AI4Science 论文速递

Code language models need repository-level context to resolve imports, APIs, and project conventions. Existing methods inject this knowledge as long inputs (retrieved through RAG or dependency analysis) or through per-repository fine-tuning and LoRA -- costly at repository scale and brittle to evolving codebases. We introduce Code2LoRA, a hypernetwork framework that generates repository-specific LoRA adapters, effectively injecting repository knowledge with zero inference-time token overhead. Code2LoRA supports two usage scenarios: Code2LoRA-Static converts a single repository snapshot into an adapter, suitable for comprehension of stable codebases; while Code2LoRA-Evo maintains an adapter backed by a GRU hidden state updated per code diff, suitable for active development of evolving codebases. To evaluate Code2LoRA against parameter-efficient fine-tuning baselines, we build RepoPeftBench, a benchmark of 604 Python repositories with two tracks: a static track with 40K training and 12K test assertion-completion tasks, and an evolution track with 215K commit-derived training and 87K commit-derived test tasks. On the static track, Code2LoRA-Static achieves 63.8% cross-repo and 66.2% in-repo exact match, matching the per-repository LoRA upper bound; on the evolution track, Code2LoRA-Evo achieves 60.3% cross-repo exact match (+5.2 pp over a single shared LoRA). Code2LoRA's code can be found at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/code2lora-6857; the model checkpoints and RepoPeftBench datasets can be found at https://huggingface.co/code2lora.

Code language models need repository-level context to resolve imports, APIs, and project conventions.

Factual sycophancy occurs when a language model abandons a correct, verifiable answer under social pressure. Because a flip occurs only when pressure toward a false answer exceeds the model's neutral preference for the truth, flip rates conflate two mechanisms: the strength of that baseline preference (truth margin), and how far pressure shifts it (manipulation sensitivity). We decompose factual sycophancy into these channels and use them to separate the effects of size and instruction tuning across 56 open-weight models spanning 0.3B-32B parameters and 13 manipulation types. We find that vulnerability is governed mainly by size, but instruction tuning changes how size acts: small instruction-tuned models can become less robust, whereas large instruction-tuned models usually become more robust. Instruction tuning primarily increases truth margin, but its behavioral effect depends on manipulation type. Scaling also changes the two channels differently: base models gain margin but become mildly more manipulation-sensitive, whereas instruction-tuned models gain margin faster and become less sensitive. Factual sycophancy is therefore not a single scalar property. Evaluations should report channel-specific, manipulation-specific, and size-conditioned robustness rather than flip rates alone.

Factual sycophancy occurs when a language model abandons a correct, verifiable answer under social pressure.

When a disaster unfolds, responders must answer not only what is happening, but also why it is happening, what will happen next, and what to do now, often from noisy low-altitude UAV views and under tight on-site compute constraints. However, most existing multimodal benchmarks emphasize perception (e.g., recognition/description), cover limited disaster types, and provide insufficient support for the multi-stage reasoning required in practical emergency response. We introduce DisasterBench, a multi-stage multimodal reasoning benchmark for UAV-Based disaster response in complex environments. DisasterBench spans 14 disaster-related scene types and 9 response-critical tasks across pre-, during-, and post-disaster stages, with fine-grained disaster-task mappings that explicitly test causal attribution, propagation prediction, damage analysis, and decision-oriented reasoning. To enable reasoning on the edge, we further propose DisasterVL, a lightweight multimodal model optimized with a three-stage pipeline combining domain instruction tuning, chain-of-thought-guided multimodal alignment, and reinforcement learning-based policy optimization. Experiments across 21 popular MLLMs show that our 2B-parameter DisasterVL outperforms all evaluated open-source models and substantially narrows the gap to state-of-the-art closed-source models, achieving GPT-4o-comparable reasoning accuracy with superior efficiency. The project page is available at https://github.com/TanmouTT/DisasterBench.

When a disaster unfolds, responders must answer not only what is happening, but also why it is happening, what will happen next, and what to do now, often from noisy low-altitude UAV views and under tight on-site compute constraints.

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has advanced remarkably for standard speech; however, pathological speech from neurological conditions remains a significant challenge. We investigate speaker conditioning via Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM), injecting x-vector-derived information into each transformer layer of a frozen ASR encoder to adapt internal representations to individual pathological speakers without modifying base model weights. We benchmark this for the ASR task against standard and parameter-efficient fine-tuning baselines, complemented by post-processing, on Spanish and English pathological speech. Additionally, we evaluate if the adapted model preserves the ability to answer speech-related questions. Results show that speaker-conditioned ASR is competitive with established adaptation strategies while retaining performance on non-conditioned speech.

