AI4Science 论文速递

Enhancing classification performance in mammography remains a persistent challenge across both small curated datasets and large-scale clinical cohorts. Conventional transfer learning approaches often neglect dataset-specific characteristics, while recent neighborhood-informed methods have been restricted to narrow tasks with rigid formulations, limiting their scalability to population-level datasets. To address these challenges, we propose the Dataset-Informed Transfer Learning (DITL) framework, which integrates dataset-derived difficulty signals with neighborhood-based triplet supervision in a unified objective. DITL introduces two adaptive components: (i) Adaptive Difficulty-Weighted Cross-Entropy (A-DWCE), which assigns per-sample weights based on k-nearest neighbor label purity in a self-supervised feature space, and (ii) Adaptive Neighborhood Representation Triplet (A-NR-Triplet), which enforces intra-class compactness and inter-class separation using a learnable margin. Unlike focal loss, DITL requires no hyperparameter tuning, removes heuristic weighting and fixed margins, and incurs negligible computational overhead, yielding a robust and scalable optimization strategy. On the large-scale VinDR-Mammo dataset, DITL achieves state-of-the-art performance for whole-image breast density classification, with significant improvements across accuracy, F1-score, and AUC (p < 0.0001). Beyond large cohorts, DITL also delivers consistent, statistically significant gains on small ROI datasets (p < 0.0001). By bridging small-scale lesion analysis with large-scale density estimation, DITL establishes a clinically relevant, scalable, and generalizable framework for mammography classification, spanning the full breast cancer screening-to-diagnosis spectrum.

Enhancing classification performance in mammography remains a persistent challenge across both small curated datasets and large-scale clinical cohorts.

Syntactic convergence (the tendency of speakers to adapt in language towards the grammatical profiles of their interlocutors) is a well-documented feature of human dialogue widely considered to operate below conscious awareness. Whether large language models exhibit analogous syntactic convergence toward human users relative to human baselines and across a broad range of syntactic constructions remains an open question. Using substitution-paradigm data in which model generations replace one speaker's turns in pre-existing human dialogues, this study measures turn-adjacent reuse of context-free grammar (CFG) rules across sixteen open-weight Llama and Gemma models (1B-70B, pretrained and instruction-tuned) at 1,901 matched positions per model. Every model showed greater CFG-rule overlap with the preceding human turn than with a sampled unrelated human prime, and in every model this actual-versus-random difference was larger for lower-frequency rules. Each instruction-tuned model also showed greater natural-output overlap with the actual prime than the human response it replaced, and all eight matched architecture pairs exhibited greater actual-prime overlap after instruction tuning. However, relative to pretrained variants, instruction-tuned outputs overlapped more with unrelated primes, showed a smaller actual-versus-random increment, and had lower conditional rule-reuse odds once target rule-set size was held constant. In exploratory analyses, each model exhibited greater mean lexical and semantic similarity to the preceding turn than the matched human responses did. Instruction-tuned models additionally produced responses with greater mean semantic similarity than their pretrained counterparts in all eight architecture pairs, whereas the lexical similarity results were more heterogeneous.

Syntactic convergence (the tendency of speakers to adapt in language towards the grammatical profiles of their interlocutors) is a well-documented feature of human dialogue widely considered to operate below conscious awareness.

Question answering (QA) over irregular clinical time series (ICTS) plays a pivotal role in a wide range of healthcare applications. Although recent multimodal time-series large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in general-purpose time-series QA, they remain poorly equipped to model the sparsity, asynchrony, and irregular sampling patterns of clinical observations. To fill this gap, we propose ClinPRISM, a cost-effective multimodal LLM reasoning framework for question answering over ICTS data. First, we devise an irregularity-aware multi-scale encoder to capture sparse clinical evidence at diverse temporal scales. Then, we propose a temporal evidence distiller to integrate representations across these scales and compress them into a small number of LLM-compatible tokens. Moreover, we introduce a progressive alignment strategy that sequentially aligns the irregular trajectories with the LLM's textual embedding space. To facilitate training, we construct 30,000 clinical time series paired with multi-scale descriptions, together with 41,000 instruction-tuning instances spanning 11 tasks. Using a 4-billion-parameter LLM backbone, ClinPRISM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the held-out evaluation benchmark while using only 16 time-series tokens and achieving an average inference latency of 0.15 seconds per question.

Question answering (QA) over irregular clinical time series (ICTS) plays a pivotal role in a wide range of healthcare applications.

