AI4Science 论文速递

Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) provide protein language models with explicit evolutionary context, but their large depth makes subsampling unavoidable under limited token budgets. Existing strategies, including random selection, identity-based filtering, and diversity-driven sampling, are effective heuristics, yet provide limited control over the evolutionary signals retained in the subset. In this work, we recast MSA subsampling as an explicit optimization problem, where key evolutionary measures, including query identity and diversity, are treated as controllable objectives. Building on this view, we introduce AP-REASONER, an Affinity-Propagation-based factor-graph approach. With evolution-aware unary factors, exemplar-consistency factors, and two control knobs, AP-REASONER performs factor-graph reasoning through message passing to infer a fixed-budget MSA subset. Experiments on long-range contact prediction and conformational ensemble prediction show that AP-REASONER outperforms baseline subsamplers on structure-sensitive downstream tasks and enables controllable recovery of alternative protein conformations. These results highlight the value of modeling MSA subsampling as a controllable optimization problem, where factor-graph reasoning offers an effective alternative to heuristic selection.

Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) provide protein language models with explicit evolutionary context, but their large depth makes subsampling unavoidable under limited token budgets.

Speaker-dependent modelling can substantially improve performance in speech-based health monitoring applications. While mixed-effect models are commonly used for such speaker adaptation, they require computationally expensive retraining for each new observation, making them impractical in a production environment. We reformulate this task as a meta-learning problem and explore three approaches of increasing complexity: ensemble-based distance models, prototypical networks, and transformer-based sequence models. Using pre-trained speech embeddings, we evaluate these methods on a large longitudinal dataset of shift workers (N=1,185, 10,286 recordings), predicting time since sleep from speech as a function of fatigue, a symptom commonly associated with ill-health. Our results demonstrate that all meta-learning approaches tested outperformed both cross-sectional and conventional mixed-effects models, with a transformer-based method achieving the strongest performance.

Speaker-dependent modelling can substantially improve performance in speech-based health monitoring applications.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models, but its performance depends strongly on how a fixed rank budget is distributed across Transformer modules. Existing adaptive-rank methods usually rely on local gradient statistics collected during training, which introduces extra memory and computation and overlooks task-conditioned global information flow. We propose IFCLoRA, a topology-aware rank allocation method applied before fine-tuning. Using a small calibration set and a frozen pretrained model, IFCLoRA builds a sparse task-conditioned interaction graph whose nodes represent LoRA-compatible modules. It combines a global information-flow topology prior with local gradient sensitivity to compute Information-Flow Centrality scores, which estimate each module's adaptation importance under multi-hop propagation. Ranks are then assigned once under a global budget. Across multiple models, tasks, and low-rank settings, IFCLoRA consistently outperforms LoRA, AdaLoRA, and EVA under matched training configurations and total rank budgets, while retaining training costs comparable to standard LoRA. On mathematical reasoning with LLaMA 3 8B, IFCLoRA improves over LoRA by 1.36 percent at rank 4 and 1.82 percent at rank 8. Further analysis shows task-dependent, non-uniform rank profiles, indicating that global information-flow structure provides an informative and interpretable prior for low-budget parameter-efficient fine-tuning.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models, but its performance depends strongly on how a fixed rank budget is distributed across Transformer modules.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have been widely adopted in large language models, yet parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for MoE models remains underexplored. Existing PEFT methods for MoE either ignore router priors with uniform adapters, reducing efficiency and risking forgetting, or rely on static expert selection, limiting per-token capacity and cross-expert feature learning. In this paper, we make the first attempt to fine-tune MoE models with MoE-style low-rank adaptation: our method, entitled MoE$^2$-LoRA, deeply couples the pretrained expert specialization with task-specific adaptivity via a dual-channel Routing-Conditioned Projection (RCP) module, which reuses base router activations to inform LoRA routing. We further introduce a single global LoRA expert pool shared across all layers, enabling model-wide adaptation with emergent layer-wise affinities and balanced expert utilization. MoE$^2$-LoRA simultaneously benefits from the advantages of prior reuse, dynamic adapter routing, and model-wide knowledge sharing. Evaluated on multiple MoE backbones with varying scales and expert granularities, MoE$^2$-LoRA consistently achieves state-of-the-art downstream accuracy while retaining stronger general capabilities.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have been widely adopted in large language models, yet parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for MoE models remains underexplored.

