AI4Science 论文速递

Time series forecasting (TSF) is evolving toward multimodal and agentic settings, yet using foundation models remains uneconomical in resource-constrained scenarios, where compact, specialized forecasters are more desirable. However, lightweight forecasters typically require substantial training data, limiting their use in domains with scarce, slowly accumulated, or privacy-sensitive time series. To address this dilemma, we investigate the challenging problem of few-shot learning for lightweight forecasters. We propose MetaCaster, a meta-harness-optimized multi-agent framework that uses agentic data generation to automatically train specialized lightweight forecasters from only a few examples and textual contexts. Our work highlights a new TSF paradigm in which agents act not as forecasters but as intermediary engineers that prepare efficient, task-specific forecasters for deployment. Experiments on 18 datasets, 23 state-of-the-art lightweight forecasters, and 14 baselines demonstrate that MetaCaster achieves both data efficiency and computational efficiency while maintaining high-quality TSF performance.

Time series forecasting (TSF) is evolving toward multimodal and agentic settings, yet using foundation models remains uneconomical in resource-constrained scenarios, where compact, specialized forecasters are more desirable.

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins. We propose the Capability-Driven Multimodal Scaling Law, the first cross-family framework that predicts VLM benchmark accuracy from directly observable textual capability. Given a low-dimensional capability score $S$ extracted from LLM textual benchmarks via PCA, we model VLM performance as a function of $S$, with a per-backbone transfer rate and an absorption rate that quantifies data-scaling efficiency. To fit and validate the framework, we train over 150 VLMs on 34 LLMs spanning 7 model families under a strictly controlled recipe. Evaluations on more than 200 textual and 50 multimodal benchmarks show that the law accurately extrapolates transfer rate from models up to 8B parameters to 72B-scale backbones, predicts full VLM training trajectories with high fidelity, and generalizes to entirely held-out model families. Beyond the scaling law, our analysis surfaces actionable insights: certain textual benchmarks negatively correlate with multimodal performance, exposing latent benchmark-gaming behavior; base LLMs outperform instruction-tuned counterparts as VLM backbones due to higher absorption rates and lower data-scaling decay; and different model families occupy distinct positions in the transfer--absorption space. The framework turns backbone selection from costly empirical sweeps into a principled, quantitative decision. Code and data are available at https://github.com/wangq-dev/CDMScaling.

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) backbone is the most consequential decision when building a vision-language model (VLM), yet it remains fundamentally unprincipled: compute-based scaling laws fail to generalize across model families, and no framework exists for directly predicting VLM performance before training begins.

Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminism, reporting a >200x slowdown for a steganographic adversary under benign prompt traffic. This bound assumes a passive attacker; we show it degrades sharply against an adversary who instead controls the prompt distribution. Because the verifier's admissible-token-set size is driven by the model's own output entropy, prompts engineered to break grammatical and sub-word structure -- rather than benign conversational traffic -- widen that set and open a materially larger covert channel. Across six instruction-tuned models spanning 1B to 32B parameters and three random seeds, our strongest attack (character- and script-level disruption) roughly doubles bits leaked per token relative to benign prompts, cutting the slowdown factor to 60x - 118x. These results indicate that static, benign-traffic-calibrated thresholds are insufficient for this defense, and that jitter-forgiveness thresholds should instead be calibrated dynamically against local token entropy.

Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminism, reporting a >200x slowdown for a steganographic adversary under benign prompt traffic.

Estimating the difference of two Stein's score functions is a fundamental problem in generative modeling. In particular, score differences arise naturally in transfer learning, where the score difference provides the mechanism for adapting a pre-trained model to a new target distribution, and in diffusion model-based post-training methods such as discriminator guidance. Existing estimators for score differences in these settings either lack of statistical consistency or are difficult to scale up in high-dimensions. We propose a statistically consistent and scalable estimator for score differences based on Sobolev regularization, which plays a crucial role in ensuring consistency and stablizing the training in the small-sample regime. Mathematically, we establish a convergence rate of $O(n^{-\frac{s-1}{d+2s-2}})$ where $d$ is the dimension and $s$ denotes the smoothness of the underlying densities, and provide a minimax lower bound of $\tildeΩ(n^{-\frac{2(s-1)}{d+2s}})$ (in mean-squared error). Empirically, our estimator exhibits significantly improved stability in small-sample regimes compared to existing methods. We demonstrate its effectiveness on real-world tasks, including transfer learning for ECG signal generation, where it substantially outperforms non-regularized score difference estimators in downstream classification performance.