Automated sleep stage classification typically employs a single population-agnostic model, disregarding established demographic variations in sleep architecture. Sleep patterns, however, differ substantially across gender, age, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity, indicating that a onesize-fits all approach may be suboptimal for diverse clinical populations. In this paper, we propose a two stage training strategy based on demographic stratification and transfer learning framework. We first pretrains a convolutional recurrent model on the full population and then fine tunes it independently for demographic subgroups defined by gender, age, and Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) severity according to the AASM clinical standard. Using the DREAMT dataset comprising 100 clinical subjects and 7 PSG channels, we evaluate 37 fine-tuned configurations across single-axis and two-way demographic combinations. Results demonstrate that 35 of the 37 fine-tuned models outperform the baseline, with Cohen's kappa improvements ranging from 0.9 to 12.9%. These findings indicate that stratified fine tuning tailored to specific patient demographics yields substantially more accurate sleep staging than a single generalized model, offering a practical and clinically grounded paradigm for personalized sleep assessment.

Automated sleep stage classification typically employs a single population-agnostic model, disregarding established demographic variations in sleep architecture.

Reliable confidence estimation remains a key limitation of test-time adaptation in vision-language models (VLMs), where prompt tuning improves zero-shot accuracy but often degrades calibration due to entropy-driven overconfidence. Prior approaches mitigate this using LLM-derived class attributes and contrastive regularization, yet treat attributes independently, ignoring their relational structure. We propose ARGTCA, which represents (class, attribute) pairs as nodes in a Symbolic Attribute Graph and trains a Graph Attention Network (GAT) using contrastive objectives to produce structurally informed embeddings that capture inter-attribute dependencies. We introduce two attribute selection strategies: ARGTCA-DIV for intra-class diversity and ARGTCA-DISC for inter-class discrimination. Experiments across nine benchmarks show that ARGTCA-DIV reduces average Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by approximately ~37% over baselines, while ARGTCA-DISC consistently performs as the second-best variant, reducing average ECE by approximately ~17% over baselines. These results suggest that modeling symbolic attribute interactions provides a principled approach for reliable test-time adaptation in VLMs.

Reliable confidence estimation remains a key limitation of test-time adaptation in vision-language models (VLMs), where prompt tuning improves zero-shot accuracy but often degrades calibration due to entropy-driven overconfidence.

A rhetorical figure that Cicero and Quintilian catalogued two thousand years ago reappears, systematically, in the text of large language models: epanorthosis, the self-correction of the specimen «This is not a course. It is a journey of transformation». This essay argues that the overuse is a trained disposition, driven mainly by a training distribution rich in promotional prose and by preference tuning (RLHF) that rewards confident, emphatic phrasing; the left-to-right nature of generation is an amplifier rather than the root cause. Building on evidence that models diverge from human rhetorical style, and on Fontanier's classification of epanorthosis as a figure of thought, it sets out a programme that scores the figure against genre-specific human baselines through an Epanorthosis Index (density relative to the human rate). A first measurement, on three sizes of one instruction-tuned model family, finds mis-calibration by register in both directions: the models overshoot in oratory (about twofold, near threefold in Italian, concentrated in the larger tiers) and undershoot in informal question-and-answer writing, while matching humans in argument, journalism, and encyclopedic prose. Three constructive contributions follow: a survey of mitigation techniques centred on lightweight LoRA adapters; a demonstration, in Italian, that a one-line instruction cuts the figure by half to nearly three-quarters and that a supervised-fine-tuning adapter removes it almost entirely, with a scaling coefficient that dials the reduction back onto the human rate; and the argument that the target is calibration to the human rate for each genre, not elimination. It closes on the stakes: the real risk is that we begin to write like the machines.

A rhetorical figure that Cicero and Quintilian catalogued two thousand years ago reappears, systematically, in the text of large language models: epanorthosis, the self-correction of the specimen «This is not a course.

This paper proposes a multitask wireless foundation model via adaptive low-rank masked autoencoders (WALoMA), a unified multi-task foundation model for sixth-generation (6G) wireless physical layer architectures, to address the limitations of specialized, task-specific deep learning models and the practical challenge of scarce labeled wireless datasets. By leveraging concepts inspired by foundation models, the proposed framework adopts a masked autoencoder (MAE) paradigm to learn from unlabeled channel data, to significantly reduce reliance on extensive annotations. The model treats wireless channel state information (CSI) as a universal modality and learns transferable representations through self-supervised channel reconstruction. Key architectural novelties include the use of 2D positional encoding (PE) to explicitly preserve the spatial-frequency relationships between antennas and subcarriers, and low-rank adaptation (LoRA) for parameter-efficient fine-tuning. The framework's efficacy is demonstrated across five downstream tasks, achieving individual scores of 96.47\% for LoS/NLoS classification, 80.45\% for beam prediction, 85.78\% for channel interpolation, 99.12\% for channel estimation, and 77.18\% for channel charting. Consequently, numerical results show that the proposed model achieves a composite score of 87.80\%, significantly outperforming the 59.90\% achieved by the large wireless model (LWM) baseline while training an average of only 14.68\% of total parameters, and maintaining strong performance even under extremely limited labeled data conditions.

This paper proposes a multitask wireless foundation model via adaptive low-rank masked autoencoders (WALoMA), a unified multi-task foundation model for sixth-generation (6G) wireless physical layer architectures, to address the limitations of specialized, task-specific deep learning models and the practical challenge of scarce labeled wireless datasets.