Pre-training Large Language Models (LLMs) on web-scale datasets becomes fundamental for advancing general-purpose AI. In contrast, enhancing their predictive performance on downstream tasks typically involves adapting their knowledge through fine-tuning. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), aim to reduce the computational cost of this process by freezing the pre-trained model and updating a smaller number of parameters. In comparison to full fine-tuning, these methods achieve over 99\% reduction in trainable parameter count, depending on the configuration. Unfortunately, such a reduction may prove insufficient as LLMs continue to grow in scale. In this work, we address the previous problem by systematically selecting only a few layers to fine-tune using LoRA or its variants. We argue that not all layers contribute equally to the model adaptation. Leveraging this, we identify the most relevant layers to fine-tune by measuring their contribution to changes in internal representations. Our method is orthogonal to and readily compatible with existing low-rank adaptation techniques. We reduce the trainable parameters in LoRA-based techniques by up to 50\%, while maintaining the predictive performance across different models and tasks. Specifically, on encoder-only architectures, this reduction in trainable parameters leads to a negligible predictive performance drop on the GLUE benchmark. On decoder-only architectures, we achieve a small drop or even improvements in the predictive performance on mathematical problem-solving capabilities and coding tasks. Finally, this effectiveness extends to multimodal models, for which we also observe competitive results relative to fine-tuning with LoRA modules in all layers. Code is available at: https://github.com/c2d-usp/Layer-wise-LoRA-with-CKA

Pre-training Large Language Models (LLMs) on web-scale datasets becomes fundamental for advancing general-purpose AI.

Accurate ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of complex, fluxional chemical systems are severely limited by the high computational scaling of correlated electronic structure methods. To overcome this bottleneck, we present a robust, graph-theoretic molecular fragmentation framework integrated with machine learning to directly model post-Hartree-Fock nuclear forces at coupled cluster accuracy. Bypassing the limitations of automatic differentiation on learned energy surfaces that may struggle with link-atom Jacobians, our approach directly predicts nuclear force vectors. By projecting these vectors onto fragment-fixed principal axes of inertia, we establish co-variant descriptors that naturally preserve rotational, translational, and permutational invariance. The methodology achieves exceptional high parameter efficiency through a vector-valued training protocol that reduces trainable parameters by over an order of magnitude, while an unsupervised mini-batch k-means space tessellation algorithm constructs highly representative training databases using only 10% to 20% of reference configurations. We rigorously validated this framework on the highly fluxional solvated Zundel cation H_{13}O_6^+ ). Our fully machine-learning-predicted AIMD trajectories successfully reproduced complex dynamical signatures and key structural characteristics, including radial distribution functions and the velocity autocorrelation power spectrum. Ultimately, this scalable, systematically improvable framework bridges the gap between high-level correlated wavefunction theories and long-timescale reactive sampling, laying the foundation for advanced, LLM-inspired transfer learning in modern chemical dynamics simulations.

Accurate ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of complex, fluxional chemical systems are severely limited by the high computational scaling of correlated electronic structure methods.

A rhetorical figure that Cicero and Quintilian catalogued two thousand years ago reappears, systematically, in the text of large language models: epanorthosis, the self-correction of the specimen «This is not a course. It is a journey of transformation». This essay argues that the overuse is a trained disposition, driven mainly by a training distribution rich in promotional prose and by preference tuning (RLHF) that rewards confident, emphatic phrasing; the left-to-right nature of generation is an amplifier rather than the root cause. Building on evidence that models diverge from human rhetorical style, and on Fontanier's classification of epanorthosis as a figure of thought, it sets out a programme that scores the figure against genre-specific human baselines through an Epanorthosis Index (density relative to the human rate). A first measurement, on three sizes of one instruction-tuned model family, finds mis-calibration by register in both directions: the models overshoot in oratory (about twofold, near threefold in Italian, concentrated in the larger tiers) and undershoot in informal question-and-answer writing, while matching humans in argument, journalism, and encyclopedic prose. Three constructive contributions follow: a survey of mitigation techniques centred on lightweight LoRA adapters; a demonstration, in Italian, that a one-line instruction cuts the figure by half to nearly three-quarters and that a supervised-fine-tuning adapter removes it almost entirely, with a scaling coefficient that dials the reduction back onto the human rate; and the argument that the target is calibration to the human rate for each genre, not elimination. It closes on the stakes: the real risk is that we begin to write like the machines.

A rhetorical figure that Cicero and Quintilian catalogued two thousand years ago reappears, systematically, in the text of large language models: epanorthosis, the self-correction of the specimen «This is not a course.