Estimating the difference of two Stein's score functions is a fundamental problem in generative modeling.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is essential for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to multi-task scenarios. A prevailing trend in this field involves complex LoRA variants with multiple adapters or heads, which rely on the premise that architectural isolation of task-specific knowledge is necessary. However, this design often introduces dynamic routing, preventing weight merging and causing significant inference latency. In this work, we present a direct challenge to this paradigm. We first reveal a paradox where a simplified, router-free multi-head model with high inter-head redundancy outperforms complex, diversity-driven baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a unified, single-adapter LoRA with increased rank achieves highly competitive performance, questioning the necessity of multi-component structures. Based on these findings, we propose Align-LoRA, a unified and efficient framework that shifts the focus from architectural isolation to representation alignment. Align-LoRA incorporates an explicit alignment loss to encourage the learning of task-shared representations within a shared latent space. Crucially, our method maintains the standard LoRA architecture, ensuring zero inference latency via weight merging. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments confirm that Align-LoRA significantly surpasses prevailing approaches, establishing a simpler, more effective, and production-friendly paradigm for multi-task PEFT. The code is available at https://github.com/jinda-liu/Align-LoRA.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is essential for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to multi-task scenarios.

Continual learning (CL) learns from a non-stationary data stream without storing or re-training on all seen samples. Meta-continual learning (MCL) casts CL as sequence prediction and meta-learns the continual learner itself as a sequence model, with Transformers as natural choices. However, despite decent performance, a Transformer learner relies on a linearly growing key-value cache to store all past representations, conflicting with CL's objective of not storing all seen samples. Sequence models with a constant-size state, e.g., linear-attention models and state-space models (SSMs), match CL's requirement by definition; however, with past samples compressed and mixed in the bounded state, such learners are harder to meta-learn, and earlier kernel-based ones performed poorly on MCL. We thus aim to obtain effective continual learners with constant-size states and make them work for MCL. By formulating the selective SSM for MCL, we propose MambaCL, with Mamba as the main model in practice. We meta-train the learner with a proposed selectivity regularization, which supervises the implicit associations within the compressed state and applies across constant-state models. Furthermore, we conduct a systematic empirical study of how Mamba and other constant-state models behave across various MCL scenarios, covering effectiveness, generalization, and model designs. The results highlight promising performance and strong generalization, demonstrating the potential of constant-state learners for efficient continual learning and adaptation.

Continual learning (CL) learns from a non-stationary data stream without storing or re-training on all seen samples.

Practical deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires families of post-trained variants---instruction-tuned, reasoning-tuned, and chat-style models---each at multiple sizes to meet diverse latency and memory budgets. Producing each (variant, size) pair independently is prohibitive, so model families typically span only a handful of coarse-grained sizes per post-trained variant. Boomerang distillation (Kangaslahti et al., 2026) reduces this cost along the size axis for base models. Through model size interpolation, it constructs models of intermediate sizes from a single teacher-student pair without additional training. However, it still treats each post-trained variant as a separate object of optimization. We introduce ADAPT---Amortized Distillation Across Post-Trained LLMs---a framework for amortizing distillation across both axes of a model family: size and post-training variant, producing $L \times K$ models for $L$ interpolated sizes across $K$ post-trained variants with a single distillation run. ADAPT combines two components. First, a two-phase distillation procedure constructs post-trained students through pre-training alignment and supervised fine-tuning distillation, enabling smooth size--performance interpolation on generation and reasoning tasks. Second, weight-delta initialization approximates this construction across post-trained variants by transferring the distillation-induced weight change from the base model to students initialized from different post-trained variants. The resulting continuum of interpolated models also enables adaptive model-size selection at inference time, improving the compute--accuracy trade-off for long-form reasoning tasks.

Practical deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires families of post-trained variants---instruction-tuned, reasoning-tuned, and chat-style models---each at multiple sizes to meet diverse latency and memory budgets.

