive verbalized confidence of at least 80%, revealing substantial overconfidence in structurally incorrect predictions. (iii) Conventional confidence estimates are unreliable, whereas agreement offers a more promising signal. Logit-based confidence frequently collapses near 1.0 regardless of correctness, while cross-prompt and cross-model agreement achieve better mean calibration and discrimination, though their advantages are not statistically significant after Holm correction. A benchmark-familiarity audit further identifies potential familiarity in five model-dataset pairs, all involving AsiaM. Overall, our results suggest LLMs are better viewed as sources of externally validated soft causal priors than as direct evidence of causal structure.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide prior causal knowledge for structural causal discovery, yet whether their direct-edge judgments and confidence can be trusted remains unclear.

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins. We propose the Capability-Driven Multimodal Scaling Law, the first cross-family framework that predicts VLM benchmark accuracy from directly observable textual capability. Given a low-dimensional capability score $S$ extracted from LLM textual benchmarks via PCA, we model VLM performance as a function of $S$, with a per-backbone transfer rate and an absorption rate that quantifies data-scaling efficiency. To fit and validate the framework, we train over 150 VLMs on 34 LLMs spanning 7 model families under a strictly controlled recipe. Evaluations on more than 200 textual and 50 multimodal benchmarks show that the law accurately extrapolates transfer rate from models up to 8B parameters to 72B-scale backbones, predicts full VLM training trajectories with high fidelity, and generalizes to entirely held-out model families. Beyond the scaling law, our analysis surfaces actionable insights: certain textual benchmarks negatively correlate with multimodal performance, exposing latent benchmark-gaming behavior; base LLMs outperform instruction-tuned counterparts as VLM backbones due to higher absorption rates and lower data-scaling decay; and different model families occupy distinct positions in the transfer--absorption space. The framework turns backbone selection from costly empirical sweeps into a principled, quantitative decision. Code and data are available at https://github.com/wangq-dev/CDMScaling.

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins.

Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminism, reporting a >200x slowdown for a steganographic adversary under benign prompt traffic. This bound assumes a passive attacker; we show it degrades sharply against an adversary who instead controls the prompt distribution. Because the verifier's admissible-token-set size is driven by the model's own output entropy, prompts engineered to break grammatical and sub-word structure -- rather than benign conversational traffic -- widen that set and open a materially larger covert channel. Across six instruction-tuned models spanning 1B to 32B parameters and three random seeds, our strongest attack (character- and script-level disruption) roughly doubles bits leaked per token relative to benign prompts, cutting the slowdown factor to 60x - 118x. These results indicate that static, benign-traffic-calibrated thresholds are insufficient for this defense, and that jitter-forgiveness thresholds should instead be calibrated dynamically against local token entropy.

Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminism, reporting a >200x slowdown for a steganographic adversary under benign prompt traffic.

Estimating the difference of two Stein's score functions is a fundamental problem in generative modeling. In particular, score differences arise naturally in transfer learning, where the score difference provides the mechanism for adapting a pre-trained model to a new target distribution, and in diffusion model-based post-training methods such as discriminator guidance. Existing estimators for score differences in these settings either lack of statistical consistency or are difficult to scale up in high-dimensions. We propose a statistically consistent and scalable estimator for score differences based on Sobolev regularization, which plays a crucial role in ensuring consistency and stablizing the training in the small-sample regime. Mathematically, we establish a convergence rate of $O(n^{-\frac{s-1}{d+2s-2}})$ where $d$ is the dimension and $s$ denotes the smoothness of the underlying densities, and provide a minimax lower bound of $\tildeΩ(n^{-\frac{2(s-1)}{d+2s}})$ (in mean-squared error). Empirically, our estimator exhibits significantly improved stability in small-sample regimes compared to existing methods. We demonstrate its effectiveness on real-world tasks, including transfer learning for ECG signal generation, where it substantially outperforms non-regularized score difference estimators in downstream classification performance.

