AI4Science 论文速递

While scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) during pre-training have been extensively studied, their behavior under reinforcement learning (RL) post-training remains largely unexplored. This paper presents a systematic empirical investigation of scaling behaviors in RL-based post-training, with a particular focus on mathematical reasoning. Based on a set of experiments across the full Qwen2.5 dense model series (0.5B to 72B), we characterize how model scale, data volume, and computational budget interact to shape performance. Our analysis leads to four key findings: 1. Larger models consistently exhibit superior learning efficiency on both compute and data metrics. 2. The relationship between test loss, compute, and data can be modeled by a predictive power-law which is robust across both base and instruction-tuned models. 3. Although larger models exhibit higher learning efficiency, the analytical learning efficiency term k(N) in the power-law reveals a latent saturation trend in learning efficiency as model size continues to increase. 4. In data-constrained regimes, repeated reuse of high-quality data proves highly effective, as final performance is primarily governed by the total number of optimization steps rather than the uniqueness of samples. Collectively, these results provide a principled foundation and practical guidelines for efficiently scaling the reasoning capabilities of LLMs through RL post-training.

While scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) during pre-training have been extensively studied, their behavior under reinforcement learning (RL) post-training remains largely unexplored.

In few-shot learning, the selection of samples has a significant impact on the performance of the model. While effective sample selection strategies are well-established in supervised settings, research on large language models largely overlooks them, favouring strategies specifically tailored to individual in-context learning settings. In this paper, we propose a new method for Automatic Combination of SamplE Selection Strategies (ACSESS) to leverage the strengths and complementarity of various well-established selection objectives. We investigate and compare the impact of 23 sample selection strategies on the performance of 5 in-context learning models and 3 few-shot learning approaches (meta-learning, few-shot fine-tuning) over 6 text and 8 image datasets. The experimental results show that the combination of strategies through the ACSESS method consistently outperforms all individual selection strategies and performs on par or exceeds the in-context learning specific baselines. Lastly, we demonstrate that sample selection remains effective even on smaller datasets, yielding the greatest benefits when only a few shots are selected, while its advantage diminishes as the number of shots increases.

In few-shot learning, the selection of samples has a significant impact on the performance of the model.

Differentially private (DP) transfer learning, i.e., fine-tuning a pretrained model on private data, is the current state-of-the-art approach for training large models under privacy constraints. We focus on two key hyperparameters in this setting: the clipping bound $C$ and batch size $B$. We show a clear mismatch between the current theoretical understanding of how to choose an optimal $C$ (stronger privacy requires smaller $C$) and empirical outcomes (larger $C$ performs better under strong privacy), caused by changes in the gradient distributions. Assuming a limited compute budget (fixed epochs), we demonstrate that the existing heuristics for tuning $B$ do not work, while cumulative DP noise better explains whether smaller or larger batches perform better. We also highlight how the common practice of using a single $(C,B)$ setting across tasks can lead to suboptimal performance. We find that performance drops especially when moving between loose and tight privacy and between plentiful and limited compute, which we explain by analyzing clipping as a form of gradient re-weighting and examining cumulative DP noise.

Differentially private (DP) transfer learning, i.e., fine-tuning a pretrained model on private data, is the current state-of-the-art approach for training large models under privacy constraints.

Few-shot Hierarchical Text Classification (few-shot HTC) is a challenging task that involves mapping texts to a predefined tree-structured label hierarchy under data-scarce conditions. While current approaches utilize structural constraints from the label hierarchy to maintain parent-child prediction consistency, they face a critical bottleneck, the difficulty in distinguishing semantically similar sibling classes due to insufficient domain knowledge. We introduce an innovative method named Sibling Contrastive Learning with Hierarchical Knowledge-aware Prompt Tuning for few-shot HTC tasks (SCHK-HTC). Our work enhances the model's perception of subtle differences between sibling classes at deeper levels, rather than just enforcing hierarchical rules. Specifically, we propose a novel framework featuring two core components: a hierarchical knowledge extraction module and a sibling contrastive learning mechanism. This design guides model to encode discriminative features at each hierarchy level, thus improving the separability of confusable classes. Our approach achieves superior performance across three benchmark datasets, surpassing existing state-of-the-art methods in most cases. Our code is available at https://github.com/happywinder/SCHK-HTC.

Few-shot Hierarchical Text Classification (few-shot HTC) is a challenging task that involves mapping texts to a predefined tree-structured label hierarchy under data-scarce conditions.

