AI4Science 论文速递

Computed tomography (CT) enterography is a primary imaging modality for assessing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet the representational choices that best support automated analysis of this modality are unknown. We present the first study of vision-language transfer learning on abdominal CT enterography and identify two main findings. First, mean pooling of slice embeddings gives better categorical disease assessment (59.2\% three-class accuracy), whereas attention pooling gives better cross-modal retrieval (0.235 text-to-image MRR). This pattern holds across all LoRA configurations tested and suggests that the two aggregators emphasize different properties of the learned representation. Second, per-slice tissue contrast matters more than broader spatial coverage: multi-window RGB encoding, which maps complementary Hounsfield Unit windows to RGB channels, outperforms all strategies that increase spatial coverage through multiplanar sampling, and in this setting adding coronal and sagittal views reduces classification performance. For report generation, fine-tuning without retrieval context yields within-1 severity accuracy at the prevalence-matched chance level (70.4\% vs.\ 71\% random), suggesting little learned ordering beyond the class distribution. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves this across all configurations, scoring 7--14 percentage points above the chance baseline and improving ordinal MAE from 0.98 to 0.80--0.89. A three-teacher pseudolabel framework enables all comparisons without expert annotations. Together, these findings provide the first baselines for this underexplored modality and offer practical guidance for building vision-language systems for volumetric medical imaging.

Computed tomography (CT) enterography is a primary imaging modality for assessing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet the representational choices that best support automated analysis of this modality are unknown.

Instruction-tuned large language models produce helpful, structured responses, but how robust is this helpfulness when trivially constrained? We show that simple lexical constraints (banning a single punctuation character or common word) cause instruction-tuned LLMs to collapse their responses, losing 14--48% of comprehensiveness in pairwise evaluation across three open-weight model families and one closed-weight model (GPT-4o-mini). The baseline response is preferred in 77--100% of 1,920 pairwise comparisons judged by GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o. Notably, GPT-4o-mini suffers 31% comprehensiveness loss (99% baseline win rate), demonstrating that the fragility extends to commercially deployed closed-weight models, contrary to prior findings on format-level constraints. Through mechanistic analysis, we identify this as a planning failure: two-pass generation (free generation followed by constrained rewriting) recovers 59--96% of response length, and linear probes on prompt representations predict response length with $R^2 = 0.51$--$0.93$ before generation begins, with $R^2$ tracking collapse severity across models. The same probes yield negative $R^2$ on base models, confirming that instruction tuning creates the representational structure encoding the collapse decision. Crucially, base models show no systematic collapse under identical constraints, with effects that are small, noisy, and bidirectional, demonstrating that instruction tuning creates this fragility by coupling task competence to narrow surface-form templates. The effect replicates on MT-Bench across all eight task categories. We further show that standard independent LLM-as-judge evaluation detects only a 3.5% average quality drop where pairwise evaluation reveals 23%, exposing a methodological blind spot in how constrained generation is assessed.

Instruction-tuned large language models produce helpful, structured responses, but how robust is this helpfulness when trivially constrained?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves factuality but retrieving for every query often hurts quality while inflating tokens and latency. We propose Training-free Adaptive Retrieval Gating (TARG), a single-shot policy that decides when to retrieve using only a short, no-context draft from the base model. From the draft's prefix logits, TARG computes lightweight uncertainty scores-mean token entropy, a margin signal derived from the top-1/top-2 logit gap via a monotone link, or small-N variance across a handful of stochastic prefixes-and triggers retrieval only when the score exceeds a threshold. The gate is model-agnostic, adds only tens to hundreds of draft tokens, and requires no additional training or auxiliary heads. On five QA benchmarks spanning short-answer (NQ-Open, TriviaQA, PopQA), multi-hop (MuSiQue), and long-form (ASQA) tasks, TARG consistently pushes the accuracy-efficiency frontier: compared with Alway-RAG, TARG matches or improves EM/F1 while reducing retrieval by 70-90% and cutting end-to-end latency, and it remains close to Never-RAG in overhead. A central empirical finding is that under modern instruction-tuned LLMs the margin signal is a robust default (entropy compresses as backbones sharpen), with small-N variance offering a conservative, budget-first alternative. We provide ablations over gate type and prefix length and use a $Δ$-latency view to make budget trade-offs explicit.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves factuality but retrieving for every query often hurts quality while inflating tokens and latency.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), have significantly reduced the number of trainable parameters needed in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). The developments of LoRA-style adapters have considered two main directions: (1) enhancing model expressivity with high-rank adapters, and (2) aiming for further parameter reduction, as exemplified by vector-based methods. However, these approaches come with a trade-off, as achieving the expressivity of high-rank weight updates typically comes at the cost of sacrificing the extreme parameter efficiency offered by vector-based techniques. To address this issue, we propose a vector-based random Tensor network for high-Rank Adaptation (TeRA), a novel PEFT method that achieves high-rank weight updates while retaining the parameter efficiency of vector-based PEFT adapters. This is achieved by parametrizing the tensorized weight update matrix as a Tucker-like tensor network (TN), whereby large randomly initialized factors are frozen and shared across layers, while only small layer-specific scaling vectors, corresponding to diagonal entries of factor matrices, are trained. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that TeRA matches or even outperforms existing high-rank adapters, while requiring as few trainable parameters as vector-based methods. Theoretical analysis and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed TeRA method. The code is available at https://github.com/guyuxuan9/TeRA.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), have significantly reduced the number of trainable parameters needed in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs).