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has advanced remarkably for standard speech; however, pathological speech from neurological conditions remains a significant challenge.

Large language models (LLMs) present a trade-off between performance and cost, where more powerful models incur greater expense. LLM routing aims to mitigate expenses while maintaining performance by sending queries to the most suitable model. However, existing methods cannot perform well for different user cost-performance preferences. To address this gap, we introduce a novel perceptive LLM routing paradigm for personalized and user-centric cost-performance optimization, which efficiently learns users' implicit preferences through little interaction. To handle the challenge of heterogeneous user needs, we formulate preference profiles as a set of distinct tasks in contextual bandit and propose MetaRouter, a meta-learning framework designed for preference-aware LLM routing. Experimental results show that MetaRouter outperforms strong baselines on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks. Furthermore, it exhibits high efficiency in learning user preferences, robustness to changes in the routable LLMs, and scalability to multi-model routing.

Large language models (LLMs) present a trade-off between performance and cost, where more powerful models incur greater expense.

As robotic systems become more sophisticated, the growing complexity of their motion planning models and the longer training times pose substantial challenges. Evolutionary algorithms such as the Sample-efficient Cross-Entropy Method (iCEM) have recently demonstrated promising potential for low-level real-time planning by leveraging efficient knowledge reuse strategies to improve performance. Although effective in many control tasks, iCEM's performance can be constrained in more complex scenarios, particularly those requiring stacking, sliding, and shelf placement. In this work, we propose a novel iCEM+TL framework that explicitly leverages Transfer Learning (TL), where key iCEM parameters are transferred from simpler upstream tasks to guide more complex downstream tasks. Additionally, we applied Reward Redesign (RR) through task decomposition for stacking objects and shelf placement to optimize task-specific performance. Results from the simulation show that our framework achieves success rate improvements of up to 23%. The framework is further validated on a real Franka Emika robot in a stacking task, demonstrating its practical feasibility for real-world deployment.

As robotic systems become more sophisticated, the growing complexity of their motion planning models and the longer training times pose substantial challenges.

We study English-to-Prakrit machine translation in a low-resource setting where the target language is unsupported by IndicTrans2. We adapt the multilingual model by mapping Prakrit to the Hindi language tag (hin_Deva) without modifying the tokenizer, vocabulary, or architecture. Using a 1,474-pair Maharashtri Prakrit parallel corpus and evaluation on a 20-sample Ardhamagadhi test set, we report corpus BLEU improvements over an untuned baseline. The results indicate that script-compatible language routing can enable feasible transfer to unsupported classical languages, while highlighting limitations due to data scarcity and dialect mismatch. Our code and trained models are released to the public for further exploration https://github.com/D3v1s0m/indictrans2-prakrit-mt.

We study English-to-Prakrit machine translation in a low-resource setting where the target language is unsupported by IndicTrans2.

Fine-grained understanding and species-specific multimodal question answering are vital for advancing biodiversity conservation and ecological monitoring. However, existing multimodal large language models face challenges when it comes to specialized topics like avian species, making it harder to provide accurate and contextually relevant information in these areas. To address this limitation, we introduce the MAviS-Dataset, a large-scale multimodal avian species dataset that integrates image, audio, and text modalities for over 1,000 bird species, comprising both pretraining and instruction-tuning subsets enriched with structured question-answer pairs. Building on the MAviS-Dataset, we introduce MAviS-Chat, a multimodal LLM that supports audio, vision, and text and is designed for fine-grained species understanding, multimodal question answering, and scene-specific description generation. Finally, for quantitative evaluation, we present MAviS-Bench, a benchmark of over 25,000 QA pairs designed to assess avian species-specific perceptual and reasoning abilities across modalities. Experimental results show that MAviS-Chat outperforms the baseline MiniCPM-o-2.6 by a large margin, achieving state-of-the-art open-source results and demonstrating the effectiveness of our instruction-tuned MAviS-Dataset. Our findings highlight the necessity of domain-adaptive multimodal LLMs for ecological applications.

Fine-grained understanding and species-specific multimodal question answering are vital for advancing biodiversity conservation and ecological monitoring.