Rubric-based reinforcement learning enriches language model training by evaluating model outputs against explicit criteria. Yet in GRPO-style pipelines, these structured judgments are reduced to a scalar response-level reward and converted into a response-level advantage, which is broadcast uniformly to all generated tokens. This leaves no explicit mechanism for allocating credit within a response, even when different criteria are grounded in different spans, formatting decisions, or semantic choices. We propose CoRT, a token-level credit weighting method for rubric-conditioned GRPO. Instead of training an auxiliary token scoring model, CoRT uses counterfactual replay to rescore the same sampled response under the original rubric-conditioned prompt and a matched criteria-free prompt. The resulting tokenwise log-likelihood contrasts serve as a proxy for dependence on the rubric context. CoRT maps these contrasts to bounded, response-normalized weights and uses them to redistribute the signed GRPO advantage across tokens, without introducing an auxiliary scorer or changing the response-level reward. Experiments across instruction-tuned models and reward granularities show that CoRT improves over matched response-level GRPO in the vast majority of comparisons, with an average gain of 4.4 percentage points. The method remains competitive with learned token-level credit baselines while avoiding a separate relevance-learning stage. These results suggest that policy-internal counterfactual likelihood contrasts provide an effective training signal for within-response credit allocation while retaining the simplicity and stability of GRPO.

Rubric-based reinforcement learning enriches language model training by evaluating model outputs against explicit criteria.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and low-bit quantization are now standard tools for adapting language models under tight compute budgets, yet their interaction is most often studied on billion-parameter models where the design space is expensive to explore. We ask a complementary question: on a specific, fully reproducible 60M-parameter encoder-decoder model (T5-small) and a single-table text-to-SQL benchmark (WikiSQL), how much task accuracy does each efficiency knob actually cost? We run a controlled, single-variable study over (i) LoRA rank r in {2, 4, 8, 16, 32}, (ii) the set of adapted modules, and (iii) numerical precision. We report task accuracy alongside system-level metrics including trainable parameters, peak training memory, inference latency, and throughput, and frame adaptation as a constrained trade-off rather than an accuracy-only objective. Our results show that LoRA with r=16 recovers within 11.6 percentage points of full fine-tuning accuracy (59.6% vs. 71.2% exact-match) while training fewer than 1% of parameters and consuming 31% less peak GPU memory. Within this setting, rank beyond r=16 yields no measurable accuracy gain. QLoRA with INT8 and NF4 quantization achieves comparable accuracy (52.8% and 53.2%) at dramatically lower memory cost (0.60 GB each), demonstrating a compelling trade-off for memory-constrained deployments. All code, configurations, and logs are released for full reproducibility.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and low-bit quantization are now standard tools for adapting language models under tight compute budgets, yet their interaction is most often studied on billion-parameter models where the design space is expensive to explore.

Computational AMP discovery is often evaluated through AMP/non-AMP recognition, yet follow-up decisions depend on assay-derived evidence such as target-species potency, hemolysis, toxicity, and selectivity. Existing AMP and peptide benchmarks cover binary recognition, multilabel annotation, assay regression, or broader peptide-model comparison, but they do not jointly place AMP recognition, species-conditioned potency, spectrum, safety-facing proxy endpoints, and cross-endpoint behavior within one sequence-homology-controlled protocol. To address this problem, we introduce AMPBench-MT, a provenance-preserving benchmark that standardizes canonical peptide records and organizes them into binary recognition, species-conditioned pMIC regression, and endpoint-specific potency and safety-facing readouts. Across 161 endpoint-specific model evaluations, high binary performance does not reliably indicate assay-endpoint behavior. Frozen protein-language-model embeddings form the leading pMIC error cluster, while graph and classical regressors remain close. Spectrum labels further reveal that PR-oriented metrics can be misleading under scarce observed negatives, whereas low-toxicity, HC50 hemolysis, and selectivity expose smaller but more assay-facing signals. AMPBench-MT shows that AMP evaluation should move beyond recognition leaderboards toward endpoint-aware evidence auditing. Our proposed benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZihengZhou06/AMPBench-MT.

Computational AMP discovery is often evaluated through AMP/non-AMP recognition, yet follow-up decisions depend on assay-derived evidence such as target-species potency, hemolysis, toxicity, and selectivity.

Rapid, large-scale 3D reconstruction from multi-date satellite imagery is vital for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster response, yet remains difficult due to illumination changes, sensor heterogeneity, and the cost of per-scene optimization. We introduce SwiftGS, a meta-learned system that reconstructs 3D surfaces in a single forward pass by predicting geometry-radiation-decoupled Gaussian primitives together with a lightweight SDF, replacing expensive per-scene fitting with episodic training that captures transferable priors. The model couples a differentiable physics graph for projection, illumination, and sensor response with spatial gating that blends sparse Gaussian detail and global SDF structure, and incorporates semantic-geometric fusion, conditional lightweight task heads, and multi-view supervision from a frozen geometric teacher under an uncertainty-aware multi-task loss. At inference, SwiftGS operates zero-shot with optional compact calibration and achieves accurate DSM reconstruction and view-consistent rendering at significantly reduced computational cost, with ablations highlighting the benefits of the hybrid representation, physics-aware rendering, and episodic meta-training.

