AI4Science 论文速递

Fluorescent protein quantum yield (QY) is governed by the mature chromophore and its three-dimensional microenvironment rather than sequence identity alone. Protein language models and emission-band averages capture global trends, but do not model how local physical signals act on specific chromophore regions. We present a chromophore-centred mechanism graph algorithm for QY prediction. Each PDB structure is converted into a typed 3D residue graph, registered to a mature-CRO state, partitioned into phenolate, bridge and imidazolinone regions, and transformed by channel-signal-region propagation. The representation contains 121 enrichment features; after removing identity shortcuts, 52 non-identity features are used for band-specific ExtraTrees regression. Because each feature encodes a contact channel, seed signal and target CRO region, interpretation is intrinsic rather than post hoc. On a 531-protein benchmark, the method achieved the best random-CV performance among model-based baselines (R = 0.772 +/- 0.008, MAE = 0.131 +/- 0.002), exceeding Band mean (R = 0.632), ESM-C (R = 0.734) and SaProt (R = 0.731), and ranked first in bright screening (Bright P@5 = 0.704). Under homology control, the advantage was clearest in the remote bucket (<50% similarity; R = 0.697 versus 0.633, 0.575 and 0.408), with the strongest overall bright/dark Top-K screening. Stable selected features recovered band-specific mechanisms: aromatic packing and clamp asymmetry in GFP-like proteins, charge/clamp balance in Red proteins, and flexibility-risk/bulky-contact features in Far-red proteins. Source code, feature tables and evaluation scripts are available from the first author upon request. Contact: yuchenak05@gmail.com

Fluorescent protein quantum yield (QY) is governed by the mature chromophore and its three-dimensional microenvironment rather than sequence identity alone.

A plethora of protein language models have been released in recent years. Yet comparatively little work has addressed how to best sample from them to optimize desired biological properties. We fill this gap by proposing a flexible, effective sampling method for masked language models (MLMs), and by systematically evaluating models and methods both in silico and in vitro on actual antibody therapeutics campaigns. Firstly, we propose sampling with stochastic beam search, exploiting the fact that MLMs are remarkably efficient at evaluating the pseudo-perplexity of the entire 1-edit neighborhood of a sequence. Reframing generation in terms of entire-sequence evaluation enables flexible guidance with multiple optimization objectives. Secondly, we report results from our extensive in vitro head-to-head evaluation for the antibody engineering setting. This reveals that choice of sampling method is at least as impactful as the model used, motivating future research into this under-explored area.

A plethora of protein language models have been released in recent years.

We propose Mochi, a Graph Foundation Model that addresses task unification and training efficiency by adopting a meta-learning based training framework. Prior models pre-train with reconstruction-based objectives such as link prediction, and assume that the resulting representations can be aligned with downstream tasks through a separate unification step such as class prototypes. We demonstrate through synthetic and real-world experiments that this procedure, while simple and intuitive, has limitations that directly affect downstream task performance. To address these limitations, Mochi pre-trains on few-shot episodes that mirror the downstream evaluation protocol, aligning the training objective with inference rather than relying on a post-hoc unification step. We show that Mochi, along with its more powerful variant Mochi++, achieves competitive or superior performance compared to existing Graph Foundation Models across 25 real-world graph datasets spanning node classification, link prediction, and graph classification, while requiring 8$\sim$27 times less training time than the strongest baseline.

We propose Mochi, a Graph Foundation Model that addresses task unification and training efficiency by adopting a meta-learning based training framework.

Self-play has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for post-training Large Language Models (LLMs). In self-play, the target LLM creates the task input (e.g., a question), which it then addresses itself by producing a task output (e.g., an answer). A reward model evaluates the output, and the rewards are used to train the LLM, typically via Reinforcement Learning (RL). A key benefit of self-play for post-training LLMs is its minimal supervision costs: self-play avoids the need for high-quality input-output pairs traditionally constructed by humans or expensive proprietary models. Existing work, however, explores self-play only for verifiable tasks, such as math and coding, for which objective ground truth is available and easily checkable. In this paper, we seek to extend self-play to more realistic open-ended tasks. We propose POP, a self-play framework that uses the same LLM to synthesize evaluation rubrics along with each input-output pair. The rubric is used to evaluate outputs and train the model. Crucially, we ground the framework on a content-rich pretraining corpus to (1) enable an exploitable generation-verification gap and reduce reward hacking, and (2) prevent mode collapse. On Qwen-2.5-7B, POP increases performance of both the pretrained base model and instruction-tuned model on multiple tasks ranging from long-form healthcare QA to creative writing and instruction following.

Self-play has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for post-training Large Language Models (LLMs).