Force and torque (F/T) sensing is critical for robot-environment interaction, but physical F/T sensors impose constraints in size, cost, and fragility. To mitigate this, recent studies have estimated force/wrench sensorlessly from robot internal states. While existing methods generally target relatively slow interactions, tasks involving rapid interactions, such as grinding, can induce task-critical high-frequency vibrations, and estimation in such robotic settings remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose a Frequency-aware Decomposition Network (FDN) for short-term forecasting of vibration-rich wrench from proprioceptive history. FDN predicts spectrally decomposed wrench with asymmetric deterministic and probabilistic heads, modeling the high-frequency residual as a learned conditional distribution. It further incorporates frequency-awareness to adaptively enhance input spectra with learned filtering and impose a frequency-band prior on the outputs. We pretrain FDN on a large-scale open-source robot dataset and transfer the learned proprioception-to-wrench representation to the downstream. On real-world grinding excavation data from a 6-DoF hydraulic manipulator and under a delayed estimation setting, FDN outperforms baseline estimators and forecasters in the high-frequency band and remains competitive in the low-frequency band. Transfer learning provides additional gains, suggesting the potential of large-scale pretraining and transfer learning for robotic wrench estimation. Code and data will be made available upon acceptance.

Force and torque (F/T) sensing is critical for robot-environment interaction, but physical F/T sensors impose constraints in size, cost, and fragility.

Vision Transformer (ViT) models have achieved remarkable performance across various vision tasks, with scalability being a key advantage when applied to large datasets. This scalability enables ViT models to exhibit strong generalization capabilities. However, as the number of parameters increases, the robustness of ViT models to adversarial examples does not scale proportionally. Adversarial training (AT), one of the most effective methods for enhancing robustness, typically requires fine-tuning the entire model, leading to prohibitively high computational costs, especially for large ViT architectures. In this paper, we aim to robustly fine-tune only a small subset of parameters to achieve robustness comparable to standard AT. To accomplish this, we introduce Criticality-Aware Adversarial Training (CAAT), a novel method that adaptively allocates resources to the most robustness-critical parameters, fine-tuning only selected modules. Specifically, CAAT efficiently identifies parameters that contribute most to adversarial robustness. It then leverages parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) to robustly adjust weight matrices where the number of critical parameters exceeds a predefined threshold. CAAT exhibits favorable generalization when scaled to larger vision transformer architectures, potentially paving the way for adversarial training at scale, e.g, compared with plain adversarial training, CAAT incurs only a 4.3% decrease in adversarial robustness while tuning approximately 6% of its parameters. Extensive experiments on three widely used adversarial learning datasets demonstrate that CAAT outperforms state-of-the-art lightweight AT methods with fewer trainable parameters.

Vision Transformer (ViT) models have achieved remarkable performance across various vision tasks, with scalability being a key advantage when applied to large datasets.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in multilingual, real-world applications with user inputs -- naturally introducing \emph{typographical errors} (typos). Yet most benchmarks assume clean input, leaving the robustness of LLMs to typos across languages largely underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MulTypo, a multilingual typo generation algorithm that simulates human-like errors based on language-specific keyboard layouts and typing behavior. We evaluate 18 open-source LLMs across three model families and five downstream tasks spanning language inference, multi-choice question answering, mathematical reasoning, and machine translation tasks. Our results show that typos consistently degrade performance, particularly in generative tasks and those requiring reasoning -- while the natural language inference task is comparatively more robust. Instruction tuning improves clean-input performance but may increase brittleness under noise. We also observe language-dependent robustness: high-resource languages are generally more robust than low-resource ones, and translation from English is more robust than translation into English. Our findings underscore the need for noise-aware training and multilingual robustness evaluation. We release a Python package for MulTypo and make the source code publicly available at https://github.com/cisnlp/multypo.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in multilingual, real-world applications with user inputs -- naturally introducing \emph{typographical errors} (typos).