Industrial technical reports contain high-value knowledge for maintenance, troubleshooting, and product engineering, but their heterogeneous structure (dense prose, specifications, tables) makes them difficult to index and reason over with standard retrieval and QA pipelines, and no public instruction-tuning or benchmark datasets are built from such documents. We address this gap with Industrial-Instruction, contributing (i) two open QA datasets built from real industrial technical reports and (ii) the end-to-end pipeline that produces them. Using 906 public Panasonic documents (7,525 pages), we apply layout-aware extraction, build a semantic retrieval index, and synthesize multiple-choice QA grounded in retrieved evidence under five query-document relationships (irrelevant retrieval, single-/multi-document support, single-/multi-document answer). After filtering an initial 23.9k generated samples, each dataset provides approximately 13.6k QA pairs with source documents and a held-out benchmark split. Fine-tuning small open LLMs (under 10B parameters) improves Set-Match Accuracy from 28.5% to 42.0% and F1 from 46.6% to 63.5% on the Panasonic benchmark. We release two parallel versions built by the same pipeline: one generated with the open-weight Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct model and one with the closed, API-based Claude-Opus-4.6 model, enabling a direct comparison of open- versus frontier-model data generation. The Claude-Opus-4.6 dataset yields a cleaner raw corpus and larger fine-tuning gains, at roughly two orders of magnitude higher cost. MMLU evaluation shows models trained on the Claude-Opus-4.6 data retain essentially all general knowledge, versus a small but measurable forgetting effect for the Qwen-generated data. Together, these datasets and pipeline offer a practical, reproducible path toward scalable industrial benchmarks and training data from real-world documentation.

Industrial technical reports contain high-value knowledge for maintenance, troubleshooting, and product engineering, but their heterogeneous structure (dense prose, specifications, tables) makes them difficult to index and reason over with standard retrieval and QA pipelines, and no public instruction-tuning or benchmark datasets are built from such documents.

Medical large language models are often judged by how many clinical questions they answer correctly. That view is useful, but it misses a practical risk. A model may know the right answer and still change its response when the same case is written in a different patient voice. This paper evaluates that risk as SDoH aware narrative anchoring bias. We use NarrativeShield SDoH MedQA, a counterfactual medical question answering dataset in which each case appears in persona based narratives while the answer key remains fixed. The dataset is reshaped from wide format into case grouped persona rows. We evaluate three open source instruction tuned LLMs from the Qwen2.5 family: 1.5B, 3B, and 7B. The final experiment uses 300 clinical cases and produces 8,100 model responses across three prompting conditions. We report persona level accuracy, counterfactual consistency, correct consistency, and narrative sensitivity error. Qwen2.5 7B achieves the best accuracy at 56.33 percent and the best correct consistency at 40.33 percent. Paired McNemar exact tests show significant accuracy gains for 7B over 3B in all prompt settings. Even so, narrative sensitivity remains, with the lowest error still at 31.67 percent. These results suggest that trustworthy clinical decision support should be evaluated by both average correctness and stability across medically equivalent patient narratives.

Medical large language models are often judged by how many clinical questions they answer correctly.

Automated interpretation of seismic images using deep learning methods is challenging because of the limited availability of training data. Few-shot learning is a suitable learning paradigm in such scenarios due to its ability to adapt to a new task with limited supervision (small training budget). Existing few-shot semantic segmentation (FSSS) methods fix the number of target classes. Therefore, they do not support joint training on multiple datasets varying in the number of classes. In the context of the interpretation of seismic facies, fixing the number of target classes inhibits the generalization capability of a model trained on one facies dataset to another, which is likely to have a different number of facies. To address this shortcoming, we propose a few-shot semantic segmentation method for interpreting seismic facies that can adapt to the varying number of facies across the dataset, dubbed the AdaSemSeg. In general, the backbone network of FSSS methods is initialized with the statistics learned from the ImageNet dataset for better performance. The lack of such a huge annotated dataset for seismic images motivates using a self-supervised algorithm on seismic datasets to initialize the backbone network. We have trained the AdaSemSeg on three public seismic facies datasets with different numbers of facies and evaluated the proposed method on multiple metrics. The performance of the AdaSemSeg on unseen datasets (not used in training) is better than the prototype-based few-shot method and baselines. Code: https://github.com/Surojit-Utah/AdaSemSeg

Automated interpretation of seismic images using deep learning methods is challenging because of the limited availability of training data.

Most self-supervised learning objectives defend against collapse but leave the target representation law unspecified. We formulate representation learning as Distribution Matching (DM), learning an augmentation-invariant encoder whose induced law matches an explicit geometric reference. The reference law specifies what the learned representation distribution should look like, whereas a separately chosen discrepancy determines how deviations from this target are measured; here we use Mallows distance. The DM framework reveals a directional inverse: generative learning maps a tractable reference to data, whereas representation learning maps data to a designed reference law. We connect the population objective to class-centre separation and classification error and prove a non-asymptotic neural-sieve guarantee. Simulations and image benchmarks show manifold rectification, fine-grained structure and transfer across label spaces.

Most self-supervised learning objectives defend against collapse but leave the target representation law unspecified.