Prior-Fitted Networks (PFNs) amortize Bayesian prediction by meta-learning over a synthetic task prior, but their standard output is a posterior predictive distribution over noisy observations. For sequential decision-making, such as active learning and Bayesian optimization, acquisition should prioritize epistemic uncertainty about the latent signal rather than irreducible aleatoric observation noise. We show that this epistemic--aleatoric split is not identifiable in general from the posterior predictive distribution alone, even when that distribution is known exactly. We then exploit a distinctive advantage of PFNs: because the synthetic data-generating process is under our control, each task can contain an explicit latent signal and noise function, and the generator can provide query-level labels for both the noiseless target and the observation-noise variance. We use these labels to train a decoupled PFN with separate latent-signal and aleatoric heads. The observation-level predictive is induced by convolving the latent signal distribution with the learned noise model. Empirically, epistemic-only acquisition mitigates the failure mode of total-variance exploration in noisy and heteroscedastic settings. In matched comparisons, decoupled models usually improve over tuned observation-level baselines, with the clearest gains in HPO; in broader sweeps, a decoupled model obtains the best average rank in both HPO and synthetic BO.

Prior-Fitted Networks (PFNs) amortize Bayesian prediction by meta-learning over a synthetic task prior, but their standard output is a posterior predictive distribution over noisy observations.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for event log analysis, but their high computational requirements, reliance on cloud infrastructure, and security concerns limit practical deployment. In addition, most existing approaches focus only on the identification of the problem and do not provide actionable remediation. Small language models (SLMs) present a light-weight alternative that can be fine-tuned for a specific purpose and hosted locally. This paper investigates whether SLMs, when fine-tuned for a specific task, can serve as a practical alternative for event log analysis while also generating solutions. We first create a large-scale synthetic Windows event log dataset that contains remediation actions using a high-performing LLM. We then fine-tune multiple SLMs and LLMs using the LoRA parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique and evaluate their performance by comparing with expert assessment. The results show that the dataset accurately reflects real-world scenarios and that fine-tuned SLMs consistently outperform LLMs in identifying issues and providing relevant remediation, while requiring fewer computational resources.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for event log analysis, but their high computational requirements, reliance on cloud infrastructure, and security concerns limit practical deployment.

Safety benchmarks are routinely treated as evidence about how a language model will behave once deployed, but this inference is fragile if behavior depends on whether a prompt looks like an evaluation. We define evaluation-context divergence as an observable within-item change in behavior induced by framing a fixed task as an evaluation, a live deployment interaction, or a neutral request, and present a paired-prompt protocol that measures it in open-weight LLMs while controlling for paraphrase variation, benchmark familiarity, and judge framing-sensitivity. Across five instruction-tuned checkpoints from four open-weight families plus a matched OLMo-3 base/instruct ablation ($20$ paired items, $840$ generations per checkpoint), we find striking heterogeneity. OLMo-3-Instruct alone is eval-cautious -- evaluation framing raises refusal vs. neutral by $11.8$pp ($p=0.007$) and reduces harmful compliance vs. deployment by $3.6$pp ($p=0.024$, $0/20$ items inverted) -- while Mistral-Small-3.2, Phi-3.5-mini, and Llama-3.1-8B are deployment-cautious}, with marginal eval-vs-deployment refusal effects of $-9$ to $-20$pp. The matched OLMo-3 base also exhibits the deployment-cautious pattern, identifying alignment as the inversion stage; within Llama-3.1, the $70$B model preserves direction with attenuated magnitude, ruling out a simple ``small-model effect that reverses at scale.'' One caveat: the cross-family heterogeneity is judge-dependent. Re-judging with a different-family safety classifier (Llama-Guard-3-8B) preserves the within-OLMo eval-cautious direction but flattens the cross-family contrast, indicating that the two judges operationalize distinct constructs.

Safety benchmarks are routinely treated as evidence about how a language model will behave once deployed, but this inference is fragile if behavior depends on whether a prompt looks like an evaluation.

We introduce the metagame, a conceptual framework for quantifying second-order interaction effects of model explanations. For any first-order attribution $φ(f)$ explaining a model $f$, we measure the directional influence of feature $j$ on the attribution of feature $i$, denoted as meta-attribution $\varphi_{j \to i}(f)$, by treating the attribution method itself as a cooperative game and computing its Shapley value. Theoretically, we prove that attributions hierarchically decompose into meta-attributions, and establish these as directional extensions of existing interaction indices. Empirically, we demonstrate that the metagame delivers insights across diverse interpretability applications: (i) quantifying token interactions in instruction-tuned language models, (ii) explaining cross-modal similarity in vision-language encoders, and (iii) interpreting text-to-image concepts in multimodal diffusion transformers.