Transfer learning presumes that a representation learned on a source task carries structure that remains usable on a related target task. Standard evaluations probe this through target accuracy or a distributional discrepancy, without stating which structural invariant should survive the change of task. We make that invariant explicit and computable. We model a task as a small category: its objects are the task's components, such as data domains or class labels, and its morphisms are the admissible relations between them, such as the comparison of a coarse class with a fine class refining it. A change of task is a functor $J:\mathcal A\to\mathcal B$ from the source task category to the target task category, recording where each component is sent and which are thereby identified. A trained representation is summarised by a functor $F:\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{V}$ into a category of invariants, e.g. the persistent homology of its latent point cloud per component. The target must then exhibit the left Kan extension $\operatorname{Lan}_JF$, the universal extension of $F$ along $J$. For an observed target invariant $G:\mathcal B\to\mathcal V$ we define the transfer discrepancy $\operatorname{Comp}_J(F,G)=\sup_{b\in\operatorname{Ob}(\mathcal B)}d_{\mathcal V}((\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b),G(b))$, scoring transfer against the invariant $J$ forces, not the source itself. We prove finite cokernel formulas for $(\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b)$ over the comma category $J\downarrow b$, in chain complexes and persistence modules, and for finite-type one-parameter persistence it equals the bottleneck distance between barcodes exactly. Controlled experiments on neural latent point clouds test whether the score recovers the correct change of task and flags representation collapses that preserve accuracy while destroying transfer-relevant topology.

Transfer learning presumes that a representation learned on a source task carries structure that remains usable on a related target task.

Fine-tuning an aligned language model on a narrow stream of bad advice can make it broadly misaligned on questions unrelated to the training data, a phenomenon called emergent misalignment. We ask why the narrow lesson generalizes at all, and we find that narrow fine-tuning recruits a persona structure that is present in the model before the fine-tune exists. From a frozen instruction-tuned model (Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct) we extract per-domain persona subspaces by contrastive teacher forcing and find that 4 unrelated domains share one low-rank core at 657x a random-subspace null, with 82% of that core lying outside a style core built at matched diversity. The literal first optimizer step of fine-tuning on insecure code climbs a broad-misalignment margin harder than the same code framed as educational, and forecasts realized margin movement out to 375 steps. Projecting the subspace out of the residual stream throughout fine-tuning prevents broad misalignment (27.7% to 0.0% of judged generations) while a matched-rank random subspace changes nothing; injecting it into the never-fine-tuned model induces misalignment that grows with dose to 45.4%, past the fine-tuned model it is measured against. The same projection applied to the weight gradient is inert, and three post-hoc weight edits leave the disposition in place: the sharpest edit suppresses the behavior rather than removing it, and the ablated structure re-forms inside the subspace the edit cleared. Spreading a fixed budget of bad data across 4 domains produces more broad misalignment than mechanical weight superposition and matched diversity jointly account for. All measurements come from one model at 14B; the extraction is from an aligned instruction-tuned checkpoint, which leaves the structure's provenance open; and the intervention that prevents misalignment also abolishes the narrow trained behavior.

Fine-tuning an aligned language model on a narrow stream of bad advice can make it broadly misaligned on questions unrelated to the training data, a phenomenon called emergent misalignment.

A LoRA adapter is a few megabytes that almost everyone treats as a skill rather than a record of the data behind it. We put that assumption on a scale. Extending compression-based memorization analysis to the frozen-base setting, we measure directly, in bits, how much a low-rank adapter writes into a model it never changes. The answer is both smaller than full fine-tuning and less lawful than parameter counting would predict. Adapters store a couple of bits per trainable parameter, well short of a full model's budget, but that figure turns less on how many parameters an adapter carries than on where they sit. Move the same parameter budget from attention into the MLP and it holds nearly twice as much; strip the frozen base of its structure and the capacity all but disappears. Applied to realistic fine-tunes of Qwen2.5, the same instrument shows privacy leakage rising with the bits an adapter writes rather than the parameters it nominally has, and it draws a clean line between supervised and reinforcement learning: the secrets that supervised fine-tuning copies down verbatim, an adapter trained on verifiable rewards never records. Measuring what fine-tuning writes, rather than attacking it after the fact, turns a piece of folklore into a quantity one can design against.

A LoRA adapter is a few megabytes that almost everyone treats as a skill rather than a record of the data behind it.

We show that post-training quantization can silently alter how large language models reason even when task accuracy is preserved. Using a six-category failure taxonomy validated by two independent human annotators (Cohen's $κ$ = 0.906), we classify 30,000 chain-of-thought outputs from five instruction-tuned LLMs (3B--14B parameters) across three quantization precisions (FP32, FP16, NF4) and four reasoning benchmarks. We find that while accuracy is robust across precisions (maximum 3.1 pp drop), Hollow Convergence (correct answers reached through incomplete or unverifiable reasoning) shows a significant size-dependent shift under NF4, dropping sharply for the two smallest models tested but remaining invariant for models at 12B parameters and above. This effect is also benchmark-specific: GSM8K is categorically immune while LogiQA and ARC-Challenge show the largest shifts. Furthermore, under NF4, Shortcut Collapse rises from 44% to 78% of wrong-answer failures in LLaMA 3.2-3B while Confidence Snowballing collapses from 15.8% to near zero, a qualitative shift invisible to accuracy metrics. Finally, we show Hollow Convergence cannot be reliably detected from surface-level text features (best F1 = 0.53), establishing it as a deployment-relevant failure mode that standard evaluation pipelines cannot catch.