LLM-driven multi-agent frameworks address complex reasoning tasks through multi-role collaboration. However, existing approaches often suffer from reasoning instability, where individual agent errors are amplified through collaboration, undermining overall performance. Current research mainly focuses on enhancing high-capability agents or suppressing unreliable outputs to improve framework effectiveness, while systematic identification and reinforcement of performance-limiting agents receive less attention. To address this gap, we propose WORC, a \underline{w}eak-link \underline{o}ptimization framework for multi-agent \underline{r}easoning and \underline{c}ollaboration, grounded in the weak-link principle. WORC follows a two-stage workflow. In the weak agent localization stage, task features are constructed, and a meta-learning-based weight predictor trained on optimal configurations identified by swarm intelligence algorithms (SIAs) enables zero-shot mapping from these features to agent performance weights, where the agent with the lowest predicted weight is identified as the weak agent. In the weak-link optimization stage, an uncertainty-driven allocation strategy assigns additional reasoning budgets to weak agents, with lower predicted weights leading to larger repeated-sampling quotas to compensate for reliability deficiencies. Experimental results show that WORC achieves an average accuracy of 82.2\% on reasoning benchmarks while improving framework stability and cross-architecture generalization, suggesting that compensating for weak links, rather than reinforcing strengths alone, enhances the robustness of multi-agent systems.

LLM-driven multi-agent frameworks address complex reasoning tasks through multi-role collaboration.

Graph self-supervised learning can reduce the need for labeled graph data and has been widely used in recommendation, social networks, and other web applications. However, existing methods often underuse high-frequency signals and may overfit to specific local patterns, which limits representation quality and generalization. We propose Frequency-Corrupt Based Graph Self-Supervised Learning (FC-GSSL), a method that builds corrupted graphs biased toward high-frequency information by corrupting nodes and edges according to their low-frequency contributions. These corrupted graphs are used as inputs to an autoencoder, while low-frequency and general features are reconstructed as supervision targets, forcing the model to fuse information from multiple frequency bands. We further design multiple sampling strategies and generate diverse corrupted graphs from the intersections and unions of the sampling results. By aligning node representations from these views, the model can discover useful frequency combinations, reduce reliance on specific high-frequency components, and improve robustness. Experiments on 14 datasets across node classification, graph prediction, and transfer learning show that FC-GSSL consistently improves performance and generalization.

Graph self-supervised learning can reduce the need for labeled graph data and has been widely used in recommendation, social networks, and other web applications.

Achieving cultural alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly depends on synthetic data generation. For such synthesis, the most vital initial step is seed curation; however, current methods lack quantifiable standards for selecting these seeds. Existing approaches rely on unscalable manual curation or bias-prone LLM extraction, treating cultural specificity as an abstract concept rather than a measurable signal. In this paper, we address this "quantification gap" by proposing C-Mining, an unsupervised framework that transforms the discovery of cultural seeds from a subjective selection process into a computable data mining formulation. Our approach exploits a novel geometric insight, leveraging the cross-lingual misalignment of cultural concepts within pre-trained embedding spaces as a quantifiable discovery signal. By systematically identifying these regions characterized by pronounced linguistic exclusivity and geometric isolation, while actively filtering out noise, C-Mining automatically extracts high-fidelity Culture Points (CPs) from raw multilingual corpora without reliance on human or LLM supervision, reducing preparation costs by more than 150-fold. We further leverage the mined knowledge to steer the synthesis of diverse instruction-tuning datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that this seed-centric approach significantly enhances cultural understanding and reasoning capabilities, achieving a +6.03 point improvement on CulturalBench-Hard and surpassing state-of-the-art baselines, providing a scalable, quantifiable solution for high-quality cultural data synthesis.

Achieving cultural alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly depends on synthetic data generation.

Few-shot learning (FSL) challenges model generalization to novel classes based on just a few shots of labeled examples, a testbed where traditional test-time augmentations fail to be effective. We introduce 1S-DAug, a one-shot generative augmentation operator that synthesizes diverse yet faithful variants from just one example image at test time. 1S-DAug couples traditional geometric perturbations with controlled noise injection and a denoising diffusion process conditioned on the original image. The generated images are then encoded and aggregated, alongside the original image, into a combined representation for more robust few-shot predictions. Integrated as a training-free model-agnostic plugin, 1S-DAug consistently improves few-shot classification across standard benchmarks of 4 different datasets without any model parameter update, including achieving up to 20\% relative accuracy improvement on the miniImagenet 5-way-1-shot benchmark. Additionally, we provide extension experiments on the larger vision language models as well as theoretical analyses.