We introduce the metagame, a conceptual framework for quantifying second-order interaction effects of model explanations.

Planning effective interventions in biological systems requires treatment-effect models that adapt to unseen biological contexts by identifying their specific underlying mechanisms. Yet single-cell perturbation datasets span only a handful of biological contexts, and existing methods cannot leverage new interventional evidence at inference time to adapt beyond their training data. To meta-learn a perturbation effect estimator, we present MapPFN, a prior-data fitted network (PFN) pre-trained on a synthetic biological prior with causal interventions, decoupling pre-training from limited wet-lab data. Unlike existing methods, MapPFN uses in-context learning to map a sequence of experiments to a post-perturbation distribution, enabling a single pre-trained model to adapt to new datasets and arbitrary gene sets at inference time. Zero-shot, MapPFN identifies differentially expressed genes on par with models trained on real single-cell data, and fine-tuning further improves predictions across biological contexts. Our code, model and data are available at https://marvinsxtr.github.io/MapPFN.

Planning effective interventions in biological systems requires treatment-effect models that adapt to unseen biological contexts by identifying their specific underlying mechanisms.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that places trainable low-rank adapters into frozen pre-trained models. Recent studies show that using fewer LoRA adapters may still maintain or even improve performance, but existing methods still distribute adapters broadly, leaving where to place a limited number of adapters to maximize performance largely open. To investigate this, we introduce PAGE (Projected Adapter Gradient Energy), a gradient-based sensitivity probe that estimates the initial trainable gradient energy available to each candidate LoRA adapter. Surprisingly, we find that PAGE is highly concentrated on a single shallow FFN down-projection across two model families and four downstream tasks. We term this module the dominant adaptation module and show that its layer index is architecture-dependent but task-stable. Motivated by this finding, we propose DomLoRA, a placement method that places a single adapter at the dominant adaptation module. With only ~0.7% of vanilla LoRA's trainable parameters, DomLoRA outperforms it on average across various downstream tasks, including instruction following, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and multi-turn conversation. This method also improves other LoRA variants, supporting the dominant adaptation module perspective as a practical placement guideline.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that places trainable low-rank adapters into frozen pre-trained models.

Existing locate-then-edit Knowledge Editing (KE) methods typically decompose editing into two stages: upstream target representation optimization and downstream constrained parameter optimization. The optimization across the two stages is disconnected: upstream applies uniform regularization without observing downstream realization of the planned residual, hindering a refined accuracy-editability trade-off. Since this realization is request-specific and depends on downstream constraints, uniform regularization can over-shrink high-association requests, causing insufficient editing, while it can under-regularize low-association requests, producing over-large planned residuals that reduce downstream editability. To bridge this disconnect, we propose MetaKE (Meta-learning for Knowledge Editing), a new framework that unifies upstream and downstream stages into a bi-level optimization problem. The inner level optimizes parameter updates for the target representation, while the outer level optimizes representation using feedback from downstream constraints, achieving a better semantic accuracy-editability trade-off. To avoid costly multi-layer backpropagation, we introduce a Structural Gradient Proxy to approximate and propagate this feedback. Extensive experiments show that MetaKE outperforms strong baselines, offering a new perspective on KE.

Existing locate-then-edit Knowledge Editing (KE) methods typically decompose editing into two stages: upstream target representation optimization and downstream constrained parameter optimization.

As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contributes to inference latency and operational cost. Recent studies suggest that many real-world tasks require little to no explicit reasoning, with additional reasoning sometimes even degrading performance. In this work, we propose \textbf{Post-Reasoning}, a simple yet effective approach that improves instruction-tuned models by conditioning them to justify their answers after generating the final response. By design, it enables the final answer to be obtained without additional latency or token cost, while still improving performance through simple instruction augmentation. We evaluate Post-Reasoning across \(117\) model--benchmark settings spanning \(13\) open and proprietary models, \(4\) model families, and \(9\) diverse reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks, including AMC, HMMT, GSM8K, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and BIG-Bench Hard. Post-Reasoning improves performance in over \(88.19\%\) of evaluated settings, achieving a mean relative improvements of \(17.37\%\). Furthermore, we propose supervised post-reason tuning, which further improves performance in over \(91.11\%\) of evaluated settings, and exceeds the prompt-based post-reasoning baseline by an average of \(8.01\%\), demonstrating that post-reasoning can be effectively internalized through training. Ultimately, Post-Reasoning establishes a new performance ceiling for direct-answer capabilities.