Rapid, large-scale 3D reconstruction from multi-date satellite imagery is vital for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster response, yet remains difficult due to illumination changes, sensor heterogeneity, and the cost of per-scene optimization.

Silicon sampling uses language models as proxies for human survey respondents, treating each model call as an independent draw from the persona's response distribution. We show this draw does not exist: instruction-tuned models do not sample from distributions, they collapse to a single output. The same persona on the same question returns the same answer on more than half of items in a public-opinion benchmark. The collapse is sharp: the model's internal probabilities concentrate on a single option, and the failure is substantially amplified by instruction tuning: across three model families with materially different post-training pipelines, every instruction-tuned model fails on every task we test, while base models fail far less often. Strikingly, the same model that cannot sample from a distribution can describe it accurately in a single call. We call this gap the KNOWS/DOES split, and trace it to a degenerate sampling primitive visible in the logits and induced by alignment training. Exploiting this split, asking the model to describe the response distribution in one call more than halves the error against human survey data compared to persona aggregation. For applications that require per-persona outputs, we propose Prompt-Perturbed Argyle (PPA), which reduces the same error by 21% at no added cost.

Silicon sampling uses language models as proxies for human survey respondents, treating each model call as an independent draw from the persona's response distribution.

Literary translation has recently gained attention as a distinct and complex task in machine translation research, yet translation by small open models remains an open problem, particularly for low-resource languages such as Romanian. We introduce the TinyFabulist Translation Framework (TF2), a unified framework for dataset creation, fine-tuning, and evaluation in English $\to$ Romanian literary translation. Building on DS-TF1-EN-3M, the largest collection of synthetic English fables to date, our pipeline first generates 15k high-quality Romanian references from the TF1 pool using a high-performing large language model (LLM). We then apply a two-stage fine-tuning process to a 12B-parameter open-weight model: (i) instruction tuning to capture genre-specific narrative style, and (ii) adapter compression for efficient deployment. Evaluation combines a five-dimension LLM-based rubric (accuracy, fluency, coherence, style, cultural adaptation) as the primary comparative framework, alongside corpus-level Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) reported as a secondary reference-based consistency metric. Our fine-tuned model (TF2-12B) achieves strong fluency and adequacy, narrowing the gap to top-performing proprietary models under automated and human-anchored evaluation, while being open, accessible, and significantly more cost-effective. We publicly release the fine-tuned model and two large-scale synthetic parallel datasets (DS-TF2-EN-RO-3M and DS-TF2-EN-RO-15K), along with all scripts and evaluation prompts. TF2 provides an end-to-end, reproducible pipeline for research on cost-efficient translation, cross-lingual narrative generation, and the broad adoption of open models for culturally significant literary content in low-resource settings.

Literary translation has recently gained attention as a distinct and complex task in machine translation research, yet translation by small open models remains an open problem, particularly for low-resource languages such as Romanian.

Real-world Image Restoration (Real-IR) aims to recover high-quality (HQ) images from complex and unknown degradations. Although recent diffusion-based methods have substantially improved perceptual quality, their current designs leave two key challenges unresolved. Methods that start from Gaussian noise are slow and often less faithful to the degraded input. Residual-based methods usually train from scratch, which makes it hard to exploit modern pre-trained generative priors. In this paper, we present ScaleResfusion, a scalable diffusion framework for real-world image restoration built on pre-trained text-to-image rectified-flow models. The core of our method is Residual Rectified Flow, which introduces the residual term R into Standard Rectified Flow. Instead of starting from pure noise, it uses a residual transport path that starts from noisy low-quality (LQ) images and admits an exact acceleration point. By learning the residual vector field, Residual Rectified Flow keeps the output distribution and linear diffusion process consistent with the pre-trained rectified-flow models. This makes parameter-efficient fine-tuning possible at scale. We further introduce a knowledge-distillation pipeline to reduce sampling cost while maintaining restoration quality. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world restoration tasks show that ScaleResfusion achieves state-of-the-art performance with much higher efficiency. These results suggest a practical and scalable way to adapt large pre-trained diffusion models to real-world image restoration. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/YukinoshitaLove/ScaleResfusion.

Real-world Image Restoration (Real-IR) aims to recover high-quality (HQ) images from complex and unknown degradations.