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) in multimodal tracking reveals a concerning trend where recent performance gains are often achieved at the cost of inflated parameter budgets, which fundamentally erodes PEFT's efficiency promise. In this work, we introduce SEATrack, a Simple, Efficient, and Adaptive two-stream multimodal tracker that tackles this performance-efficiency dilemma from two complementary perspectives. We first prioritize cross-modal alignment of matching responses, an underexplored yet pivotal factor that we argue is essential for breaking the trade-off. Specifically, we observe that modality-specific biases in existing two-stream methods generate conflicting matching attention maps, thereby hindering effective joint representation learning. To mitigate this, we propose AMG-LoRA, which seamlessly integrates Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for domain adaptation with Adaptive Mutual Guidance (AMG) to dynamically refine and align attention maps across modalities. We then depart from conventional local fusion approaches by introducing a Hierarchical Mixture of Experts (HMoE) that enables efficient global relation modeling, effectively balancing expressiveness and computational efficiency in cross-modal fusion. Equipped with these innovations, SEATrack advances notable progress over state-of-the-art methods in balancing performance with efficiency across RGB-T, RGB-D, and RGB-E tracking tasks. \href{https://github.com/AutoLab-SAI-SJTU/SEATrack}{\textcolor{cyan}{Code is available}}.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) in multimodal tracking reveals a concerning trend where recent performance gains are often achieved at the cost of inflated parameter budgets, which fundamentally erodes PEFT's efficiency promise.

Specification gaming under Reinforcement Learning (RL) is known to cause LLMs to develop sycophantic, manipulative, or deceptive behavior, yet the conditions under which this occurs remain unclear. We train 11 instruction-tuned LLMs (0.5B--14B) with on-policy RL across 3 environments and find that model size acts as a safety buffer in some environments but enables greater harmful exploitation in others. Controlled ablations trace this reversal to environment-specific features such as role framing and implicit gameability cues. We further show that most safety benchmarks do not predict RL-induced misalignment, except in the case of Sycophancy scores when the exploit relies on inferring the user's preference. Finally, we find that on-policy RL preserves a safety buffer inherent in the model's own generation distribution, one that is bypassed during off-policy settings.

Specification gaming under Reinforcement Learning (RL) is known to cause LLMs to develop sycophantic, manipulative, or deceptive behavior, yet the conditions under which this occurs remain unclear.

Bioacoustic research, vital for understanding animal behavior, conservation, and ecology, faces a monumental challenge: analyzing vast datasets where animal vocalizations are rare. While deep learning techniques are becoming standard, adapting them to bioacoustics remains difficult. We address this with animal2vec, an interpretable large transformer model, and a self-supervised training scheme tailored for sparse and unbalanced bioacoustic data. It learns from unlabeled audio and then refines its understanding with labeled data. Furthermore, we introduce and publicly release MeerKAT: Meerkat Kalahari Audio Transcripts, a dataset of meerkat (Suricata suricatta) vocalizations with millisecond-resolution annotations, the largest labeled dataset on non-human terrestrial mammals currently available. Our model outperforms existing methods on MeerKAT and the publicly available NIPS4Bplus birdsong dataset. Moreover, animal2vec performs well even with limited labeled data (few-shot learning). animal2vec and MeerKAT provide a new reference point for bioacoustic research, enabling scientists to analyze large amounts of data even with scarce ground truth information.

Bioacoustic research, vital for understanding animal behavior, conservation, and ecology, faces a monumental challenge: analyzing vast datasets where animal vocalizations are rare.

Knowledge tracing (KT) models are commonly evaluated by training on early interactions from all students and testing on later responses. While effective for measuring average predictive performance, this evaluation design obscures a cold start scenario that arises in deployment, where models must infer the knowledge state of previously unseen students from only a few initial interactions. Prior studies have shown that under this setting, standard empirically risk-minimized KT models such as DKT, DKVMN and SAKT exhibit substantially lower early accuracy than previously reported. We frame new-student performance prediction as a few-shot learning problem and introduce MAML-KT, a model-agnostic meta learning approach that learns an initialization optimized for rapid adaptation to new students using one or two gradient updates. We evaluate MAML-KT on ASSIST2009, ASSIST2015 and ASSIST2017 using a controlled cold start protocol that trains on a subset of students and tests on held-out learners across early interaction windows (questions 3-10 and 11-15), scaling cohort sizes from 10 to 50 students. Across datasets, MAML-KT achieves higher early accuracy than prior KT models in nearly all cold start conditions, with gains persisting as cohort size increases. On ASSIST2017, we observe a transient drop in early performance that coincides with many students encountering previously unseen skills. Further analysis suggests that these drops coincide with skill novelty rather than model instability, consistent with prior work on skill-level cold start. Overall, optimizing KT models for rapid adaptation reduces early prediction error for new students and provides a clearer lens for interpreting early accuracy fluctuations, distinguishing model limitations from genuine learning and knowledge acquisition dynamics.

Knowledge tracing (KT) models are commonly evaluated by training on early interactions from all students and testing on later responses.