Few-shot learning (FSL) challenges model generalization to novel classes based on just a few shots of labeled examples, a testbed where traditional test-time augmentations fail to be effective.

Existing research on large language models (LLMs) for automated code compliance has primarily focused on performance, treating the models as black boxes and overlooking how training decisions affect their interpretive behavior. This paper addresses this gap by employing a perturbation-based attribution analysis to compare the interpretive behaviors of LLMs across different fine-tuning strategies such as full fine-tuning (FFT), low-rank adaptation (LoRA) and quantized LoRA fine-tuning, as well as the impact of model scales which include varying LLM parameter sizes. Our results show that FFT produces attribution patterns that are statistically different and more focused than those from parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. Furthermore, we found that as model scale increases, LLMs develop specific interpretive strategies such as prioritizing numerical constraints and rule identifiers in the building text, albeit with performance gains in semantic similarity of the generated and reference computer-processable rules plateauing for models larger than 7B. This paper provides crucial insights into the explainability of these models, taking a step toward building more transparent LLMs for critical, regulation-based tasks in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry.

Existing research on large language models (LLMs) for automated code compliance has primarily focused on performance, treating the models as black boxes and overlooking how training decisions affect their interpretive behavior.

Effective personalization of LLMs is critical for a broad range of user-interfacing applications such as virtual assistants and content curation. Inspired by the strong in-context capabilities of LLMs, we propose few-shot preference optimization (FSPO), an algorithm for LLM personalization that reframes reward modeling as a meta-learning problem. Under FSPO, an LLM learns to quickly infer a personalized reward function for a user via a few labeled preferences. FSPO also utilizes user description rationalization (RAT) to encourage better reward modeling and instruction following, recovering performance with the oracle user description. Since real-world preference data is challenging to collect at scale, we propose careful design choices to construct synthetic preference datasets for personalization, generating over 1M synthetic personalized preferences using publicly available LLMs. To successfully transfer from synthetic data to real users, we find it crucial for the data to exhibit both high diversity and coherent, self-consistent structure. We evaluate FSPO on personalized open-ended generation for up to 1,500 synthetic users across three domains: movie reviews, education, and open-ended question answering. We also run a controlled human study. Overall, FSPO achieves an 87% Alpaca Eval winrate in generating responses that are personalized to synthetic users and a 70% winrate with real human users in open-ended question answering.

Effective personalization of LLMs is critical for a broad range of user-interfacing applications such as virtual assistants and content curation.

Parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) methods adapt large artificial neural networks to downstream tasks without fine-tuning the entire model. However, existing additive methods, such as adapters, sometimes struggle to capture distributional shifts in intermediate feature embeddings. We propose a novel histogram-based parameter-efficient tuning (HPT) technique that captures the statistics of the target domain and modulates the embeddings. Experimental results on three downstream passive sonar datasets (ShipsEar, DeepShip, Vessel Type Underwater Acoustic Data (VTUAD)) demonstrate that HPT outperforms conventional adapters. Notably, HPT achieves 91.8% vs. 89.8% accuracy on VTUAD. For active sonar imagery (Watertank, Turntable), HPT is competitive with other PETL methods. Furthermore, HPT yields feature representations closer to those of fully fine-tuned models. Overall, HPT balances parameter savings and provides a distribution-aware alternative to existing adapters and shows a promising direction for transfer learning in resource-constrained environments. The code is publicly available: https://github.com/Advanced-Vision-and-Learning-Lab/HLAST_DeepShip_ParameterEfficient.

Parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) methods adapt large artificial neural networks to downstream tasks without fine-tuning the entire model.

Foundational optimization embeddings have recently emerged as powerful pre-trained representations for mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems. These embeddings were shown to enable cross-domain transfer and reduce reliance on solver-generated labels. In this work, we investigate whether such representations generalize beyond optimization to decision problems, focusing on Boolean satisfiability (SAT). We adapt the foundational optimization architecture to SAT by mapping CNF formulas into the same bipartite constraint-variable graph representation used for MIPs. This allows direct reuse of the pre-trained embedding model without architectural changes or supervised fine-tuning. Our results show that these embeddings capture structural regularities in SAT instances and support unsupervised tasks such as instance clustering and distribution identification. We demonstrate, for the first time, that foundational optimization embeddings can transfer to constraint satisfaction domains. Our findings is a step toward a unified representational framework for both optimization and decision problems.