Activation steering controls language models by adding vectors or features to hidden states at inference time, but the upstream source of these steering signals is often treated as a secondary detail. We study this source choice as activation source selection: the combination of source context and activation readout policy used to collect the hidden states from which a steering signal is built. Holding the downstream intervention fixed, we show across three instruction-tuned models and four steering task families that changing only the source activations substantially changes steering success. We further find that effective steering is not explained simply by whether the desired behavior appears in the source text. Instead, strong signals come from execution-boundary states, where the model is about to produce or continue the target behavior. This pre-/post-realization distinction explains why answer-based sources sometimes work: their useful component aligns with execution-boundary directions rather than target appearance alone. Building on this view, we introduce tail subtraction, which removes shared prompt and continuation semantics from boundary states and yields cleaner, more stable steering signals. Overall, our results suggest that steering depends on representations of what the model is about to do, not merely on what has already appeared.

Activation steering controls language models by adding vectors or features to hidden states at inference time, but the upstream source of these steering signals is often treated as a secondary detail.

Structure-prediction networks built on co-evolutionary statistics have transformed protein-based drug discovery, yet their accuracy does not extend to peptide therapeutics--an increasingly important modality defined by non-canonical residues, macrocyclization, and complex topologies. We introduce Vilya-2, a diffusion transformer that extends the all-atom representation of Vilya-1 from modeling individual molecules to modeling their interactions with protein targets. This all-atom representation enables transfer learning between different molecular types, and delivers highly accurate structural modeling of peptides across sizes, classes, and compositions bound to therapeutically relevant targets. By generating diverse structural ensembles and ranking them with calibrated confidence, Vilya-2 recovers 59.1% of peptide interfaces to sub-2 Å backbone RMSD, far exceeding the performance of a representative co-folding model even when that model is given the bound receptor as a template. In addition, Vilya-2 is state-of-the-art at small-molecule docking, and generalizes to novel protein-small molecule complexes unlike those seen in training. It also generalizes to modeling molecular conformations of diverse macrocycles and disulfide-stapled miniproteins several-fold larger than any molecule seen in training. Finally, Vilya-2 can be used as a foundation model, and fine-tuned to enrich for active compounds in hit-to-lead campaigns. By unifying predictive accuracy with broad generalizability across chemical space, Vilya-2 is the structure-prediction oracle that de novo peptide design pipelines require--establishing the all-atom approach as a general foundation for the design and evaluation of de novo peptide therapeutics.

Structure-prediction networks built on co-evolutionary statistics have transformed protein-based drug discovery, yet their accuracy does not extend to peptide therapeutics--an increasingly important modality defined by non-canonical residues, macrocyclization, and complex topologies.

The alignment of Small Language Models (SLMs) in the 70--500M parameter range using reinforcement learning is often considered unstable, though the underlying failure mechanisms have not been systematically investigated. In the State-of-the-Art (SOTA) research, fifteen (model, corpus) configurations were trained using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The experiments included Pythia-70M, 160M, 410M and SmolLM2-135M, 360M on the TinyStories, CNN/DailyMail, and Wikitext-103 corpora. Three reproducible failure modes were identified in small-scale language models: silent LoRA parameter freezing in standard PEFT/TRL pipelines, numerical overflow in importance ratios when using bfloat16, and catastrophic policy collapse due to reward-model error. These issues were addressed using a merge-and-reinitialize adapter technique, float32 precision during PPO updates, and a three-layer safety mechanism comprising reward whitening, importance-ratio guarding, and weight rollback. In this paper, a capacity-headroom hypothesis is proposed, which states that PPO performance at the SLM scale depends on both a fluent supervised model ($\text{PPL}<20$) and a discriminative reward signal, rather than on the number of model parameters. The proposed system converged stably in all experiments and improved preference win rate over the SFT baseline in configurations with a fluent prior and an informative reward signal. Furthermore, it outperformed instruction-tuned baselines while requiring significantly less training data. All checkpoints, preference datasets, and training scripts are publicly released$^§$.

The alignment of Small Language Models (SLMs) in the 70--500M parameter range using reinforcement learning is often considered unstable, though the underlying failure mechanisms have not been systematically investigated.

Developers judge a model checkpoint by how it behaves. After supervised fine-tuning (SFT), two checkpoints that perform about the same across relevant benchmarks are treated as interchangeable, equally ready for the next alignment stage, typically preference optimization. We ask whether this judgment misses a pretraining imprint: a difference that no post-SFT benchmark reveals, yet that decides how each checkpoint responds to further training. To find out, we run a controlled experiment on the final window of pretraining, the last data trained on before instruction tuning. Six branches fork from one partially pretrained checkpoint and differ only in this window: 500 million tokens, 0.1% to 1% of the tokens that precede it. Each branch trains its window on a single data source: generic web text, filtered web text, normative discourse, safety text, mathematical text, or synthetic educational text. SFT and post-training are then identical. After SFT the branches behave near-identically, within about one point on instruction following, refusal, and capability, yet the same post-training carries them to very different endpoints, under both a direct preference optimization update and a reinforcement learning update with a verifiable reward. We measure this deviation through refusal of harmful requests: when post-training begins the safety text branch refuses no more than the web text branch, yet by the end it has lost far less of its refusal. The other four branches gain little or no protection, so the effect is selective to what the window contained. The protection requires the safety text to arrive last rather than earlier in pretraining, and it reproduces on a second model family. What a model is pretrained on last shapes how it reacts to alignment. Therefore, a checkpoint should not be evaluated by its post-SFT behavior alone, and what it was trained on last should be reported with it.