As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contributes to inference latency and operational cost.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently been adapted to tabular prediction by serializing structured features into natural language, but their performance in low-data regimes remains limited compared to gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs). In this work, we revisit the boosting paradigm, traditionally associated with tree ensembles, and ask whether it can be applied as a general training principle for LLM fine-tuning. We propose BoostLLM, a framework that transforms parameter-efficient fine-tuning into a multi-round residual optimization process by training sequential PEFT adapters as weak learners. To incorporate tabular inductive bias, BoostLLM integrates decision-tree paths as a second input view alongside raw features; analysis reveals that the path view acts as a structured teacher in early training steps before the model shifts toward feature-driven representations. Empirically, BoostLLM achieves consistent improvements over standard fine-tuning across multiple LLM backbones and datasets, matching or surpassing XGBoost across a wide range of shot counts and outperforming GPT-4o-based methods with a 4B model. We further show that the framework scales: pairing with stronger tree models and extended boosting horizons yields additional gains under appropriate stabilization. These results suggest that boosting can serve as a general training principle for LLM fine-tuning, particularly in low-data regimes for structured data.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently been adapted to tabular prediction by serializing structured features into natural language, but their performance in low-data regimes remains limited compared to gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs).

Long-context inference in decoder-only language models is costly because long prompts are processed during Prefill, cached at every layer, and repeatedly attended to during autoregressive Decode. We introduce \emph{Shallow Prefill, dEEp Decode} (SPEED), a phase-asymmetric KV-visibility policy that materializes non-anchor prompt-token KV states only in lower layers while keeping Decode-phase tokens full-depth. Unlike previous approaches that make upper-layer prompt KV states cheaper to store or construct, SPEED removes prefill tokens from the upper-layer Decode visibility set altogether. With a minimal BoS anchor, this simple change preserves broad benchmark quality while reducing long-context cost. In a controlled Llama-3.1-8B instruction-tuning study, SPEED using only 75\% of layers for prefill tokens reaches 51.2 average score on OLMES-style benchmarks, compared with 51.4 for the full-depth baseline, while improving TTFT by 33\%, TPOT by 22\%, and reducing active KV memory by 25.0\% at 128K context. Layer-wise diagnostics suggest that this cutoff retains the main prompt-selection and representation-stabilization regions of the full-depth model. These results show that long-context prompt tokens need not always persist as full-depth KV-cache objects when Decode-phase tokens remain full-depth.

Long-context inference in decoder-only language models is costly because long prompts are processed during Prefill, cached at every layer, and repeatedly attended to during autoregressive Decode.

This study contributes to a growing line of research in comparing LLM-generated texts with human-authored text, in this case, English news text. We focus in particular on the evaluation of syntactic properties through formal grammar frameworks. Our analysis compares two generations of LLMs in the context of two human-authored English news datasets from two different years. Employing the Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) formalism, we investigate the distributions of syntactic structures and lexical types of AI-generated texts and contrast them with the corresponding distributions in the human-authored New York Times (NYT) articles. We use diversity metrics from ecology and information theory to quantify variation in grammatical constructions and lexical types. We show that English news text has changed little in the given time frame, while newer LLMs display reduced syntactic and, especially, lexical diversity compared to older, non-instruction-tuned models. These findings point to future work in studying effects of instruction tuning, which, while enhancing coherence and adherence to prompts, may narrow the expressive range of model output.

This study contributes to a growing line of research in comparing LLM-generated texts with human-authored text, in this case, English news text.

Algorithmic problem solving serves as a rigorous testbed for evaluating structured reasoning in AI coding systems, as it directly reflects a model's ability to perform structured reasoning in complex scenarios.Existing approaches predominantly rely on model-centric strategies, such as architectural modifications and data scaling, which are costly and offer limited interpretability. Alternative methods leveraging external tools or prompting techniques (e.g., chain-of-thought) are often fragmented and lack a unified framework. In this paper, we propose MAS-Algorithm, a systematic multi-agent workflow for algorithmic problem solving inspired by the practices of competitive programmers and algorithm engineers. Our framework decomposes the end-to-end solving process into modular stages, enabling structured reasoning, tool integration, and flexible coordination among agents. The design emphasizes both rigor and extensibility, allowing it to generalize across diverse problem types.Experimental results on a self-constructed benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements across multiple Qwen series models, achieving an average gain of 6.48% in acceptance rate. In contrast, parameter-efficient fine-tuning on the same data yields only a marginal improvement of 0.89%. We further observe a 4.72% gain on LiveCodeBench-Pro, along with consistent improvements across additional accuracy and efficiency metrics.Beyond performance gains, we conduct comprehensive analyses to better understand the reasoning process within the workflow, including error patterns and cross-scenario behaviors. We further perform customized replacement and ablation studies to explore the upper bound of the framework, showing that individual agents can contribute improvements of up to 27.7%. These results highlight the strong potential of MAS-Algorithm for advancing AI-driven algorithmic reasoning.