Lifting 3D hand poses from 2D monocular representations remains challenging due to the limited availability of large-scale, diverse 3D-annotated hand datasets, in contrast to the abundance of human body motion data. We address this limitation by transferring motion representations learned from large body pose corpora to the hand domain. We introduce TransHands, a backbone-agnostic transfer learning framework that enables pre-trained human motion encoders to be effectively adapted for 3D hand pose estimation from 2D pose inputs. Rather than training hand-specific biomechanical models from scratch, TransHands combines a two-stage training and fine-tuning strategy with a lightweight hand-specific input adaptation module that aligns hand kinematics with the representation space learned for full-body motion. We evaluate TransHands across four state-of-the-art motion modeling architectures, including transformer-based, graph-based, and frequency- domain models. Results demonstrate that motion priors learned from body pose data transfer consistently across architectures, yielding consistent accuracy gains, strong cross-domain generalization, particularly in challenging egocentric settings, and applicability for downstream tasks in real-world contexts.

Lifting 3D hand poses from 2D monocular representations remains challenging due to the limited availability of large-scale, diverse 3D-annotated hand datasets, in contrast to the abundance of human body motion data.

Stochastic Bilevel Optimization has emerged as a fundamental framework for meta-learning and hyperparameter optimization. Despite the practical prevalence of single-loop algorithms, their theoretical understanding in the stochastic regime remains less developed than that of multi-loop methods. In this paper, we provide a refined convergence analysis of the Single-loop Stochastic Approximate Implicit Differentiation (SSAID) algorithm. Under the squared-gradient stationarity criterion $\|\nablaΦ(x)\|^2\leε$, the corrected proof establishes an oracle complexity of $\mathcal{O}(κ^{14}ε^{-2})$, equivalently an averaged stationarity rate of $\mathcal{O}(κ^7K^{-1/2})$. The result preserves the canonical $\mathcal{O}(ε^{-2})$ dependence on the target accuracy while giving an explicit characterization of the condition-number dependence for stochastic AID-based single-loop methods.

Stochastic Bilevel Optimization has emerged as a fundamental framework for meta-learning and hyperparameter optimization.

Construction accident narratives contain rich causal information, but the evidence is often implicit, long-span, and distributed. We introduce ConstructCIE, a manually annotated dataset for Causal Information Extraction from OSHA construction accident reports. The dataset uses a hierarchical schema for accident types, causal factors, sub-causal factors, and supporting evidence spans. We evaluate supervised sequence taggers and instruction-tuned LLMs in an end-to-end hierarchical extraction setting. Results show that most evaluated models achieve strong accident-type prediction and recover broad causal meaning but remain limited in precise span-level extraction. Joint Hierarchical Extraction generally achieves stronger exact and soft matching, while Individual Hierarchical Extraction sometimes achieves higher keyword F1. Error distributions vary by extraction strategy, but evidence-selection and span-boundary errors remain common. These findings show that reliable Causal Information Extraction for construction accidents requires stronger domain grounding and more accurate evidence extraction. The code and data can be found at https://github.com/lab-flair/ConstructCIE .

Construction accident narratives contain rich causal information, but the evidence is often implicit, long-span, and distributed.

Quantized large language models enable on-premises processing of sensitive data, but their confidence estimates must be trustworthy. Reliability depends on implementation choices--prompt template, label wording, and scoring normalization--that are seldom treated as experimental variables. We evaluate three 7-billion-parameter Mistral variants (base, BioMistral, and instruction-tuned) at FP16, INT8, and INT4 on five-class sentence classification in medical abstracts. Two primary templates are evaluated on n=2,000 test sentences and two auxiliary templates on n=200 validation sentences. Because the primary templates were selected using 100 test-derived examples and a preliminary scorer later found to have a token-boundary error, results involving them are exploratory. Within this design, candidate-scoring normalization dominates apparent calibration: switching from summed to mean-token log-likelihood reverses which model appears better calibrated (BioMistral's mean calibration error nearly triples, while the instruction-tuned model's drops by more than half), yet accuracy changes by at most 1.4 percentage points for the two specialized models. Negative log-likelihood and Brier score confirm the reversal. Across the two primary templates, prompt choice changes mean accuracy by 2.9--17.8 percentage points, depending on the model. INT8 changes accuracy by at most 1.1 percentage points for the specialized models; INT4 effects are mixed but non-catastrophic. Post-hoc temperature scaling improves calibration under summed scoring but has not been validated under the alternative normalization that reverses the ranking. These exploratory results indicate that scoring normalization and prompt design should be first-order experimental decisions in calibration comparisons of decoder-based classifiers.

Quantized large language models enable on-premises processing of sensitive data, but their confidence estimates must be trustworthy.

