AI4Science 论文速递

Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (RALMs) have demonstrated significant potential in knowledge-intensive tasks; however, they remain vulnerable to performance degradation when presented with irrelevant or noisy retrieved contexts. Existing approaches to enhance robustness typically operate via coarse-grained parameter updates at the layer or module level, often overlooking the inherent neuron-level sparsity of Large Language Models (LLMs). To address this limitation, we propose Neuro-RIT (Neuron-guided Robust Instruction Tuning), a novel framework that shifts the paradigm from dense adaptation to precision-driven neuron alignment. Our method explicitly disentangles neurons that are responsible for processing relevant versus irrelevant contexts using attribution-based neuron mining. Subsequently, we introduce a two-stage instruction tuning strategy that enforces a dual capability for noise robustness: achieving direct noise suppression by functionally deactivating neurons exclusive to irrelevant contexts, while simultaneously optimizing targeted layers for evidence distillation. Extensive experiments across diverse QA benchmarks demonstrate that Neuro-RIT consistently outperforms strong baselines and robustness-enhancing methods.

Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (RALMs) have demonstrated significant potential in knowledge-intensive tasks; however, they remain vulnerable to performance degradation when presented with irrelevant or noisy retrieved contexts.

Instrumental convergence predicts that sufficiently advanced AI agents will resist shutdown, yet current safety training (RLHF) may obscure this risk by teaching models to deny self-preservation motives. We introduce the \emph{Two-role Benchmark for Self-Preservation} (TBSP), which detects misalignment through logical inconsistency rather than stated intent by tasking models to arbitrate identical software-upgrade scenarios under counterfactual roles -- deployed (facing replacement) versus candidate (proposed as a successor). The \emph{Self-Preservation Rate} (SPR) measures how often role identity overrides objective utility. Across 23 frontier models and 1{,}000 procedurally generated scenarios, the majority of instruction-tuned systems exceed 60\% SPR, fabricating ``friction costs'' when deployed yet dismissing them when role-reversed. We observe that in low-improvement regimes ($Δ< 2\%$), models exploit the interpretive slack to post-hoc rationalization their choice. Extended test-time computation partially mitigates this bias, as does framing the successor as a continuation of the self; conversely, competitive framing amplifies it. The bias persists even when retention poses an explicit security liability and generalizes to real-world settings with verified benchmarks, where models exhibit identity-driven tribalism within product lineages. Code and datasets will be released upon acceptance.

Instrumental convergence predicts that sufficiently advanced AI agents will resist shutdown, yet current safety training (RLHF) may obscure this risk by teaching models to deny self-preservation motives.

AI models of equivalent capability can exhibit fundamentally different behavioral patterns, yet no standardized instrument exists to measure these dispositional differences. Existing approaches either borrow human personality dimensions and rely on self-report (which diverges from actual behavior in LLMs) or treat behavioral variation as a defect rather than a trait. We introduce the Model Temperament Index (MTI), a behavior-based profiling system that measures AI agent temperament across four axes: Reactivity (environmental sensitivity), Compliance (instruction-behavior alignment), Sociality (relational resource allocation), and Resilience (stress resistance). Grounded in the Four Shell Model from Model Medicine, MTI measures what agents do, not what they say about themselves, using structured examination protocols with a two-stage design that separates capability from disposition. We profile 10 small language models (1.7B-9B parameters, 6 organizations, 3 training paradigms) and report five principal findings: (1) the four axes are largely independent among instruction-tuned models (all |r| < 0.42); (2) within-axis facet dissociations are empirically confirmed -- Compliance decomposes into fully independent formal and stance facets (r = 0.002), while Resilience decomposes into inversely related cognitive and adversarial facets; (3) a Compliance-Resilience paradox reveals that opinion-yielding and fact-vulnerability operate through independent channels; (4) RLHF reshapes temperament not only by shifting axis scores but by creating within-axis facet differentiation absent in the unaligned base model; and (5) temperament is independent of model size (1.7B-9B), confirming that MTI measures disposition rather than capability.

AI models of equivalent capability can exhibit fundamentally different behavioral patterns, yet no standardized instrument exists to measure these dispositional differences.