Estimating the difference of two Stein's score functions is a fundamental problem in generative modeling.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is essential for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to multi-task scenarios. A prevailing trend in this field involves complex LoRA variants with multiple adapters or heads, which rely on the premise that architectural isolation of task-specific knowledge is necessary. However, this design often introduces dynamic routing, preventing weight merging and causing significant inference latency. In this work, we present a direct challenge to this paradigm. We first reveal a paradox where a simplified, router-free multi-head model with high inter-head redundancy outperforms complex, diversity-driven baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a unified, single-adapter LoRA with increased rank achieves highly competitive performance, questioning the necessity of multi-component structures. Based on these findings, we propose Align-LoRA, a unified and efficient framework that shifts the focus from architectural isolation to representation alignment. Align-LoRA incorporates an explicit alignment loss to encourage the learning of task-shared representations within a shared latent space. Crucially, our method maintains the standard LoRA architecture, ensuring zero inference latency via weight merging. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments confirm that Align-LoRA significantly surpasses prevailing approaches, establishing a simpler, more effective, and production-friendly paradigm for multi-task PEFT. The code is available at https://github.com/jinda-liu/Align-LoRA.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is essential for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to multi-task scenarios.

Agent harnesses record a failed tool call and its error message in the transcript and ask the model to continue, on the assumption that the error is corrective information. We measure whether it is. Defining the corrective gain of a failure record as the change in log-probability of re-emitting the action that just failed, we find the gain is negative for every instruction-tuned model we tested (6 checkpoints, 135M-1.7B, 4 families) in two environments: simulated tool calling and MBPP program repair. Normalised by action length the effect is about -1.03 nats per action token, a factor of 2.8 in the odds of each token, and holds on 90%-100% of individual items, not only on average. Over a fixed candidate set the probability of repeating the failed call rises from 0.06 to 0.54, and greedy decoding reproduces it token for token on 19% of items after the failure versus 0% before. Counterfactuals pairing the same call with a failure message, a success message, or a neutral acknowledgement separate two effects: the failed call's surface form accounts for 83% of the damage, while the semantic contribution of marking it failed is small and inconsistent in sign across environments. The problem is in the harness, not the model's grasp of error messages, and that predicts which remedies work. Replacing the verbatim call with a runtime-generated description of the failure removes 76% of the inversion at no token cost, and making previously-failed strings unreachable at the decoder acts on the same term. Two plausible remedies do not: an explicit "do not repeat" instruction leaves the measured quantity where it was, and deleting the failed attempt to retry from a clean context, the standard prescription for context contamination, is the worst harness we measured for repetition, because it restores the context that produced the failure. The study runs end to end on a CPU; all artefacts are released.

Agent harnesses record a failed tool call and its error message in the transcript and ask the model to continue, on the assumption that the error is corrective information.

Continual learning (CL) learns from a non-stationary data stream without storing or re-training on all seen samples. Meta-continual learning (MCL) casts CL as sequence prediction and meta-learns the continual learner itself as a sequence model, with Transformers as natural choices. However, despite decent performance, a Transformer learner relies on a linearly growing key-value cache to store all past representations, conflicting with CL's objective of not storing all seen samples. Sequence models with a constant-size state, e.g., linear-attention models and state-space models (SSMs), match CL's requirement by definition; however, with past samples compressed and mixed in the bounded state, such learners are harder to meta-learn, and earlier kernel-based ones performed poorly on MCL. We thus aim to obtain effective continual learners with constant-size states and make them work for MCL. By formulating the selective SSM for MCL, we propose MambaCL, with Mamba as the main model in practice. We meta-train the learner with a proposed selectivity regularization, which supervises the implicit associations within the compressed state and applies across constant-state models. Furthermore, we conduct a systematic empirical study of how Mamba and other constant-state models behave across various MCL scenarios, covering effectiveness, generalization, and model designs. The results highlight promising performance and strong generalization, demonstrating the potential of constant-state learners for efficient continual learning and adaptation.

Continual learning (CL) learns from a non-stationary data stream without storing or re-training on all seen samples.