Streaming Data-Driven Optimization (SDDO) problems arise in many applications where data arrive continuously and the optimization environment evolves over time. Concept drift produces non-stationary landscapes, making optimization methods challenging due to outdated models. Existing approaches often rely on simple surrogate combinations or directly injecting solutions, which may cause negative transfer under sudden environmental changes. We propose GeM-EA, a Generative and Meta-learning Enhanced Evolutionary Algorithm for SDDO that unifies meta-learned surrogate adaptation with generative replay for effective evolutionary search. Upon detecting concept drift, a bi-level meta-learning strategy rapidly initializes the surrogate using environment-relevant priors, while a linear residual component captures global trends. A multi-island evolutionary strategy further leverages historical knowledge via generative replay to accelerate optimization. Experimental results on benchmark SDDO problems demonstrate that GeM-EA achieves faster adaptation and improved robustness compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Streaming Data-Driven Optimization (SDDO) problems arise in many applications where data arrive continuously and the optimization environment evolves over time.

We consider the problem of offline black-box optimization, where the goal is to discover optimal designs (e.g., molecules or materials) from past experimental data. A key challenge in this setting is data scarcity: in many scientific applications, only small or poor-quality datasets are available, which severely limits the effectiveness of existing algorithms. Prior work has theoretically and empirically shown that performance of offline optimization algorithms depends on how well the surrogate model captures the optimization bias (i.e., ability to rank input designs correctly), which is challenging to accomplish with limited experimental data. This paper proposes Surrogate Learning with Optimization Bias via Synthetic Task Generation (OptBias), a meta-learning framework that directly tackles data scarcity. OptBias learns a reusable optimization bias by training on synthetic tasks generated from a Gaussian process, and then fine-tunes the surrogate model on the small data for the target task. Across diverse continuous and discrete offline optimization benchmarks, OptBias consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in small data regimes. These results highlight OptBias as a robust and practical solution for offline optimization in realistic small data settings.

We consider the problem of offline black-box optimization, where the goal is to discover optimal designs (e.g., molecules or materials) from past experimental data.

Modern applications increasingly involve highly sensitive network data, where raw edges cannot be shared due to privacy constraints. We propose \texttt{TransNet}, a new spectral clustering-based transfer learning framework that improves community detection on a \emph{target network} by leveraging heterogeneous, locally stored, and privacy-preserved auxiliary \emph{source networks}. Our focus is the \textit{local differential privacy} regime, in which each local data provider perturbs edges via \textit{randomized response} before release, requiring no trusted third party. \texttt{TransNet} aggregates source eigenspaces through a novel adaptive weighting scheme that accounts for both privacy and heterogeneity, and then regularizes the weighted source eigenspace with the target eigenspace to optimally balance the two. Theoretically, we establish an error-bound-oracle property: the estimation error for the aggregated eigenspace depends only on \textit{informative sources}, ensuring robustness when some sources are highly heterogeneous or heavily privatized. We further show that the error bound of \texttt{TransNet} is no greater than that of estimators using only the target network or only (weighted) sources. Empirically, \texttt{TransNet} delivers strong gains across a range of privacy levels and heterogeneity patterns. For completeness, we also present \texttt{TransNetX}, an extension based on Gaussian perturbation of projection matrices under the assumption that trusted local data curators are available.

Modern applications increasingly involve highly sensitive network data, where raw edges cannot be shared due to privacy constraints.

Fine-tuning is a widely used strategy for adapting pre-trained models to new tasks, yet its methodology and theoretical properties in high-dimensional nonparametric settings with variable selection have not yet been developed. This paper introduces the fine-tuning factor augmented neural Lasso (FAN-Lasso), a transfer learning framework for high-dimensional nonparametric regression with variable selection that simultaneously handles covariate and posterior shifts. We use a low-rank factor structure to manage high-dimensional dependent covariates and propose a novel residual fine-tuning decomposition in which the target function is expressed as a transformation of a frozen source function and other variables to achieve transfer learning and nonparametric variable selection. This augmented feature from the source predictor allows for the transfer of knowledge to the target domain and reduces model complexity there. We derive minimax-optimal excess risk bounds for the fine-tuning FAN-Lasso, characterizing the precise conditions, in terms of relative sample sizes and function complexities, under which fine-tuning yields statistical acceleration over single-task learning. The proposed framework also provides a theoretical perspective on parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. Extensive numerical experiments across diverse covariate- and posterior-shift scenarios demonstrate that the fine-tuning FAN-Lasso consistently outperforms standard baselines and achieves near-oracle performance even under severe target sample size constraints, empirically validating the derived rates.

Fine-tuning is a widely used strategy for adapting pre-trained models to new tasks, yet its methodology and theoretical properties in high-dimensional nonparametric settings with variable selection have not yet been developed.