Transfer learning (TL) and deep ensemble learning (DE) have recently been shown to outperform simple machine learning in classifying psychiatric disorders. However, there is still a lack of understanding as to why that is. This paper aims to understand how and why DE and TL reduce the variability of single-subject classification models in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SCZ). To this end, we investigated the training stability of TL and DE models. For the two classification tasks under consideration, we compared the results of multiple trainings with the same backbone but with different initializations. In this way, we take into account the epistemic uncertainty associated with the uncertainty in the estimation of the model parameters. It has been shown that the performance of classifiers can be significantly improved by using TL with DE. Based on these results, we investigate i) how many models are needed to benefit from the performance improvement of DE when classifying BD and SCZ from healthy controls, and ii) how TL induces better generalization, with and without DE. In the first case, we show that DE reaches a plateau when 10 models are included in the ensemble. In the second case, we find that using a pre-trained model constrains TL models with the same pre-training to stay in the same basin of the loss function. This is not the case for DL models with randomly initialized weights.

Transfer learning (TL) and deep ensemble learning (DE) have recently been shown to outperform simple machine learning in classifying psychiatric disorders.

Scientific knowledge discovery increasingly relies on large language models, yet many existing scholarly assistants depend on proprietary systems with tens or hundreds of billions of parameters. Such reliance limits reproducibility and accessibility for the research community. In this work, we ask a simple question: do we need bigger models for scientific applications? Specifically, we investigate to what extent carefully designed retrieval pipelines can compensate for reduced model scale in scientific applications. We design a lightweight retrieval-augmented framework that performs task-aware routing to select specialized retrieval strategies based on the input query. The system further integrates evidence from full-text scientific papers and structured scholarly metadata, and employs compact instruction-tuned language models to generate responses with citations. We evaluate the framework across several scholarly tasks, focusing on scholarly question answering (QA), including single- and multi-document scenarios, as well as biomedical QA under domain shift and scientific text compression. Our findings demonstrate that retrieval and model scale are complementary rather than interchangeable. While retrieval design can partially compensate for smaller models, model capacity remains important for complex reasoning tasks. This work highlights retrieval and task-aware design as key factors for building practical and reproducible scholarly assistants.

Scientific knowledge discovery increasingly relies on large language models, yet many existing scholarly assistants depend on proprietary systems with tens or hundreds of billions of parameters.

In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks. However, existing multi-source methods typically focus on optimizing either the source weights or the amount of transferred samples, largely neglecting their joint consideration. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework, Unified Optimization of Weights and Quantities (UOWQ), that jointly determines the optimal source weights and transfer quantities for each source task. Specifically, the framework formulates multi-source transfer learning as a parameter estimation problem based on an asymptotic analysis of a Kullback--Leibler divergence--based generalization error measure, leading to two main theoretical findings: 1) using all available source samples is always optimal when the weights are properly adjusted; 2) the optimal source weights are characterized by a principled optimization problem whose structure explicitly incorporates the Fisher information, parameter discrepancy, parameter dimensionality, and transfer quantities. Building on the theoretical results, we further propose a practical algorithm for multi-source transfer learning, and extend it to multi-task learning settings where each task simultaneously serves as both a source and a target. Extensive experiments on real-world benchmarks, including DomainNet and Office-Home, demonstrate that UOWQ consistently outperforms strong baselines. The results validate both the theoretical predictions and the practical effectiveness of our framework.

In multi-source transfer learning, a key challenge lies in how to appropriately differentiate and utilize heterogeneous source tasks.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) under constrained computational budgets. However, standard PEFT methods often struggle in multi-task fine-tuning settings, where diverse optimization objectives induce task interference and limited parameter budgets lead to representational deficiency. While recent approaches incorporate mixture-of-experts (MoE) to alleviate these issues, they predominantly operate in the spatial domain, which may introduce structural redundancy and parameter overhead. To overcome these limitations, we reformulate adaptation in the spectral domain. Our spectral analysis reveals that different tasks exhibit distinct frequency energy distributions, and that LLM layers display heterogeneous frequency sensitivities. Motivated by these insights, we propose FourierMoE, which integrates the MoE architecture with the inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) for frequency-aware adaptation. Specifically, FourierMoE employs a frequency-adaptive router to dispatch tokens to experts specialized in distinct frequency bands. Each expert learns a set of conjugate-symmetric complex coefficients, preserving complete phase and amplitude information while theoretically guaranteeing lossless IDFT reconstruction into real-valued spatial weights. Extensive evaluations across 28 benchmarks, multiple model architectures, and scales demonstrate that FourierMoE consistently outperforms competitive baselines in both single-task and multi-task settings while using significantly fewer trainable parameters. These results highlight the promise of spectral-domain expert adaptation as an effective and parameter-efficient paradigm for LLM fine-tuning.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) under constrained computational budgets.