Practical deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires families of post-trained variants---instruction-tuned, reasoning-tuned, and chat-style models---each at multiple sizes to meet diverse latency and memory budgets. Producing each (variant, size) pair independently is prohibitive, so model families typically span only a handful of coarse-grained sizes per post-trained variant. Boomerang distillation (Kangaslahti et al., 2026) reduces this cost along the size axis for base models. Through model size interpolation, it constructs models of intermediate sizes from a single teacher-student pair without additional training. However, it still treats each post-trained variant as a separate object of optimization. We introduce ADAPT---Amortized Distillation Across Post-Trained LLMs---a framework for amortizing distillation across both axes of a model family: size and post-training variant, producing $L \times K$ models for $L$ interpolated sizes across $K$ post-trained variants with a single distillation run. ADAPT combines two components. First, a two-phase distillation procedure constructs post-trained students through pre-training alignment and supervised fine-tuning distillation, enabling smooth size--performance interpolation on generation and reasoning tasks. Second, weight-delta initialization approximates this construction across post-trained variants by transferring the distillation-induced weight change from the base model to students initialized from different post-trained variants. The resulting continuum of interpolated models also enables adaptive model-size selection at inference time, improving the compute--accuracy trade-off for long-form reasoning tasks.

Practical deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires families of post-trained variants---instruction-tuned, reasoning-tuned, and chat-style models---each at multiple sizes to meet diverse latency and memory budgets.

Industrial technical reports contain high-value knowledge for maintenance, troubleshooting, and product engineering, but their heterogeneous structure (dense prose, specifications, tables) makes them difficult to index and reason over with standard retrieval and QA pipelines, and no public instruction-tuning or benchmark datasets are built from such documents. We address this gap with Industrial-Instruction, contributing (i) two open QA datasets built from real industrial technical reports and (ii) the end-to-end pipeline that produces them. Using 906 public Panasonic documents (7,525 pages), we apply layout-aware extraction, build a semantic retrieval index, and synthesize multiple-choice QA grounded in retrieved evidence under five query-document relationships (irrelevant retrieval, single-/multi-document support, single-/multi-document answer). After filtering an initial 23.9k generated samples, each dataset provides approximately 13.6k QA pairs with source documents and a held-out benchmark split. Fine-tuning small open LLMs (under 10B parameters) improves Set-Match Accuracy from 28.5% to 42.0% and F1 from 46.6% to 63.5% on the Panasonic benchmark. We release two parallel versions built by the same pipeline: one generated with the open-weight Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct model and one with the closed, API-based Claude-Opus-4.6 model, enabling a direct comparison of open- versus frontier-model data generation. The Claude-Opus-4.6 dataset yields a cleaner raw corpus and larger fine-tuning gains, at roughly two orders of magnitude higher cost. MMLU evaluation shows models trained on the Claude-Opus-4.6 data retain essentially all general knowledge, versus a small but measurable forgetting effect for the Qwen-generated data. Together, these datasets and pipeline offer a practical, reproducible path toward scalable industrial benchmarks and training data from real-world documentation.

Industrial technical reports contain high-value knowledge for maintenance, troubleshooting, and product engineering, but their heterogeneous structure (dense prose, specifications, tables) makes them difficult to index and reason over with standard retrieval and QA pipelines, and no public instruction-tuning or benchmark datasets are built from such documents.

Medical large language models are often judged by how many clinical questions they answer correctly. That view is useful, but it misses a practical risk. A model may know the right answer and still change its response when the same case is written in a different patient voice. This paper evaluates that risk as SDoH aware narrative anchoring bias. We use NarrativeShield SDoH MedQA, a counterfactual medical question answering dataset in which each case appears in persona based narratives while the answer key remains fixed. The dataset is reshaped from wide format into case grouped persona rows. We evaluate three open source instruction tuned LLMs from the Qwen2.5 family: 1.5B, 3B, and 7B. The final experiment uses 300 clinical cases and produces 8,100 model responses across three prompting conditions. We report persona level accuracy, counterfactual consistency, correct consistency, and narrative sensitivity error. Qwen2.5 7B achieves the best accuracy at 56.33 percent and the best correct consistency at 40.33 percent. Paired McNemar exact tests show significant accuracy gains for 7B over 3B in all prompt settings. Even so, narrative sensitivity remains, with the lowest error still at 31.67 percent. These results suggest that trustworthy clinical decision support should be evaluated by both average correctness and stability across medically equivalent patient narratives.