In domains such as materials science, biomedicine, and finance, high-stakes deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires injecting private, domain-specific knowledge that is proprietary, fast-evolving, and under-represented in public pretraining. However, the two dominant paradigms for private knowledge injection each have clear drawbacks: fine-tuning is expensive to iterate under continual updates that can induce catastrophic forgetting and general-capability regression; retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) keeps the base model intact but remains brittle in specialized private corpora due to chunk-induced evidence fragmentation, retrieval mismatch, and long-context pressure. Inspired by how multimodal LLMs align heterogeneous modalities into a shared semantic space, we propose Generation-Augmented Generation (GAG), which treats private expertise as an auxiliary modality and injects it into a frozen base model through a compact, constant-budget latent interface. Concretely, GAG distills question-conditioned specialist knowledge from lightweight domain experts into multi-slot latent memories, integrates multi-layer expert signals via per-slot cross-layer fusion, and aligns them to the frozen base model through gated residual projection, while supporting scalable mixed-domain deployment with reliable selective activation. In a unified mixed-domain evaluation spanning two scientific private-domain QA benchmarks (catalytic materials and immunology adjuvant) together with general-domain queries, GAG consistently outperforms strong retrieval-based and parameter-efficient fine-tuning baselines on specialist QA, while preserving general-domain capability, achieving highly reliable routing, and offering a favorable efficiency--effectiveness trade-off. Code and datasets are provided in the supplementary material. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/360CVGroup/GAG.

In domains such as materials science, biomedicine, and finance, high-stakes deployment of large language models (LLMs) requires injecting private, domain-specific knowledge that is proprietary, fast-evolving, and under-represented in public pretraining.

We propose a Hybrid Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Network (HQC-PINN) that integrates parameterized variational quantum circuits into the PINN framework for hydrological PDE-constrained learning. Our architecture encodes multi-source remote sensing features into quantum states via trainable angle encoding, processes them through a hardware-efficient variational ansatz with entangling layers, and constrains the output using the Saint-Venant shallow water equations and Manning's flow equation as differentiable physics loss terms. The inherent stochasticity of quantum measurement provides a natural mechanism for uncertainty quantification without requiring explicit Bayesian inference machinery. We further introduce a quantum transfer learning protocol that pre-trains on multi-hazard disaster data before fine-tuning on flood-specific events. Numerical simulations on multi-modal satellite and meteorological data from the Kalu River basin, Sri Lanka, show that the HQC-PINN achieves convergence in ~3x fewer training epochs and uses ~44% fewer trainable parameters compared to an equivalent classical PINN, while maintaining competitive classification accuracy. Theoretical analysis indicates that hydrological physics constraints narrow the effective optimization landscape, providing a natural mitigation against barren plateaus in variational quantum circuits. This work establishes the first application of quantum-enhanced physics-informed learning to hydrological prediction and demonstrates a viable path toward quantum advantage in environmental science.

We propose a Hybrid Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Network (HQC-PINN) that integrates parameterized variational quantum circuits into the PINN framework for hydrological PDE-constrained learning.

Large language models have achieved remarkable success in various tasks. However, it is challenging for them to learn new tasks incrementally due to catastrophic forgetting. Existing approaches rely on experience replay, optimization constraints, or task differentiation, which encounter strict limitations in real-world scenarios. To address these issues, we propose Joint Flashback Adaptation. We first introduce flashbacks -- a limited number of prompts from old tasks -- when adapting to new tasks and constrain the deviations of the model outputs compared to the original one. We then interpolate latent tasks between flashbacks and new tasks to enable jointly learning relevant latent tasks, new tasks, and flashbacks, alleviating data sparsity in flashbacks and facilitating knowledge sharing for smooth adaptation. Our method requires only a limited number of flashbacks without access to the replay data and is task-agnostic. We conduct extensive experiments on state-of-the-art large language models across 1000+ instruction-following tasks, arithmetic reasoning tasks, and general reasoning tasks. The results demonstrate the superior performance of our method in improving generalization on new tasks and reducing forgetting in old tasks.

Large language models have achieved remarkable success in various tasks.

Industrial control systems operate in dynamic environments where traffic distributions vary across scenarios, labeled samples are limited, and unknown attacks frequently emerge, posing significant challenges to cross-domain intrusion detection. To address this issue, this paper proposes a clustering-enhanced domain adaptation method for industrial control traffic. The framework contains two key components. First, a feature-based transfer learning module projects source and target domains into a shared latent subspace through spectral-transform-based feature alignment and iteratively reduces distribution discrepancies, enabling accurate cross-domain detection. Second, a clustering enhancement strategy combines K-Medoids clustering with PCA-based dimensionality reduction to improve cross-domain correlation estimation and reduce performance degradation caused by manual parameter tuning. Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly improves unknown attack detection. Compared with five baseline models, it increases detection accuracy by up to 49%, achieves larger gains in F-score, and demonstrates stronger stability. Moreover, the clustering enhancement strategy further boosts detection accuracy by up to 26% on representative tasks. These results suggest that the proposed method effectively alleviates data scarcity and domain shift, providing a practical solution for robust cross-domain intrusion detection in dynamic industrial environments.