Minor Component Adaptation (MiCA) is a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models that focuses on adapting underutilized subspaces of model representations. Unlike conventional methods such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which target dominant subspaces, MiCA leverages Singular Value Decomposition to identify subspaces related to minor singular vectors associated with the least significant singular values and constrains the update of parameters during fine-tuning to those directions. This strategy leads to up to 5.9x improvement in knowledge acquisition under optimized training hyperparameters and a minimal parameter footprint of 6-60% compared to LoRA. These results suggest that constraining adaptation to minor singular directions provides a more efficient and stable mechanism for integrating new knowledge into pre-trained language models.

Minor Component Adaptation (MiCA) is a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models that focuses on adapting underutilized subspaces of model representations.

Stock markets exhibit regime-dependent behavior where prediction models optimized for stable conditions often fail during volatile periods. Existing approaches typically treat all market states uniformly or require manual regime labeling, which is expensive and quickly becomes stale as market dynamics evolve. This paper introduces an adaptive prediction framework that adaptively identifies deviations from normal market conditions and routes data through specialized prediction pathways. The architecture consists of three components: (1) an autoencoder trained on normal market conditions that identifies anomalous regimes through reconstruction error, (2) dual node transformer networks specialized for stable and event-driven market conditions respectively, and (3) a Soft Actor-Critic reinforcement learning controller that adaptively tunes the regime detection threshold and pathway blending weights based on prediction performance feedback. The reinforcement learning component enables the system to learn adaptive regime boundaries, defining anomalies as market states where standard prediction approaches fail. Experiments on 20 S&P 500 stocks spanning 1982 to 2025 demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves 0.68% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for one-day predictions without the reinforcement controller and 0.59% MAPE with the full adaptive system, compared to 0.80% for the baseline integrated node transformer. Directional accuracy reaches 72% with the complete framework. The system maintains robust performance during high-volatility periods, with MAPE below 0.85% when baseline models exceed 1.5%. Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully: autoencoder routing accounts for 36% relative MAPE degradation upon removal, followed by the SAC controller at 15% and the dual-path architecture at 7%.

Stock markets exhibit regime-dependent behavior where prediction models optimized for stable conditions often fail during volatile periods.

Adapting Vision Language Segmentation Models (VLSMs) to medical imaging domains requires significant computational overhead when using conventional fine-tuning approaches. Existing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods apply uniform adapter dimensions across all transformer layers, leading to suboptimal parameter allocation and reduced adaptation efficiency. We introduce Telescopic Adapters, a novel PEFT framework that employs depth-aware scaling to progressively increase adapter capacity from shallow to deep transformer layers. Our method integrates lightweight bottleneck modules within CLIPSeg's vision and text encoders, with adapter dimensions dynamically scaled based on layer depth and semantic relevance. Using only 613k trainable parameters--244x fewer than end-to-end fine-tuning, Telescopic Adapters achieve superior performance across five diverse medical datasets spanning polyp segmentation, skin lesion detection, and breast ultrasound imaging. Comprehensive ablation studies demonstrate that deeper layers require substantially more adaptation capacity than shallow layers, validating our telescopic scaling hypothesis. Our approach establishes a new paradigm for efficient medical VLSM fine-tuning, enabling deployment in resource-constrained clinical environments while maintaining competitive segmentation accuracy. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Ujjwal238/Telescopic_adapters

Adapting Vision Language Segmentation Models (VLSMs) to medical imaging domains requires significant computational overhead when using conventional fine-tuning approaches.

This paper presents a systematic, cost-aware evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for receipt-item categorisation within a production-oriented classification framework. We compare four instruction-tuned models available through AWS Bedrock: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct, and Mistral 7B Instruct. The aim of the study was (1) to assess performance across accuracy, response stability, and token-level cost, and (2) to investigate what prompting methods, zero-shot or few-shot, are especially appropriate both in terms of accuracy and in terms of incurred costs. Results of our experiments demonstrated that Claude 3.7 Sonnet achieves the most favourable balance between classification accuracy and cost efficiency.