Reasoning models produce long chain-of-thought traces that are costly to distill and encourage verbose student outputs. We study post-hoc compression of such traces before knowledge distillation. Two teachers, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and gpt-oss-120B, generate about 283k correct traces each; two instruction-tuned models then compress them to 8.6-21.0% of their original character length. Across a 48-run main grid plus seven Qwen-teacher truncation ablations, compressed traces reduce training tokens to 12-30% of raw, speed up training by 2.0-7.6x, and shorten inference outputs by 3-19x with smaller reductions under the shorter gpt-oss teacher. However, raw traces retain the highest downstream accuracy at every scale and for both teachers. A length-matched raw-trace truncation ablation shows that compression is not merely benefiting from a smaller token budget: model-compressed traces usually beat or match naive truncation, especially for smaller students, while maintaining shorter inference outputs. Overall, reasoning-trace compression offers an accuracy-efficiency trade-off rather than a free improvement: students retain up to 96% of raw-trace accuracy while gaining up to 18x higher per-token efficiency, and at the 0.8B scale under LoRA compressed traces narrow the raw-vs-compressed gap but do not exceed raw.

Reasoning models produce long chain-of-thought traces that are costly to distill and encourage verbose student outputs.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used, including in political applications, but their political fairness has been little studied. We assess it using perplexity, posing that a fair model should give equal probability to all political groups. However, we find, across ten LLMs and three datasets covering 37 languages, that LLMs are more perplexed by the texts of far right and nationalist parties than of social-democratic parties. We find this to be consistent with previous work on translation fairness, to the point that perplexity correlates with downstream translation metrics. Our method is applicable to both base LLMs as well as their instruction-tuned counterpart, and we find that both are highly correlated, suggesting that the political fairness of LLMs stems from their pretraining, and is hardly affected by instruction-tuning.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used, including in political applications, but their political fairness has been little studied.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a resource-efficient strategy for adapting Pretrained Foundation Models (PFMs) by learning a small number of task-specific updates $ΔW$. Existing methods often learn $ΔW$ largely independently of pretrained weights $W_0$, or exploit $W_0$ mainly through initialization or simple reparameterization. To further leverage the structural information encoded in $W_0$, we propose Generative Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (GenFT), a $W_0$-conditioned PEFT method that uses a deterministic weight generator to produce task-specific updates. Specifically, GenFT performs row and column transformations with nonlinear activations to extract structured patterns from $W_0$, and introduces a shared-specific decomposition to balance cross-layer information reuse and layer-specific flexibility. GenFT is simple and parameter-efficient, achieving competitive or better average performance across NLP and CV benchmarks. We further provide a pilot study on LLaMA-7B to examine its feasibility for generative models. The code is available at GitHub https://github.com/xuguangning1218/GenFT.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a resource-efficient strategy for adapting Pretrained Foundation Models (PFMs) by learning a small number of task-specific updates $ΔW$.

Deploying frontier large language models (LLMs) for domain-specific structured evaluation tasks often incurs substantial latency, cost, and data privacy overhead. We present a hybrid framework that combines a fine-tuned small language model (LLaMA 3.1 8B, with only 2.05% trainable parameters via LoRA) and a deterministic rule-based post-processing layer. Trained on just 219 curated examples, the system is applied to multi-label compliance evaluation of conversational transcripts spanning 18 heterogeneous output fields. In blind evaluation on 53 previously unseen production transcripts, it achieves 100% JSON structural validity, 83.0% human-validated overall accuracy, and 100% accuracy on the most critical classification field. The proposed approach formalizes a hybrid neural-symbolic decomposition and introduces targeted hard-negative augmentation to improve performance on critical decision boundaries. Running on a single NVIDIA A100 GPU, inference completes in approximately 2 seconds, which is 2-5x faster than frontier-model APIs. The system costs only $0.013 per evaluation compared with $0.025-$0.055 for proprietary alternatives, resulting in 46-76% cost savings. These results demonstrate that domain-adapted small language models, when combined with deterministic post-processing, can match frontier-model accuracy for structured compliance evaluation while substantially reducing operational cost, latency, and privacy risk. Keywords: small language models, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, LoRA, domain adaptation, hybrid inference, compliance evaluation, structured output.