Industrial control systems operate in dynamic environments where traffic distributions vary across scenarios, labeled samples are limited, and unknown attacks frequently emerge, posing significant challenges to cross-domain intrusion detection.

The Identifiable Victim Effect (IVE) $-$ the tendency to allocate greater resources to a specific, narratively described victim than to a statistically characterized group facing equivalent hardship $-$ is one of the most robust findings in moral psychology and behavioural economics. As large language models (LLMs) assume consequential roles in humanitarian triage, automated grant evaluation, and content moderation, a critical question arises: do these systems inherit the affective irrationalities present in human moral reasoning? We present the first systematic, large-scale empirical investigation of the IVE in LLMs, comprising N=51,955 validated API trials across 16 frontier models spanning nine organizational lineages (Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, DeepSeek, xAI, Alibaba, IBM, and Moonshot). Using a suite of ten experiments $-$ porting and extending canonical paradigms from Small et al. (2007) and Kogut and Ritov (2005) $-$ we find that the IVE is prevalent but strongly modulated by alignment training. Instruction-tuned models exhibit extreme IVE (Cohen's d up to 1.56), while reasoning-specialized models invert the effect (down to d=-0.85). The pooled effect (d=0.223, p=2e-6) is approximately twice the single-victim human meta-analytic baseline (d$\approx$0.10) reported by Lee and Feeley (2016) $-$ and likely exceeds the overall human pooled effect by a larger margin, given that the group-victim human effect is near zero. Standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting $-$ contrary to its role as a deliberative corrective $-$ nearly triples the IVE effect size (from d=0.15 to d=0.41), while only utilitarian CoT reliably eliminates it. We further document psychophysical numbing, perfect quantity neglect, and marginal in-group/out-group cultural bias, with implications for AI deployment in humanitarian and ethical decision-making contexts.

The Identifiable Victim Effect (IVE) $-$ the tendency to allocate greater resources to a specific, narratively described victim than to a statistically characterized group facing equivalent hardship $-$ is one of the most robust findings in moral psychology and behavioural economics.

Predicting the functional impact of single amino acid substitutions (SAVs) is central to understanding genetic disease and engineering therapeutic proteins. While protein language models and structure-based methods have achieved strong performance on this task, they systematically neglect protein dynamics; residue flexibility, correlated motions, and allosteric coupling are well-established determinants of mutational tolerance in structural biology, yet have not been incorporated into supervised variant effect predictors. We present TriFit, a multimodal framework that integrates sequence, structure, and protein dynamics through a four-expert Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) fusion module with trimodal cross-modal contrastive learning. Sequence embeddings are extracted via masked marginal scoring with ESM-2 (650M); structural embeddings from AlphaFold2-predicted C-alpha geometries; and dynamics embeddings from Gaussian Network Model (GNM) B-factors, mode shapes, and residue-residue cross-correlations. The MoE router adaptively weights modality combinations conditioned on the input, enabling protein-specific fusion without fixed modality assumptions. On the ProteinGym substitution benchmark (217 DMS assays, 696k SAVs), TriFit achieves AUROC 0.897 +/- 0.0002, outperforming all supervised baselines including Kermut (0.864) and ProteinNPT (0.844), and the best zero-shot model ESM3 (0.769). Ablation studies confirm that dynamics provides the largest marginal contribution over pairwise modality combinations, and TriFit achieves well-calibrated probabilistic outputs (ECE = 0.044) without post-hoc correction.

Predicting the functional impact of single amino acid substitutions (SAVs) is central to understanding genetic disease and engineering therapeutic proteins.

Cross-domain few-shot object detection (CD-FSOD) remains a challenging problem for existing object detectors and few-shot learning approaches, particularly when generalizing across distinct domains. As part of NTIRE 2026, we hosted the second CD-FSOD Challenge to systematically evaluate and promote progress in detecting objects in unseen target domains under limited annotation conditions. The challenge received strong community interest, with 128 registered participants and a total of 696 submissions. Among them, 31 teams actively participated, and 19 teams submitted valid final results. Participants explored a wide range of strategies, introducing innovative methods that push the performance frontier under both open-source and closed-source tracks. This report presents a detailed overview of the NTIRE 2026 CD-FSOD Challenge, including a summary of the submitted approaches and an analysis of the final results across all participating teams. Challenge Codes: https://github.com/ohMargin/NTIRE2026_CDFSOD.

Cross-domain few-shot object detection (CD-FSOD) remains a challenging problem for existing object detectors and few-shot learning approaches, particularly when generalizing across distinct domains.