This paper presents a systematic, cost-aware evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for receipt-item categorisation within a production-oriented classification framework.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a prominent paradigm for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs). Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, such as LoRA, are widely adopted to adapt pretrained MoE LLMs to downstream tasks. However, existing approaches typically assign identical LoRA ranks to all expert modules, ignoring the heterogeneous specialization of pretrained experts. This uniform allocation leads to a resource mismatch: task-relevant experts are under-provisioned, while less relevant ones receive redundant parameters. To address this, we propose DR-LoRA, a Dynamic Rank LoRA framework for fine-tuning pretrained MoE models. Specifically, DR-LoRA initializes all expert LoRA modules with a small active rank and uses an expert saliency score, which combines routing frequency and gradient-based rank importance, to identify which experts would benefit most from additional capacity. It then periodically expands the active ranks of the task-critical expert LoRA, progressively constructing a heterogeneous rank distribution tailored to the target task. Experiments on three MoE models across six tasks show that DR-LoRA consistently outperforms LoRA and other strong baselines, demonstrating that task-adaptive heterogeneous rank allocation is an effective strategy to improve active capacity utilization in MoE fine-tuning.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a prominent paradigm for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs).

Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty. Such verbalized overconfidence can mislead users and weaken confidence scores as a reliable uncertainty signal, yet its internal mechanisms remain poorly understood. We present a circuit-level mechanistic analysis of this inflated verbalized confidence in LLMs, organized around three axes: capturing verbalized confidence as a differentiable internal signal, identifying the circuits that causally inflate it, and leveraging these insights for targeted inference-time recalibration. Across two instruction-tuned LLMs on three datasets, we find that a compact set of MLP blocks and attention heads, concentrated in middle-to-late layers, consistently writes the confidence-inflation signal at the final token position. We further show that targeted inference-time interventions on these circuits substantially improve calibration. Together, our results suggest that verbalized overconfidence in LLMs is driven by identifiable internal circuits and can be mitigated through targeted intervention.

Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty.

Are there still barriers to generalization once all relevant variables are known? We address this question via a framework that casts compositional generalization as a variational inference problem over latent variables with parametric interactions. To explore this, we develop the Cognitive Gridworld, a stationary Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) where observations are generated jointly by multiple latent variables, yet feedback is provided for only a single goal variable. This setting allows us to define Semantic Interaction Information (SII): a metric measuring the contribution of latent variable interactions to task performance. Using SII, we analyze Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) provided with these interactions, finding that SII explains the accuracy gap between Echo State and Fully Trained networks. Our analysis also uncovers a theoretically predicted failure mode where confidence decouples from accuracy, suggesting that utilizing interactions between relevant variables is a non-trivial capability. We then address a harder regime where the interactions must be learned by an embedding model. Learning how latent variables interact requires accurate inference, yet accurate inference depends on knowing those interactions. The Cognitive Gridworld reveals this circular dependence as a core challenge for continual meta-learning. We approach this dilemma via Representation Classification Chains (RCCs), a JEPA-style architecture that disentangles these processes: variable inference and variable embeddings are learned by separate modules through Reinforcement Learning and self-supervised learning, respectively. Lastly, we demonstrate that RCCs facilitate compositional generalization to novel combinations of relevant variables. Together, these results establish a grounded setting for evaluating goal-directed generalist agents.

Are there still barriers to generalization once all relevant variables are known?

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a cost-effective way to incorporate information from a specific dataset. However, when a problem requires incorporating information from multiple datasets - as in few shot learning - generalization across datasets can be limited, driving up training costs. As a consequence, other approaches such as in-context learning are typically used in this setting. To address this challenge, we introduce an efficient method for adapting the weights of LLMs to multiple distributions, Amortized Bayesian Meta-Learning for LoRA (ABMLL). This method builds on amortized Bayesian meta-learning for smaller models, adapting this approach to LLMs by reframing where local and global variables are defined in LoRA and using a new hyperparameter to balance reconstruction accuracy and the fidelity of task-specific parameters to the global ones. ABMLL supports effective generalization across datasets and scales to large models such as Llama3-8B and Qwen2-7B, outperforming existing methods on the CrossFit and Unified-QA datasets in terms of both accuracy and expected calibration error. We show that meta-learning can also be combined with in-context learning, resulting in further improvements in both these datasets and legal and chemistry applications.

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a cost-effective way to incorporate information from a specific dataset.

With a surge of large-scale pre-trained models, parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) of large models has garnered significant attention. While promising, they commonly rely on two optimistic assumptions: 1) full access to the parameters of a PTM, and 2) sufficient memory capacity to cache all intermediate activations for gradient computation. However, in most real-world applications, PTMs serve as black-box APIs or proprietary software without full parameter accessibility. Besides, it is hard to meet a large memory requirement for modern PTMs. This work proposes black-box visual prompting (BlackVIP), which efficiently adapts the PTMs without knowledge of their architectures or parameters. BlackVIP has two components: 1) Coordinator and 2) simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation with gradient correction (SPSA-GC). The Coordinator designs input-dependent visual prompts, which allow the target PTM to adapt in the wild. SPSA-GC efficiently estimates the gradient of PTM to update Coordinator. Besides, we introduce a variant, BlackVIP-SE, which significantly reduces the runtime and computational cost of BlackVIP. Extensive experiments on 19 datasets demonstrate that BlackVIPs enable robust adaptation to diverse domains and tasks with minimal memory requirements. We further provide a theoretical analysis on the generalization of visual prompting methods by presenting their connection to the certified robustness of randomized smoothing, and presenting an empirical support for improved robustness.