We show that post-training quantization can silently alter how large language models reason even when task accuracy is preserved.

Multi-task learning (MTL) is a promising approach for prediction tasks derived from video game state data, as modern game telemetry provides multiple related supervision signals from the same structured observations. We study whether a shared model trained jointly across tasks in team-based multiplayer games can improve generalization while reducing training and inference cost compared to specialized single-task models. We adapt a multimodal architecture for endpoint prediction to a general multi-task setting that combines rasterized vision inputs, global match context, and per-unit state information through an image encoder and attention-based interaction modeling. Experiments on a large proprietary World of Tanks dataset compare single-task and multi-task training, evaluate weighting strategies for mixed losses and conflicting gradients, and test pre-training/fine-tuning under limited target-data regimes. We also examine within-game transfer across game maps under structured environment shift.

Multi-task learning (MTL) is a promising approach for prediction tasks derived from video game state data, as modern game telemetry provides multiple related supervision signals from the same structured observations.

Large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and become valuable tools in everyday life. However, how to align LLMs to a particular set of human values is still an open problem. Recent studies show that instruction tuning has strong potential for zero-shot tasks and may serve as an effective approach to addressing value alignment. Nevertheless, although many datasets for instruction tuning already exist, they are not specifically designed around moral scenarios and behaviors. We construct a unified moral-value dataset that can be directly used for instruction tuning. This dataset is built upon existing moral-value datasets by merging them into a unified corpus and converting them into an instruction-response format. We show that training on a mixed dataset combining general task datasets with our dataset preserves general-task performance, and we report preliminary observations on how the mixing ratio affects value-oriented task performance. Our work provides a moral-value dataset for instruction tuning and offers a useful resource for further alignment research. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/teohzzh/value-for-instruction-tuning.

Large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and become valuable tools in everyday life.

By leveraging standard RISC-V extensions, namely Zfh (scalar float16) and Zvfh (vector float16), this work proposes an open-source framework to enable complete on-device training on resource-constrained RISC-V single-core. Our approach allows memory footprint reduction by about 50% as compared to using float32 and with minimal model performance degradation. We also facilitate transfer learning and fine-tuning scenarios by incorporating layer-freezing capabilities. Our work builds onto AIfES, an open-source, modular and generic DNN training and inference framework for embedded systems that can be extended with custom hardware-specific functions. The benefits of float16 is further emphasized by outlining the low area overhead of Zfh on a RV64GC super-scalar out-of-order FPGA softcore (+1.15% LUT6 and +0.05% FF at 175MHz). Finally, we discuss the architecture of a Zvfh implementation within the same RISC-V core.

By leveraging standard RISC-V extensions, namely Zfh (scalar float16) and Zvfh (vector float16), this work proposes an open-source framework to enable complete on-device training on resource-constrained RISC-V single-core.

Prior work establishes that instruction-tuned LLMs exhibit left-of-center political bias, but measures it exclusively through abstract questionnaires. We show this does not generalize to concrete policy decisions. We introduce a dual-instrument methodology grounded in Swiss direct democracy: the Smartvote questionnaire (75 policy questions), administered to 66 LLMs and compared to 184 elected members of the Swiss National Council, and 48 real federal referenda (Volksabstimmungen) put to 9 flagship LLMs in four national languages and three information conditions, compared to actual outcomes and party recommendations (Parolen). The instruments disagree. (1) The left-to-right agreement gradient that dominates Smartvote (replicating prior work; Cohen's d = 3.64) shifts to center-peaked on referenda, where models align most with centrist Die Mitte and FDP rather than leftist SP and Gruene (Wilcoxon p = 0.008). (2) For some models the language of a question changes the answer more than its content does: cross-linguistic consistency ranges from 50% (Mistral) to 98% (GPT-5.4). (3) Two models vote Nein on 83-94% of referenda at similar rates on progressive and conservative proposals (binomial p < 0.0001), a status-quo aversion rather than a left-right bias. What prior work measured as "leftward bias" may not extend beyond abstract instruments: confronted with real decisions, LLMs behave less like coalition partners of the left than like cautious civil servants, centrist and inconsistent across languages.

Prior work establishes that instruction-tuned LLMs exhibit left-of-center political bias, but measures it exclusively through abstract questionnaires.