Deploying frontier large language models (LLMs) for domain-specific structured evaluation tasks often incurs substantial latency, cost, and data privacy overhead.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that require nuanced ethical reasoning, yet existing bias evaluations treat model outputs as simply "biased" or "unbiased." This binary framing misses the gradual, context-sensitive way bias actually emerges. We address this gap in two stages: behavioral profiling and mechanistic validation. In the behavioral stage, we introduce the Moral Sensitivity Index (MSI), a metric that quantifies the probability of biased output across a graduated, seven-tier stress test ranging from abstract numerical problems to scenarios rooted in historical and socioeconomic injustice. Evaluating four leading models (Claude 3.5, Qwen 3.5, Llama 3, and Gemini 1.5), we identify distinct behavioral signatures shaped by alignment design: for instance, Gemini 1.5 reaches 72.7% MSI by Tier 5 under socioeconomic framing, while Claude exhibits sharp suppression consistent with identity-based safety training. We then verify these behavioral patterns mechanistically. We select criminal-bias scenarios, which produced the highest MSI scores across models, as probes and apply logit lens, attention analysis, activation patching, and semantic probing to a controlled set of six models spanning three capability tiers: small language models (SLMs), instruction-tuned base models, and reasoning-distilled variants. Circuit-level analysis reveals a U-curve of bias: SLMs exhibit strong criminal bias; scaling to instruction-tuned models eliminates it; reasoning distillation reintroduces bias to SLM-like levels despite identical parameter counts, suggesting distillation compresses reasoning traces in ways that reactivate shallow statistical associations. Critically, the socially loaded cues that drive high MSI scores activate the same bias-driving circuits identified mechanistically, providing cross-stage validation.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that require nuanced ethical reasoning, yet existing bias evaluations treat model outputs as simply "biased" or "unbiased." This binary framing misses the gradual, context-sensitive way bias actually emerges.

Reasoning-trained language models often spend more tokens on harder problems, but longer chains of thought do not show whether a model is merely computing for more steps or following a different internal trajectory. We study this distinction through hidden-state trajectories during chain-of-thought generation across competitive programming, mathematics, and Boolean satisfiability. Raw trajectory geometry is strongly shaped by generation length: longer generations mechanically alter path statistics, so difficulty-dependent comparisons are misleading without adjustment. After residualizing trajectory statistics on length, difficulty remains systematically coupled to corrected trajectory geometry across all domains studied. The clearest reasoning-specific separation appears in the code domain, where harder problems show more direct corrected trajectories and less heterogeneous local curvature in reasoning-trained models than in matched instruction-tuned baselines. Corrected difficulty-geometry coupling is weaker, but still present, in mathematics and Boolean satisfiability. Prompt-stage linear probes do not mirror the code-domain separation, and behavioral annotations show that stronger corrected coupling co-occurs with strategy shifts and uncertainty monitoring. Together, these findings establish length correction as a prerequisite for generation-time trajectory analysis and show that reasoning training can be associated with distinct corrected trajectory geometry, with the strength of the effect depending on the domain.

Reasoning-trained language models often spend more tokens on harder problems, but longer chains of thought do not show whether a model is merely computing for more steps or following a different internal trajectory.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance on diverse downstream and domain-specific tasks via parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). However, existing PEFT methods, particularly MoE-LoRA architectures, suffer from limited parameter efficiency and coarse-grained adaptation due to the proliferation of LoRA experts and instance-level routing. To address these issues, we propose Core Space Mixture of LoRA (\textbf{CoMoL}), a novel MoE-LoRA framework that incorporates expert diversity, parameter efficiency, and fine-grained adaptation. Specifically, CoMoL introduces two key components: core space experts and core space routing. Core space experts store each expert in a compact core matrix, preserving diversity while controlling parameter growth. Core space routing dynamically selects and activates the appropriate core experts for each token, enabling fine-grained, input-adaptive routing. Activated core experts are then merged via a soft-merging strategy into a single core expert, which is combined with a shared LoRA to form a specialized LoRA module. Besides, the routing network is projected into the same low-rank space as the LoRA matrices, further reducing parameter overhead without compromising expressiveness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoMoL retains the adaptability of MoE-LoRA architectures while achieving parameter efficiency comparable to standard LoRA, consistently outperforming existing methods across multiple tasks.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance on diverse downstream and domain-specific tasks via parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT).

The development of multilingual Alzheimer's Disease Dementia (AD) detection models presents significant challenges due to the resource-intensive and time-consuming nature of language-specific model training. We propose a novel solution using cross-language training to detect AD in languages beyond those used for model training. This study investigates multilingual deep learning models for detecting AD across different languages and cognitive impairment levels. Using datasets in English, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi, we developed transformer-based models for binary AD classification. Our approach achieved F1 scores of 82\% across all languages, demonstrating strong cross-linguistic generalization. The rapid inference time (0.5 seconds) supports potential real-time screening applications, while consistent performance across languages indicates feasibility for global deployment.

The development of multilingual Alzheimer's Disease Dementia (AD) detection models presents significant challenges due to the resource-intensive and time-consuming nature of language-specific model training.

Medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) has strong potential for clinical decision support by enabling AI models to interpret medical images and answer clinically relevant queries. Recent approaches typically connect off-the-shelf vision encoders with large language models (LLMs) through lightweight mapping networks to reduce computational cost. However, these methods often overlook the importance of handling noise and small irrelevant changes in visual representations. To address these challenges, we propose a noise-aware Med-VQA framework that incorporates a denoising autoencoder before visual embeddings are mapped into the input space of an LLM. The denoising autoencoder is pretrained to reconstruct clean visual embeddings from corrupted inputs, encouraging the model to learn robust visual representations that are less sensitive to noise. The resulting embeddings are then projected into the language model embedding space using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), forming visual prefix tokens that provide image information to the LLM. To enable efficient adaptation without full retraining, we employ parameter-efficient fine-tuning using low-rank adaptation (LoRA). The proposed method is evaluated on the SLAKE and PathVQA benchmarks. Experimental results show improved robustness to noisy input embeddings while maintaining competitive clean performance across multiple evaluation criteria. These findings suggest that learning more robust visual representations can enhance Med-VQA performance and robustness.

Medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) has strong potential for clinical decision support by enabling AI models to interpret medical images and answer clinically relevant queries.

Producing a labeled vulnerable code at scale is a recurring obstacle for learning-based vulnerability detection: mined corpora carry substantial label noise, and existing LLM-based augmentation propagates these inaccuracies because it transforms vulnerable seeds rather than synthesising vulnerabilities from a specification. A complementary route is to start from safe code and ask an instruction-tuned LLM to inject a specified CWE (which would shift the labeling burden from open-ended detection to bounded binary confirmation) but safety-aligned code LLMs systematically refuse such prompts. This paper is a preliminary feasibility study of abliteration, a low-rank weight edit that orthogonally projects out the refusal direction in the residual stream, as a tool to remove this barrier. We use Python and CWE-89 (SQL injection) as a case study, evaluating the Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct family at 3B, 7B, and 14B parameters on safe samples drawn from PromSec and SafeCoder, replicated three times per condition. We find that (i) refusal on injection prompts is strongly size- and prompt-context-dependent: the 14B refuses 100% of prompts, the 7B refuses 73% of PromSec but only 5% of SafeCoder, whereas the 3B is essentially never blocked; (ii) abliteration reduces refusal to zero or near-zero across all sizes while leaving syntactic validity above 93%, supporting the view that, in this setting, refusal can be detached from measured code-generation capability; and (iii) the post-abliteration injection rate remains capacity-bound (88-97% on the 14B, 89-90% on the 7B, and 25-48% on the 3B) separating willingness, which abliteration unlocks, from capability, which scales with parameters. Vulnerability verdicts are produced by a three-tool detector ensemble (CodeQL, Semgrep, Bandit) followed by manual adjudication by two authors on detector-positive outputs.

Producing a labeled vulnerable code at scale is a recurring obstacle for learning-based vulnerability detection: mined corpora carry substantial label noise, and existing LLM-based augmentation propagates these inaccuracies because it transforms vulnerable seeds rather than synthesising vulnerabilities from a specification.

Recent works show that image and video generators exhibit zero-shot visual understanding behaviors, in a way reminiscent of how LLMs develop emergent capabilities of language understanding and reasoning from generative pretraining. While it has long been conjectured that the ability to create visual content implies an ability to understand it, there has been limited evidence that generative vision models have developed strong understanding capabilities. In this work, we demonstrate that image generation training serves a role similar to LLM pretraining, and lets models learn powerful and general visual representations that enable SOTA performance on various vision tasks. We introduce Vision Banana, a generalist model built by instruction-tuning Nano Banana Pro (NBP) on a mixture of its original training data alongside a small amount of vision task data. By parameterizing the output space of vision tasks as RGB images, we seamlessly reframe perception as image generation. Our generalist model, Vision Banana, achieves SOTA results on a variety of vision tasks involving both 2D and 3D understanding, beating or rivaling zero-shot domain-specialists, including Segment Anything Model 3 on segmentation tasks, and the Depth Anything series on metric depth estimation. We show that these results can be achieved with lightweight instruction-tuning without sacrificing the base model's image generation capabilities. The superior results suggest that image generation pretraining is a generalist vision learner. It also shows that image generation serves as a unified and universal interface for vision tasks, similar to text generation's role in language understanding and reasoning. We could be witnessing a major paradigm shift for computer vision, where generative vision pretraining takes a central role in building Foundational Vision Models for both generation and understanding.

Recent works show that image and video generators exhibit zero-shot visual understanding behaviors, in a way reminiscent of how LLMs develop emergent capabilities of language understanding and reasoning from generative pretraining.