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance, but their robustness to realistic lexical corruption remains poorly understood. We evaluate four open-weight instruction-tuned models and frontier models across four reasoning benchmarks under keyboard noise, character swaps, and filler insertion. Character-level perturbations substantially degrade accuracy, especially on multi-step reasoning tasks, while filler insertion has little effect. We trace this asymmetry to Attention Diversion: lexical corruption fragments subword tokenization, and the resulting fragments attract disproportionate attention mass, concentrated in middle and final transformer layers. Length-matched controls confirm that fragmentation, not prompt length, drives the loss. A factorial intervention then shows why the damage is hard to undo: fragmentation corrupts token content and attention allocation together, and the two are coupled. Restoring clean attention while the content remains corrupted is actively harmful, restoring content alone is insufficient, and only restoring both recovers a substantial share of the gap. This coupling explains why inference-time strategies, including chain-of-thought prompting, spell-checking, self-repair, and stronger repair models, fail to consistently recover performance: each addresses one channel at a time. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Jiaqian-Janelle/Attention-Diversion

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance, but their robustness to realistic lexical corruption remains poorly understood.

The effectiveness of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) is often limited in low-resource linguistic settings due to a lack of high-quality training data. We introduce LuxIT, a monolingual instruction tuning dataset for Luxembourgish developed to mitigate this challenge. We synthesize the dataset from a corpus of native Luxembourgish texts, utilizing DeepSeek-R1-0528, chosen for its shown proficiency in Luxembourgish. Following generation, we apply a quality assurance process, employing an LLM-as-a-judge approach, retaining 227,507 high-quality instruction-answer pairs. To investigate the practical utility of the dataset, we fine-tune 14 smaller-scale LLMs ($\leq$15B parameters) on LuxIT and evaluate them on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and five downstream NLP tasks. Training on LuxIT yields a mean accuracy change of +5.37 percentage points on language exams across all 14 models, with 12 of 14 showing improvement. On NLP downstream tasks, 9 of 14 models improve in macro-averaged F1, though gains on the two benchmarks do not systematically correlate. These results underscore the feasibility of leveraging monolingual synthetic data to improve LLM capabilities in low-resource languages, while highlighting the multi-faceted nature of language proficiency.

The effectiveness of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) is often limited in low-resource linguistic settings due to a lack of high-quality training data.

Mechanistic interpretability has identified transformer circuits, but lacks a shared vocabulary for describing how their functions compose across tasks and architectures. We introduce Coherentist Probabilistic Compositionalism (CPC), an interpretive framework that grounds transformer computation in coherentist theories of interpretation and describes it through four operator roles. Alignment identifies candidate relations, unification integrates supporting information, suppression reduces incompatible alternatives, and routing carries selected information to the output. Across 15 models from five architecture families, the suppression, unification, and routing weight-space signatures correlate with held-out activation-level role measures above random baselines. Suppression is more stable across tasks than unification. Ablating alignment heads reduces downstream suppressive activity beyond a random-head control in 10 models, but similar effects on no-conflict prompts indicate a general upstream dependency, not contradiction-specific coupling. Explicit contradictions significantly shift a layerwise coherence proxy in 14 models; after removing shared residual covariance, the gap has the predicted direction in every model. Base and instruction-tuned variants preserve induction-head score structure ($r{\geq}0.98$) without a consistent shift of operator signatures towards later layers. These results support CPC as a shared vocabulary for comparing transformer mechanisms while showing that their depth and geometric expression remain architecture-specific.

Mechanistic interpretability has identified transformer circuits, but lacks a shared vocabulary for describing how their functions compose across tasks and architectures.

The current progress of Clinical Vision Large Language Models (C-VLLMs) has substantially improved digital diagnostics, still these frameworks often endure lesion noises, modality misalignment, hallucination, and missed contextual grounding in complex clinical cases. Moreover, prevailing agent systems usually depend on static and non-adaptable pipelines and lack the versatility necessary for complex medical reasoning. To resolve these difficulties, we present BioMed-Agent-RL, a unified medical agent that incorporates adaptive orchestration, policy, and reward-based reinforcement learning (RL) models for biomedical applications. To ensure reliability, it invokes clinical context-aware preference optimization (CPO), direct preference optimization (DPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO) with dynamic entropy regulation. This pipeline utilizes a multimodal meta-learning approach that operates as a field-specific expert and human judgment synthesizer. The agent adaptively utilizes a set of model-level expertise, such as clinical grounding and reasoner, lesion segmenter, and field-specific synthesizer, across various clinical modalities (e.g., X-ray) by utilizing an iterative and adaptive RL approach. The agent learns to seriously synthesize misleading, conflicting vision cues and trust in inherent reasoning, while specialist advice is faulty. An intensive ablation study is conducted across multiple benchmarks, and the agent significantly outperforms existing state of the art models, such as GPT-5, attaining up to ~73% accuracy (gain of ~5%) over contemporary baselines. As a result, the framework suggests a new standard for building factual, reliable, robust, and expert-like intelligent agent systems for independent clinical reasoning.