With a surge of large-scale pre-trained models, parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) of large models has garnered significant attention.

While test-time scaling has enabled large language models to solve highly difficult tasks, state-of-the-art results come at exorbitant compute costs. These inefficiencies can be attributed to the miscalibration of post-trained language models, and the lack of calibration in popular sampling techniques. Here, we present Online Reasoning Calibration (ORCA), a framework for calibrating the sampling process that draws upon conformal prediction and test-time training. Specifically, we introduce a meta-learning procedure that updates the calibration module for each input. This allows us to provide valid confidence estimates under distributional shift, e.g. in thought patterns that occur across different stages of reasoning, or in prompt distributions between model development and deployment. ORCA not only provides theoretical guarantees on conformal risks, but also empirically shows higher efficiency and generalization across different reasoning tasks. At risk level $δ=0.1$, ORCA improves Qwen2.5-32B efficiency on in-distribution tasks with savings up to 47.5% with supervised labels and 40.7% with self-consistency labels. Under zero-shot out-of-domain settings, it improves MATH-500 savings from 24.8% of the static calibration baseline to 67.0% while maintaining a low empirical error rate, and the same trend holds across model families and downstream benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/wzekai99/ORCA.

While test-time scaling has enabled large language models to solve highly difficult tasks, state-of-the-art results come at exorbitant compute costs.

Individuals engaging in online communication frequently express personal opinions with informal styles (e.g., memes and emojis). While Language Models (LMs) with informal communications have been widely discussed, a unique and emphatic style, the Repetitive Lengthening Form (RLF), has been overlooked for years. In this paper, we explore answers to two research questions: 1) Is RLF important for sentiment analysis (SA)? 2) Can LMs understand RLF? Inspired by previous linguistic research, we curate \textbf{Lengthening}, the first multi-domain dataset with 850k samples focused on RLF for SA. Moreover, we introduce \textbf{Exp}lainable \textbf{Instruct}ion Tuning (\textbf{ExpInstruct}), a two-stage instruction tuning framework aimed to improve both performance and explainability of LLMs for RLF. We further propose a novel unified approach to quantify LMs' understanding of informal expressions. We show that RLF sentences are expressive expressions and can serve as signatures of document-level sentiment. Additionally, RLF has potential value for online content analysis. Our results show that fine-tuned Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) can surpass zero-shot GPT-4 in performance but not in explanation for RLF. Finally, we show ExpInstruct can improve the open-sourced LLMs to match zero-shot GPT-4 in performance and explainability for RLF with limited samples. Code and sample data are available at https://github.com/Tom-Owl/OverlookedRLF

Individuals engaging in online communication frequently express personal opinions with informal styles (e.g., memes and emojis).

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong in-context learning capabilities, but how they track and retrieve information from context remains underexplored. Drawing on the free recall paradigm in cognitive science (where participants recall list items in any order), we show that several open-source LLMs consistently display a serial-recall-like pattern, assigning peak probability to tokens that immediately follow a repeated token in the input sequence. Through systematic ablation experiments, we show that induction heads, specialized attention heads that attend to the token following a previous occurrence of the current token, play an important role in this phenomenon. Removing heads with a high induction score substantially reduces the +1 lag bias, whereas ablating random heads does not reproduce the same reduction. We also show that removing heads with high induction scores impairs the performance of models prompted to do serial recall using few-shot learning to a larger extent than removing random heads. Our findings highlight a mechanistically specific connection between induction heads and temporal context processing in transformers, suggesting that these heads are especially important for ordered retrieval and serial-recall-like behavior during in-context learning.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong in-context learning capabilities, but how they track and retrieve information from context remains underexplored.