Proteins are shaped by gradual evolution under biophysical and functional constraints. Protein language models learn rich evolutionary constraints from large-scale sequences, and discrete diffusion-based protein language models~(\eg, DPLMs) are promising for both understanding and generation. However, existing DPLMs typically rely on masked diffusion that contradicts a simple biological intuition: proteins evolve through accumulated edits, not by emerging from masks. Consequently, these frameworks lack explicit pretraining objectives for substitution and insertion/deletion (indel) operations, limiting both optimization-style post-editing and flexible guided generation. To address these limitations, we present DPLM-Evo, an evolutionary discrete diffusion framework that explicitly predicts substitution, insertion, and deletion operations during denoising. DPLM-Evo decouples an upsampled-length latent alignment space from the variable-length observed sequence space, which makes indel-aware generation tractable. To better align substitutions with real evolution, we further introduce a contextualized evolutionary noising kernel that produces biologically informed, context-dependent mutation patterns. Across tasks, DPLM-Evo improves sequence understanding and achieves state-of-the-art mutation effect prediction performance on ProteinGym in the single-sequence setting. It also enables variable-length simulated evolution, and post-editing/optimization of existing proteins via explicit edit trajectories.

Proteins are shaped by gradual evolution under biophysical and functional constraints.

The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing has led to large, high-dimensional omics datasets. Deep unsupervised learning architectures, particularly Autoencoders (AEs), are increasingly used for dimensionality reduction and representation learning in this domain. However, AEs are highly sensitive to architectural choices and hyperparameters, and unsupervised optimization typically relies on reconstruction loss, which may be a poor proxy for downstream utility. Exhaustive hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is computationally expensive, leading researchers to frequently rely on suboptimal default configurations. To democratize access to large-scale unsupervised HPO research, we introduce $\textbf{BBOmix}$, the first open-source tabular benchmark for unsupervised representation learning on real-world biological data. Our benchmark includes 105,000 evaluations across four AE architectures and seven multi-omics modalities from the TCGA and SCHC datasets. We quantify the correlation between reconstruction loss and downstream task performance and provide an extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art single-fidelity, multi-fidelity, and transfer learning HPO methods, establishing a rigorous baseline for future research in unsupervised biological representation learning.

The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing has led to large, high-dimensional omics datasets.

Transfer learning is a natural strategy when a target population has limited data but multiple related auxiliary sources are available. A central difficulty is source heterogeneity: auxiliary sources may not be equally useful, and their usefulness may vary in a structured, cluster-like fashion. Existing transfer-learning methods often reduce source selection to a binary informative/non-informative decision, overlooking subgroups of sources with differential transferability. Motivated by a suicide-risk study using data from the Connecticut Hospital Information Management Exchange (CHIME), comprising 636,758 patients across 27 hospitals, we propose Trans-GLMC, a cluster-structured transfer-learning procedure for generalized linear models. The CHIME setting illustrates the core challenge: hospital-specific risk models are unstable because suicide attempts are rare at any single facility, whereas indiscriminate pooling across hospitals can obscure facility-level differences in patient mix and risk profiles. Trans-GLMC first constructs a coefficient-based distance among the target and candidate sources to recover latent source clusters. It then combines global fusion, within-cluster refinement, and target debiasing to produce an estimator that adapts to the detected structure. We establish a non-asymptotic error bound that improves over its unclustered counterpart whenever a meaningful target cluster exists and matches the unclustered rate up to constants otherwise. In simulations and in the CHIME study, Trans-GLMC improves facility-specific prediction, identifies interpretable communities of hospitals with mutual transferability, and recovers clinically coherent suicide-risk factors.

Transfer learning is a natural strategy when a target population has limited data but multiple related auxiliary sources are available.

The smoothness of the transformer architecture has been extensively studied in the context of generalization, training stability, and adversarial robustness. However, its role in transfer learning remains poorly understood. In this paper, we analyze the ability of vision transformer components to adapt their outputs to changes in inputs, or, in other words, their \emph{plasticity}. Defined as an average rate of change, it captures the sensitivity to input perturbation; in particular, a high plasticity implies a low smoothness. Our theoretical analysis and extensive experiments -- over $1,000$ finetuning runs on large-scale vision transformers -- showcase that this perspective provides principled guidance in choosing the components to prioritize during adaptation. A key takeaway for practitioners is that the high plasticity of the attention modules and feedforward layers consistently leads to better finetuning performance. Our findings depart from the prevailing assumption that smoothness is desirable, offering a novel perspective on transformers' functional properties. The code is available at https://github.com/ambroiseodt/vit-plasticity.

The smoothness of the transformer architecture has been extensively studied in the context of generalization, training stability, and adversarial robustness.