Developers judge a model checkpoint by how it behaves.

State-of-the-art toxicity detectors for text-to-image generation adopt a one-size-fits-all approach: a single universal model applying fixed safety guidelines to all users. Our empirical evidence shows that these detectors fail to shield marginalized communities: approximately 35% of generated images labeled safe are considered harmful by disability communities. In this position paper, we argue for community-specific toxicity detection (CTD). To demonstrate its feasibility, we collaborate with disability experts to develop safety guidelines for two communities: dwarfism and blind/low vision. Using a dataset of 2,400 annotated T2I-generated images we demonstrate that both large vision-language models and existing general-purpose toxicity detectors catastrophically fail to recognize harmful content under these guidelines in zero-shot settings with F1 score lower than random guessing (F1 0.32 and 0.37). Promisingly, prompt-based adaptation methods (ICL, VQA) substantially improve harm detection performance (GPT-4o: F1 0.50 and 0.78), while parameter-efficient fine-tuning improves smaller models (0.5b-7b with best F1 0.48 and 0.59) with less than 100 demonstrations, but remains sensitive to evolving guidelines. Despite these gains, CTD performance remains far below F1 $\approx 0.9$ achieved for general-purpose toxicity detection, highlighting the challenge and the need for sustained research effort.

State-of-the-art toxicity detectors for text-to-image generation adopt a one-size-fits-all approach: a single universal model applying fixed safety guidelines to all users.

As the inference phase of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires handling long context windows, the Key-Value (KV) cache initially appears to address this challenge but eventually becomes a significant bottleneck as the context window continues to grow. Low-rank compression has recently been studied as an effective approach to reduce KV cache memory while maintaining model performance. However, only a few existing methods treat the Key and Value caches differently, despite their distinct roles. Moreover, these methods typically employ fixed attention-head grouping, which may not fully exploit the structural similarity among attention heads. In this paper, we propose an improved low-rank KV cache compression framework. For the Key cache, we dynamically group attention heads based on Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) similarity and allocate the rank budget adaptively under a parameter budget. For the Value cache, we adopt the same approach as ReCalKV, refining the low-rank decomposition through offline calibration to improve reconstruction quality. Experimental results on three instruction-tuned LLMs show that our method reduces the number of Key cache parameters while maintaining competitive accuracy. We further observe that the proposed strategy is particularly effective for Multi-Head Attention (MHA) models, whereas it should be applied more conservatively to Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) models, especially in long-context settings.

As the inference phase of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires handling long context windows, the Key-Value (KV) cache initially appears to address this challenge but eventually becomes a significant bottleneck as the context window continues to grow.

Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes. Existing studies often rely on standalone tree ensembles or generic neural networks, although fine-grained ecological classes frequently exhibit overlapping spectral, topographic, and structural characteristics. Many frameworks also provide limited protection against stacking leakage, insufficient probability calibration, weak minority-class evaluation, and little evidence of stability across repeated data splits. To address these limitations, this study proposes Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a tree-neural probability-fusion framework that combines out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, validation-selected meta-learning, and post-hoc temperature scaling. Raster values from six LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy variables and two hyperspectral vegetation indices were extracted at coordinate-based reference locations. Quality control removed 26 samples with missing elevation and one sample with non-finite NDWI, producing 1,833 complete records across 29 vegetation and non-vegetation classes. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.8000, a macro F1-score of 0.7768, a balanced accuracy of 0.7903, and an MCC of 0.7903. Calibration reduced the expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 without changing class predictions. Five-seed evaluation yielded a macro F1-score of 0.7717 +/- 0.0112, indicating stable performance across repeated splits. The results demonstrate a reliable discrimination-calibration trade-off for small-sample, fine-grained ecological classification.

Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes.

Mechanistic understanding and rational design of complex chemical systems depend on fast and accurate predictions of electronic structures beyond individual building blocks. However, if the system exceeds hundreds of atoms, first-principles quantum mechanical (QM) modeling becomes impractical. In this study, we developed FB-GNN-MBE by integrating a fragment-based graph neural network (FB-GNN) into the many-body expansion (MBE) theory and demonstrated its capacity to reproduce first-principles potential energy surfaces (PES) for hierarchically structured systems with manageable accuracy, complexity, and interpretability. Specifically, we divided the entire system into basic building blocks (fragments), evaluated their one-fragment energies using a QM model, and addressed many-fragment interactions using the structure-property relationships trained by FB-GNNs. Our investigation shows that FB-GNN-MBE achieves chemical accuracy in predicting two-body (2B) and three-body (3B) energies across water, phenol, and mixture benchmarks, as well as the one-dimensional dissociation curves of water and phenol dimers. To transfer the success of FB-GNN-MBE across various systems with minimal computational costs and data demands, we developed and validated a teacher-student learning protocol. A heavy-weight FB-GNN trained on a mixed-density water cluster ensemble (teacher) distills its learned knowledge and passes it to a light-weight GNN (student), which is later fine-tuned on a uniform-density (H2O)21 cluster ensemble. This transfer learning strategy resulted in efficient and accurate prediction of 2B and 3B energies for variously sized water clusters without retraining. Our transferable FB-GNN-MBE framework outperformed conventional non-FB-GNN-based models and provided a scalable and accurate route toward interaction energies of large molecular assemblies.