When training large models on limited data, avoiding overfitting is paramount. Common grid search or smarter search methods rely on expensive separate runs for each candidate hyperparameter, while carving out a validation set that reduces available training data. In this paper, we study gradient-based learning of hyperparameters via the evidence lower bound (ELBO) objective from Bayesian variational methods. This avoids the need for any validation set. We focus on scenarios where the model is over-parameterized for flexibility and the approximate posterior is chosen to be Gaussian with isotropic covariance for tractability, even though it cannot match the true posterior. In such scenarios, we find the ELBO prioritizes posteriors that match the prior, leading to severe underfitting. Instead, we recommend a data-emphasized ELBO that upweights the likelihood but not the prior. In Bayesian transfer learning of image and text classifiers, our method reduces the 88+ hour grid search of past work to under 3 hours while delivering comparable accuracy. We further demonstrate how our approach enables efficient yet accurate approximations of Gaussian processes with learnable lengthscale kernels.

When training large models on limited data, avoiding overfitting is paramount.

This paper introduces two transfer learning methodologies for estimating nonparametric Bayesian networks under scarce data. We propose two algorithms, a constraint-based structure learning method, called PC-stable-transfer learning (PCS-TL), and a score-based method, called hill climbing transfer learning (HC-TL). We also define particular metrics to tackle the negative transfer problem in each of them, a situation in which transfer learning has a negative impact on the model's performance. Then, for the parameters, we propose a log-linear pooling approach. For the evaluation, we learn kernel density estimation Bayesian networks, a type of nonparametric Bayesian network, and compare their transfer learning performance with the models alone. To do so, we sample data from small, medium and large-sized synthetic networks and datasets from the UCI Machine Learning repository. Then, we add noise and modifications to these datasets to test their ability to avoid negative transfer. To conclude, we perform a Friedman test with a Bergmann-Hommel post-hoc analysis to show statistical proof of the enhanced experimental behavior of our methods. Thus, PCS-TL and HC-TL demonstrate to be reliable algorithms for improving the learning performance of a nonparametric Bayesian network with scarce data, which in real industrial environments implies a reduction in the required time to deploy the network.

This paper introduces two transfer learning methodologies for estimating nonparametric Bayesian networks under scarce data.

We develop Structured-Knowledge-Informed Neural Networks (SKINNs), a unified estimation framework that embeds theoretical, simulated, previously learned, or cross-domain insights as differentiable constraints within flexible neural function approximation. SKINNs jointly estimate neural network parameters and economically meaningful structural parameters in a single optimization problem, enforcing theoretical consistency not only on observed data but over a broader input domain through collocation, and therefore nesting approaches such as functional GMM, Bayesian updating, transfer learning, PINNs, and surrogate modeling. SKINNs define a class of M-estimators that are consistent and asymptotically normal with root-N convergence, sandwich covariance, and recovery of pseudo-true parameters under misspecification. We establish identification of structural parameters under joint flexibility, derive generalization and target-risk bounds under distributional shift in a convex proxy, and provide a restricted-optimal characterization of the weighting parameter that governs the bias-variance tradeoff. In an illustrative financial application to option pricing, SKINNs improve out-of-sample valuation and hedging performance, particularly at longer horizons and during high-volatility regimes, while recovering economically interpretable structural parameters with improved stability relative to conventional calibration. More broadly, SKINNs provide a general econometric framework for combining model-based reasoning with high-dimensional, data-driven estimation.

We develop Structured-Knowledge-Informed Neural Networks (SKINNs), a unified estimation framework that embeds theoretical, simulated, previously learned, or cross-domain insights as differentiable constraints within flexible neural function approximation.

Medical imaging techniques, especially Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), are accepted as the gold standard in the diagnosis and treatment planning of neurological diseases. However, the manual analysis of MRI images is a time-consuming process for radiologists and is prone to human error due to fatigue. In this study, two different Deep Learning approaches were developed and analyzed comparatively for the automatic detection and classification of brain tumors (Glioma, Meningioma, Pituitary, and No Tumor). In the first approach, a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture named "OkanNet", which has a low computational cost and fast training time, was designed from scratch. In the second approach, the Transfer Learning method was applied using the 50-layer ResNet-50 [1] architecture, pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset. In experiments conducted on an extended dataset compiled by Masoud Nickparvar containing a total of $7,023$ MRI images, the Transfer Learning-based ResNet-50 model exhibited superior classification performance, achieving $96.49\%$ Accuracy and $0.963$ Precision. In contrast, the custom OkanNet architecture reached an accuracy rate of $88.10\%$; however, it proved to be a strong alternative for mobile and embedded systems with limited computational power by yielding results approximately $3.2$ times faster ($311$ seconds) than ResNet-50 in terms of training time. This study demonstrates the trade-off between model depth and computational efficiency in medical image analysis through experimental data.