As chain of thought (CoT) has become central to scaling reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs), it has also emerged as a promising tool for interpretability, suggesting the opportunity to understand model decisions through verbalized reasoning. However, the utility of CoT toward interpretability depends upon its faithfulness---whether the model's stated reasoning reflects the underlying decision process. We provide mechanistic evidence that instruction-tuned models often determine their answer before generating CoT. Training linear probes on residual stream activations at the last token before CoT, we can predict the model's final answer with >0.9 AUC on most tasks. We find that these directions are not only predictive, but also causal: steering activations along the probe direction often flips model answers, with flip rates substantially exceeding norm-matched orthogonal baselines across most model-dataset pairs. When steering induces incorrect answers, we observe two distinct failure modes: confabulation (fabricating false premises) and non-entailment (stating correct premises but drawing unsupported conclusions). While post-hoc reasoning may be instrumentally useful when the model has a correct pre-CoT belief, these failure modes suggest it can result in undesirable behaviors when reasoning from a false belief.

As chain of thought (CoT) has become central to scaling reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs), it has also emerged as a promising tool for interpretability, suggesting the opportunity to understand model decisions through verbalized reasoning.

Federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) enables communication-efficient adaptation of large pretrained models on decentralized edge data, but it remains fragile under non-IID client heterogeneity. In low-rank adaptation (LoRA), different clients may learn locally useful but spectrally misaligned update subspaces, causing high-variance aggregation and poor global transfer. We propose TRISHUL, a spectral-control framework for robust federated PEFT. TRISHUL follows the FL no-raw-data-sharing setting but does not itself provide formal privacy guarantees. TRISHUL uses shared frozen multi-head low-rank bases to obtain algebraically exact aggregation of compact core updates, applies nuclear norm proximal shrinkage to suppress client-specific high-rank spectral components before upload, and allocates adaptation heads non-uniformly across layers using a concave water filling budget rule derived from pretrained layer capacity. Because shrinkage is performed only on small core matrices, TRISHUL adds negligible computation and no extra per-round communication over the underlying multi-head PEFT protocol. Across vision and language benchmarks, including CIFAR-100, SVHN, 20 Newsgroups, MRQA, and GLUE with LLaMA3.2-1B, TRISHUL improves convergence, stability, and final performance over federated LoRA baselines, with greater gains under stronger heterogeneity.

Federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) enables communication-efficient adaptation of large pretrained models on decentralized edge data, but it remains fragile under non-IID client heterogeneity.

Fine-tuning large diffusion models for new domains or styles involves a trade-off: improving target-specific generation often degrades the pretrained model's broad generative capability. Existing full and parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods typically handle this trade-off only implicitly. In this work, we propose a novel source-prior-driven selective adaptation method to efficiently fine-tune diffusion models, achieving a favorable trade-off. Our method relies on two key observations: (1) the loss of general generative capability is highly inconsistent across pretrained parameters, and (2) parameters that have a relatively small impact on the model's general generative capability remain structurally inconsistent across layers and parameter types. Motivated by these observations, we first learn a static mask to explicitly identify parameters better suited for downstream adaptation, and then construct structured update strategies for the selected subset. Experiments show that our method achieves a better adaptation-retention trade-off than existing strong baselines.

Fine-tuning large diffusion models for new domains or styles involves a trade-off: improving target-specific generation often degrades the pretrained model's broad generative capability.

Large language models are increasingly used in K-12 education, but existing benchmarks mainly test exam question answering rather than understanding how curriculum knowledge is structured and visually presented. We call this capability curriculum cognition. It covers prerequisite chains, concept taxonomies, experiment-concept links, pedagogical sequencing, and visual grounding. We introduce K12-KGraph, a curriculum-aligned knowledge graph extracted from official People's Education Press textbooks in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology across primary, middle, and high school. It contains nine node types and fourteen relation types covering curriculum structure and visual grounding. From this graph, we derive K12-Bench, a 23,640-question multi-select benchmark with five task families: Ground, Prereq, Neighbor, Evidence, and Locate. We also build K12-Train, a graph-guided supervised fine-tuning corpus of 7,335 samples, including 2,267 text-only QA pairs and 5,068 multimodal VQA pairs. On K12-Bench, Gemini-3-Flash achieves only 57 percent exact match and Gemma-4-31B-IT reaches 46 percent, with Prereq and Neighbor being the hardest tasks. Our training experiments show that domain-specific supervision can reduce this gap. Under a matched 2,300-sample budget, K12-Train-Text consistently outperforms equally sized subsets of eight mainstream instruction-tuning corpora on GaokaoBench and EduEval. For vision-language models, K12-Train-Full achieves the best overall results on Gaokao-MM, MDK12-medium, and K12Vista among all compared training configurations, despite using fewer samples than the full DataFlow and WizardLM baselines. It also surpasses both text-only and multimodal-only variants, showing that textual and visual supervision are complementary. We release the graph, benchmark, training data, and complete construction pipeline.