Mechanistic understanding and rational design of complex chemical systems depend on fast and accurate predictions of electronic structures beyond individual building blocks.

Domain Incremental Learning (DIL) is a sub-branch of continual learning that aims to address the never-ending arrival of new domains without catastrophic forgetting. Despite the advent of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) approaches, prior works create task-specific LoRAs that overlook shared knowledge across tasks. Inaccurate selection of task-specific LoRAs during inference leads to significant drops in accuracy, while existing works rely on linear or prototype-based classifiers, which have suboptimal generalization powers. Our paper proposes continual knowledge consolidation low-rank adaptation (CONEC-LoRA) addressing the DIL problems. CONEC-LoRA is developed from consolidations between task-shared LORA to extract common knowledge and task-specific LORA to incorporate domain-specific knowledge. Unlike existing approaches, CONEC-LoRA integrates the concept of a stochastic classifier whose parameters are sampled from a distribution, thus enhancing the likelihood of correct classifications. Last but not least, an auxiliary network is deployed to optimally predict the task-specific LoRAs for inference and implements the concept of a different-depth network structure in which every layer is connected with a local classifier to leverage intermediate representations. This module integrates the ball-generator loss and transformation module to address the synthetic sample bias problem. Our rigorous experiments demonstrate the advantage of CONEC-LoRA over prior art on 4 popular benchmark problems with over 5% margins.

Domain Incremental Learning (DIL) is a sub-branch of continual learning that aims to address the never-ending arrival of new domains without catastrophic forgetting.

This work explores the journey towards achieving Bahnaric-Vietnamese translation for the sake of culturally bridging the two ethnic groups in Vietnam. However, translating from Bahnaric to Vietnamese also encounters some difficulties. The most prominent challenge is the lack of available original Bahnaric resources source language, including vocabulary, grammar, dialogue patterns and bilingual corpus, which hinders the data collection process for training. To address this, we leverage a transfer learning approach using sequence-to-sequence pre-training language model. First of all, we leverage a pre-trained Vietnamese language model to capture the characteristics of this language. Especially, to further serve the purpose of machine translation, we aim for a sequence-to-sequence model, not encoder-only like BERT or decoder-only like GPT. Taking advantage of significant similarity between the two languages, we continue training the model with the currently limited bilingual resources of Vietnamese-Bahnaric text to perform the transfer learning from language model to machine translation. Thus, this approach can help to handle the problem of imbalanced resources between two languages, while also optimizing the training and computational processes. Additionally, we also enhanced the datasets using data augmentation to generate additional resources and defined some heuristic methods to help the translation more precise. Our approach has been validated to be highly effective for the Bahnaric-Vietnamese translation model, contributing to the expansion and preservation of languages, and facilitating better mutual understanding between the two ethnic people.

This work explores the journey towards achieving Bahnaric-Vietnamese translation for the sake of culturally bridging the two ethnic groups in Vietnam.

Medical image segmentation is crucial for clinical applications, but it is frequently disrupted by noisy annotations and ambiguous anatomical boundaries, limiting its application in real-world scenarios. Existing methods often directly adapt noisy label learning techniques designed for instance classification, overlooking the pixel-wise heterogeneity in medical segmentation with its spatially and anatomically varying difficulties. Consequently, global assumptions or simple confidence metrics fail to address these local variations, leaving boundary ambiguities unresolved. To address this issue, we propose MetaDCSeg, a robust framework that dynamically learns optimal pixel-wise weights to suppress the influence of noisy labels while preserving reliable annotations. By explicitly modeling boundary uncertainty through a Dynamic Center Distance (DCD) mechanism, our approach utilizes weighted feature distances for foreground, background, and boundary centers, directing the model's attention toward hard-to-segment pixels near ambiguous boundaries. This strategy enables more precise handling of structural boundaries, which are often overlooked by existing methods, and significantly enhances segmentation performance. Extensive experiments across four benchmark datasets with varying noise levels demonstrate that MetaDCSeg outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.

Medical image segmentation is crucial for clinical applications, but it is frequently disrupted by noisy annotations and ambiguous anatomical boundaries, limiting its application in real-world scenarios.