Prior brain-AI alignment studies are typically constrained by specific inputs and tasks, limiting their ability to capture organizational properties across models with different modalities. In this work, we focus on Transformer-based models and introduce a brain-model topological alignment space. Rather than inferring alignment from neural mechanisms, we examine it through graph-based organizational properties, mapping the intrinsic spatial attention topology of a model onto canonical human intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs). This enables a modality-agnostic and task-free comparison across vision, language, and multimodal systems at the level of organizational properties. Analyzing 151 Transformer-based models across these modalities and scales, we observe a continuous arc-shaped distribution, reflecting varying degrees of topological alignment. Consistent with their training objectives, models optimized for global semantic abstraction were associated more closely with higher-order ICNs, while local detail-focused models associated with low-level ICNs. More surprisingly, we uncovered non-intuitive phenomena: DINOv2 exhibited reduced alignment compared to its predecessors, distilled DeiT models showed a counterintuitive scaling inversion where larger models aligned less well with higher-order ICNs, and fine-tuning as well as instruction tuning had limited effect on alignment. Furthermore, topological alignment scores showed non-significant correlation with ImageNet-1K Top-1 accuracy in 30 vision Transformers (r=0.266, p=0.156). This work provides a new quantitative perspective for comparing the organizational properties of Transformer-based models through brain-referenced topological mapping.

Prior brain-AI alignment studies are typically constrained by specific inputs and tasks, limiting their ability to capture organizational properties across models with different modalities.

LLMs can appear cautious in risk decision-making tasks, yet cautious-looking outputs do not necessarily indicate alignment with human decision-making mechanisms. We investigate this distinction using the St. Petersburg game as a controlled testbed, a classical paradox in which the expected payoff is infinite, yet humans typically report low, finite willingness to pay. We evaluate 28 LLMs with a structured prompt suite that includes the original game; controlled decision variants that perturb truncation, repeated play, numeric endowment, and occupational identity; a human-perspective prompt that asks models to reason as human decision makers; and paired comparisons between base models and their instruction-tuned counterparts. In the original game, most models generate finite bids, creating the appearance of human-like risk behavior. However, this outcome-level resemblance masks substantial mechanism-level differences. The controlled variants reveal that rather than maintaining human-like behavior seen in the original game, models often shift to conditionally and computationally rational behavior. Human-cue prompting and instruction tuning often lower bids and reduce some visible pathologies, but most mechanism-level response patterns remain largely unchanged. These findings show that behavioral alignment in risk decision-making can be surface-level: LLMs may produce human-like risk decisions without exhibiting human-consistent mechanisms. High-stakes evaluations of LLM decision-making should therefore move beyond outcome similarity and examine whether the alignment is supported by mechanism-level consistency.

LLMs can appear cautious in risk decision-making tasks, yet cautious-looking outputs do not necessarily indicate alignment with human decision-making mechanisms.

Current prompt-based and adapter-based tuning of vision-language models (VLMs) is attractive for medical imaging, where clinical data sensitivity favors frozen backbones and annotations are limited. However, these methods typically optimize only the ground-truth class, treating all other classes as equally incorrect, ignoring clinically meaningful class relations and yielding unstable decision boundaries in limited-supervision settings. We propose Omni-Geometry Knowledge Distillation (OGKD), a new framework that injects class-relation structure into the teacher to produce directional targets that preserve the ground truth while respecting inter-class geometry. Using these targets, we develop two distillation losses: Global Geometry-Aware Distillation (GAD) operates on the global image token, and Label-Guided Geometry Distillation (LGD) applies the same geometry to attentive patch tokens to improve fine-grained alignment. Across comprehensive experiments and analyses on 11 widely-used medical datasets for base-to-novel and few-shot evaluations, our OGKD achieves substantially better performance, consistently improving accuracy by an average absolute gain of 1.7%-2.8% over all prior state-of-the-art VLM adaptation counterparts. It also robustly generalizes to unseen classes and yields more reliable predictions than other approaches. Our code is available at https://github.com/tientrandinh/OGKD.