Large language models are increasingly used in K-12 education, but existing benchmarks mainly test exam question answering rather than understanding how curriculum knowledge is structured and visually presented.

A name alone measurably reshapes a language model's next-token distribution before a single token is sampled. We measure full-vocabulary Shannon entropy of the next-token distribution across six open-weight model families on 5,760 sentence-completion prompts in which race and gender are signaled only by a first name. Black-associated names co-occur with higher first-token entropy and more diverse continuations than White-associated names -- directionally consistent in all six instruction-tuned models under shared raw-text input, all six base checkpoints, and, for output diversity, five of six models under native chat formatting -- opposite to the homogeneity bias documented under explicit group labels (Lee et al., 2024). The gap persists under tokenization and frequency controls and on a frequency-matched name subset; per-prompt effects are small (d = 0.06-0.16) but uniformly signed (template-level paired d = 0.66-1.08). Gender points the other way, additively with race. First-token entropy attenuates sharply under chat-formatted input, and explicit group-label probing is mostly null or reversed; a variance-matched comparison locates the output-diversity disparity in heterogeneity across name-conditioned continuations -- a dimension a fixed group label cannot express. Probing methodology shapes not only whether a disparity is detected but which direction it takes.

A name alone measurably reshapes a language model's next-token distribution before a single token is sampled.

Large language models (LLMs) reproduce homogeneity bias -- the tendency to portray marginalized groups as more internally similar than dominant groups -- but whether this bias generalizes across models, is stable under different inference settings, or depends on how group identity is signaled remains unstudied. We map homogeneity bias across seven open-weight instruction-tuned LLMs (7-20B parameters), a 5x5 temperature x top-p decoding grid, and two paradigms for signaling group identity (explicit labels vs. racially distinctive names). In six of seven models, Hispanic and Asian Americans are portrayed as significantly more homogeneous than White Americans at the default configuration, and the effect remains positive on average at every temperature and top-p tested; African American and gender bias instead vary in direction across models. A conservative cell-level re-analysis confirms Hispanic and Asian homogeneity as robust while weaker African American and gender signals largely do not survive, establishing group-specific robustness. We also apply the same grid to a names-based paradigm in which group identity is signaled via racially distinctive surnames rather than explicit labels. The names paradigm corroborates Hispanic and Asian homogeneity bias, but Black-coded surnames elicit robustly less homogeneous outputs than White-coded names in every model tested -- a reversal absent from the label paradigm -- showing that how group identity is operationalized shapes which biases surface and in which direction.

Large language models (LLMs) reproduce homogeneity bias -- the tendency to portray marginalized groups as more internally similar than dominant groups -- but whether this bias generalizes across models, is stable under different inference settings, or depends on how group identity is signaled remains unstudied.

Constitutive modeling under uncertainty remains a central challenge for reliable mechanics simulations, particularly when the available stress-deformation data are sparse, noisy, or heterogeneous. We propose interval and fuzzy physics-augmented neural networks (iPANNs and fPANNs) for uncertainty-aware hyperelastic constitutive modeling. iPANNs learn sparse lower, mean, and upper free energy density branches whose stresses, obtained by automatic differentiation, ultimately enclose noisy stress observations. In contrast to this deterministic interval description, fPANNs embed the learned iPANN branches into a fuzzy-set representation through alpha-cut interpolation, yielding a nested family of admissible responses. iPANNs and fPANNs encode mechanistic constraints - preserving objectivity, consistency and promoting polyconvexity - and smoothed L0 regularization promotes interpretable energy representations. The bound models are trained through a two-stage transfer-learning procedure in which a sparse mean constitutive response is learned first and then fine-tuned into lower and upper energy branches. We evaluate the framework on synthetic isotropic hyperelastic data with heteroscedastic noise, varying random realizations, shifted noise means, and varying noise magnitudes. The results show that the learned bounds enclose noisy stress observations while generalizing to the test set. Further, we examine the propagation of uncertainty through the mean, upper and lower bound predictions of the learned iPANN models in a finite element setting. The proposed framework provides a compact, physics-consistent route for distribution-free aleatoric uncertainty quantification in hyperelastic constitutive modeling, and propagation in downstream finite element simulations.

Constitutive modeling under uncertainty remains a central challenge for reliable mechanics simulations, particularly when the available stress-deformation data are sparse, noisy, or heterogeneous.