Foundational optimization embeddings have recently emerged as powerful pre-trained representations for mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems.

Machine learning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare requires not only strong predictive performance but also reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) to support human oversight. Multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a central task in this domain, yet remains challenging due to label imbalances, dependencies, and combinatorial complexity. Existing MLTC benchmarks are increasingly saturated and may be affected by training data contamination, making it difficult to distinguish genuine reasoning capabilities from memorization. We introduce MADE, a living MLTC benchmark derived from {m}edical device {ad}verse {e}vent reports and continuously updated with newly published reports to prevent contamination. MADE features a long-tailed distribution of hierarchical labels and enables reproducible evaluation with strict temporal splits. We establish baselines across more than 20 encoder- and decoder-only models under fine-tuning and few-shot settings (instruction-tuned/reasoning variants, local/API-accessible). We systematically assess entropy-/consistency-based and self-verbalized UQ methods. Results show clear trade-offs: smaller discriminatively fine-tuned decoders achieve the strongest head-to-tail accuracy while maintaining competitive UQ; generative fine-tuning delivers the most reliable UQ; large reasoning models improve performance on rare labels yet exhibit surprisingly weak UQ; and self-verbalized confidence is not a reliable proxy for uncertainty. Our work is publicly available at https://hhi.fraunhofer.de/aml-demonstrator/made-benchmark.

Machine learning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare requires not only strong predictive performance but also reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) to support human oversight.

Understanding and reasoning over long contexts is a crucial capability for language models (LMs). Although recent models support increasingly long context windows, their accuracy often deteriorates as input length grows. In practice, models often struggle to keep attention aligned with the most relevant context throughout decoding. In this work, we propose DYSCO, a novel decoding algorithm for improving long-context reasoning. DYSCO leverages retrieval heads--a subset of attention heads specialized for longcontext retrieval--to identify task-relevant tokens at each decoding step and explicitly up-weight them. By doing so, DYSCO dynamically adjusts attention during generation to better utilize relevant context. The method is training-free and can be applied directly to any off-the-shelf LMs. Across multiple instruction-tuned and reasoning models, DYSCO consistently improves performance on challenging long-context reasoning benchmarks, yielding relative gains of up to 25% on MRCR and LongBenchV2 at 128K context length with modest additional compute. Further analysis highlights the importance of both dynamic attention rescaling and retrievalhead guided selection for the effectiveness of the method, while providing interpretability insights into decoding-time attention behavior. Our code is available at https://github.com/princeton-pli/DySCO.

Understanding and reasoning over long contexts is a crucial capability for language models (LMs).

Recent advances in vision language models (VLMs) offer reasoning capabilities, yet how these unfold and integrate visual and textual information remains unclear. We analyze reasoning dynamics in 18 VLMs covering instruction-tuned and reasoning-trained models from two different model families. We track confidence over Chain-of-Thought (CoT), measure the corrective effect of reasoning, and evaluate the contribution of intermediate reasoning steps. We find that models are prone to answer inertia, in which early commitments to a prediction are reinforced, rather than revised during reasoning steps. While reasoning-trained models show stronger corrective behavior, their gains depend on modality conditions, from text-dominant to vision-only settings. Using controlled interventions with misleading textual cues, we show that models are consistently influenced by these cues even when visual evidence is sufficient, and assess whether this influence is recoverable from CoT. Although this influence can appear in the CoT, its detectability varies across models and depends on what is being monitored. Reasoning-trained models are more likely to explicitly refer to the cues, but their longer and fluent CoTs can still appear visually grounded while actually following textual cues, obscuring modality reliance. In contrast, instruction-tuned models refer to the cues less explicitly, but their shorter traces reveal inconsistencies with the visual input. Taken together, these findings indicate that CoT provides only a partial view of how different modalities drive VLM decisions, with important implications for the transparency and safety of multimodal systems.

Recent advances in vision language models (VLMs) offer reasoning capabilities, yet how these unfold and integrate visual and textual information remains unclear.