The current progress of Clinical Vision Large Language Models (C-VLLMs) has substantially improved digital diagnostics, still these frameworks often endure lesion noises, modality misalignment, hallucination, and missed contextual grounding in complex clinical cases.

We investigate the robustness of value alignment via midtraining with synthetic documents, using animal compassion as a value that is both important in its own right and orthogonal to existing alignment efforts. To evaluate compassionate reasoning, we develop and publicly release Animal Norms In Moral Assessment (ANIMA), a 26-question evaluation spanning 13 ethical dimensions, publicly available as a dataset and Inspect evaluation. On ANIMA, training with 3000 documents achieves 77% compared to 40% for instruction-tuning approaches, with generalization to human compassion and no degradation in standard safety benchmarks or capabilities. However, subsequent unrelated instruction-tuning degrades the intervention, with the advantage disappearing after 5000 samples. Our exploratory results suggest document-based value interventions may require explicit preservation strategies to remain effective through typical training pipelines.

We investigate the robustness of value alignment via midtraining with synthetic documents, using animal compassion as a value that is both important in its own right and orthogonal to existing alignment efforts.

We introduce CoLoRA (Convolutional Low-Rank Adaptation), a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CoLoRA extends LoRA to convolutional layers by decomposing kernel updates into lightweight depthwise and pointwise components. This design reduces the number of trainable convolutional-update parameters by over 80\% compared with full convolutional fine-tuning, while allowing the learned updates to be merged into the pretrained convolutional kernels, thereby preserving the original model size and inference complexity. Experiments on MedMNIST datasets, particularly OCTMNISTv2, demonstrate that CoLoRA applied to VGG16 and ResNet50 achieves competitive classification performance while substantially reducing the number of trainable parameters. Comparisons with transfer learning, adapters, BitFit, and convolutional LoRA variants further characterize the trade-offs among predictive performance, trainable parameters, and training cost. Additional experiments on CIFAR-100 and Cats vs. Dogs provide preliminary evidence that the proposed adaptation strategy also transfers to non-medical image-classification tasks. Peak GPU-memory measurements further show that parameter efficiency does not translate directly into proportional training-memory savings, with memory consumption depending strongly on the placement of the adapted convolutional layers. Overall, CoLoRA provides a parameter-efficient and deployment-efficient alternative to full fine-tuning for convolutional models.

We introduce CoLoRA (Convolutional Low-Rank Adaptation), a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

The prevalence of harmful content on social media platforms poses significant risks to users and society, necessitating more effective and scalable content moderation strategies. Current approaches rely on human moderators, supervised classifiers, and large volumes of training data, and often struggle with scalability, subjectivity, and the dynamic nature of harmful content (e.g., violent content, dangerous challenge trends, etc.). To bridge these gaps, we utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) to undertake few-shot dynamic content moderation via in-context learning. Through extensive experiments on multiple LLMs, we demonstrate that our few-shot approaches can outperform existing proprietary baselines (Perspective and OpenAI Moderation) as well as prior state-of-the-art few-shot learning methods, in identifying harm. We also incorporate visual information (video thumbnails) and assess if different multimodal techniques improve model performance. Our results underscore the significant benefits of employing LLM based methods for scalable and dynamic harmful content moderation online.

The prevalence of harmful content on social media platforms poses significant risks to users and society, necessitating more effective and scalable content moderation strategies.

Many consumer decisions involve repeated choices under uncertainty, where experience in one context may inform decisions in another. For example, experience with a brand in one market or usage context may shape beliefs about that brand in a new context. We study whether such cross-context transfer takes the form of meta-learning, in which experience across contexts updates higher-order beliefs that guide learning in a new context. In a hierarchical laboratory task, participants choose among airlines across routes and observe noisy binary outcomes. Participants improve both within and across routes, indicating cross-route knowledge transfer. We compare human choices with no-transfer, fully integrated meta-learning, and boundedly rational meta dynamic programming policies, BRMDP(D), where D is the number of hyper-posterior draws used to approximate integration. Trial-by-trial likelihood comparisons show that low-D policies, especially BRMDP(1), best predict participant choices. The results suggest that consumers transfer information across contexts using coarse representations of higher-order uncertainty.