Medical large language models are often judged by how many clinical questions they answer correctly.

Automated interpretation of seismic images using deep learning methods is challenging because of the limited availability of training data. Few-shot learning is a suitable learning paradigm in such scenarios due to its ability to adapt to a new task with limited supervision (small training budget). Existing few-shot semantic segmentation (FSSS) methods fix the number of target classes. Therefore, they do not support joint training on multiple datasets varying in the number of classes. In the context of the interpretation of seismic facies, fixing the number of target classes inhibits the generalization capability of a model trained on one facies dataset to another, which is likely to have a different number of facies. To address this shortcoming, we propose a few-shot semantic segmentation method for interpreting seismic facies that can adapt to the varying number of facies across the dataset, dubbed the AdaSemSeg. In general, the backbone network of FSSS methods is initialized with the statistics learned from the ImageNet dataset for better performance. The lack of such a huge annotated dataset for seismic images motivates using a self-supervised algorithm on seismic datasets to initialize the backbone network. We have trained the AdaSemSeg on three public seismic facies datasets with different numbers of facies and evaluated the proposed method on multiple metrics. The performance of the AdaSemSeg on unseen datasets (not used in training) is better than the prototype-based few-shot method and baselines. Code: https://github.com/Surojit-Utah/AdaSemSeg

Automated interpretation of seismic images using deep learning methods is challenging because of the limited availability of training data.

Most self-supervised learning objectives defend against collapse but leave the target representation law unspecified. We formulate representation learning as Distribution Matching (DM), learning an augmentation-invariant encoder whose induced law matches an explicit geometric reference. The reference law specifies what the learned representation distribution should look like, whereas a separately chosen discrepancy determines how deviations from this target are measured; here we use Mallows distance. The DM framework reveals a directional inverse: generative learning maps a tractable reference to data, whereas representation learning maps data to a designed reference law. We connect the population objective to class-centre separation and classification error and prove a non-asymptotic neural-sieve guarantee. Simulations and image benchmarks show manifold rectification, fine-grained structure and transfer across label spaces.

Most self-supervised learning objectives defend against collapse but leave the target representation law unspecified.

Lifting 3D hand poses from 2D monocular representations remains challenging due to the limited availability of large-scale, diverse 3D-annotated hand datasets, in contrast to the abundance of human body motion data. We address this limitation by transferring motion representations learned from large body pose corpora to the hand domain. We introduce TransHands, a backbone-agnostic transfer learning framework that enables pre-trained human motion encoders to be effectively adapted for 3D hand pose estimation from 2D pose inputs. Rather than training hand-specific biomechanical models from scratch, TransHands combines a two-stage training and fine-tuning strategy with a lightweight hand-specific input adaptation module that aligns hand kinematics with the representation space learned for full-body motion. We evaluate TransHands across four state-of-the-art motion modeling architectures, including transformer-based, graph-based, and frequency- domain models. Results demonstrate that motion priors learned from body pose data transfer consistently across architectures, yielding consistent accuracy gains, strong cross-domain generalization, particularly in challenging egocentric settings, and applicability for downstream tasks in real-world contexts.

Lifting 3D hand poses from 2D monocular representations remains challenging due to the limited availability of large-scale, diverse 3D-annotated hand datasets, in contrast to the abundance of human body motion data.

Stochastic Bilevel Optimization has emerged as a fundamental framework for meta-learning and hyperparameter optimization. Despite the practical prevalence of single-loop algorithms, their theoretical understanding in the stochastic regime remains less developed than that of multi-loop methods. In this paper, we provide a refined convergence analysis of the Single-loop Stochastic Approximate Implicit Differentiation (SSAID) algorithm. Under the squared-gradient stationarity criterion $\|\nablaΦ(x)\|^2\leε$, the corrected proof establishes an oracle complexity of $\mathcal{O}(κ^{14}ε^{-2})$, equivalently an averaged stationarity rate of $\mathcal{O}(κ^7K^{-1/2})$. The result preserves the canonical $\mathcal{O}(ε^{-2})$ dependence on the target accuracy while giving an explicit characterization of the condition-number dependence for stochastic AID-based single-loop methods.