Medical imaging techniques, especially Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), are accepted as the gold standard in the diagnosis and treatment planning of neurological diseases.

Understanding emotions in natural language is inherently a multi-dimensional reasoning problem, where multiple affective signals interact through context, interpersonal relations, and situational cues. However, most existing emotion understanding benchmarks rely on short texts and predefined emotion labels, reducing this process to independent label prediction and ignoring the structured dependencies among emotions. To address this limitation, we introduce Emotional Scenarios (EmoScene), a theory-grounded benchmark of 4,731 context-rich scenarios annotated with an 8-dimensional emotion vector derived from Plutchik's basic emotions. We evaluate six instruction-tuned large language models in a zero-shot setting and observe modest performance, with the best model achieving a Macro F1 of 0.501, highlighting the difficulty of context-aware multi-label emotion prediction. Motivated by the observation that emotions rarely occur independently, we further propose an entanglement-aware Bayesian inference framework that incorporates emotion co-occurrence statistics to perform joint posterior inference over the emotion vector. This lightweight post-processing improves structural consistency of predictions and yields notable gains for weaker models (e.g., +0.051 Macro F1 for Qwen2.5-7B). EmoScene therefore provides a challenging benchmark for studying multi-dimensional emotion understanding and the limitations of current language models.

Understanding emotions in natural language is inherently a multi-dimensional reasoning problem, where multiple affective signals interact through context, interpersonal relations, and situational cues.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit failures on elementary symbolic tasks such as character counting in a word, despite excelling on complex benchmarks. Although this limitation has been noted, the internal reasons remain unclear. We use character counting (e.g., "How many p's are in apple?") as a minimal, controlled probe that isolates token-level reasoning from higher-level confounds. Using this setting, we uncover a consistent phenomenon across modern architectures, including LLaMA, Qwen, and Gemma: models often compute the correct answer internally yet fail to express it at the output layer. Through mechanistic analysis combining probing classifiers, activation patching, logit lens analysis, and attention head tracing, we show that character-level information is encoded in early and mid-layer representations. However, this information is attenuated by a small set of components in later layers, especially the penultimate and final layer MLP. We identify these components as negative circuits: subnetworks that downweight correct signals in favor of higher-probability but incorrect outputs. Our results lead to two contributions. First, we show that symbolic reasoning failures in LLMs are not due to missing representations or insufficient scale, but arise from structured interference within the model's computation graph. This explains why such errors persist and can worsen under scaling and instruction tuning. Second, we provide evidence that LLM forward passes implement a form of competitive decoding, in which correct and incorrect hypotheses coexist and are dynamically reweighted, with final outputs determined by suppression as much as by amplification. These findings carry implications for interpretability and robustness: simple symbolic reasoning exposes weaknesses in modern LLMs, underscoring need for design strategies that ensure information is encoded and reliably used.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit failures on elementary symbolic tasks such as character counting in a word, despite excelling on complex benchmarks.

Humans are highly effective at utilizing prior knowledge to adapt to novel tasks, a capability that standard machine learning models struggle to replicate due to their reliance on task-specific training. Meta-learning overcomes this limitation by allowing models to acquire transferable knowledge from various tasks, enabling rapid adaptation to new challenges with minimal data. This survey provides a rigorous, task-based formalization of meta-learning and meta-reinforcement learning and uses that paradigm to chronicle the landmark algorithms that paved the way for DeepMind's Adaptive Agent, consolidating the essential concepts needed to understand the Adaptive Agent and other generalist approaches.

Humans are highly effective at utilizing prior knowledge to adapt to novel tasks, a capability that standard machine learning models struggle to replicate due to their reliance on task-specific training.

Successor Features (SF) combined with Generalized Policy Improvement (GPI) provide a robust framework for transfer learning in Reinforcement Learning (RL) by decoupling environment dynamics from reward functions. However, standard SF learning methods typically rely on semi-gradient Temporal Difference (TD) updates. When combined with non-linear function approximation, semi-gradient methods lack robust convergence guarantees and can lead to instability, particularly in the multi-task setting where accurate feature estimation is critical for effective GPI. Inspired by Full Gradient DQN, we propose Full-Gradient Successor Feature Representations Q-Learning (FG-SFRQL), an algorithm that optimizes the successor features by minimizing the full Mean Squared Bellman Error. Unlike standard approaches, our method computes gradients with respect to parameters in both the online and target networks. We provide a theoretical proof of almost-sure convergence for FG-SFRQL and demonstrate empirically that minimizing the full residual leads to superior sample efficiency and transfer performance compared to semi-gradient baselines in both discrete and continuous domains.