Many consumer decisions involve repeated choices under uncertainty, where experience in one context may inform decisions in another.

That a prompt's effect is not a property of the prompt is established: prompts optimised for one model degrade on another, and rankings reorder under neutral reformatting. That evidence is about task accuracy, which cannot say whether the interaction is a fact about task machinery or about the conditional distribution itself. We ask on a readout with no task in it: the fixed-point structure of the short-window argmax map x_{t+1} = argmax_x p(x | x_{t-1}, x_t), censused from 96 starts. It is deterministic, so nothing can be helped or hurt, and it exists only at short windows -- four of six models lose it entirely by window 16 -- so everything here concerns how a model reads a fragment. Two results. First, the interaction reaches this readout at full magnitude: nine tokens of conditioning move the fixed-point fraction across most of its range, change a four-way structural class, and reorder models, while instruction tuning worth 60.5 IFEval points moves the class by zero. Second, nothing we proposed carries it. Prefix length fails: the effect is not monotone. Four phenomenological factors -- prose-versus-markup, a universal direction, bidirectionality, instruct-resistance -- were each withdrawn within one run of being proposed, dissolved by widening the sample. And the nearest mechanistic account, attention-sink dominance of early tokens, predicts the sign of the shift on 2 of 5 models -- chance -- while a length-by-content cross shows it holds on real text and fails on our probe's uniformly random input, so we are outside its regime, not against it. One fixed nine-token prefix drives four models toward 0 and two toward 1; the bidirectionality survives in-distribution starts. On this readout the unit of explanation is the prompt-model pair. The recurring error it caught in us has a name: a criterion with a shape applied to a quantity with no room to vary.

That a prompt's effect is not a property of the prompt is established: prompts optimised for one model degrade on another, and rankings reorder under neutral reformatting.

Reliable evaluation of large language models should separate supported answering from unsupported guessing without conflating either with data contamination, prompt idiosyncrasy, or generic refusal behavior. We present a contamination-aware, multi-zone benchmark for measuring the transition from answerable knowledge to abstention-expected unknowns under frozen build-time labels. The benchmark contains 1,200 items across five domains, explicit abstention expectations, contamination-risk metadata, and dual parsing with an official strict parser plus a normalized robustness parser. We evaluate FLAN-T5, Qwen2.5-Instruct, and Llama-3-Instruct models under locked answer-or-abstain prompts, answer-only controls, and prompt-template variants. The benchmark is not solved by generic non-answer behavior: FLAN baselines remain weak on productive abstention, while stronger instruction-tuned models expose a selective but incomplete transition from answering to abstaining. Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct achieves the best overall reliability, but answer-expected zones remain difficult, calibration remains poor, and benign-item refusal persists. Prompt and parser robustness analyses preserve the main ranking and qualitative conclusions. The benchmark therefore provides a reproducible protocol for auditing answerability, abstention, refusal, and contamination as distinct but interacting dimensions of LLM reliability.The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/renweimeng/Know2Guess-A-Contamination-Aware-Multi-Zone-Benchmark.

Reliable evaluation of large language models should separate supported answering from unsupported guessing without conflating either with data contamination, prompt idiosyncrasy, or generic refusal behavior.

This paper develops a general transfer learning framework for nonparametric regression with data consisting of multiple groups. Under the assumption that groups share a common structure along with group-specific deviations in additive form, the proposed method employs a two-stage offset learning procedure: the first stage pools data from all groups to estimate an overall mean function, and the second stage estimates offsets for each group, yielding final group-level estimators through additive combination. Upper bounds on the $\mathcal L_2$ error are established for the proposed framework, covering a broad class of nonparametric estimators under mild complexity and noise conditions. When instantiated with deep ReLU networks, explicit convergence rates are derived under hierarchical composition models, demonstrating the ability to overcome the curse of dimensionality. Conditions that enable positive transfer with faster rates are considered, including learning with simpler functions and data augmentation through pooling samples across groups. Various simulations and real-data experiments further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This paper develops a general transfer learning framework for nonparametric regression with data consisting of multiple groups.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in settings where textual summaries, numerical observations, and external tool outputs may provide conflicting evidence. We study how LLMs arbitrate between such sources when they support opposing decisions. To do so, we introduce a controlled synthetic benchmark in which latent risk trajectories generate both numerical time series and natural language summaries, allowing us to construct conflicts where exactly one evidence source is aligned with the ground-truth label. This design lets us independently manipulate modality, temporal recency, source reliability, and evidence provenance. Across open-weight instruction-tuned models, we find that arbitration behaviour is systematic rather than random: models exhibit distinct text-versus-number preferences, follow temporal recency more consistently than explicit reliability cues, and can over-rely on external forecasts even when they conflict with direct contextual evidence. These results suggest that current LLMs often rely on heuristic arbitration strategies when integrating heterogeneous evidence, highlighting a failure mode for tool-augmented decision systems.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in settings where textual summaries, numerical observations, and external tool outputs may provide conflicting evidence.