This work aims to improve the generalization of logic-based legal reasoning systems by integrating recent advances in NLP with legal-domain adaptive few-shot learning techniques using LLMs. Existing logic-based legal reasoning pipelines typically rely on fine-tuned models to map natural-language legal cases into logical formulas before forwarding them to a symbolic reasoner. However, such approaches are heavily constrained by the scarcity of high-quality annotated training data. To address this limitation, we propose a novel LLM-based legal reasoning framework that enables effective in-context learning through retrieval-augmented generation. Specifically, we introduce Legal2LogicICL, a few-shot retrieval framework that balances diversity and similarity of exemplars at both the latent semantic representation level and the legal text structure level. In addition, our method explicitly accounts for legal structure by mitigating entity-induced retrieval bias in legal texts, where lengthy and highly specific entity mentions often dominate semantic representations and obscure legally meaningful reasoning patterns. Our Legal2LogicICL constructs informative and robust few-shot demonstrations, leading to accurate and stable logical rule generation without requiring additional training. In addition, we construct a new dataset, named Legal2Proleg, which is annotated with alignments between legal cases and PROLEG logical formulas to support the evaluation of legal semantic parsing. Experimental results on both open-source and proprietary LLMs demonstrate that our approach significantly improves accuracy, stability, and generalization in transforming natural-language legal case descriptions into logical representations, highlighting its effectiveness for interpretable and reliable legal reasoning. Our code is available at https://github.com/yingjie7/Legal2LogicICL.

This work aims to improve the generalization of logic-based legal reasoning systems by integrating recent advances in NLP with legal-domain adaptive few-shot learning techniques using LLMs.

The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive systems has enabled the creation of dynamic, open-ended Role-Playing Agents (RPAs). However, evaluating these agents remains a significant challenge, as standard NLP metrics fail to capture the nuances of role adherence, logical consistency, and long-term narrative stability. This paper introduces RPA-Check, a multi-stage automated evaluation framework designed to objectively assess the performance of LLM-based RPAs in complex, constraints-heavy environments. Our methodology is based on a four-step pipeline: (1) Dimension Definition, establishing high-level qualitative behavioral criteria; (2) Augmentation, where these requirements are expanded into granular boolean checklist indicators; (3) Semantic Filtering, to ensure indicator objectivity, no redundancy and agent isolation; and (4) LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation, which employs chain-of-thought verification to score agent fidelity. We validate this framework by applying it to LLM Court, a serious game for forensic training involving several quantized local models. Experimental results across five distinct legal scenarios demonstrate the framework's ability to identify subtle trade-offs between model size, reasoning depth, and operational stability. Notably, the findings reveal an inverse relationship between parametric scale and procedural consistency, showing that smaller, adequately instruction-tuned models (8-9B) can outperform larger architectures prone to user-alignment bias or sycophancy. RPA-Check thus provides a standardized and reproducible metric for future research in generative agent evaluation within specialized domains.

The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive systems has enabled the creation of dynamic, open-ended Role-Playing Agents (RPAs).

Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly through instruction tuning, which enables broad task generalization without additional fine-tuning. However, their reliance on large-scale datasets-often collected from human or web sources-makes them vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where adversaries poison a small subset of data to implant hidden behaviors. Despite this growing risk, defenses for instruction-tuned models remain underexplored. We propose MB-Defense (Merging & Breaking Defense Framework), a novel training pipeline that immunizes instruction-tuned LLMs against diverse backdoor threats. MB-Defense comprises two stages: (i) Defensive Poisoning, which merges attacker and defensive triggers into a unified backdoor representation, and (ii) Backdoor Neutralization, which breaks this representation through additional training to restore clean behavior. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs show that MB-Defense substantially lowers attack success rates while preserving instruction-following ability. Our method offers a generalizable and data-efficient defense strategy, improving the robustness of instruction-tuned LLMs against unseen backdoor attacks.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly through instruction tuning, which enables broad task generalization without additional fine-tuning.

We present CapBench, a fully reproducible, multi-PDK dataset for capacitance extraction. The dataset is derived from open-source designs, including single-core CPUs, systems-on-chip, and media accelerators. All designs are fully placed and routed using 14 independent OpenROAD flow runs spanning three technology nodes: ASAP7, NanGate45, and Sky130HD. From these layouts, we extract 61,855 3D windows across three size tiers to enable transfer learning and scalability studies. High-fidelity capacitance labels are generated using RWCap, a state-of-the-art random-walk solver, and validated against the industry-standard Raphael, achieving a mean absolute error of 0.64% for total capacitance. Each window is pre-processed into density maps, graph representations, and point clouds. We evaluate 10 machine learning architectures that illustrate dataset usage and serve as baselines, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), point cloud transformers, and graph neural networks (GNNs). CNNs demonstrate the lowest errors (1.75%), while GNNs are up to 41.4x faster but exhibit larger errors (10.2%), illustrating a clear accuracy-speed trade-off. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/THU-numbda/CapBench.

We present CapBench, a fully reproducible, multi-PDK dataset for capacitance extraction.