Preventing machine failure is inherently superior to reactive remediation, particularly for critical assets like gas turbines, where early fault detection (FD) is a cornerstone of industrial sustainability. However, modern deep learning-based FD models often face a significant trade-off between architectural complexity and real-time operational constraints, often hindered by a lack of temporal context within restricted vibration signal windows. To address these challenges, this study proposes a Temporal Cross-Modal Knowledge-Distillation Transfer-Learning (TCMKDTL) framework. The framework employs a "privileged" teacher model trained on expansive temporal windows incorporating both past and future signal context to distill latent feature-based knowledge into a compact student model. To mitigate issues of data scarcity and domain shift, the framework leverages robust pre-training on benchmark datasets (such as CWRU) followed by adaptation to target industrial data. Extensive evaluation using experimental and industrial gas turbine (MGT-40) datasets demonstrates that TCMKDTL achieves superior feature separability and diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional pre-trained architectures. Ultimately, this approach enables high-performance, unsupervised anomaly detection suitable for deployment on resource-constrained industrial hardware.

Preventing machine failure is inherently superior to reactive remediation, particularly for critical assets like gas turbines, where early fault detection (FD) is a cornerstone of industrial sustainability.

Large-scale renewable energy deployment introduces pronounced volatility into the electricity system, turning grid operation into a complex stochastic optimization problem. Accurate electricity price forecasting (EPF) is essential not only to support operational decisions, such as optimal bidding strategies and balancing power preparation, but also to reduce economic risk and improve market efficiency. Probabilistic forecasts are particularly valuable because they quantify uncertainty stemming from renewable intermittency, market coupling, and regulatory changes, enabling market participants to make informed decisions that minimize losses and optimize expected revenues. However, it remains an open question which models to employ to produce accurate forecasts. Should these be task-specific machine learning (ML) models or Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs)? In this work, we compare four models for day-ahead probabilistic EPF (PEPF) in European bidding zones: a deterministic NHITS backbone with Quantile-Regression Averaging (NHITS+QRA) and a conditional Normalizing-Flow forecaster (NF) are compared with two TSFMs, namely Moirai and ChronosX. On the one hand, we find that TSFMs outperform task-specific deep learning models trained from scratch in terms of CRPS, Energy Score, and predictive interval calibration across market conditions. On the other hand, we find that well-configured task-specific models, particularly NHITS combined with QRA, achieve performance very close to TSFMs, and in some scenarios, such as when supplied with additional informative feature groups or adapted via few-shot learning from other European markets, they can even surpass TSFMs. Overall, our findings show that while TSFMs offer expressive modeling capabilities, conventional models remain highly competitive, emphasizing the need to weigh computational expense against marginal performance improvements in PEPF.

Large-scale renewable energy deployment introduces pronounced volatility into the electricity system, turning grid operation into a complex stochastic optimization problem.

Vision State Space Models (SSMs) like Vim, VMamba, and SiMBA rely on complex scanning strategies to adapt sequential SSMs to process 2D images, introducing computational overhead and architectural complexity. We propose HAMSA, a scanning-free SSM operating directly in the spectral domain. HAMSA introduces three key innovations: (1) simplified kernel parameterization-a single Gaussian-initialized complex kernel replacing traditional (A, B, C) matrices, eliminating discretization instabilities; (2) SpectralPulseNet (SPN)-an input-dependent frequency gating mechanism enabling adaptive spectral modulation; and (3) Spectral Adaptive Gating Unit (SAGU)-magnitude-based gating for stable gradient flow in the frequency domain. By leveraging FFT-based convolution, HAMSA eliminates sequential scanning while achieving O(L log L) complexity with superior simplicity and efficiency. On ImageNet-1K, HAMSA reaches 85.7% top-1 accuracy (state-of-the-art among SSMs), with 2.2 X faster inference than transformers (4.2ms vs 9.2ms for DeiT-S) and 1.4-1.9X speedup over scanning-based SSMs, while using less memory (2.1GB vs 3.2-4.5GB) and energy (12.5J vs 18-25J). HAMSA demonstrates strong generalization across transfer learning and dense prediction tasks.

Vision State Space Models (SSMs) like Vim, VMamba, and SiMBA rely on complex scanning strategies to adapt sequential SSMs to process 2D images, introducing computational overhead and architectural complexity.

Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in urban planning, but since gendered space theory highlights how gender hierarchies are embedded in spatial organization, there is concern that LLMs may reproduce or amplify such biases. We introduce SPAGBias - the first systematic framework to evaluate spatial gender bias in LLMs. It combines a taxonomy of 62 urban micro-spaces, a prompt library, and three diagnostic layers: explicit (forced-choice resampling), probabilistic (token-level asymmetry), and constructional (semantic and narrative role analysis). Testing six representative models, we identify structured gender-space associations that go beyond the public-private divide, forming nuanced micro-level mappings. Story generation reveals how emotion, wording, and social roles jointly shape "spatial gender narratives". We also examine how prompt design, temperature, and model scale influence bias expression. Tracing experiments indicate that these patterns are embedded and reinforced across the model pipeline (pre-training, instruction tuning, and reward modeling), with model associations found to substantially exceed real-world distributions. Downstream experiments further reveal that such biases produce concrete failures in both normative and descriptive application settings. This work connects sociological theory with computational analysis, extending bias research into the spatial domain and uncovering how LLMs encode social gender cognition through language.

Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in urban planning, but since gendered space theory highlights how gender hierarchies are embedded in spatial organization, there is concern that LLMs may reproduce or amplify such biases.

The proliferation of financial misinformation poses a severe threat to market stability and investor trust, misleading market behavior and creating critical information asymmetry. Detecting such misleading narratives is inherently challenging, particularly in real-world scenarios where external evidence or supplementary references for cross-verification are strictly unavailable. This paper presents our winning methodology for the "Reference-Free Financial Misinformation Detection" shared task. Built upon the recently proposed RFC-BENCH framework (Jiang et al. 2026), this task challenges models to determine the veracity of financial claims by relying solely on internal semantic understanding and contextual consistency, rather than external fact-checking. To address this formidable evaluation setup, we propose a comprehensive framework that capitalizes on the reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach systematically integrates in-context learning, specifically zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies, with Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to optimally align the models with the subtle linguistic cues of financial manipulation. Our proposed system demonstrated superior efficacy, successfully securing the first-place ranking on both official leaderboards. Specifically, we achieved an accuracy of 95.4% on the public test set and 96.3% on the private test set, highlighting the robustness of our method and contributing to the acceleration of context-aware misinformation detection in financial Natural Language Processing. Our models (14B and 32B) are available at https://huggingface.co/KaiNKaiho.

The proliferation of financial misinformation poses a severe threat to market stability and investor trust, misleading market behavior and creating critical information asymmetry.

We propose a method to explore the flavor structure of leptons using diffusion models, which are known as one of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI). We consider a simple extension of the Standard Model with the type I seesaw mechanism and train a neural network to generate the neutrino mass matrix. By utilizing transfer learning, the diffusion model generates 104 solutions that are consistent with the neutrino mass squared differences and the leptonic mixing angles. The distributions of the CP phases and the sums of neutrino masses, which are not included in the conditional labels but are calculated from the solutions, exhibit non-trivial tendencies. In addition, the effective mass in neutrinoless double beta decay is concentrated near the boundaries of the existing confidence intervals, allowing us to verify the obtained solutions through future experiments. An inverse approach using the diffusion model is expected to facilitate the experimental verification of flavor models from a perspective distinct from conventional analytical methods.

We propose a method to explore the flavor structure of leptons using diffusion models, which are known as one of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI).

Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for sequential task adaptation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) but is severely restricted by catastrophic forgetting. While existing literature focuses on the reasoning language backbone, in this work, we expose a critical yet neglected dual-forgetting phenomenon across both perception drift in Cross-modal Projection Space and reasoning collapse in Low-rank Parameter Space. To resolve this, we present \textbf{MAny} (\textbf{M}erge \textbf{Any}thing), a framework that merges task-specific knowledge through \textbf{C}ross-modal \textbf{P}rojection \textbf{M}erging (\textbf{CPM}) and \textbf{L}ow-rank \textbf{P}arameter \textbf{M}erging (\textbf{LPM}). Specifically, CPM recovers perceptual alignment by adaptively merging cross-modal visual representations via visual-prototype guidance, ensuring accurate feature recovery during inference. Simultaneously, LPM eliminates mutual interference among task-specific low-rank modules by recursively merging low-rank weight matrices. By leveraging recursive least squares, LPM provides a closed-form solution that mathematically guarantees an optimal fusion trajectory for reasoning stability. Notably, MAny operates as a training-free paradigm that achieves knowledge merging via efficient CPU-based algebraic operations, eliminating additional gradient-based optimization beyond initial tuning. Our extensive evaluations confirm the superior performance and robustness of MAny across multiple MLLMs and benchmarks. Specifically, on the UCIT benchmark, MAny achieves significant leads of up to 8.57\% and 2.85\% in final average accuracy over state-of-the-art methods across two different MLLMs, respectively.

Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for sequential task adaptation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) but is severely restricted by catastrophic forgetting.

Memory-based self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for coding agents. However, existing approaches typically restrict memory utilization to homogeneous task domains, failing to leverage the shared infrastructural foundations, such as runtime environments and programming languages, that exist across diverse real-world coding problems. To address this limitation, we investigate \textbf{Memory Transfer Learning} (MTL) by harnessing a unified memory pool from heterogeneous domains. We evaluate performance across 6 coding benchmarks using four memory representations, ranging from concrete traces to abstract insights. Our experiments demonstrate that cross-domain memory improves average performance by 3.7\%, primarily by transferring meta-knowledge, such as validation routines, rather than task-specific code. Importantly, we find that abstraction dictates transferability; high-level insights generalize well, whereas low-level traces often induce negative transfer due to excessive specificity. Furthermore, we show that transfer effectiveness scales with the size of the memory pool, and memory can be transferred even between different models. Our work establishes empirical design principles for expanding memory utilization beyond single-domain silos. Project page: https://memorytransfer.github.io/

Memory-based self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for coding agents.

Accurate methane sorption prediction across heterogeneous coal ranks requires models that combine thermodynamic consistency, efficient knowledge transfer across data-scarce geological systems, and calibrated uncertainty estimates, capabilities that are rarely addressed together in existing frameworks. We present a physics-informed transfer learning framework that adapts a hydrogen sorption PINN to methane sorption prediction via Elastic Weight Consolidation, coal-specific feature engineering, and a three-phase curriculum that progressively balances transfer preservation with thermodynamic fine-tuning. Trained on 993 equilibrium measurements from 114 independent coal experiments spanning lignite to anthracite, the framework achieves R2 = 0.932 on held-out coal samples, a 227% improvement over pressure-only classical isotherms, while hydrogen pre-training delivers 18.9% lower RMSE and 19.4% faster convergence than random initialization. Five Bayesian uncertainty quantification approaches reveal a systematic divergence in performance across physics-constrained architectures. Monte Carlo Dropout achieves well-calibrated uncertainty at minimal overhead, while deep ensembles, regardless of architectural diversity or initialization strategy, exhibit performance degradation because shared physics constraints narrow the admissible solution manifold. SHAP and ALE analyses confirm that learned representations remain physically interpretable and aligned with established coal sorption mechanisms: moisture-volatile interactions are most influential, pressure-temperature coupling captures thermodynamic co-dependence, and features exhibit non-monotonic effects. These results identify Monte Carlo Dropout as the best-performing UQ method in this physics-constrained transfer learning framework, and demonstrate cross-gas transfer learning as a data-efficient strategy for geological material modeling.

Accurate methane sorption prediction across heterogeneous coal ranks requires models that combine thermodynamic consistency, efficient knowledge transfer across data-scarce geological systems, and calibrated uncertainty estimates, capabilities that are rarely addressed together in existing frameworks.

Instruction-tuned LLMs can annotate thousands of instances from a short prompt at negligible cost. This raises two questions for active learning (AL): can LLM labels replace human labels within the AL loop, and does AL remain necessary when entire corpora can be labelled at once? We investigate both questions on a new dataset of 277,902 German political TikTok comments (25,974 LLM-labelled, 5,000 human-annotated), comparing seven annotation strategies across four encoders to detect anti-immigrant hostility. A classifier trained on 25,974 GPT-5.2 labels (\$43) achieves comparable F1-Macro to one trained on 3,800 human annotations (\$316). Active learning offers little advantage over random sampling in our pre-enriched pool and delivers lower F1 than full LLM annotation at the same cost. However, comparable aggregate F1 masks a systematic difference in error structure: LLM-trained classifiers over-predict the positive class relative to the human gold standard. This divergence concentrates in topically ambiguous discussions where the distinction between anti-immigrant hostility and policy critique is most subtle, suggesting that annotation strategy should be guided not by aggregate F1 alone but by the error profile acceptable for the target application.

Instruction-tuned LLMs can annotate thousands of instances from a short prompt at negligible cost.