Gradient descent scales well to large models, but becomes unstable over long time horizons. Gradient-free optimizers can scale to arbitrary timespans, but are hobbled by high dimensions. Since learning occurs in large models over long timescales, neither of these approaches is likely to produce traits which can accelerate the learning process. Instead, we propose a meta-learning algorithm in which the agent learns to modify its own weights and biases. Our algorithm consists of an inner loop, wherein the agent performs some high-dimensional optimization upon itself, and an outer loop, wherein we perform some low-dimensional optimization upon the inner loop. Since the outer loop handles very few parameters, standard zeroth-order methods may be used.

Gradient descent scales well to large models, but becomes unstable over long time horizons.

Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty. Such verbalized overconfidence can mislead users and weaken confidence scores as a reliable uncertainty signal, yet its internal mechanisms remain poorly understood. We present a circuit-level mechanistic analysis of this inflated verbalized confidence in LLMs, organized around three axes: capturing verbalized confidence as a differentiable internal signal, identifying the circuits that causally inflate it, and leveraging these insights for targeted inference-time recalibration. Across two instruction-tuned LLMs on three datasets, we find that a compact set of MLP blocks and attention heads, concentrated in middle-to-late layers, consistently writes the confidence-inflation signal at the final token position. We further show that targeted inference-time interventions on these circuits substantially improve calibration. Together, our results suggest that verbalized overconfidence in LLMs is driven by identifiable internal circuits and can be mitigated through targeted intervention.

Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty.

Over-prompting, a phenomenon where excessive examples in prompts lead to diminished performance in Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges the conventional wisdom about in-context few-shot learning. To investigate this few-shot dilemma, we outline a prompting framework that leverages three standard few-shot selection methods - random sampling, semantic embedding, and TF-IDF vectors - and evaluate these methods across multiple LLMs, including GPT-4o, GPT-3.5-turbo, DeepSeek-V3, Gemma-3, LLaMA-3.1, LLaMA-3.2, and Mistral. Our experimental results reveal that incorporating excessive domain-specific examples into prompts can paradoxically degrade performance in certain LLMs, which contradicts the prior empirical conclusion that more relevant few-shot examples universally benefit LLMs. Given the trend of LLM-assisted software engineering and requirement analysis, we experiment with two real-world software requirement classification datasets. By gradually increasing the number of TF-IDF-selected and stratified few-shot examples, we identify their optimal quantity for each LLM. This combined approach achieves superior performance with fewer examples, avoiding the over-prompting problem, thus surpassing the state-of-the-art by 1% in classifying functional and non-functional requirements.

Over-prompting, a phenomenon where excessive examples in prompts lead to diminished performance in Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges the conventional wisdom about in-context few-shot learning.

Deep learning and computer vision techniques have become increasingly important in the development of self-driving cars. These techniques play a crucial role in enabling self-driving cars to perceive and understand their surroundings, allowing them to safely navigate and make decisions in real-time. Using Neural Networks self-driving cars can accurately identify and classify objects such as pedestrians, other vehicles, and traffic signals. Using deep learning and analyzing data from sensors such as cameras and radar, self-driving cars can predict the likely movement of other objects and plan their own actions accordingly. In this study, a novel approach to enhance the performance of self-driving cars by using pre-trained and custom-made neural networks for key tasks, including traffic sign classification, vehicle detection, lane detection, and behavioral cloning is provided. The methodology integrates several innovative techniques, such as geometric and color transformations for data augmentation, image normalization, and transfer learning for feature extraction. These techniques are applied to diverse datasets, including the German Traffic Sign Recognition Benchmark (GTSRB), road and lane segmentation datasets, vehicle detection datasets, and data collected using the Udacity self-driving car simulator to evaluate the model efficacy. The primary objective of the work is to review the state-of-the-art in deep learning and computer vision for self-driving cars. The findings of the work are effective in solving various challenges related to self-driving cars like traffic sign classification, lane prediction, vehicle detection, and behavioral cloning, and provide valuable insights into improving the robustness and reliability of autonomous systems, paving the way for future research and deployment of safer and more efficient self-driving technologies.

Deep learning and computer vision techniques have become increasingly important in the development of self-driving cars.

Instruction tuning has become a key technique for enhancing the performance of large language models, enabling them to better follow human prompts. However, low-resource languages such as Luxembourgish face severe limitations due to the lack of high-quality instruction datasets. Traditional reliance on machine translation often introduces semantic misalignment and cultural inaccuracies. In this work, we address these challenges by creating a cross-lingual instruction tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, without resorting to machine-generated translations into it. Instead, by leveraging aligned data from English, French, and German, we build a high-quality dataset that preserves linguistic and cultural nuances. We provide evidence that cross-lingual instruction tuning not only improves representational alignment across languages but also the model's generative capabilities in Luxembourgish. This highlights how cross-lingual data curation can avoid the common pitfalls of machine-translated data and directly benefit low-resource language development.

Instruction tuning has become a key technique for enhancing the performance of large language models, enabling them to better follow human prompts.