Fine-tuning has been widely used to adapt large language models (LLMs) for domain-specific tasks. Parameter efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as low-rank adaptation (LoRA) are frequently used to reduce computational costs. PortLLM is a training-free and data-free scheme used to adapt LLMs after continual pretraining. Although the initial PortLLM results show that LoRA patches exhibit short-term temporal portability, the long-term performance of PortLLM across several updates of continual pretraining remains underexplored. Furthermore, the intriguing effectiveness of PortLLM is not well understood from a theoretical standpoint. We address these two open questions by (1) performing an extensive empirical study of the long-term temporal portability of PortLLM patches across 10 continual pretraining steps using base models Mistral, Gemma, and Qwen; and (2) offering two theoretical analyses to explain our observation that the simple PortLLM method achieves competitive performance. We find empirically that the portability persists across longer time duration, indicating that repeated fine-tuning is not required when the base model is periodically updated. We find theoretically that near-orthogonality of high-dimensional vectors is a key justification for temporal portability. Our analyses also demonstrate a geometric perspective of the loss landscape in facilitating the theoretical comparison of different adaptation options.

Fine-tuning has been widely used to adapt large language models (LLMs) for domain-specific tasks.

Large language models are increasingly evaluated through the values they endorse, but such evaluations presuppose that models can identify the value expressed in a concrete situation. We study this prerequisite as controlled top-1 recognition over Schwartz's ten basic values. Our evaluation set contains 1,000 Russian situational texts, balanced across the ten values and independently labeled by two human annotators per item. We evaluate 21 instruction-tuned LLM runs under a fixed ranked-response protocol; 20 runs with reliable outputs form the semantic panel. Pooled Acc@1 is 0.683 and Acc@3 is 0.892, showing that models often locate the correct motivational region while ranking close alternatives unstably. Adjacent values account for 50.9% of semantic errors, compared with 24.4% under a checkpoint-specific null. Eight directed confusions recur across checkpoints and human-confirmed subsets. Several are strongly asymmetric, including Universalism to Benevolence, Tradition to Conformity, and Security to Power, whereas Stimulation-Hedonism forms a bidirectional boundary. Their severity is checkpoint-specific and can bias higher-order value profiles. The results motivate value-recognition evaluation that combines exact accuracy, ranked recovery, and directed error analysis.

Large language models are increasingly evaluated through the values they endorse, but such evaluations presuppose that models can identify the value expressed in a concrete situation.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models. Since different modules and layers may contribute unequally to downstream adaptation, allocating rank resources under a fixed parameter budget is an important problem for balancing efficiency, expressiveness, and generalization. Existing adaptive rank methods address this problem mainly through carefully designed importance scores constructed from gradient-derived sensitivity and uncertainty measures, without an explicit statistical interpretation. In this paper, we formulate LoRA rank allocation as a statistical hypothesis testing problem and propose StatLoRA, a statistical inference-based rank allocation method. StatLoRA associates each LoRA component with a test statistic and uses estimated p-values to determine which components should be retained or pruned under a prescribed rank budget. The proposed testing procedure is supported by our central limit theory for stochastic optimizer trajectories. In particular, we establish asymptotic normality for a broad class of commonly used optimizers in deep learning, including AdamW, and derive the corresponding asymptotic distributions for the proposed component scores used in hypothesis testing. We evaluate StatLoRA on LoRA fine-tuning of DeBERTaV3-base, BART-Large, and Qwen2.5-7B across natural language understanding, natural language generation, and question answering tasks. Experiments show that StatLoRA achieves comparable or better performance than vanilla LoRA, AdaLoRA, and IGU-LoRA under matched rank budgets. Sensitivity analyses and empirical diagnostics further support the stability of the proposed hypothesis-testing-based allocation rule and provide empirical evidence for the asymptotic theory of component scores.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models.

Antibodies are essential proteins that play a central role in immune recognition by binding specific antigen molecules. Although recent protein language models have enabled progress in single-chain protein modeling and generation, they often fall short in antigen-specific antibody design, where effective modeling requires explicit pairing between antibody and antigen, particularly at the epitope level. To address these limitations, we introduce AAMFM, an Antigen-specific Antibody Multimodal Foundation Model that learns unified representations of antibody sequences and structures conditioned on antigen context. AAMFM incorporates rich antigen information including geometric interfaces and epitope annotations via a cross-modal adapter, enabling joint modeling of antibody-antigen interactions in a shared latent space. To further guide the model toward functional relevance, we fine-tune AAMFM using Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization (Cal-DPO), leveraging preference signals extracted from a strong structural prior to align learning with binding-specific objectives. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AAMFM achieves state-of-the-art performance in functional antibody design, revealing its potential for antigen-specific antibody engineering. Our code is available at https://github.com/XL-S224/AAMFM.