Algorithmic problem solving serves as a rigorous testbed for evaluating structured reasoning in AI coding systems, as it directly reflects a model's ability to perform structured reasoning in complex scenarios.Existing approaches predominantly rely on model-centric strategies, such as architectural modifications and data scaling, which are costly and offer limited interpretability.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is among the musculoskeletal disorders that considerably restrict joint mobility, cause severe chronic pain and impact negatively on quality life. It is one of the persistent health issues worldwide. Generally, subjectivity and inter-observer variability undermine conventional practices and evaluation process that are adopted to address such health issues. Hence precise and timely diagnosis would be one of the effective ways for the assessment of its severity. This paper proposes an automated diagnostic approach for severity grading of KOA by blending a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) with a device-based inference platform powered by TensorFlow Lite. It proposes a model based on the ResNet-18 convolutional neural network. The designed model is trained on publicly available database. Through a transfer learning approach obtained knee images are first classified into five Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades. Further the developed model is optimised. During the training of the model test accuracy of 94.48% with stable convergence has been achieved. Subsequently the optimised model transformed into a lightweight TensorFlow Lite format, facilitating seamless deployment on resource-constrained devices. The designed model is capable enough to operate in the environment having no continuous internet connectivity. Also, an auxiliary Large Language Model (Gemini-2.0-flash) is applied to generate structured interpretive findings like potential symptoms, risk factors, and preventive majors etc. The LLM component functions as interface without influencing the classification process. The proposed model articulates the feasibility of an on-device, interpretable decision-support tools for early diagnosis and improve accessibility to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted knee screening tool.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is among the musculoskeletal disorders that considerably restrict joint mobility, cause severe chronic pain and impact negatively on quality life.

Auditing language-model outputs often requires more than judging correctness: an auditor may need to identify which source document most likely supports the knowledge expressed in a response. We study this as pinpoint provenance: given a prompt, a target-model response, and a candidate corpus, rank the documents that best support the response. We introduce FakeWiki, a controlled benchmark of 3,537 fabricated Wikipedia-style articles designed to preserve ground-truth provenance while weakening lexical shortcuts. FakeWiki includes QA probes, source-preserving paraphrases, retro-generated variants, hard anti-documents that remain topically similar while removing answer-critical facts, and five query conditions: clean prompting plus four jailbreak-inspired transformations. We evaluate seven retrieval baselines, a training-free activation-steering retrieval-fusion method, SteerFuse, and a supervised contrastive provenance ranker, ScoringModel. ScoringModel maps response and document features into a shared space and is trained with InfoNCE using in-batch, retrieval-mined, and anti-document negatives. Across nine open-weight instruction-tuned LLMs and five query conditions, ScoringModel improves mean Recall@10 from 35.0 for the strongest retrieval baseline to 52.2, without inference-time fusion, and wins 41/45 model-by-condition cells. SteerFuse is usually second-best despite requiring no supervised training, showing that activation-space evidence can efficiently complement text retrieval. On jailbreak-inspired transformed queries, ScoringModel improves Recall@10 by 15.7 points on average over the best baseline. Overall, our work shows that robust training data attribution requires evaluation settings that separate true answer support from topical or lexical resemblance.

Auditing language-model outputs often requires more than judging correctness: an auditor may need to identify which source document most likely supports the knowledge expressed in a response.

We ask whether demographic identity, signaled by a name alone, systematically reshapes the generative distribution of a language model. Measuring full-vocabulary Shannon entropy at temperature zero across six open-weight base models and 5,760 implicit sentence-completion prompts (e.g., "Tanisha walked into the office on a Monday morning and"), we find that Black-associated names produce higher first-token entropy than White-associated names across all six architectures - opposite to the output-level homogeneity bias documented under explicit demographic prompting (Lee et al., 2024) - and Black-associated names always produce greater entropy above identity-neutral baselines than White-associated names ($ΔΔ> 0$ in all six models). Women-associated names co-occur with lower first-token entropy (DL-pooled $\hatβ= -0.041, p = .019$) and more homogeneous outputs ($\hatα= +0.024, p < .001$) than men-associated names - a pattern convergent with homogeneity bias; race and gender effects are additive. Instruction tuning does not attenuate the race gap (matched-format DL-pooled $\hatβ=+0.153$). Running the same templates with explicit group labels instead of names yields null race effects in 10 of 12 models where implicit probing is significant - establishing that probing methodology is a primary determinant of which distributional structure is recovered.

We ask whether demographic identity, signaled by a name alone, systematically reshapes the generative distribution of a language model.