Large language model (LLM) simulations of human behavior have the potential to revolutionize the social and behavioral sciences, if and only if they faithfully reflect real human behaviors. Current evaluations of simulation fidelity are fragmented, based on bespoke tasks and metrics, creating a patchwork of incomparable results. To address this, we introduce SimBench, the first large-scale, standardized benchmark for a robust, reproducible science of LLM simulation. By unifying 20 diverse datasets covering tasks from moral decision-making to economic choice across a large global participant pool, SimBench provides the necessary foundation to ask fundamental questions about when, how, and why LLM simulations succeed or fail. We show that the best LLMs today achieve meaningful but modest simulation fidelity (score: 40.80/100), with performance scaling log-linearly with model size but not with increased inference-time compute. We discover an alignment-simulation tradeoff: instruction tuning improves performance on low-entropy (consensus) questions but degrades it on high-entropy (diverse) ones. Models particularly struggle when simulating specific demographic groups. Finally, we demonstrate that simulation ability correlates most strongly with knowledge-intensive reasoning (MMLU-Pro, r = 0.939). By making progress measurable, we aim to accelerate the development of more faithful LLM simulators.

Large language model (LLM) simulations of human behavior have the potential to revolutionize the social and behavioral sciences, if and only if they faithfully reflect real human behaviors.

Training student models on synthetic data generated by strong teacher models is a promising way to distilling the capabilities of teachers. However, recent studies show that stronger models are not always optimal teachers, revealing a mismatch between teacher outputs and student learnability. To address this issue, we propose PerSyn (Personalized data Synthesis), a novel synthesis strategy that operates under a new ``Route then Generate'' paradigm to create data tailored to each student model, enabling it to learn more effectively. Specifically, PerSyn first assigns each prompt to its optimal teacher via a query-level router that jointly considers student learnability and teacher response quality. Each teacher then synthesizes data only for its assigned prompts, making the process more efficient than the conventional ``Generate then Select'' paradigm, where all teachers must generate parallel responses for the entire prompt set before constructing the final dataset. Extensive experiments across different model families and scales demonstrate that PerSyn consistently achieves superior or comparable performance to all baselines in instruct tuning and math reasoning settings. Further analysis verifies the effectiveness of PerSyn and offers extra insights to propel future research.

Training student models on synthetic data generated by strong teacher models is a promising way to distilling the capabilities of teachers.

Can large language models (LLMs) generate continuous numerical features that improve reinforcement learning (RL) trading agents? We build a modular pipeline where a frozen LLM serves as a stateless feature extractor, transforming unstructured daily news and filings into a fixed-dimensional vector consumed by a downstream PPO agent. We introduce an automated prompt-optimization loop that treats the extraction prompt as a discrete hyperparameter and tunes it directly against the Information Coefficient - the Spearman rank correlation between predicted and realized returns - rather than NLP losses. The optimized prompt discovers genuinely predictive features (IC above 0.15 on held-out data). However, these valid intermediate representations do not automatically translate into downstream task performance: during a distribution shift caused by a macroeconomic shock, LLM-derived features add noise, and the augmented agent under-performs a price-only baseline. In a calmer test regime the agent recovers, yet macroeconomic state variables remain the most robust driver of policy improvement. Our findings highlight a gap between feature-level validity and policy-level robustness that parallels known challenges in transfer learning under distribution shift.

Can large language models (LLMs) generate continuous numerical features that improve reinforcement learning (RL) trading agents?

The identification of reliable molecular biomarkers for Parkinson's disease remains challenging due to its multifactorial nature. Although protein sequences constitute a fundamental and widely available source of biological information, their standalone discriminative capacity for complex disease classification remains unclear. In this work, we present a controlled and leakage-free evaluation of multiple representations derived exclusively from protein primary sequences, including amino acid composition, k-mers, physicochemical descriptors, hybrid representations, and embeddings from protein language models, all assessed under a nested stratified cross-validation framework to ensure unbiased performance estimation. The best-performing configuration (ProtBERT + MLP) achieves an F1-score of 0.704 +/- 0.028 and ROC-AUC of 0.748 +/- 0.047, indicating only moderate discriminative performance. Classical representations such as k-mers reach comparable F1 values (up to approximately 0.667), but exhibit highly imbalanced behavior, with recall close to 0.98 and precision around 0.50, reflecting a strong bias toward positive predictions. Across representations, performance differences remain within a narrow range (F1 between 0.60 and 0.70), while unsupervised analyses reveal no intrinsic structure aligned with class labels, and statistical testing (Friedman test, p = 0.1749) does not indicate significant differences across models. These results demonstrate substantial overlap between classes and indicate that primary sequence information alone provides limited discriminative power for Parkinson's disease classification. This work establishes a reproducible baseline and provides empirical evidence that more informative biological features, such as structural, functional, or interaction-based descriptors, are required for robust disease modeling.

The identification of reliable molecular biomarkers for Parkinson's disease remains challenging due to its multifactorial nature.