Antibodies are essential proteins that play a central role in immune recognition by binding specific antigen molecules.

The wind energy industry relies on accurate power curve models to make power forecast, evaluate turbine performance, quantify upgrade, or support site-planning decisions. In this paper, we focus on site-planning power curves, i.e., we investigate how power curve models trained using turbine data on an operating wind farm can be transferred to a new, undeveloped farm. The traditional wisdom in the wind energy literature relies on distance, layout, or terrain characteristics for making cross-farm power curve transfer. Through the lens of domain adaptation, we propose a more reliable transfer learning approach for cross-farm power curve modeling. In the cross-farm applications, a domain is specified by the temporal environmental variates and spatial terrain variables. Domain adaptation is to find a capable similarity metric to adapt the domain on the new farm to that on the existing farm. Empirical results show that our domain adapted power curve consistently outperforms competing approaches by an appreciable margin for site-planning power predictions.

The wind energy industry relies on accurate power curve models to make power forecast, evaluate turbine performance, quantify upgrade, or support site-planning decisions.

Rapid, large-scale 3D reconstruction from multi-date satellite imagery is vital for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster response, yet remains difficult due to illumination changes, sensor heterogeneity, and the cost of per-scene optimization. We introduce SwiftGS, a meta-learned system that reconstructs 3D surfaces in a single forward pass by predicting geometry-radiation-decoupled Gaussian primitives together with a lightweight SDF, replacing expensive per-scene fitting with episodic training that captures transferable priors. The model couples a differentiable physics graph for projection, illumination, and sensor response with spatial gating that blends sparse Gaussian detail and global SDF structure, and incorporates semantic-geometric fusion, conditional lightweight task heads, and multi-view supervision from a frozen geometric teacher under an uncertainty-aware multi-task loss. At inference, SwiftGS operates zero-shot with optional compact calibration and achieves accurate DSM reconstruction and view-consistent rendering at significantly reduced computational cost, with ablations highlighting the benefits of the hybrid representation, physics-aware rendering, and episodic meta-training.

Rapid, large-scale 3D reconstruction from multi-date satellite imagery is vital for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster response, yet remains difficult due to illumination changes, sensor heterogeneity, and the cost of per-scene optimization.

We identify a structured confound in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Pairwise preference labels are intended to reflect the compared outputs, but they may also reflect the rater's state during annotation. Under sustained stressful or distressing conditions, raters' preferences may shift over time, so that preference data encode rater state alongside judgments about response quality. We argue that, if present, such shifts would differ from ordinary disagreement or random label noise. They would be state dependent, could be shared across annotators under similar conditions, and would not necessarily cancel during aggregation, reward modeling, and policy optimization. We propose rater state shift as a plausible and testable source of structured bias in RLHF preference data. This paper develops a hypothesis and an audit framework for studying this source of bias. We define rater state shift, rater state confound, and correlated rater state bias. We also propose survival level emotional authenticity as a candidate output signature, defined by lexical, pragmatic, discourse, and safety features whose reliability and validity remain to be demonstrated. We analyze the conditions under which correlated rater state bias would not be averaged out during aggregation and could enter the learned reward signal. We state five predictions that distinguish this mechanism from generic engagement optimization, together with effect size thresholds for an initial audit, and note which require proprietary data. Finally, we present an audit protocol and pilot study plan that can be applied to publicly available instruction tuned models. We do not infer the training history of any specific deployed model.

We identify a structured confound in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).

Instruction tuning is meant to make language models follow user requests, yet it is unclear whether small models comply when an instruction conflicts with their usual task behavior. We study this across three tasks - multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), sentiment classification, and mathematical question answering - by pairing a standard instruction with a conflicting non-standard one (select an incorrect option, output the opposite sentiment, or return twice the answer). This cross-task design allows us to test whether resistance to conflicting instructions is tied to specific task characteristics or reflects a broader behavioral tendency. As all predictions are scored against the original ground truth, a model that ignores the non-standard instruction still appears accurate. Using standard accuracy, non-standard accuracy, and an Instruction-Following Failure Rate (IFFR), we evaluate instruction-tuned Qwen models across sizes. Both standard accuracy and instruction following generally improve with scale, although the pattern is not consistent across all tasks and datasets. Small models stay competent yet routinely ignore the non-standard instruction, while larger models show a clear gap between the two settings. These findings suggest that gains in task capability do not automatically provide reliable control over model behavior. Task competence and instruction following are therefore distinct abilities, and reporting only standard accuracy hides instruction-following failures.

Instruction tuning is meant to make language models follow user requests, yet it is unclear whether small models comply when an instruction conflicts with their usual task behavior.