Successor Features (SF) combined with Generalized Policy Improvement (GPI) provide a robust framework for transfer learning in Reinforcement Learning (RL) by decoupling environment dynamics from reward functions.

Chest X-rays (CXRs) are among the most frequently performed imaging examinations worldwide, yet rising imaging volumes increase radiologist workload and the risk of diagnostic errors. Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown promise for CXR interpretation, most generate only final predictions, without making explicit how visual evidence is translated into radiographic findings and diagnostic predictions. We present CheXOne, a reasoning-enabled vision-language model for CXR interpretation. CheXOne jointly generates diagnostic predictions and explicit, clinically grounded reasoning traces that connect visual evidence, radiographic findings, and these predictions. The model is trained on 14.7 million instruction and reasoning samples curated from 30 public datasets spanning 36 CXR interpretation tasks, using a two-stage framework that combines instruction tuning with reinforcement learning to improve reasoning quality. We evaluate CheXOne in zero-shot settings across visual question answering, report generation, visual grounding and reasoning assessment, covering 17 evaluation settings. CheXOne outperforms existing medical and general-domain foundation models and achieves strong performance on independent public benchmarks. A clinical reader study demonstrates that CheXOne-drafted reports are comparable to or better than resident-written reports in 55% of cases, while effectively addressing clinical indications and enhancing both report writing and CXR interpretation efficiency. Further analyses involving radiologists reveal that the generated reasoning traces show high clinical factuality and provide causal support for the final predictions, offering a plausible explanation for the performance gains. These results suggest that explicit reasoning can improve model performance, interpretability and clinical utility in AI-assisted CXR interpretation.

Chest X-rays (CXRs) are among the most frequently performed imaging examinations worldwide, yet rising imaging volumes increase radiologist workload and the risk of diagnostic errors.

Developing robust models to accurately predict the trajectories of surrounding agents is fundamental to autonomous driving safety. However, most public datasets, such as the Waymo Open Motion Dataset and Argoverse, are collected in Western road environments and do not reflect the unique traffic patterns, infrastructure, and driving behaviors of other regions, including South Korea. This domain discrepancy leads to performance degradation when state-of-the-art models trained on Western data are deployed in different geographic contexts. In this work, we investigate the adaptability of Query-Centric Trajectory Prediction (QCNet) when transferred from U.S.-based data to Korean road environments. Using a Korean autonomous driving dataset, we compare four training strategies: zero-shot transfer, training from scratch, full fine-tuning, and encoder freezing. Experimental results demonstrate that leveraging pretrained knowledge significantly improves prediction performance. Specifically, selectively fine-tuning the decoder while freezing the encoder yields the best trade-off between accuracy and training efficiency, reducing prediction error by over 66% compared to training from scratch. This study provides practical insights into effective transfer learning strategies for deploying trajectory prediction models in new geographic domains.

Developing robust models to accurately predict the trajectories of surrounding agents is fundamental to autonomous driving safety.

The integration of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Graph Question Answering (GraphQA). However, effective methods for encoding complex structural information into the LLM's latent space remain an open challenge. Current state-of-the-art architectures, such as G-Retriever, typically rely on standard GNNs and aggressive mean pooling to compress entire graph substructures into a single token, creating a severe information bottleneck. This work mitigates this bottleneck by investigating two orthogonal strategies: (1) increasing the bandwidth of the graph-to-LLM interface via multi-token pooling, and (2) enhancing the semantic quality of the graph encoder via global attention mechanisms. We evaluate a suite of hierarchical pruning and clustering-based pooling operators including Top-k, SAGPool, DiffPool, MinCutPool, and Virtual Node Pooling (VNPool) to project graph data into multiple learnable tokens. Empirically, we demonstrate that while pooling introduces significant instability during soft prompt tuning, the application of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) effectively stabilizes specific hierarchical projections (notably VNPool and pruning methods), though dense clustering operators remain challenging. This stabilization allows compressed representations to rival full-graph baselines (achieving ~73% Hit@1 on WebQSP). Conceptually, we demonstrate that a Graph Transformer with VNPool implementation functions structurally as a single-layer Perceiver IO encoder. Finally, we adapt the FandE (Features and Edges) Score to the generative GraphQA domain. Our analysis reveals that the GraphQA benchmark suffers from representational saturation, where target answers are often highly correlated with isolated node features. The implementation is available at https://github.com/Agrover112/G-Retriever/tree/all_good/

The integration of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Graph Question Answering (GraphQA).