Stochastic Bilevel Optimization has emerged as a fundamental framework for meta-learning and hyperparameter optimization.

Quantized large language models enable on-premises processing of sensitive data, but their confidence estimates must be trustworthy. Reliability depends on implementation choices--prompt template, label wording, and scoring normalization--that are seldom treated as experimental variables. We evaluate three 7-billion-parameter Mistral variants (base, BioMistral, and instruction-tuned) at FP16, INT8, and INT4 on five-class sentence classification in medical abstracts. Two primary templates are evaluated on n=2,000 test sentences and two auxiliary templates on n=200 validation sentences. Because the primary templates were selected using 100 test-derived examples and a preliminary scorer later found to have a token-boundary error, results involving them are exploratory. Within this design, candidate-scoring normalization dominates apparent calibration: switching from summed to mean-token log-likelihood reverses which model appears better calibrated (BioMistral's mean calibration error nearly triples, while the instruction-tuned model's drops by more than half), yet accuracy changes by at most 1.4 percentage points for the two specialized models. Negative log-likelihood and Brier score confirm the reversal. Across the two primary templates, prompt choice changes mean accuracy by 2.9--17.8 percentage points, depending on the model. INT8 changes accuracy by at most 1.1 percentage points for the specialized models; INT4 effects are mixed but non-catastrophic. Post-hoc temperature scaling improves calibration under summed scoring but has not been validated under the alternative normalization that reverses the ranking. These exploratory results indicate that scoring normalization and prompt design should be first-order experimental decisions in calibration comparisons of decoder-based classifiers.

Quantized large language models enable on-premises processing of sensitive data, but their confidence estimates must be trustworthy.

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance, but their robustness to realistic lexical corruption remains poorly understood. We evaluate four open-weight instruction-tuned models and frontier models across four reasoning benchmarks under keyboard noise, character swaps, and filler insertion. Character-level perturbations substantially degrade accuracy, especially on multi-step reasoning tasks, while filler insertion has little effect. We trace this asymmetry to Attention Diversion: lexical corruption fragments subword tokenization, and the resulting fragments attract disproportionate attention mass, concentrated in middle and final transformer layers. Length-matched controls confirm that fragmentation, not prompt length, drives the loss. A factorial intervention then shows why the damage is hard to undo: fragmentation corrupts token content and attention allocation together, and the two are coupled. Restoring clean attention while the content remains corrupted is actively harmful, restoring content alone is insufficient, and only restoring both recovers a substantial share of the gap. This coupling explains why inference-time strategies, including chain-of-thought prompting, spell-checking, self-repair, and stronger repair models, fail to consistently recover performance: each addresses one channel at a time. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Jiaqian-Janelle/Attention-Diversion

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance, but their robustness to realistic lexical corruption remains poorly understood.

The effectiveness of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) is often limited in low-resource linguistic settings due to a lack of high-quality training data. We introduce LuxIT, a monolingual instruction tuning dataset for Luxembourgish developed to mitigate this challenge. We synthesize the dataset from a corpus of native Luxembourgish texts, utilizing DeepSeek-R1-0528, chosen for its shown proficiency in Luxembourgish. Following generation, we apply a quality assurance process, employing an LLM-as-a-judge approach, retaining 227,507 high-quality instruction-answer pairs. To investigate the practical utility of the dataset, we fine-tune 14 smaller-scale LLMs ($\leq$15B parameters) on LuxIT and evaluate them on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and five downstream NLP tasks. Training on LuxIT yields a mean accuracy change of +5.37 percentage points on language exams across all 14 models, with 12 of 14 showing improvement. On NLP downstream tasks, 9 of 14 models improve in macro-averaged F1, though gains on the two benchmarks do not systematically correlate. These results underscore the feasibility of leveraging monolingual synthetic data to improve LLM capabilities in low-resource languages, while highlighting the multi-faceted nature of language proficiency.

The effectiveness of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) is often limited in low-resource linguistic settings due to a lack of high-quality training data.