Code comment classification is a critical task for automated software documentation and analysis. In the context of the NLBSE'26 Tool Competition, we present LoRA-MME, a Multi-Model Ensemble architecture utilizing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT). Our approach addresses the multi-label classification challenge across Java, Python, and Pharo by combining the strengths of four distinct transformer encoders: UniXcoder, CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT, and CodeBERTa. By independently fine-tuning these models using Low-Rank Adaptation(LoRA) and aggregating their predictions via a learned weighted ensemble strategy, we maximize classification performance without the memory overhead of full model fine-tuning. Our tool achieved an F1 Weighted score of 0.7906 and a Macro F1 of 0.6867 on the test set. However, the computational cost of the ensemble resulted in a final submission score of 41.20%, highlighting the trade-off between semantic accuracy and inference efficiency.

Code comment classification is a critical task for automated software documentation and analysis.

Using responses generated by high-performing large language models (LLMs) for instruction tuning has become a widely adopted approach. However, the existing literature overlooks a property of LLM-generated responses: they conflate world knowledge acquired during pre-training with instruction-following capabilities acquired during post-training. We hypothesize that disentangling the instruction-following capabilities from pre-trained knowledge improves the effectiveness of instruction tuning. To this end, we propose CoDIT, a method that applies contrastive decoding between a post-trained model and its pre-trained counterpart during response generation. The method suppresses pre-trained knowledge shared between the two models while amplifying the instruction-following behavior acquired via post-training, resulting in responses that more purely reflect instruction-following capabilities. Experiment results demonstrate that models trained on datasets constructed via CoDIT consistently outperform those trained on directly generated responses. Training on our datasets also yields better performance than on existing publicly available instruction-tuning datasets across multiple benchmarks. Furthermore, we theoretically and empirically show that CoDIT can be interpreted as distilling the chat vector from parameter space to text space, enabling the transfer of instruction-tuning capabilities across models of different architectures.

Using responses generated by high-performing large language models (LLMs) for instruction tuning has become a widely adopted approach.

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) refer to environmental, behavioral, and social conditions that influence how individuals live, work, and age. SDOH have a significant impact on personal health outcomes, and their systematic identification and management can yield substantial improvements in patient care. However, SDOH information is predominantly captured in unstructured clinical notes within electronic health records, which limits its direct use as machine-readable entities. To address this issue, researchers have employed Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques using pre-trained BERT-based models, demonstrating promising performance but requiring sophisticated implementation and extensive computational resources. In this study, we investigated prompt engineering strategies for extracting structured SDOH events utilizing LLMs with advanced reasoning capabilities. Our method consisted of four modules: 1) developing concise and descriptive prompts integrated with established guidelines, 2) applying few-shot learning with carefully curated examples, 3) using a self-consistency mechanism to ensure robust outputs, and 4) post-processing for quality control. Our approach achieved a micro-F1 score of 0.866, demonstrating competitive performance compared to the leading models. The results demonstrated that LLMs with reasoning capabilities are effective solutions for SDOH event extraction, offering both implementation simplicity and strong performance.

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) refer to environmental, behavioral, and social conditions that influence how individuals live, work, and age.

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) aims to adapt pre-trained models to specific tasks using relatively small and domain-specific datasets. Among Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) stands out by matching the performance of full fine-tuning while avoiding additional inference latency. In this paper, we propose a novel PEFT method that incorporates the TLoRA+ optimizer into the weight matrices of pre-trained models. The proposed approach not only preserves the efficiency of low-rank adaptation but also further enhances performance without significantly increasing computational cost. We conduct experiments on the GLUE benchmark across diverse model architectures. Numerical experiments consistently demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) aims to adapt pre-trained models to specific tasks using relatively small and domain-specific datasets.

Accurate modeling of robot dynamics is essential for model-based control, yet remains challenging under distributional shifts and real-time constraints. In this work, we formulate system identification as an in-context meta-learning problem and compare deterministic and generative sequence models for forward dynamics prediction. We take a Transformer-based meta-model, as a strong deterministic baseline, and introduce to this setting two complementary diffusion-based approaches: (i) inpainting diffusion (Diffuser), which learns the joint input-observation distribution, and (ii) conditioned diffusion models (CNN and Transformer), which generate future observations conditioned on control inputs. Through large-scale randomized simulations, we analyze performance across in-distribution and out-of-distribution regimes, as well as computational trade-offs relevant for control. We show that diffusion models significantly improve robustness under distribution shift, with inpainting diffusion achieving the best performance in our experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that warm-started sampling enables diffusion models to operate within real-time constraints, making them viable for control applications. These results highlight generative meta-models as a promising direction for robust system identification in robotics.

Accurate modeling of robot dynamics is essential for model-based control, yet remains challenging under distributional shifts and real-time constraints.