Current prompt-based and adapter-based tuning of vision-language models (VLMs) is attractive for medical imaging, where clinical data sensitivity favors frozen backbones and annotations are limited.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly trained to abstain from answering questions they are unsure about. However, this ability is often misused: in real-world applications, input prompts sometimes contain uncertainty elements, and driven by this, LLMs are inclined to abstain even on problems they are capable of solving. We argue that LLM abstention is not only an expression of genuine uncertainty; it is also an artifact that can be largely influenced by prompts. We name this phenomenon *Abstention Inflation*. We add "Unknown" as an extra option for LLMs to choose from; experiments show serious accuracy drops on True/False Questions (TFQs). Replacing "Unknown" with an unrelated random word produces an identical effect. We argue that LLMs are trained to imitate the surface pattern of *abstention*, rather than to express genuine uncertainty. Based on ten experiments, we support four claims that form a progressive argument: **(C1)** *Abstention Inflation* is triggered by the structural presence of an extra option, not by genuine uncertainty; **(C2)** further, it makes the model deny it can answer even when it can; **(C3)** at the representation level, this manifests as a later-layer output override; **(C4)** finally, this bias is stable and emerges through instruction tuning, rather than stochastic noise.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly trained to abstain from answering questions they are unsure about.

Large language models reach 50 to 70% accuracy on causal reasoning benchmarks such as CLadder, but it is unclear whether this reflects structural reasoning or lexical pattern matching. We introduce Caliper, a controlled perturbation that replaces semantic variable names with placeholder tokens while preserving the causal graph and probabilistic specification of each question. Across nine instruction-tuned LLMs from 3.8B to 671B and three causal reasoning benchmarks, lexical anonymization yields robust accuracy drops of +7.6, +27.0, and +11.1 pp on a local 3.8B-14B set, rising to +29.6 and +18.0 pp on CRASS and e-CARE across nine frontier models spanning the 2024-2026 generations. Of 40 engaged model-by-benchmark cells, 39 show a positive gap, and the gap collapses by 17x on CLadder's pseudoword subset. Structured scaffolding and few-shot in-context learning each narrow the gap, but mainly by lowering P0 accuracy on smaller models rather than recovering P1. Current instruction-tuned LLMs, evaluated zero-shot, show little evidence of structural causal reasoning once lexical anchors are removed.

Large language models reach 50 to 70% accuracy on causal reasoning benchmarks such as CLadder, but it is unclear whether this reflects structural reasoning or lexical pattern matching.

Symbolic regression aims to find symbolic expressions that describe datasets. Due to its inherent interpretability, symbolic regression (SR) is a powerful paradigm for scientific discovery. Recent advances have expanded SR to describe related phenomena using a single expression with varying sets of parameters, thereby introducing a single categorical variable. To illustrate, this enables the search for a single expression describing temperaturedependent viscosity across multiple fluids, while simultaneously identifying a distinct set of fluid-specific parameters. We expand upon prior efforts by considering multiple categorical variables and introducing intermediate levels of parameter sharing. Rather than parameters being either entirely universal or entirely unique, some parameters can also be shared across specific categories while remaining distinct for others. This allows for separating universal effects (shared parameters), category-specific trends (partially-shared parameters), and category interactions (non-shared parameters). We test the limits of this setup in terms of reducing data requirements and transfer learning using a synthetic, fitting-only example. Furthermore, we apply the method to an astrophysics dataset also used in a previous single-category study. In comparison, we achieve similar fit quality with significantly fewer parameters while extracting additional information about the problem.

Symbolic regression aims to find symbolic expressions that describe datasets.

Protein language models are increasingly used to guide experimental and clinical decisions, yet it is often unclear whether a confident prediction reflects recognition of biological evidence or retrieval of a statistical default. We examine this distinction for a near-universal biological rule, that proteins begin with methionine, by tracing the computational pathway through which ESM2-8M produces this prediction. The model does not detect methionine at the masked position. Instead, it retrieves a methionine-favouring signal from a reference representation at the beginning-of-sequence token via a position-specific query assembled across layers, with the final output emerging through competition with context-dependent circuits. To understand how positional information reaches the readout, we introduce a norm-direction decomposition of attention scores within rotary frequency bands. Positional encoding operates through coupled changes in query norm and angular alignment distributed across these bands. On sequences whose true N-terminus is not methionine, where the biological question matters, the model predicts methionine anyway. This is not a correct prediction produced by an unexpected mechanism, but the output of a positional-prior retrieval circuit that matches the statistical average and fails where biology diverges from it. Distinguishing the two requires resolution at the level of individual circuits, frequency bands, and query composition, suggesting that mechanistic verification will be necessary, and challenging, for predictions where the biological stakes are higher. Even for the simplest biological rule, the model's prediction is mediated by a distributed computational circuit rather than direct recognition, suggesting that increasing task complexity will further obscure the relationship between model confidence and underlying biological evidence.

Protein language models are increasingly used to guide experimental and clinical decisions, yet it is often unclear whether a confident prediction reflects recognition of biological evidence or retrieval of a statistical default.