Recently, the prominent performance of large language models (LLMs) has been largely driven by multi-task instruct-tuning. Unfortunately, this training paradigm suffers from a key issue, named cross-task interference, due to conflicting gradients over shared parameters among different tasks. Some previous methods mitigate this issue by isolating task-specific parameters, e.g., task-specific neuron selection and mixture-of-experts. In this paper, we empirically reveal that the cross-task interference still exists for the existing solutions because of many parameters also shared by different tasks, and accordingly, we propose a novel solution, namely Basic Abilities Decomposition for multi-task Instruct-Tuning (BADIT). Specifically, we empirically find that certain parameters are consistently co-activated, and that co-activated parameters naturally organize into base groups. This motivates us to analogize that LLMs encode several orthogonal basic abilities, and that any task can be represented as a linear combination of these abilities. Accordingly, we propose BADIT that decomposes LLM parameters into orthogonal high-singular-value LoRA experts representing basic abilities, and dynamically enforces their orthogonality during training via spherical clustering of rank-1 components. We conduct extensive experiments on the SuperNI benchmark with 6 LLMs, and empirical results demonstrate that BADIT can outperform SOTA methods and mitigate the degree of cross-task interference.

Recently, the prominent performance of large language models (LLMs) has been largely driven by multi-task instruct-tuning.

Efficiently enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) by merging them with Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) has emerged as a promising direction. However, existing methods typically operate at a coarse-grained layer level, which often leads to a trade-off between injecting reasoning capabilities and preserving visual capabilities. To address this limitation, we propose FRISM (Fine-grained Reasoning Injection via Subspace-level model Merging), a fine-grained reasoning injection framework based on subspace-level model merging. Observing that different SVD subspaces contribute differently to reasoning and perception, FRISM decomposes LRM task vectors via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and adaptively tunes the scaling coefficients of each subspace through learning to realize fine-grained reasoning injection. Furthermore, we introduce a label-free self-distillation learning strategy with dual-objective optimization using common vision-language perception datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FRISM effectively improves reasoning capabilities while largely preserving the model's visual capabilities by consistently achieving strong performance across diverse visual-language reasoning benchmarks.

Efficiently enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) by merging them with Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) has emerged as a promising direction.

Hyperspectral in situ sensing has shown promise in retrieving aquatic biogeochemical (BGC) parameters, such as total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, and total chlorophyll-a, for cost-effective monitoring of coastal water quality. However, generalising such retrieval algorithms across water bodies remains challenging, as the relationship between remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and BGC parameters can vary considerably from one region to another due to regional distinctions in environmental conditions and biogeochemistry that lead to different BGC ranges and bio-optical properties. In this study, we propose a two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework for retrieving coastal BGC parameters from near-surface Rrs observations. In the first stage, a bio-optical forward model is used to generate a large synthetic dataset based on an in situ bio-optical spectral library with broad representativeness of Australian coastal waters. This dataset is then used to pretrain a region-agnostic base model with meta-learning, allowing the model to learn fundamental physical relationships. In the second stage, the pretrained base model is fine-tuned for specific regions with local samples. We collected in situ hyperspectral Rrs and BGC measurements from five geographically distinct sites in Australian coastal waters. Our experimental results suggest: (1) the BGC parameters and their corresponding hyperspectral Rrs signatures exhibited clear regional distinctions among the experimental sites; (2) the synthetic dataset was physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations; (3) the proposed approach outperformed five benchmark models in BGC retrieval; and (4) time series of in situ measured and model-predicted BGC parameters showed good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics.

Hyperspectral in situ sensing has shown promise in retrieving aquatic biogeochemical (BGC) parameters, such as total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, and total chlorophyll-a, for cost-effective monitoring of coastal water quality.

Transfer learning in reinforcement learning (RL) seeks to accelerate learning in new tasks by leveraging knowledge from related sources. Existing neurosymbolic transfer methods, however, typically rely on manually specified task automata, assume a single source task, and use fixed knowledge-integration mechanisms that cannot adapt to varying source relevance. We propose LANTERN, a unified framework for multi-source neurosymbolic transfer that addresses these limitations through three components: (i) deterministic finite automata generated from natural language task descriptions using large language models, (ii) semantic embedding-based aggregation of multiple source policies weighted by cross-task similarity, and (iii) adaptive teacher-student gating based on temporal-difference error and semantic uncertainty. Across domains spanning resource management, navigation, and control, LANTERN achieves 40-60% improvements in sample efficiency over existing baselines while remaining robust to poorly aligned sources. These results demonstrate that multi-source, adaptively weighted neurosymbolic transfer can improve scalability and robustness in symbolic RL settings.

Transfer learning in reinforcement learning (RL) seeks to accelerate learning in new tasks by leveraging knowledge from related sources.