Watermarking schemes for large language model output are evaluated almost exclusively on English text using each scheme's detection threshold and a narrow set of quality measurements. Multilingual deployment exposes evaluation-design choices that are inconsequential on English but determine conclusions cross-lingually. We propose an evaluation framework with four components: detection thresholds calibrated empirically per deployment context, a threshold-independent companion measurement that distinguishes calibration failures from detection failures, three disjoint quality measurement paradigms (distributional, paired-semantic, and reference-perplexity), and a generalized-entropy decomposition of cross-language disparity over a typological family partition. Applied to six watermarking schemes, three open-weight generators, eleven languages spanning four scripts and eight typological families, and both base and instruction-tuned regimes, the framework reveals failure modes that single-language single-paradigm evaluation cannot surface. Across detection and quality, observed disparity is predominantly between-family on the typological partition, indicating that cross-lingual fairness gaps in watermarking are structural to language properties rather than idiosyncratic to particular languages.

Watermarking schemes for large language model output are evaluated almost exclusively on English text using each scheme's detection threshold and a narrow set of quality measurements.

Existing approaches to anomalous behaviour log detection, such as Wazuh rely primarily on predefined detection rules, while statistical anomaly detection approaches such as OpenSearch identify deviations from previously observed behavioural patterns. Recent research has investigated LLMs for log anomaly detection because of their ability to interpret semantic and contextual information. However, LLM-based approaches can be affected by prompt construction, noisy log data, and reliance on generic datasets that may lack endpoint-specific authentication behaviours. To address these limitations, this study develops a standardised instruction-based LLM classification framework for detecting anomalous authentication behaviours, including borderline cases. A controlled cybersecurity testbed was developed to generate endpoint-specific authentication data, producing a curated dataset comprising normal, borderline, and anomalous behavioural scenarios. Three instruction-tuned LLMs, Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct, and GPT-OSS 20B, were evaluated against Wazuh rule-based detection and OpenSearch Anomaly Detection using a common ground-truth severity framework. Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct achieved the strongest overall end-to-end detection performance, with an accuracy of 89.3%, recall of 88.2%, F1-score of 91.8%, and false negative rate of 11.8%. In comparison, Wazuh achieved an accuracy of 52.0% and false negative rate of 68.6%, while OpenSearch achieved an accuracy of 49.3% and false negative rate of 74.5%. Meta Llama also detected 80% of the borderline anomalous scenarios, compared with 20% for Wazuh and 15% for OpenSearch. Qwen achieved lower overall detection performance than Meta Llama but recorded the lowest average inference latency and 100% structured-response validity. GPT-OSS demonstrated strong classification performance when valid responses were produced.

Existing approaches to anomalous behaviour log detection, such as Wazuh rely primarily on predefined detection rules, while statistical anomaly detection approaches such as OpenSearch identify deviations from previously observed behavioural patterns.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly improved LLMs' mathematical problem-solving capabilities, but distilling such capabilities into smaller models remains challenging due to the capacity mismatch between verbose teachers and compact students. Directly copying teachers' lengthy reasoning chains causes capacity overload, resulting in truncated outputs or repetitive failure. Existing remedies each sacrifice a critical property of CoT: implicit reasoning methods (e.g., compressing reasoning into hidden states) trade away interpretability and verifiability, while heuristic compression strategies (e.g., random step pruning) destroy logical integrity. To address this, we propose BRIDGE, a curriculum framework that first establishes structural understanding via masked reconstruction, then uses GRPO-based reinforcement learning to guide students in self-discovering the optimal balance between accuracy and brevity, and finally internalizes complex reasoning through teacher-guided rewriting on failure cases. On GSM8K, BRIDGE enables Qwen2.5-3B to achieve 11.29% accuracy improvement and 27.4% token reduction over the original model, outperforming instruction-tuned variants and distillation baselines. Zero-shot transfer experiments on SVAMP and MATH-500 further confirm the generalization of internalized reasoning. Our code and model checkpoints are publicly available at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SDM2026_BRIDGE and https://huggingface.co/bowen0815/BRIDGE.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly improved LLMs' mathematical problem-solving capabilities, but distilling such capabilities into smaller models remains challenging due to the capacity mismatch between verbose teachers and compact students.