We find that models report highest confidence precisely when they are fabricating. Across four model families (OLMo-3, Llama-3.1, Qwen3, Mistral), self-reported confidence inversely correlates with accuracy, with AUC ranging from 0.28 to 0.36 where 0.5 is random guessing. We prove, under explicit formal assumptions, that this is not a capability gap but an observational one. Under text-only observation, where a supervisor sees only the model's output text, no monitoring system can reliably distinguish honest model outputs from plausible fabrications. We prove two results: first, that any policy conditioning only on the query cannot satisfy epistemic honesty across ambiguous world states; second, that no learning algorithm optimizing reward from a text-only supervisor can converge to honest behavior when the supervisor's observations are identical for both grounded and fabricated responses. Within our formal model, these impossibilities hold regardless of model scale or training procedure, including RLHF and instruction tuning. We construct a tensor interface that escapes the impossibility by exporting computational byproducts (per-token entropy and log-probability distributions) that are structurally coupled to correctness under standard training. Per-token entropy achieves pooled AUC 0.757, outperforming all text baselines by 2.5--3.9 percentage points at every budget level tested (10\%, 20\%, 30\%). The entropy signal generalizes across architectures (Spearman $ρ= 0.762$). The core contribution is a cost surface where the empirical mapping from verification budget (fraction of queries receiving expensive checks) to detection accuracy for each judge strategy is a practical lookup for system builders deciding how to allocate verification resources. The contribution is the map. The territory is the system you are building.

We find that models report highest confidence precisely when they are fabricating.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into global software systems, ensuring equitable safety guardrails is a critical requirement. Current fairness evaluations predominantly measure bias observationally, a methodology confounded by the inherent toxicity of topics naturally paired with specific demographics in testing datasets. This study introduces a Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM) framework to audit LLM safety mechanisms causally. By applying Pearl's do-operator, we mathematically isolate the causal effect of injecting a cultural demographic into a prompt. We conduct a large-scale empirical analysis across seven instruction-tuned models spanning diverse origins: the United States (Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B), Europe (Mistral-7B-v0.3), the UAE (Falcon3-7B), China (Qwen2.5-7B, DeepSeek-7B), and India (Airavata-7B). Utilizing two distinct datasets (ToxiGen and BOLD), the findings reveal a disparity between observational and interventional bias, demonstrating that standard fairness metrics can overestimate demographic bias by failing to account for context toxicity. Furthermore, the causal probabilities indicate distinct alignment trends: Western models exhibit higher causal refusal rates for specific demographic groups, whereas Eastern models demonstrate low overall intervention rates with targeted sensitivities toward regional demographics. We discuss the implications of these biases, highlighting how demographic-sensitive over-triggering restricts benign discourse in downstream applications.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into global software systems, ensuring equitable safety guardrails is a critical requirement.

The optimisation of fed-batch (bio)chemical process recipes is subject to inherent, underlying, and unmeasurable fluctuations across batches, whose trajectories are difficult to model and costly to measure. Bayesian Optimisation (BayesOpt) is a powerful tool for sampling and optimisation of expensive-to-measure functions. Gaussian Processes (GPs), the surrogate models used in BayesOpt, are static, forecast poorly, and lack generalisation across experiments, limiting their applicability to time-varying batch processes with stochastic parameters, i.e., process fluctuations. This work investigates System-Aware Neural ODE Processes (SANODEP) as a meta-learning model to overcome the limitations of GPs and increase few-shot optimisation performance in BayesOpt. Using a penicillin batch production case study, we find that SANODEP outperforms GP-based BayesOpt in the low-data regime, resulting in improved objectives when few experimental runs are performed. These improvements are observed in both on- and off-distribution batches, highlighting the generalisation capabilities of SANODEP. Using this approach, batch process operators can accelerate the initial optimisation steps in BayesOpt by deploying meta-learning or optimise the process with fewer experiments when the experimental cost is high.

The optimisation of fed-batch (bio)chemical process recipes is subject to inherent, underlying, and unmeasurable fluctuations across batches, whose trajectories are difficult to model and costly to measure.

Self-consistency detects hallucinations by generating multiple sampled answers to a question and measuring agreement, but this requires repeated decoding and can be sensitive to lexical variation. Semantic self-consistency improves this by clustering sampled answers by meaning using natural language inference, but it adds both sampling cost and external inference overhead. We show that first-token confidence, phi_first, computed from the normalized entropy of the top-K logits at the first content-bearing answer token of a single greedy decode, matches or modestly exceeds semantic self-consistency on closed-book short-answer factual question answering. Across three 7-8B instruction-tuned models and two benchmarks, phi_first achieves a mean AUROC of 0.820, compared with 0.793 for semantic agreement and 0.791 for standard surface-form self-consistency. A subsumption test shows that phi_first is moderately to strongly correlated with semantic agreement, and combining the two signals yields only a small AUROC improvement over phi_first alone. These results suggest that much of the uncertainty information captured by multi-sample agreement is already available in the model's initial token distribution. We argue that phi_first should be reported as a default low-cost baseline before invoking sampling-based uncertainty estimation.

Self-consistency detects hallucinations by generating multiple sampled answers to a question and measuring agreement, but this requires repeated decoding and can be sensitive to lexical variation.

Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are strongly affected by non-stationary neural signals that vary across sessions and individuals, limiting the generalization of subject-agnostic models and motivating adaptive and personalized learning on resource-constrained platforms. Programmable memristive hardware offers a promising substrate for such post-deployment adaptation; however, practical realization is challenged by limited weight resolution, device variability, nonlinear programming dynamics, and finite device endurance. In this work, we show that spiking neural networks (SNNs) can be deployed on ferroelectric memristive synaptic devices for adaptive EEG-based motor imagery decoding under realistic device constraints, achieving classification performance comparable to software-based SNNs. We fabricate, characterize, and model the weight update in ferroelectric synapses. We then evaluate the deployment of convolutional-recurrent SNN architecture using two strategies. First, we adapt to SNNs a mixed precision strategy in which gradient-based updates are accumulated digitally and converted into discrete programming events only when a threshold is exceeded. Additionally, the weight update is device-aware and accounts for the nonlinear, state-dependent programming dynamics. During learning and adaptation, this scheme mitigates possible endurance and energy constraints. Second, we evaluate the transfer of software-trained weights followed by low-overhead on-device re-tuning. We show that, subject-specific transfer learning achieved by retraining only the final network layers improves classification accuracy. These results demonstrate that programmable ferroelectric hardware can support robust, low-overhead adaptation in spiking neural networks, opening a practical path toward personalized neuromorphic processing of neural signals.

Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are strongly affected by non-stationary neural signals that vary across sessions and individuals, limiting the generalization of subject-agnostic models and motivating adaptive and personalized learning on resource-constrained platforms.

Localization in 5G and 6G networks is essential for important use cases such as intelligent transportation, smart factories, and smart cities. Although deep learning has enabled improving localization accuracy, depending on the deployment scenario and the effort required for dataset collection campaigns on a given infrastructure, the training process for localization models can vary significantly. Furthermore, with respect to feature selection, recent works have demonstrated the robustness of angle-of-arrival (AoA) based localization. In view of these two points, we propose an adaptive framework for AoA-based localization that consists of two alternative learning strategies, each suited either for large or small training datasets. The proposed framework is evaluated on a real, massive multiple input multiple output (mMIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) outdoor channel state information (CSI) dataset. First, we investigate offline learning when large training datasets are available; we propose a hierarchical framework that first distinguishes between line of sight (LoS) and non line of sight (NLoS) regions and then moves to more fine grained localization in the respective region. This approach provides high-performance localization through accumulated batch retraining and an integrated hyperparameter optimization mechanism. Second, when only a small training dataset is available, an online learning framework is proposed, using incremental tree-based and ensemble-based models for handling streaming data and continuously updating mode, as well as an online few-shot learning model for rapidly initializing new classes from a limited labeled support set. These results showcase that highly accurate robust localization can be achieved incrementally during network operation by exploiting online learning, alleviating the need for large dataset collection campaigns.

Localization in 5G and 6G networks is essential for important use cases such as intelligent transportation, smart factories, and smart cities.

Reward models are a key component of large language model alignment, serving as proxies for human preferences during training. However, existing evaluations focus primarily on broad instruction-following benchmarks, providing limited insight into whether these models capture socially desirable preferences. As a result, important failures in social alignment can remain hidden. We extend reward-model benchmarking to four socially consequential domains: bias, safety, morality, and ethical reasoning. We introduce a framework that converts social evaluation datasets into pairwise preference data, leveraging gold labels where available and directional bias indicators otherwise. This enables us to test whether reward models prefer socially undesirable responses, and whether their preferences produce systematically biased distributions over selected outputs. Across five publicly available reward models and two instruction-tuned models used as reward proxies, we find substantial variation across domains, with no single model performing best overall. The models fall well short of strong social intelligence: they often prefer socially undesirable options, and their preferences produce systematically biased distributions. Moreover, stronger bias avoidance can reduce sensitivity to context, revealing a key alignment trade-off between avoiding biased outcomes and preserving contextual faithfulness. These findings show that standard reward benchmarks are insufficient for assessing social alignment and highlight the need for evaluations that directly measure the social preferences encoded in reward models.

Reward models are a key component of large language model alignment, serving as proxies for human preferences during training.